
2025 Media Relations Strategy From Muck Rack's Journalism Study
When I previously explored how luxury brands were rethinking their relationship with the press, I referenced what New York Times' Vanessa Friedman had dubbed the 'Beyoncé Strategy' — where brands bypass traditional media to engage directly with their audiences. At the time, this seemed like a strategic shift driven by a desire for speed, control, and narrative ownership. But new data from Muck Rack's 2025 State of Journalism report suggests this pivot reflects a deeper transformation reshaping every aspect of modern media relations strategy.
With insights from more than 1,500 journalists worldwide, the report highlights sweeping changes reshaping how luxury brands should approach media outreach. These shifts explain what today's sophisticated marketers must understand to succeed in this evolving landscape; one where the consumer's passionate pursuit of luxury is highly supported by genuine press relationships.
How Not To Execute A Media Relations Strategy
Just days before the survey's release, a journalist posted on LinkedIn a scathing email he received after interviewing Lyft's CEO. 'Learn a thing or two about a thing 2,' the sender wrote, demanding 'a deep dive on my LinkedIn profile' while dismissing the journalist's reporting as 'drivel.' He also CC'd the editor-in-chief, accusing the publication of offering 'weak leaders and execs' as distractions from 'poor decision making.' The sender questioned Lyft CEO David Risher's credentials, mocked his nonprofit experience, and speculated readers were 'rolling their eyes' at the coverage.
The sender thought positioning himself as more knowledgeable while attacking the journalist's competence, invoking big names (Gates and Bezos got name-dropped), and delivering sweeping indictments about entire industries would earn him kudos – literally, he ended the email by saying 'I welcome comments, critiques and kudos.'
Every journalist has a story of some crackpot who didn't like their article. I was digitally hounded by one who took personal issues with Hermès and demanded I take down my coverage of the brand, or at the very least, include his outlandish, unsubstantiated claims. When I didn't, he bought Meta ads to continue harassing me, even reaching out to my clients to discredit me. Nothing came of his actions, of course, except increased traffic to my article. It turns out Hermès had banned him from their stores. He then launched an ecommerce store selling sandals made with Hermès scarves, in what a legal expert might call copyright infringement.
There's a reason brands rely on PR advisors to guide press communications: they help avoid the kind of self-sabotage that makes the saboteur a perpetual target for negative press coverage after offending the wrong journalist. Elon Musk dismissed his PR team entirely, then proceeded to tank Tesla's stock with midnight Twitter rants and SEC violations – and this was before he entered politics. Kanye West fired multiple PR firms before his antisemitic meltdowns destroyed billion-dollar partnerships with Adidas and Gap. Both cases prove the same point: when smart money meets unchecked ego, the money usually loses.
The Beyoncé Strategy may work for brand-to-audience communication because it's strategically executed by professionals who understand both media dynamics and audience psychology. But speaking directly to journalists without professional guidance is an entirely different game. For CMOs watching these instances unfold, valued PR counsel protects your reputation as much as it manages relationships.
The New Journalism Reality In Planning Media Relations Strategy
LONDONDERRY, NEW HAMPSHIRE - JANUARY 23: Republican presidential candidate, former U.S. President ... More Donald Trump talks to reporters while visiting the polling site at Londonderry High School on January 23, 2024 in Londonderry, New Hampshire. With Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis having dropped out of the race two days earlier, Trump and fellow candidate former UN Ambassador Nikki Haley are battling it out in this first-in-the-nation primary. (Photo by)
Ever since Kellyanne Conway redefined 'fake news' as anything her client didn't agree with, a cultural shift has emboldened people to undermine journalists, convinced they know the job better than the professionals doing it. According to Muck Rack's study, one-third of journalists said mis- or disinformation was the most serious threat to their industry, with another 25% pointing to journalism's politicization and polarization.
