School dinners may encourage picky teenagers to eat better, study suggests
The findings, published in the Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, suggest picky eaters at the age of 13 were more likely than non-picky children to avoid meat, fish and fruit in their packed lunches.
But there was little evidence of picky eaters avoiding meat, fish and fruit in school dinners.
Researchers examined data from more than 5,300 children from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children – also known as the 'Children of the 90s' study.
The University of Bristol-led study analysed data from children when they were pre-schoolers and again at age 13 to understand how picky eating behaviour changes over time.
'Our results suggest that some picky eating behaviours persist while others may be modified in adolescents when they are away from direct familial influence, such as when eating school dinners with their peers,' the study said.
It added: 'It is likely that family norms have a stronger influence over packed lunch content than over school dinner choices where the child has more autonomy and may be influenced by their peers.'
Dr Caroline Taylor, lead researcher and associate professor in nutrition at the University of Bristol, said: 'Every child is different, and what works for some won't work for others.
'We found that school dinners could be a good option to increase variety in the diets of picky teens, but there are plenty of other things parents can do to encourage a healthy diet.
'Whether that is enjoying family meals together, modelling a balanced diet yourself, or involving them in meal preparation, it all helps.
'We know that most picky children are eating enough, but they're sometimes lacking a good balance of foods.
'It's important to encourage all children to eat enough nutrient-rich fruits and vegetables to help them grow and develop, whether that's at home or at school.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Graziadaily
18 minutes ago
- Graziadaily
I Wore the Celeb-Loved LED Mask Daily For A Month – Here's How My Skin Changed
I'll admit it: my mind and internet search history have been crowded with the term 'LED light mask' since the moment I turned 27 earlier this year. Premature or not, I knew my hormonal breakouts and perpetually tired eyes needed an extra LED light boost in addition to my regular skincare routine. What I didn't know was where to start. So, when one of Grazia 's beauty editors recommended CurrentBody's mask, I knew I had to get my hands on one. Specifically, the new and improved CurrentBody LED Face Mask Series 2. Backed by a serious A-list endorsement, the red light mask promised a brighter, smoother and more even complexion with just 10 minutes of use every day – exactly what both my tired skin and packed schedule needed. As someone who managed to get through puberty acne-free, the first signs of stress and hormonal acne in my 20s were particularly difficult for me. After years of premature popping and harsh exfoliation, my skin suffered a lot of hyperpigmentation, particularly on my cheeks. While this has been my main skin concern for years, late-night Netflix binge-watches and an inconsistent skincare routine have also left my under-eyes generally puffier and darker than normal. So naturally, when I had the opportunity to test the CurrentBody LED Light Therapy Face Mask Series2, it felt like fate. Given my social media addiction, I was familiar with the red light therapy mask. After all, everyone from Lily Collins on Emily in Paris to Nicola Coughlan, Suki Waterhouse, and even Kim Kardashian (who has wrapped the LED masks up as Christmas presents) have waxed lyrical about the brand's original mask. The upgraded Series 2 mask offers a more flexible and closer fit than its predecessor, thanks to a multiway strap that sits on top and across the back of the head. It uses a combination of red, near-infrared, and deep near-infrared light to penetrate deep and target signs of ageing while tightening, brightening and smoothing the skin. The mask's red light therapy is also meant to be suitable for all skin types, says Emily Buckwell, head of brand . 'Red LED light therapy is safe and effective for 99.9% of people. That's one of the reasons we chose to specialise in it at CurrentBody. Our customers wanted something easy and safe to use that gave them results with minimal effort. The effects that our hundreds of thousands of customers report have included everything from reduced fine lines and wrinkles to an improvement in skin conditions such as rosacea and acne.' CurrentBody also swears that the mask's powerful red light therapy reduces wrinkles by 30% and improves plumpness by 57% visibly with about four weeks of usage. While I'm not usually won over by bold anti-ageing claims, the idea of a skin reboot in a month sounded intriguing to say the least. I'll be honest, I'm not usually as consistent with my skincare as I'd