I ditched Google Calendar for paper, and it gave me the mental clarity I needed
I started using a paper calendar as sort of a joke. It was part of my experiment to live as if I were back in 1993. I ditched all modern tech and bought a weekly planner from the dollar store. My busy adult life still needed some kind of planning system. I didn't expect to stick with it after my experiment was up, but you know what? I did.
The experiment ended but the paper calendar stuck around. It found a home on my desk, where I've been using it every day since then. It's strange because Google Calendar had been my go-to tool for years. It organized everything in my life, from my kids' dentist appointments to my bike rides. But weirdly, I feel more in control of my schedule with pen and paper than I did with Google's digital tools.
Do you feel stressed by your digital life?
0 votes
Yes, my digital life is a disorganized mess.
NaN %
Sometimes, and I'm thinking of changing.
NaN %
Sometimes, but I can deal.
NaN %
No, my digital life is perfect for me.
NaN %
I made the switch to slow down
Nathan Drescher / Android Authority
Maybe you've felt the same way I was feeling: the constant dinging, the notification dots, that feeling that no matter what you do, you're a disorganized mess who can't get all your ducks in a row. So, you add more to your calendar, more to your to-do list, more to your note-taking apps.
I've been there too. I was worn down by digital fatigue and wanted something that would slow my life down without losing control of the things that matter. The paper planner I bought for that experiment turned out to be exactly what I was looking for. It slowed me down and made me think about each item I added to my day.
I gained some mental space by switching
It took some self-discipline to get started, but the habit of sitting with my calendar each morning formed surprisingly quickly. Here's what I do at the beginning of every day: Open my planner and see if there are any items left over from yesterday.
Add those to today's tasks and put three exclamation marks next to them (!!!).
Check if I have any appointments already entered for the day.
Check Slack and Asana and add any tasks due for the day.
Check my shared family calendar and add anything my wife has put in for the day.
The whole thing takes about five minutes, and it gives me a sense of clarity that digital tools never did.
Nathan Drescher / Android Authority
I add appointments to their specific day when I make them. I add due dates for bills a month in advance, so when I get to that specific day, it's there. Funny enough, by writing them into a calendar, I haven't forgotten about them. In fact, this has kept me more on my budget than ever before, and I find I no longer forget appointments or important events.
This has kept me more on my budget than ever before.
As I complete tasks, I cross them off my list and feel a sense of accomplishment. Then I sit down with my calendar at the end of the day for a minute or two and review what I've done for the day and what's coming up tomorrow. That small moment of reflection each day has helped me stay focused and intentional.
Not everything works as well in a paper calendar
Joe Maring / Android Authority
There's a lot more friction when working with a paper planner. I can't just whip something into my calendar while I'm out and about, so it means I often have to make a note of something in Obsidian and then remember to transfer it to my calendar when I get home. That's a lot of hoops to jump through, and I've definitely missed a few things this way.
There are no push notifications or emails, so I have to check the calendar throughout the day. And the convenience of adding emails, addresses, and notes to an event in Google Calendar cannot be understated. I do a lot of meetings and interviews as a journalist, and Google Calendar allows me to track everything I need when I'm meeting with a subject. Not so my dollar store weekly planner.
I'm going to stick with paper for the time being
Nathan Drescher / Android Authority
Still, I haven't gone back. The pros outweigh the cons, and the paper planner has brought some much-needed peace to my life. It has slowed my life down in a way I didn't know I needed. It forces me to be more mindful of my schedule and more present in my own life.