The survey reveals deeper challenges. While 67% of journalists still find their work meaningful, 47% describe it as exhausting and 33% call it precarious. Most significantly, 62% say their responsibilities have expanded significantly beyond their core reporting roles, with 37% reporting layoffs or buyouts at their organizations in the past year.
This matters for any luxury brand seeking third-party validation from editorial media. Journalists are doing more with less and offering brands a much narrower window to capture their attention. Although 84% disclose that some stories originate from PR pitches, 86% immediately delete pitches irrelevant to their beat. Yet 47% say they're regularly receiving those very kinds of useless pitches at a daily rate of 6-20+ emails. With only 22% regularly responding, gaining journalist interest has become an editorial Hunger Games where just 3% of journalists say they always receive information relevant to their coverage areas.
Rethinking Communication Channels in Your Media Relations Strategy
This photo illustration shows the social media platform X (former Twitter) app on a smartphone in ... More Rio de Janeiro, Brazil on September 18, 2024. Brazilian X users reported their surprise after being able to access the platform, suspended in Latin America's largest country by a decision of the supreme court, which is investigating an apparent technical 'instability'. (Photo by Mauro PIMENTEL / AFP) (Photo by MAURO PIMENTEL/AFP via Getty Images)
Safety and reputational concerns are also reshaping how journalists engage online. Over half report these issues impact how they use social media professionally, with 35% ending their presence on X entirely. Once a journalist's town square, X is now considered the least dependable platform, with 72% of journalists not trusting it to treat their content fairly. Just 21% regard X as their most valuable platform, down from 36% last year.
49% of journalists are now spending more time on LinkedIn, with 60% rating it as trustworthy. Instagram and Bluesky are also on the rise, forcing a reassessment of how brands track and connect with press. For brands who've built sophisticated Twitter strategies over the past decade, this migration confirms the centralized 'town square' approach no longer exists.
As journalists scatter across platforms, brands must meet them where they are without losing sight of their own audience alignment. That means mapping journalist activity against brand-relevant topics, shifting resources away from static strategies, and experimenting with new storytelling formats native to each channel. Resist the urge to copy-paste old Twitter tactics onto new spaces, and instead engage thoughtfully with journalists' posts, amplify their work when relevant, and offer meaningful insight without an immediate ask.
The smartest luxury brands diversify their media engagement across multiple platforms while developing platform-specific approaches. Create LinkedIn content showcasing thought leadership and industry expertise, use Instagram to share behind-the-scenes brand storytelling for journalists to reference, and establish early presence on emerging platforms before they become oversaturated.
Independent Journalism Creates New Media Relations Strategy
Candid portrait of African-American entrepreneur interviewed on a radio podcast.
In reflecting new dynamics and opportunities, the report notes 34% of journalists now publish work independently, with 61% of them monetizing those efforts. This opens new avenues for brand storytelling, particularly for companies willing to develop more intimate relationships with writers who control their own editorial calendars. They may be more receptive to longer-term content partnerships, exclusive access arrangements, or collaborative storytelling approaches traditional newsroom ethics might prohibit.
These independents must still maintain editorial independence and credibility with their audiences, however. PR 101 teaches journalists are never your friend but can be allies when your missions are aligned. The most successful luxury brands support independent journalism through value-added partnerships, recognizing authenticity and editorial integrity is why the journalist has an audience in the first place.
Media Relations Strategy Implications for Luxury Marketers
BASEL, SWITZERLAND - MARCH 21: Swizz Beatz (R) attends the Zenith press conference at the Baselworld ... More luxury watch trade fair 2018 on March 21, 2018 in Basel, Switzerland. (Photo byfor Zenith)
With journalists facing increased job insecurity, brands investing in long-term relationship building see better results. The best journalists always land on their feet, leaving one publication for another and carrying the weight of prior relationships into their next opportunity.
Brands thriving in this new environment share a few key traits:
Precision Targeting: They prioritize sending pitches only to journalists whose work aligns with their message, using the journalists' own published work as a guide.
