
Major safety warning on popular sunscreen: 'It doesn't do what it says', study finds
A popular sunscreen does not work, potentially leaving consumers at risk of skin cancer, according to a report.
Consumer champion Which? tested 15 sun creams from Boots, Garnier and Nivea, as well as own-brand alternatives, and saw surprising results.
While a £2.99 supermarket-own sun protectant passed the stringent testing process, a £28 branded favourite failed to reach industry standards.
As a result, the consumer body warned, users may not be adequately protected from the sun's ultraviolet (UV) rays - putting them at risk of cancer.
Ultrasun Family SPF30, sold by some of the biggest high street retailers and costing £28, markets itself as being 'perfect for the whole family' and 'especially suitable for children with sensitive skin'.
But the cream failed two separate tests that measured both its sun protection factor -or SPF - and UV protection.
To trial the creams, scientists applied a small amount on volunteers' backs, before shining a lamp on the patch to simulate the sun's rays.
The time it takes for the skin to become red was then measured.
Ultrasun Family SPF30 (left), sold by some of the biggest high street retailers, markets itself as being 'perfect for the whole family' and 'especially suitable for children with sensitive skin'. Another sunscreen that made it on to the Don't Buy list was Morrisons Moisturising Sun Spray SPF30 - £3.75 per bottle
In another test, scientists took a sample of the cream and spread it onto a glass plate to measure the absorption of UV radiation directly.
To pass, the sunscreen needed to provide at least one third of the claimed SPF.
SPF is measurement of the length of time you can be in the sun before you get burnt.
For example, a sunscreen with an SPF of 30 will take 30 times longer to damage your skin compared to no protection at all.
If a product failed to demonstrate the level of SPF it claimed to have on its first test, Which? repeated the test. If it passed the second time around, a third test was done.
Any product that failed either test twice overall, was labelled a 'Don't Buy' by Which?.
Natalie Hitchins, Which?'s head of home products and services, warned shoppers to look out for these products, as they are not guaranteed to protect as expected.
'It's really concerning that widely available sunscreens could be putting families at risk by failing to offer the level of sun protection claimed on the packaging,' she said.
'Our results prove that there's no need to splash out to keep you and your loved ones safe in the sun as we've found other cheap and reliable options.'
A spokesman from Ultrasun told Which? the brand was fully confident in its testing protocols and that these surpass industry standards, adding: 'As an independent brand delivering very high UVB and UVA protection options for over 30 years, our detailed testing processes, independent and peer reviewed, continue to not only meet but surpass industry standards. Our chosen testing protocol is one of the strictest available.
'Further detail and clarification from Which? on their testing protocols would also be helpful, particularly on how these resulted in two different results from the same sample. We conclusively support the results of our independent tests which found the Ultrasun Family SPF30 reached a UVB-SPF in vivo of 31.4 and a UVA-PF in vitro of 13.1 which equates to a 92 per cent UVA absorbance. The UVA absorbance is calculated by the formula 1-(1/UVA-PF).'
Another sunscreen that made it on to this year's Don't Buy list was Morrisons Moisturising Sun Spray SPF30, priced at £3.75 per bottle.
Morrisons says it is looking closely at the data and working with its supplier to carry out additional independent testing.
Sunscreens that did pass the Which? test included Aldi's Lacura Sensitive Sun Lotion SPF50+, which costs just £2.99.
At just £1.50 per 100ml, it also earned a Which? Great Value badge.
Lidl's Cien Sun Spray 30SPF High (£3.79) Boot's Soltan Protect & Moisturise Suncare Spray SPF30 (£5.50) Nivea's Sun Protect and Moisture Lotion SPF30 (£7.90) and Sainsbury's Sun Protect Moisturising Lotion SPF30 (£5.50) all also passed the safety tests.
The damning report comes days after Kelsey Parker, 34, came under fire for admitting she doesn't put sunscreen on her children.
The podcast host claimed daughter Aurelia, five, and son Bodhi, four, 'don't burn' and that using sunscreen 'causes skin cancer'.
The children's father, The Wanted star Tom Parker, tragically died from brain cancer in 2022.
Speaking in the latest episode of her Mum's The Word! podcast about 'the secret world of parenting', Ms Parker confessed that she opts to keep her children out of the sun rather than using SPF to protect them.
She added that she makes 'organic' sunscreen out of beeswax for UV protection instead.
'It's bad for you–that sunscreen,' she said. 'My kids do not wear sun cream.
'The only thing that I may put on them is an organic sun cream.