like to be. But I am a committed Grazia journalist so, for the last two months, I've been religiously using the CurrentBody Series 2 LED Maskthree times a week for 10 minutes. After cleansing my face each night, I strapped on the mask and let it work its magic thanks to a combination of 236 LED lights emitting three clinically recognised wavelengths. The soft mask moulded perfectly to my skin while the eye inserts kept my eyes from being strained by the bright red light so I could read, scroll through my phone or simply relax in bed without tempting headaches. On the weeks before my period, when I felt my hormonal acne flaring under the surface, I increased the usage to five days a week and immediately felt the blemishes subsiding. The mask's clip-on controller also made it easy to move around the house, while the auto-turn-off feature meant I wasn't worried about overdoing it. It also comes with a Veritace NFC card, which ensures the quality checks your specific product went through, and that's not the case with many other expensive alternatives in the market. While many reviewers started noting a difference around week two, I can't say I marked any significant shift apart from an instant glow the day after using the mask. So, at the very least, I knew the LED red light mask was perfect for a quick refresh before big events. By week four, however, my skin began to seriously change. The sunspots and acne scarring on my cheek began clearing up. My chin and nose, which suffered from bumps and uneven skin, were beginning to smooth out, which meant makeup went on much easier and looked more natural. Now, two months later, while I still suffer from the occasional hormonal acne, my breakouts are rarer and heal much faster than before. I'm 27, so I can't quite attest to the mask's effectiveness on deeper wrinkles, but the finer lines under my eyes have been noticeably plumper. Before and after using the CurrentBody LED Light Therapy Face Mask: Series 2 CurrentBody LED Light Therapy Face Mask: Series 2 Pros Flexible, improved fit covers the face and chin perfectly. The lightweight mask is comfortable to wear. Effectively targets skin concerns ranging from pigmentation and inflammation to uneven skin tone and visible signs of ageing. Cons The results take at least 4 weeks to show so consistent usage is neccesary. Mask type: Flexible face mask Wireless charger type: USB-C Material: Clinical-grade silicone Wave length used: Red light (633nm), near-infrared (830nm), deep near-infrared (1072nm) Treatment time: 10 minutes The biggest question is, does the CurrentBody LED Light Therapy Face Mask Series 2 earn a permanent place in my skincare routine? Absolutely, it does. At £399.99, it's definitely an investment, but one that lives up to its promises. It feels highly technical and luxe but is incredibly easy to use and delivers results slowly, but surely. As with any beauty gadget, consistency is key, and I can already see my skin transforming with continued use. While I'm still using light touches of concealer and foundation, I'm optimistic about being able to skip makeup on a daily basis in a few months. Of course, nothing can truly replace your trusty moisturiser and SPF combo, but if you're looking to elevate your everyday skincare regime, I'd honestly recommend CurrentBody's LED Light Therapy Face Mask Series 2. And if social media is any indication, so would many of our favourite celebrities. Does the Currentbody LED facemask work? Having tested the product for over two months now, I can definitely say that the product works and delivers on every promise it makes. My skin is much brighter and even-toned than before and my hormonal acne is better controlled as well. The texture on my face has begun to smooth out, making makeup application easier. Is the CurrentBody LED face mask FDA approved? Yes, according to the brand, the CurrentBody LED Light Therapy Face Mask Series 2 is FDA-approved and safe to be used on the skin. How often can you use the CurrentBody LED face mask? The ideal usage for the CurrentBody LED Light Therapy Face Mask Series 2 is three to five times a week, but you could also use it daily. Personally, I've been averaging the mask about four times a week at night as part of my skincare routine. How long does it take to see results from CurrentBody LED face mask? If you're after a simple glow, the results from the CurrentBody red light therapy LED fasce mask are almost immediate. However, for more effectove anti-ageing, brightening and smoothing benefits, you'll have to use the mask regularly for about a month. Main image credits: ©Instagram/@currentbody ©Grazia/Hitanshi Kamdar Hitanshi Kamdar is a senior commerce writer for Grazia. Hitanshi is always on the hunt for the latest trends, emerging designers and the internet's most bizarre style discourse. When not writing, she can be found IDing outfits during Netflix binges and shopping for the latest It-girl shoe trends.