Platform Agility: They adapt to where journalists are actually spending time, diversifying outreach across platforms instead of clinging to legacy channels, just in case their most populous platform should disappear.
Value-First Approach: They save journalists time by offering clear relevance, expert access, helpful assets and simply well-organized information.
Final Takeaways For A Modern Media Relations Strategy
INGLEWOOD, CALIFORNIA - SEPTEMBER 01: (Editorial Use Only) Beyoncé performs onstage during the ... More "RENAISSANCE WORLD TOUR" at SoFi Stadium on September 01, 2023 in Inglewood, California. (Photo by Kevin Mazur/WireImage for Parkwood)
While the Beyoncé Strategy may work in brand-to-consumer storytelling, if you want to bypass a PR advisor to speak directly to journalists, understand they're navigating limited resources, shrinking job security, and constant digital hostility. Follow these final takeaways to enlist the power of the pen in getting your message delivered to the right audience:
Respect Journalistic Expertise
The strongest media relationships recognize journalists operate under tight deadlines, editorial standards, and professional judgment. Lecturing them about their job only signals you don't understand theirs. Courtesy and respect have become strategic advantages in the face of mounting press hostility.
Prioritize Relevance Over Reach
With nearly half of journalists citing irrelevant pitches as their biggest frustration, success depends on a precise and relevant message. Review a journalist's recent work before reaching out. If your story doesn't align with their historical coverage, don't pitch it.
Support, Don't Strain
As 62% of journalists take on expanded roles amid industry layoffs, your job is to make theirs easier. Provide clear, concise materials. If you arrange an interview, send the transcript afterward. A small action like this builds goodwill and increases your coverage chances.
Adapt to Platform Shifts
With many journalists fleeing X for new platforms like Bluesky, your media engagement strategy should follow suit. But don't treat social media as a shortcut. Engage thoughtfully with a journalist's content long before you need something. Relationship-building starts with respect, not requests.
Approach the press without understanding the pressures they face, and don't be surprised when your media relations strategy falls flat, or worse, becomes a case study on what not to do. In a journalistic landscape where credibility is currency and time is scarce, empathy and preparation are what separate successful coverage from your message being ignored.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rivian vs. Lucid: 1 Reason Jim Cramer Likes One Stock Over the Other
Key Points Lucid closed a deal with Uber to power its robotaxi division. Wall Street veteran Jim Cramer is doubting the deal's long-term potential. Rivian may be a better buy due to a deal with VW. 10 stocks we like better than Lucid Group › Lucid Group (NASDAQ: LCID) soared in value following the announcement of its partnership with Uber Technologies. According to the deal's terms, Uber will invest $300 million in the electric vehicle (EV) maker. Uber also committed to purchase 20,000 vehicles from Lucid to kick-start its robotaxi division. Wall Street veteran Jim Cramer recently weighted in on the deal, and his take was surprising to many. He compared Lucid's deal with Uber to a partnership Rivian Automotive (NASDAQ: RIVN), another EV stock, made earlier this year. If you're invested in either Lucid or Rivian, you'll want to give Cramer's comments some consideration. How big is the Uber and Lucid partnership in reality? The details of Lucid's partnership with Uber are fairly straightforward. The latter says it is expecting to launch a robotaxi service later next year in a major U.S. city. To power this launch, Uber plans to order 20,000 Lucid Gravity SUVs over the next six years. According to a press release, the vehicles will be owned and operated by Uber or its third-party fleet partners and made available to riders exclusively via the Uber platform. To help Lucid scale up enough to produce this many vehicles, Uber also agreed to invest $300 million into the business. Around the same time, Lucid announced a 1-for-10 reverse stock split, but it's not clear how connected these two events are. While all of this looks promising on paper, there are two obvious problems. First, Uber's robotaxi division remains in its infancy. Whether it can actually grow big enough to acquire 20,000 Lucid vehicles remains a huge open question. Second, $300 million won't do much to keep Lucid financially viable over the next six years. While it ended 2024 with more than $6 billion in liquidity, the company also posted a net loss of $2.7 billion, roughly the same net loss it posted in 2023. A $300 million cash infusion is helpful, but it will hardly cure its ongoing financial challenges. Jim Cramer thinks Rivian's deal with Volkswagen is superior When Jim Cramer was asked about Lucid's