'My kids, we went on holiday, I never put sun cream on them and they do not burn.
'I never used to wear sun cream, sun cream causes skin cancer.'
Since making the controversial remarks, the expectant mother has been blasted by listeners, who have accused her of spreading 'dangerous misinformation.
One listener wrote on social media: 'This is really dangerous spreading this information. Please research.'
'This is insane and so unsafe. It's so damaging, burning doesn't indicate sun damage, it can literally kill them. Wow,' a second said.
A third slammed the 'dangerous advice', while a fourth called the dismissal of conventional sun cream 'irresponsible'.
Experts say there is no evidence that sunscreen causes cancer in humans.
Dr Bav Shergill a consultant dermatologist at the Queen Victoria Hospital, London and spokesperson for the British Association of Dermatologists, previously told MailOnline: 'Sunscreens are a safe and effective way to protect your skin from burning and other forms of sun damage.
'Millions of people have used sunscreen over many decades so we can be confident about their safety profile.'
Studies have long shown sun creams can contain both mineral and chemical UV filters.
Mineral UV filters mainly remain on the skin's surface and form a physical barrier to deflect UV rays before they penetrate your skin.
Chemical UV filters, meanwhile, absorb UV light and convert it into heat energy.
As well as being used in sun creams, they may be added to other personal care products, such as moisturisers.
Some research on animals, mainly mice, has indicated many commonly used chemical UV filters in high quantities could be endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) — chemicals that interfere with hormones — such as mimicking natural oestrogen found in our bodies.
Lifetime exposure to oestrogen is an established risk factor for cancers, including breast.
But no research on humans has backed this up.
Going without sunscreen, meanwhile, has been shown to directly raise the risk of developing skin cancer.
Around 15,000 people in the UK are diagnosed with melanoma each year—the UK's fifth most common cancer—with the incidence rate rising faster than any other common cancer.
A recent study from Cancer Research UK warned found that an alarming 87 per cent of melanoma cases, the equivalent of 17,100 in the UK each year, are caused by overexposure to ultraviolet radiation, either directly from the sun or sun beds—meaning they could be avoided.
This is because increased UV exposure can damage the DNA in skin cells, triggering mutations that become cancerous.
From here, the cancer can spread to the blood vessels beneath the skin, getting into the bloodstream and spreading throughout the body.
Last year, rates of the cancer reached a record high in the UK, with new diagnoses increasing by almost a third in just a decade, according to the charity.
According to the NHS website, people should apply suncream to avoid burning and use 'at least factor 30'.
'Sunburn increases your risk of skin cancer. Sunburn does not just happen on holiday. You can burn in the UK, even when it's cloudy,' the site reads.
The health service also recommends avoiding the sun when it is at its strongest, between the hours of 11am and 3pm from March to November, and to cover up with suitable clothing and sunglasses.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
33 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Women who 'suffer in silence' over 'allergy to sex' mistaken for STDs
Experts have highlighted the hidden dangers from a little-known condition that makes some women 'allergic to sex.' Seminal plasma hypersensitivity can cause intimate discomfort, swelling or difficulty breathing during or after intimacy. It's triggered by proteins found in semen, and researchers in the UK say the condition may affect more people than previously thought - and it often goes undiagnosed. Writing for The Conversation, Dr Michael Carroll, associate professor in reproductive science at Manchester Metropolitan University, warned it is often mistaken for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), yeast infections, and general sensitivity. But one clue you're in fact 'allergic to sex' is 'symptoms disappearing when condoms are used,' he revealed. The sex allergy is now recognized as a 'type 1 hypersensitivity,' falling into the same category as peanut allergy, cat dander, and hay fever, he said. The professor argues that, while rare, it is underdiagnosed due to embarrassment, stigma and a lack of awareness - meaning 'many women suffer in silence.' In women it typically affects the vulva or vagina, but can also cause full body symptoms like hives, wheezing, dizziness, runny nose and even anaphylaxis, a potentially life-threatening immune response, he warned. Seminal plasma hypersensitivity was first documented in 1967 when a woman was hospitalized after a 'violent allergic reaction' to sex. It was thought to only affect less than 100 women globally, until a study in 1997 found that nearly 12 per cent of those reporting symptoms after sex could have the allergy. While Dr Carroll had similar results in his own unpublished survey in 2013, he thinks the true figure could be higher. The professor said: 'It's time to bring this hidden condition out of the shadows and into the consultation room. 