I still use Google Calendar for family events and meetings, because there are some things a paper calendar could never replace. But for everything else, I spend the time to jot it down with a pen, review it every day, think about what it means, and actually do it. No scrolling, no notifications, and no cloud sync. It just sits there, waiting for me, and I didn't know how badly I needed that until I tried it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Entrepreneur
8 minutes ago
- Entrepreneur
SiMa.ai Secures USD 85 Mn to Advance Physical AI Platform
Funding led by Maverick Capital with StepStone Group joining will drive global expansion and innovation for edge-based AI applications You're reading Entrepreneur India, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media. has secured USD 85 million in a funding round led by Maverick Capital, with StepStone Group joining as a new investor. The round was oversubscribed and included participation from existing backers. With this latest infusion, the company's total funding has reached USD 355 million. The capital will be used to expand global presence and to accelerate the growth of its Physical AI platform. Plans include increasing investment in software innovation, enhancing go-to-market activities, strengthening customer support, and advancing its automotive development plans. "This new funding further validates our leadership in the Physical AI space and the growing demand for solutions that deliver top-tier performance per watt with exceptional ease of use," said Krishna Rangasayee, Founder and CEO of "With the support of both new and existing investors, we are moving quickly to extend our lead and meet demand across robotics, automotive, industrial automation, aerospace and defense, smart vision, and healthcare." Founded in 2018 by Rangasayee, is headquartered in San Jose, California. The company specialises in Physical AI computing, creating platforms that enable intelligent applications to operate efficiently at the edge. Its flagship Modalix platform offers high performance while maintaining strong energy efficiency, designed to make advanced AI capabilities accessible in industries such as robotics, automotive, aerospace, and industrial automation. offers a full-stack Physical AI solution through its ONE platform. This integrates purpose-built silicon with a software-first approach to simplify deployment and maximise performance. The platform includes Modalix, a second-generation multimodal MLSoC now available to customers, and Palette, a software suite that features both a software development kit and Edgematic, a no-code visual development tool. The system supports major machine learning frameworks, including vision models, transformers, and generative AI, within a single architecture. Andrew Homan, Managing Partner at Maverick Capital, said, " is redefining possibilities at the edge by combining advanced silicon with a software-centric approach to Physical AI. Their ability to deliver powerful, low-energy solutions with simple deployment positions them to lead in a rapidly growing market." John Avirett, Partner at StepStone Group, added, "As generative AI changes the data center, we see significant opportunity in AI at the edge. integrated solution, technical expertise, and customer adoption make it a leader in this space." With AI applications increasingly moving to the edge, aims to address the need for high performance, energy efficiency, and ease of use in real-world environments.
Forbes
10 minutes ago
- Forbes
Stablecoins – The Internet's Upgrade To Money?
Imagine if PayPal, Swift, and your banking app went on a wellness weekend in Silicon Valley and returned Monday as leaner, faster versions of themselves. That's the premise behind stablecoins - crypto's sensible sibling. They are digital tokens pegged to real-world currencies, such as the US dollar. One stablecoin, one dollar, it's as simple as that. Or at least that is the idea. Backed 1:1 by short-dated US Treasuries or bank deposits, stablecoins like USDC (Circle) and USDT (Tether) now represent a parallel financial infrastructure: programmable, blockchain-native money that moves 24/7, costs pennies (sometimes fractions of pennies) to transmit, and settles in seconds across borders. Unlike their volatile crypto cousins, stablecoins don't swing with Elon's tweets. They are built for stability and, increasingly, for scale. In short, stablecoins might just be the internet's long-overdue upgrade to money. The Market Defined - a $3 Trillion Disruption in Motion If traditional FX is a battered old dial-up modem, stablecoins are fibre-optic. The current foreign exchange system is built upon decades-old 'correspondent banking' rails. That means sending USD to Nairobi from Berlin still involves a long conga line of intermediaries, opaque fees, and 2–5 business days of holding your