partnership with Uber last week, he called the deal a "dalliance." In other words, he views it more as a short-term arrangement than a bona fide long-term partnership. "I think that you need a commitment, like the Volkswagen commitment to Rivian is extraordinary," Cramer said. "That's an open-ended check from one of the biggest car companies." He is referring to a joint venture between Volkswagen and Rivian that was announced in November 2024. The German automaker will receive crucial access to Rivian's software operating platform and technological back end. In exchange, Rivian receives up to $5.8 billion in funding. It's not hard to see the difference in commitments here. Uber is investing just $300 million into Lucid, with the promise of buying vehicles over the next six years. Rivian, meanwhile, is receiving up to $5.8 billion in funding by the end of 2027, starting with an immediate $1 billion convertible note. To be clear, Lucid's deal with Uber is still very exciting. ARK Investment CEO Cathie Wood eventually sees the robotaxi market being worth up to $10 trillion by 2030. But Rivian's deal with Volkswagen gives more credence to Rivian's tech stack and differentiation. If you're excited about the Uber-Lucid tie-up, be sure to dive into Rivian's and Volkswagen's partnership, as Cramer correctly points out. Should you invest $1,000 in Lucid Group right now? Before you buy stock in Lucid Group, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Lucid Group wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Ryan Vanzo has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Uber Technologies. The Motley Fool recommends Volkswagen Ag. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Rivian vs. Lucid: 1 Reason Jim Cramer Likes One Stock Over the Other was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The clock is ticking on solar tax credits and All Energy Solar can help
MADISON, Wis., July 27, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Homeowners and businesses have a critical, rapidly approaching deadline to take advantage of the 30% federal solar tax credit: December 31, 2025. After this date, the Residential Clean Energy Credit will be eliminated entirely, and the Clean Energy Investment Tax Credit for commercial projects will be subject to new restrictions and early phase-out. All Energy Solar Inc. is urging people to act now to ensure their projects are completed in time to qualify for these significant savings. The recent "One Big, Beautiful Bill Act" abruptly cut short the federal solar tax credit, which was previously set to continue through 2034. This change creates a compressed timeline for those interested in investing in solar energy. For homeowners, this means a potential savings of an average of $9,000 will vanish in 2026. Businesses also face a limited window to capitalize on the full credit for renewable energy projects. "The phase-out of this federal tax credit is a big shift—not just for the solar industry, but for any homeowner or business thinking about going solar," said Ryan Buege, Vice President of Sales and Marketing at All Energy Solar. "The window is closing, but there's still time to lock in the full value if you act now. It may be years before solar becomes this affordable again." Typical installation timelines can span several months due to site design, permitting, and utility coordination. All Energy Solar encourages anyone considering solar to start their project now to maximize savings and avoid missing out on current incentives. "From your first consultation to system activation, going solar takes time—especially with permitting and utility approvals," Buege added. "Our team is experienced at navigating these local processes, but as demand surges, there will come a point where we simply can't guarantee new projects will qualify under the current incentive, especially for residential solar." For businesses switching to solar, the changes to the tax credit present a more nuanced, though still urgent, timeline. While the general elimination date for the Clean Energy Investment Tax Credit is December 31, 2027, projects that begin construction by July 4, 2026, can still qualify for the full 30% credit, provided they are placed in service within four years. Projects beginning construction after July 4, 2026, must be placed in service by December 31, 2027, to receive any credit. Furthermore, projects beginning construction after December 31, 2025, will face new "Foreign Entity of Concern" (FEOC) restrictions, requiring a certain percentage of components to be sourced from non-FEOC manufacturers to qualify for the credit. About All Energy SolarAll Energy Solar is a full-service solar energy solutions provider for residential, commercial, agricultural, and government customers seeking to make the transition to solar energy. Learn more at View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE All Energy Solar, Inc
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Should You Buy XRP (Ripple) While It's Under $5?