'And it's not just women. It's possible some men may be allergic to their own sperm,' he added. In men it has also been called post-orgasmic illness syndrome - because it causes symptoms that last seconds, minutes or even hours after ejaculation. It can cause headaches, burning eyes, a runny nose, sore throat, fever, muscle weakness and fatigue, claimed French researchers last year. More extreme symptoms include palpitations and incoherent speech, wrote an expert from Hospital Center des Quatre Villes, on the outskirts of Paris, in a French journal. In the hours after climaxing, a 22-year-old man was described as suffering from sneezing, watery eyes, stomach cramps, muscle pain and deep fatigue, in a paper published in the American Journal of Case Reports earlier this year. While only 60 cases of post-orgasmic illness syndrome have been reported since it was first discovered in 2002, it could affect many more as it is likely some don't seek medical attention. 'The problem isn't the sperm', explained Dr Carroll, but rather a prostate-specific antigen, a compound found in semen. And it isn't specific to any one partner - women can develop a reaction to any man's ejaculate. There was also evidence of something called 'cross-reactivity' found - when those with existing allergies can develop another one. So if you're allergic to dogs or other things, you may have developed an allergy to sex, even if you don't realize it. 'In one unusual case, a woman with a Brazil nut allergy broke out in hives after sex, probably due to trace nut proteins in her partner's semen,' he said. The diagnostic process involves a review of your sexual and medical history often followed by a skin prick test with your partner's semen or blood tests. Treatments include prophylactic antihistamines to prevent allergic reactions before exposure and anti-inflammatories. There is also desensitization, which involves a doctor placing a diluted semen solution in the vagina or onto the penis, at 20 minutes intervals. While the allergy doesn't directly affect fertility - and many women with SHP successfully conceive - it can complicate things. 'Avoiding the allergen - usually the most effective treatment for allergies - isn't feasible for couples trying to conceive,' he explained. So, if your allergic to sex and you're trying for a baby, you may wish to choose IVF with washed sperm - to avoid the allergen PSA altogether.


BBC News
41 minutes ago
- BBC News
Diseased ash trees in Redditch to be felled to protect residents
Trees infected with a deadly disease will be felled in order to protect public Borough Council plan to cut down a number of ash trees along Birchfield Road, from the top of Bromsgrove Road to the slip road for Bromsgrove Highway, in Webhealth, that are infected with ash dieback. The disease leads to leaf loss, branch die and ultimately tree death, however it also poses risk to humans and animals as weakened branches can suddenly fall. Jen Snape from the local authority said it was "imperative" to look after the environment and remove any trees that could become "a safety risk to residents". Orange marks had been placed on infected trees, with work expected to get underway in the coming months, a spokesperson for the borough council said. They added that the removed trees would not be replanted, as the surrounding trees and vegetation were "sufficient to allow natural regeneration". Follow BBC Hereford & Worcester on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.


Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
Carrie Johnson admitted to hospital over 'severe dehydration'
Carrie Johnson - the wife of former prime minister Boris Johnson - has revealed she was admitted to hospital with severe dehydration, as she offered advice to other breastfeeding mothers in the hot weather. Mrs Johnson, 37, posted a picture of herself and her newborn daughter Poppy Eliza Josephine on Friday in a hospital bed. "Being hospitalised for two nights for severe dehydration was not on my postpartum bingo card," she captioned the Instagram post. Mrs Johnson urged other "breastfeeding mums" to make sure they eat and drink enough "in this heat", especially those who are "clusterfeeding". Poppy was born on 21 May, becoming the couple's fourth child after their son Frank, born in July 2023, daughter Romy, born in December 2021, and son Wilfred, born in April 2020. In a separate Instagram story, Mrs Johnson described an "honestly brutal week". "Mastitis (me), reflux (her), dehydration (me). What a pair we are!," she said. "But thank you for all the kind messages, especially all the brilliant advice on reflux. Really appreciate it and made me feel way less alone going thru (sic) it all. And as ever, thanks to our amazing NHS." The NHS recommends drinking plenty of fluids while breastfeeding - and avoiding caffeine and alcohol to stop their effects being passed on to the baby. Having a drink nearby when mothers stop to feed is advised, as is water, lower-fat milk, and low-sugar drinks. The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) has issued an amber heat health alert for the next four days. Although not a public weather warning, it advises health and social care organisations of possible dangers to their patients and facilities. Temperatures could reach 34C on Monday - with a 20% chance of beating the hottest June day on record of 35.6C from 1976. The likelihood of record-breaking temperatures could increase over the weekend as the day approaches.