breath. Now imagine a contractor in Lagos receiving USD in minutes, not days, with 90% lower fees. That's the promise - and increasingly, the reality - of stablecoin payments. According to Visa and Artemis, over $35 trillion in stablecoins were transferred in the last 12 months, more than Visa and Mastercard combined. Adoption spans over 190 countries, with more than 30 million active wallets and $214 billion in supply. And yet, this is still small fry compared to the $1.1 trillion traded daily in traditional FX markets. The runway is long. The Emerging Stablecoin Stack At the heart of this emerging ecosystem are three core players: Stablecoins are now less about crypto speculation and more about enabling global payments, liquidity management, and even treasury operations. (Yes, SpaceX reportedly uses stablecoins to manage treasury exposure in places like Argentina and Nigeria.) Why Now? Three tailwinds are converging: As Jeremy Allaire of Circle put it: 'This is one of the biggest TAMs (Total Addressable Markets) of all industries out there.' Stablecoin Benefits - Not Just a Cheaper Payment Let's be clear: stablecoins aren't just shaving a few basis points off remittance fees. They're overhauling the plumbing of money movement, and if carried out properly, should ensure: Even governments are starting to warm up. The US Secretary of the Treasury recently noted stablecoins could 'reinforce the dollar's role as the world's reserve currency'. Now there's a geopolitical incentive too. The Use Cases - From Contractors to Capital Markets Today, stablecoins are fuelling cross-border B2B and remittances (especially in high-friction corridors like LatAm, Africa, Southeast Asia), Vendor payments and global payroll (freelancers, contractors, AI microtasks), DeFi and tokenised assets, Treasury operations and liquidity management, retail and micropayments (Stripe now lets you 'Pay with Crypto,' settling in fiat), etc. Platforms like Koywe and BVNK are abstracting away the blockchain complexity, offering embedded wallets and FX capabilities to fintechs, banks, and corporates alike. The Programmable Edge - Money with a Brain Stablecoins aren't just faster dollars. They're programmable money. Developers can build logic into transactions, such as pay-on-delivery, split payments, escrow with triggers, etc. Imagine Stripe automatically issuing a virtual card with preset limits for a one-time transaction. Or a DAO releasing funds when a smart contract verifies an invoice, this is where stablecoins become 'room-temperature superconductors for financial services,' to borrow Stripe's analogy. Fiat vs. Stablecoin - The Convergence is Underway Here's the kicker – the more people spend stablecoins, the less they need to convert back to fiat. This threatens the incumbents, not because stablecoins are replacing dollars or banks, but because they may become the rails on which banks ride. Think of stablecoins as TCP/IP for money, invisible but essential. Fiat isn't disappearing. But control over the user interface, the relationship, the rail – that's the next frontier. But… There are still Challenges Of course, no revolution is without its wrinkles. The regulation is still evolving. US and EU frameworks are being formed, but cross-border clarity remains a work in progress. Redemption risk: Some 'stable' coins aren't so stable (read: algorithmic failures). The user experience is improving. Right now, wallets, gas fees, cross-chain issues are still too clunky for grandma. There's friction with the Central Bank. Will CBDC (Central Bank Digital Currency) replace stablecoins? Maybe. But don't expect it to be programmable, anonymous, or innovation friendly. CBDC is great tools for surveillance, monetary policy, and state control but it won't be winning developer hearts any time soon. The Road Ahead – What Matters and Who Wins? Here's what we're betting on: The winners will straddle both worlds. Not crypto-native or TradFi alone, but companies that can operate across both and move fast. Banks and fintechs will converge. Banks are already exploring the issuance of stablecoins and fintechs are acquiring bank charters. Platforms matter. Ethereum and Solana are dominating, but keep an eye on Bitcoin Lightning, Stellar, and Tron in emerging markets. Yield matters. Those who capture the interest from reserves will be the ones to define business models. Ultimately, stablecoins aren't a threat to the financial system. They represent an evolution - an upgrade. The question isn't if they'll go mainstream, but how fast, who wins, and what rails the money flows on. If you're still thinking of stablecoins as a crypto gimmick, you're already late for the next phase of finance.
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I tested Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs. iPhone 16 Pro Max in a 200-photo shootout — which camera phone wins?