Key Points XRP's value has surged nearly 480% in just 12 months. Deregulation, ETFs, and general crypto enthusiasm are driving the coin's value higher. XRP is priced for perfection, and it's looking increasingly like a speculative gamble. 10 stocks we like better than XRP › Cryptocurrency XRP (CRYPTO: XRP) has gained lots of attention from investors lately, resulting in a 480% increase over the past year. Whenever any type of investment rises that quickly, it's worth evaluating to see if it's worth owning. Unlike some cryptocurrencies, XRP (sometimes called Ripple) has real-world applications through its blockchain, which can act as a bridge currency in foreign transactions, saving both time and money compared to traditional financial transactions. But XRP's rapid value increase calls into question whether the crypto is overvalued right now, and if it's being driven higher simply because of investor sentiment. While XRP isn't necessarily a meme coin, here are three reasons why it may be best not to buy it right now. 1. It's very volatile If you're interested in owning cryptocurrencies, then it's likely that you're OK with some volatility. Any type of investment will have price swings, of course, but cryptocurrencies are more prone to make big movements on little to no news. While XRP isn't unique in its volatility, I think it's significant enough to dissuade some investors from owning it. Consider that back in February, XRP's value fell about 30% in just a five-week period. XRP regained its footing temporarily, but then fell 16% in just one week following the announcement of President Donald Trump's tariffs in early April. Those are just two examples of XRP's tendency toward volatility, both occurring within weeks of each other. Of course, the coin's value has subsequently rallied again, but if you're not used to investment value shifts to this degree and they might cause you undue stress or prompt you to take action without thinking, then it's probably best to stay away. 2. It's fairly speculative It's important to point out that some of the price movements XRP has experienced are tied to concrete reasons. For example, some of XRP's price gains over the past year have come from investors getting excited about crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs) focused on XRP and the Trump administration taking a more open approach toward cryptocurrencies. But while crypto ETFs can signal more legitimacy for digital coins and open them up to more investors, there's still a lot of speculating involved. Some analysts have estimated that XRP's price could surge to $25 because of the launch of the ETFs -- only to see the value then fall by 90%. While that's just a prediction, it's a good representation of how speculative the price of XRP can be. What's more, XRP's value jumped more than 70% in the past month after the House of Representatives passed the Genius Act and the Digital Markets Clarity Act in the House, both of which clarify regulations for crypto and stablecoins. While it's good news for the industry, a 70% surge in XRP's price is likely unwarranted. Huge value movements over a short period, whether for stocks or crypto, often signal that investors are pushing up an investment solely based on how they feel. 3. It's already richly valued XRP's massive run lately means this crypto is priced for perfection. Its price already includes optimism around crypto deregulation, the launch of XRP ETFs, real-world usage of its blockchain, and a general optimism that's fueling a surge in crypto prices. In short, XRP is already on a huge run based on a handful of tangible reasons, and any more gains from here are likely purely built on the whims of crypto investors. Unlike stocks, cryptocurrencies don't have cash flow or earnings to judge their value by, and based on XRP's 480% jump over the past year, it looks like the coin's price is now detached from the already speculative metrics used to judge crypto values. Could XRP still go higher? Of course. Many cryptocurrencies have shown that they can continue to climb even without being tied to any concrete metrics. But there's no getting around the fact that buying XRP means you're paying a premium. And with optimism for XRP sky-high, any unmet expectations from the crypto could cause a substantial sell-off. Should you invest $1,000 in XRP right now? Before you buy stock in XRP, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and XRP wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Chris Neiger has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends XRP. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Should You Buy XRP (Ripple) While It's Under $5? was originally published by The Motley Fool