logo
eNCA journalists reflect on chaos, looting & reporting from the frontlines

eNCA journalists reflect on chaos, looting & reporting from the frontlines

eNCA2 days ago
The July Unrest occurred in KwaZulu-Natal and Gauteng, from 9 to 18 July 2021. The protests were sparked by the arrest and incarceration of former President Jacob Zuma.
The protests quickly escalated resulting in looting, rioting, rise in racial tensions, damage to property, violence and the deaths of more than 350 people.
It is estimated that the July unrest also caused more than R50 billion in damage to the South African economy.
eNCA Senior Reporter Dasen Thathiah and eNCA Camera Operator Nkanyiso Mdlalose were there, reporting from the frontlines.
In the video below, they both reflect on the life-changing experience four years on.
A Reporter's Reflection of The July 2021 Unrest – Four Years On
By Dasen Thathiah
The term "unrest" is such a misnomer. Sure, for anyone who wasn't there, it works.
A public disturbance? Riots? Maybe a failed insurrection? For those of us who lived through it - on the frontlines - it was a catastrophic nightmare.
The first eight days overflowed with anxiety, fear, sadness, anger, trepidation.
The recipe for a lifetime of unspoken trauma. The province that raised us was set alight.
Its infrastructure abused, the fragile economy gang-raped. People who lived alongside me mutated into savages.
Others became statistics, no longer referred to by name, but only as a collective.
"More than 350 died," we say. Yet the ones who orchestrated it are most likely still alive and well.
But we don't just grieve for the departed. We mourn the jobs lost, the livelihoods shattered, the businesses buried.
About ten percent of the murders took place in a north Durban township. The nature of the violence birthed the term "Phoenix Massacre." Its impact pushed race relations decades back.
A minority of barbarians in a usually warm, close-knit community turned on their long-time neighbours in the most brutal way.
Both "sides" paid with their loved ones, casualties of a racial war. This wasn't just a story to us. It was our lived experience.
We saw the bodies strewn across the roadway. We know the helplessness of not being able to save the ones taking their last breaths. We felt the racism directed at us.
And propagandists capitalised on the confusion that reigned.
People who look like me wanted someone to blame for the backlash stemming from the actions of a small group of racist murderers.
So, one propagandist offered me to them as a virtual sacrifice on Facebook. It worked.
I was labelled a traitor, threatened, ostracised, blamed and even became the subject of a campaign led by some to get me fired.
Just for telling the truth; for standing up when it was easier to sit down.
A few days later, another propagandist on Twitter (X) doctored a video clip to create a new narrative. "Journalist by day, vigilante killing black people at night," they said.
So, while the city burned around me, I had my own fires to extinguish. Fake news threatened to reduce my career to ashes.
I was fortunate to navigate this space with a colleague who I regard as a dear friend; a brother.
Together, Nkanyiso and I - a pair that had seen the ugliest side of people during the unrest - helped each other stay true to our beliefs.
Armed with an eNCA camera and a microphone, we showed you not just the bad, but the inspirational.
We listened as the voices of good South Africans grew loud enough to eventually overpower the evil ones.
We introduced you to the community heroes, who outnumbered the racist vigilantes.
We held the government to account for its failures.
Simply put, we followed the truth even when the path was deserted.
Four years later, we reflect on an unbelievable time that should never be forgotten.
It should serve as a reminder of exactly what we are not as South Africans.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Shop owner accused of illegally selling controlled medicine
Shop owner accused of illegally selling controlled medicine

The South African

time10 minutes ago

  • The South African

Shop owner accused of illegally selling controlled medicine

This morning, Hawks arrested Rianne Janse van Rensburg, the owner of Muscle Mecca Shop, in Mpumalanga. Rensburg is facing a charge of the contravention of the Medicine and Related Substances Act. Rensburg appeared before the Evander District Court, with his co-accused, Paul Stephen Corbitt and Marco Rodolph Meintjies standing beside him. They are employees of Muscle Mecca Shop. 'Their appearance came after they were found selling controlled medicine without a valid license,' said Hawks spokesperson, Lieutenant Colonel Magonseni Nkosi. According to Nkosi, the Secunda based Hawks Serious Organised Crime Investigation unit had been investigating the shop for a while. They subsequently discovered that the retailer was allegedly selling pharmaceutical products that require prescriptions, over the counter. On 11 September 2024, the court granted the unit a search warrant. After the Hawks searched Muscle Mecca, they immediately arrested Corbitt and Meintjies. 'During the search, Jansen van Rensburg was not at the shop,' said Nkosi. Nkosi said Rensburg was released on R5 000 bail today, hours after being nabbed by the Hawks. Corbitt and Meintjies are also currently out on R5000 bail each, following their initial arrest in September. Rensburg, Corbitt and Meintjies will be back in court on Wednesday, 23 July 2025. The Hawks will be discussing the merits of the case. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news

'I was going to shoot him': Norma Mngoma on catching Malusi Gigaba cheating
'I was going to shoot him': Norma Mngoma on catching Malusi Gigaba cheating