South Wales Guardian
13 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Girls and black children face inequalities in transplant treatment, study shows
Academics found that some children in need of a kidney transplant are facing inequalities in their care. Black children are less likely to be put on the transplant waiting list, as are those from more deprived backgrounds, researchers from the University of Bristol found. There are currently 137 children aged 17 and under on the kidney transplant waiting list in the UK. Researchers set out to examine whether inequalities exist in access to kidney transplantation among children in the UK by analysing the UK Renal Registry and NHS Blood and Transplant data between 1996 and 2020. They found that girls were 12% less likely to be put on a transplant waiting list compared to boys. Children from the poorest backgrounds were 33% less likely to be put on the waiting list compared to those from the wealthiest. And black children were 19% less likely to be put on the waiting list compared to their white peers. Once children are on the waiting list, the disparities related to gender and income appeared to reduce, but disadvantages for black children persisted. 'We were particularly struck by how early these disparities appear in the transplant process,' said Dr Alice James, lead author of the study. 'It's not just about who gets a transplant, but who even gets considered in the first place. 'Those from black ethnic backgrounds face systemic disadvantages even after being placed on the waitlist, including fewer living donor opportunities.' When looking at kidney transplants given by a living donor within two years of being on the waiting list, the odds of getting a transplant are lower among those from poorer backgrounds and children of black or Asian ethnicity, according to the study, which has been presented to the ESOT (European Society for Organ Transplantation) Congress 2025. Dr James added: 'It is notable – and particularly disquieting – that such disparities are evident even in a paediatric population within a universal healthcare system like the NHS. 'The persistent disadvantage faced by children from black ethnic backgrounds even after wait-listing is especially striking, suggesting systemic or cultural barriers that extend beyond access alone.' On gender inequalities seen in the study, she added: 'The gender disparity in wait-listing, with girls being less likely to be wait-listed, may reflect implicit gender biases in clinical decision-making, differences in parental advocacy, or variation in disease presentation and severity between sexes. 'There may also be social factors influencing clinicians' assumptions about transplant suitability or family engagement in the transplantation process. 'While evidence is limited in paediatric populations, adult studies suggest that women are often perceived as less suitable candidates due to comorbidities or psychosocial factors— perceptions that may inadvertently extend to female children.' Fiona Loud, policy director at Kidney Care UK, said: 'This research is shocking and it's not good enough to see such heartbreaking inequalities so early in life. 'There are around 1,000 children receiving kidney replacement therapy via either dialysis or transplant in the UK. 'This is a relatively small number which should mean we have a real opportunity to change this and make sure we improve things for the future for children and young people. 'But right now it is very hard for families whose children have kidney failure. 'More work needs to be done to explore local barriers and raise awareness of the value and importance of living kidney donation through personalised and community education programmes.' Professor Derek Manas, medical director for organ and tissue donation at NHS Blood and Transplant, which is responsible for allocating organs to people on the list, said: 'These results will help hospital clinical teams across the UK to further understand and mitigate this issue. 'NHS Blood and Transplant does not decide which individual patients are added to the transplant waiting list, but we do manage how organs are allocated to patients and the research found that once patients are on the waiting list, they had equitable access to donations, irrespective of ethnicity or deprivation. 'The transplant community has come a long way in ensuring equity once listed but this study confirms we all have more to do. 'Kidneys also need to be matched and people from the same ethnicity are more likely to be a match. 'There are currently not enough donors from black and Asian backgrounds and we urge people to show their support for donation on the NHS Organ Donor Register and to tell their families they want to donate.' An NHS England spokesperson said: 'The decision to place somebody on the transplant list should never be affected by their gender, ethnicity or family income and this analysis is a stark reminder that, whilst we have made progress on tackling health inequalities, much remains to be done – and this will be at the heart of the 10 Year Health Plan. 'More widely, we know kidney failure disproportionately impacts people from Black African and Black Caribbean heritage so we would always encourage more donors from these backgrounds to come forward, and we have recently launched a new simple genetic blood test for these groups to help reduce the risk of kidney failure.'