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 against the iPhone 16 Pro Max puts Samsung's most expensive phone versus Apple's most expensive iPhone. And there is a huge quantity of differences. Although the iPhone 16 Pro Max is deservedly thought of as one of the best phones around, the Galaxy Z Fold 7, with its folding design and even higher price tag, is on a different level. But users expect these phones to still cover the essentials, including taking great photos. To see how these two phones compare, I took them both out for a long snapping session. And below you can see my results, which will demonstrate that the major differences between these phones doesn't stop at just their shape or software. Main We begin with this parish boundary marker as the subject for our phones' main cameras. The Galaxy Z Fold 7's take on the scene has more color, while the iPhone's shot has more natural tones, in line with how I saw the scene on the day. Ultrawide A short distance away, looking up at a church through the phones' ultrawide cameras, we can see the iPhone's image is way brighter than the Samsung's, aside from the clouds, which are similarly bright and colored. This makes sense considering the size and resolution of the iPhone's 48MP ultrawide camera, while the Galaxy Z Fold 7 uses a smaller 12MP one. Macro The Galaxy Z Fold 7's weaker ultrawide camera also impacts its macro photography abilities. Its image of a yellow flower is much darker than the iPhone's, even if it's still detailed. Perhaps the lower light level will be preferable to some users, but it's not to my liking at least. 3x Zoom Moving now to the telephoto cameras, we begin with the optical zoom level of the Galaxy Z Fold 7's telephoto camera. To hit this zoom, the iPhone 16 Pro Max has to use a cropped main camera image. You can tell from the softness of the iPhone image that it's not using a proper zoom lens, along with its weirdly dull coloration of this sign. The Samsung shot isn't particularly interesting, but it's definitely the better-looking one of the two with more contrast. 5x zoom Upping the magnification puts us into the native territory of the iPhone's telephoto camera. And its increased sharpness over the Z Fold's image is plain to see. The Galaxy Z Fold 7's flatter colors make for an interesting visual difference, too. Selfie Using the front-facing cameras on these two phones (the outer one in the Z Fold 7's case), we can see how the phones depicts a person and applies a portrait effect. The iPhone has given me exaggerated highlights in my hair and the brightest parts of my skin, and a warmer overall tone compared to the Z Fold 7, which has gone for a more natural coloration. The portrait effect in both photos is well applied, but interestingly the Samsung's blur is noticeably gentler. Low light A Lego minifigure keyring posed on a dark shelf shows us how these phones deal with night mode/low light photography. The iPhone has turned in the brighter image, which isn't surprising given it took a seven-second exposure to the Galaxy's three-second one. But as a result, lighter parts of the shot look over sharpened with exaggerated highlights. As a result, I think I like the Z Fold 7's photo in this particular example. Colors Looking across a park, we have a variety of colors for the two phones to depict. The brighter iPhone image brings elements like the purple flowers, the green lawn and the blue shopfronts in the distance to the fore, while the Z Fold 7 is using a flatter color tuning. It's especially noticeable in the sky, which comes across as a plain grey from the Galaxy Z Fold 7 but a more lively blue on the iPhone. The iPhone's pic is a brighter but a bit overexposed, while the Z Fold 7's shot is darker and a bit more evenly exposed. So it comes down to your preference. HDR Putting the color difference aside, this coffee cup gives us a good demo of the two phones' ability to handle extreme light and dark in the same shot. The Galaxy Z Fold 7 gives us a shot that is not that different from the iPhone in terms of highlights, but there is a little more to see in the darker areas of the iPhone image, like the texture of the ceramics, or the chocolate powder spilling over the edge of the cup. Max resolution Lastly, I took a shot with the phones' main cameras again, but set to their maximum resolutions - 48MP in the iPhone's case, and 200MP for the Galaxy. The iPhone image of this street scene is brighter, which helps make the dark-colored elements like the road, the trees or the buildings pop out more. But the Samsung, thanks to having over four times the pixels, gives you more detail when you zoom in, such as the clock near the center of the image. It's hard to make out in the small previous window above, but having more pixels to play with can be helpful for editing or reframing a shot after you've taken it. Verdict Personally, I think the iPhone 16 Pro Max comes out on top in this comparison. But much of what determines the winner of this comparison for anyone examining these images is going to be personal taste, due to the different ways these phones process images. Apple's focus on brightness and more intense colors is often a smart route to take, but Samsung's generally less exaggerated take on scenes can be the better one a lot of the time. There's not a huge amount splitting these phones apart in terms of image quality really. The iPhone is therefore the better value of the two, if you can call a $1,200 phone a "value" device. The Z Fold 7 still capturees excellent photos a lot of the time though, which some buyers may find tempts them to go for a foldable rather than a regular flagship. More from Tom's Guide I tested this MagSafe wallet for a month and now I can't live without it — especially at 44% off right now Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold — what we know so far How to speed up your iPhone by clearing its cache