The South African

time10 minutes ago

  • The South African

'I was going to shoot him': Norma Mngoma on catching Malusi Gigaba cheating

Norma Mngoma has detailed the infamous moment she smashed a luxury car belonging to her ex-husband, Malusi Gigaba, in a fit of rage. The businesswoman has opened up about her marriage and divorce from the former Minister – whom she did not name – in a sit-down interview on the Showmax show, Untied. Speaking to Untied presenter Relebogile Mabotja, Norma Mngoma shared the shocking story of how she reportedly caught her then-husband in bed with another woman. Mngoma and her two children, whom she shares with Gigaba, has returned home early after a trip to Durban. After suspecting him of cheating throughout their marriage, she finally saw 'proof' of his actions. 'The lady was in bed [with him]. She was trying to cover herself. I took off his glasses, and I tried to beat him up. A livid Norma Mngoma then proceeded to smash a R3 million Mercedes-Benz G63 AMG, which Gigaba had borrowed from a friend. She continued: 'I hated him, I thank God we didnt have a gun. Because if we had…I wasn't going to be dead. I was not going to die and leave my kids. I was going to shoot him, that's how angry I was. She added: 'I was not in the right state of mind, what happened…I don't even remember' A video of the incident went viral on social media… Norma Mngoma was later arrested and sued by Malusi Gigaba and his pal for malicious damage to property and for sending a 'threatening' WhatsApp message. Her arrest – where all of her electronic devices were confiscated – was deemed unlawful, and the case was withdrawn by the NPA. However, the defendant pursued civil charges, which are still ongoing. In 2021, the year her divorce was finalised, Norma Mngoma testified against her ex-husband, Malusi Gigaba, on his alleged dealings with the notorious Gupta family. In it, she claimed that Gigaba allegedly received bags of money from the brothers. The family allegedly paid for their honeymoon in Dubai, home renovations, a luxury car, as well as purchasing designer clothing. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.

ARTsolar throws in towel in ‘gagging' case against ‘whistle-blowers' and journalist
ARTsolar throws in towel in ‘gagging' case against ‘whistle-blowers' and journalist

Daily Maverick

timean hour ago

  • Daily Maverick

ARTsolar throws in towel in ‘gagging' case against ‘whistle-blowers' and journalist

The solar panel company had wanted to stop three 'whistle-blowers' and a journalist from reporting that it was importing and not locally manufacturing its solar panels. Solar panel manufacturer ARTsolar has thrown in the towel in its controversial battle against three 'whistle-blowers' and a journalist. The company had successfully gagged them by court order from making or reporting on 'defamatory' allegations that ARTsolar was importing and not locally manufacturing its solar panels. The interim gagging order was granted in March by Durban High Court acting Judge Perlene Bramdhew against businessman Brett Latimer, two former employees of ARTsolar and journalist Bongani Hans. The date to determine whether the order should be confirmed or discharged was set for 29 July. But this week, ARTsolar withdrew the application and tendered to pay the costs of Latimer, Hans and former employees Kandace Singh and Shalendra Hansraj. It also tendered to pay the costs of the Industrial Development Corporation, which entered the legal fray because it had provided R90-million funding to ARTsolar to set up its 'proudly South African' factory in New Germany. The IDC wanted to interview Latimer about his claims. The initial court order specifically barred Latimer from communicating with the IDC. The IDC launched its own urgent court application, successfully arguing that it should have been joined in the proceedings, and that the order was stifling an investigation into the matter on the instruction of Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition Parks Tau. The order was amended to exclude reference to the IDC. The shift in ARTsolar's stance came after it appointed new attorneys last month. Mohamed Mota, partner at Cox Yeats, confirmed the withdrawal. He said his client had no comment 'at this stage'. Media freedom Because the case had implications for freedom of expression, the amaBhungane Centre for Investigative Journalism had applied to be admitted as an amicus curiae. Managing partner Sam Sole said the withdrawal was a 'bittersweet victory'. 'The facts of the case make it clear the order should never have been granted and amaBhungane was looking forward to urging the court to give decisive direction to other presiding officers about the very narrow and limited circumstances which could justify such pre-publication censorship,' he said. 'We had also intended to remind the court that an effective press is a 'public sentinel' and is a conduit for the public's right to receive and impart information, meaning curbs on the media effectively limit the rights of the general public. 'This places a duty on the courts to be exceptionally vigilant in ensuring adherence to the legal safeguards of press freedom, especially where the public have no voice in the proceedings – as in this case, where the media house did not initially come to court.' Sole said there were various reasons that a journalist may fail to effectively oppose such an application, especially an extremely urgent one, such as a lack of timely access to adequate (or any) legal representation. 'We hope the publicity engendered by this case will discourage other parties from running to court and will also encourage presiding officers to exercise due care and caution when faced with similar cases,' Sole said. ARTsolar's urgent application was sparked by Hans sending questions, based on Latimer's allegations, to the company. Latimer, a former client of ARTsolar, alleged that he had been duped into believing that the panels were locally manufactured when they were in fact imported from China. He was backed up by Singh and Hansraj, who previously worked for the company. On the back of the gagging order, Latimer obtained a subpoena against Turners Shipping and, in a supplementary affidavit, he said the shipping documents (bills of lading) showed that the company imported 99% of its panels. Latimer's attorney MS Omar said: 'The interim gagging order was a drastic and draconian violation of my client's fundamental rights of freedom of expression as enshrined in section 16 of the Constitution. The overbroad interim order plainly prohibits permissible statements, based on truth and public interest, and failed to take account of the high threshold for a defamation interdict.' The application will be formally withdrawn in court on 29 July. DM

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store