Leader Live
16 hours ago
- Leader Live
Girls and black children face inequalities in transplant treatment, study shows
Academics found that some children in need of a kidney transplant are facing inequalities in their care. Black children are less likely to be put on the transplant waiting list, as are those from more deprived backgrounds, researchers from the University of Bristol found. There are currently 137 children aged 17 and under on the kidney transplant waiting list in the UK. Researchers set out to examine whether inequalities exist in access to kidney transplantation among children in the UK by analysing the UK Renal Registry and NHS Blood and Transplant data between 1996 and 2020. They found that girls were 12% less likely to be put on a transplant waiting list compared to boys. Children from the poorest backgrounds were 33% less likely to be put on the waiting list compared to those from the wealthiest. And black children were 19% less likely to be put on the waiting list compared to their white peers. Once children are on the waiting list, the disparities related to gender and income appeared to reduce, but disadvantages for black children persisted. 'We were particularly struck by how early these disparities appear in the transplant process,' said Dr Alice James, lead author of the study. 'It's not just about who gets a transplant, but who even gets considered in the first place. 'Those from black ethnic backgrounds face systemic disadvantages even after being placed on the waitlist, including fewer living donor opportunities.' When looking at kidney transplants given by a living donor within two years of being on the waiting list, the odds of getting a transplant are lower among those from poorer backgrounds and children of black or Asian ethnicity, according to the study, which has been presented to the ESOT (European Society for Organ Transplantation) Congress 2025. Dr James added: 'It is notable – and particularly disquieting – that such disparities are evident even in a paediatric population within a universal healthcare system like the NHS. 'The persistent disadvantage faced by children from black ethnic backgrounds even after wait-listing is especially striking, suggesting systemic or cultural barriers that extend beyond access alone.' On gender inequalities seen in the study, she added: 'The gender disparity in wait-listing, with girls being less likely to be wait-listed, may reflect implicit gender biases in clinical decision-making, differences in parental advocacy, or variation in disease presentation and severity between sexes. 'There may also be social factors influencing clinicians' assumptions about transplant suitability or family engagement in the transplantation process. 'While evidence is limited in paediatric populations, adult studies suggest that women are often perceived as less suitable candidates due to comorbidities or psychosocial factors— perceptions that may inadvertently extend to female children.' Fiona Loud, policy director at Kidney Care UK, said: 'This research is shocking and it's not good enough to see such heartbreaking inequalities so early in life. 'There are around 1,000 children receiving kidney replacement therapy via either dialysis or transplant in the UK. 'This is a relatively small number which should mean we have a real opportunity to change this and make sure we improve things for the future for children and young people. 'But right now it is very hard for families whose children have kidney failure. 'More work needs to be done to explore local barriers and raise awareness of the value and importance of living kidney donation through personalised and community education programmes.' Professor Derek Manas, medical director for organ and tissue donation at NHS Blood and Transplant, which is responsible for allocating organs to people on the list, said: 'These results will help hospital clinical teams across the UK to further understand and mitigate this issue. 'NHS Blood and Transplant does not decide which individual patients are added to the transplant waiting list, but we do manage how organs are allocated to patients and the research found that once patients are on the waiting list, they had equitable access to donations, irrespective of ethnicity or deprivation. 'The transplant community has come a long way in ensuring equity once listed but this study confirms we all have more to do. 'Kidneys also need to be matched and people from the same ethnicity are more likely to be a match. 'There are currently not enough donors from black and Asian backgrounds and we urge people to show their support for donation on the NHS Organ Donor Register and to tell their families they want to donate.' An NHS England spokesperson said: 'The decision to place somebody on the transplant list should never be affected by their gender, ethnicity or family income and this analysis is a stark reminder that, whilst we have made progress on tackling health inequalities, much remains to be done – and this will be at the heart of the 10 Year Health Plan. 'More widely, we know kidney failure disproportionately impacts people from Black African and Black Caribbean heritage so we would always encourage more donors from these backgrounds to come forward, and we have recently launched a new simple genetic blood test for these groups to help reduce the risk of kidney failure.'
