logo
From Gaza to Tehran, why journalists are frontline targets in the Middle East - Region

From Gaza to Tehran, why journalists are frontline targets in the Middle East - Region

As missiles rain down and cameras go dark, a new front in modern warfare has emerged: the systematic targeting of journalists. From Tehran to Gaza, media workers are being bombed, shot, and silenced—not for what they've done, but for what they dare to show.
On 16 June, broadcaster Sahar Emami was halfway through her evening bulletin when the building shook. The missile struck like thunder. The lights blew out. Smoke filled the room. Somewhere down the corridor, someone screamed.
An Israeli airstrike had just hit the compound of Iran's state broadcaster, IRIB, in Tehran. Emami paused only briefly, running for cover as the shockwaves intensified. She returned to her chair moments later—composed, defiant—and resumed the live broadcast.
File Photo: A snapshot of Broadcaster Sahar Emami after an Israeli strike hit the building.
The attack killed producer Masoumeh Azimi and news editor Nima Rajabpour. Many others were wounded.
"This was part of a plan to destroy 'the regime's symbols,'" American-Iranian journalist, formerly based in Beirut, Séamus Malekafzali told Ahram Online. "If they can stop IRIB from broadcasting and kill its reporters, they can prevent the state from informing people about what is happening in their own country."
"It has a chilling effect on going back to work and on associating oneself with its reporters," he added.
The strike on IRIB was part of a growing Israeli strategy of targeting "hostile" media infrastructure.
Iran responded with missiles aimed at Israel's Channel 14 and Channel 12. The strike caused structural damage but no casualties. Iran's government labelled Channel 14 a "terror network" tied to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition.
Israel condemned the attack as a strike against civilian media. But in Tehran, the questions had already shifted.
"We heard the bombs around us, our windows shook, and we kept working," wrote Iranian journalist Ruhollah Nakhaee to Ahram Online. "Some of us had to move our families out of Tehran and return to work alone."
"They [the West] brushed off IRIB being hit because it's state TV," he said. "The BBC is state TV. The VOA is state TV. Would anyone react the same if they were targeted? I'm very aware that if any of our offices are hit, no one will ask why. And even if they do, it won't matter."
The language of international law offers no protection, he adds.
"After all Israel has done with blanket support from the West, terms like 'international law' mean nothing here. They never did."
Cross-border attacks and the information war
File Photo: Reuters video journalist Issam Abdallah. Photo courtesy of social media.
The strike on IRIB reflects a growing pattern of Israeli attacks on journalists in the region. On 13 October 2023, the Israeli army opened tank fire on seven reporters clearly marked as press while filming on a hillside near Alma Al-Shaab, southern Lebanon.
Reuters video journalist Issam Abdallah was killed. AFP photojournalist Christina Assi lost her leg. Five others were injured.
Investigations by AFP, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and the United Nations all concluded the strike was deliberate.
"Despite extensive evidence of a war crime … Israel has faced zero accountability," said Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) President Jodie Ginsberg in a 2024 report.
"All over Palestine and in southern Lebanon, the primary aim of assassinating all these journalists has been to prevent the dissemination of what is happening on these fronts to the rest of the world," Malekafzali said. "They attack reporters no matter what network they're from … as long as they are focused on exposing Israeli atrocities."
Reporting from the front lines in Gaza and the West Bank
File Photo: A Palestinian woman holds the body of her son, killed in an Israeli strike. Photo courtesy of Salma Al-Qaddoumi's Instagram.
By the second month of the ongoing genocide, Gaza had already become the world's most dangerous environment for journalists.
On a blistering August morning, journalists Ibrahim Muhareb, Salma Al-Qaddoumi, Ezzedine Muasher, Rasha Ahmed, and Saeed Al-Lulu were documenting displacement in Gaza's Hamad City when an Israeli tank opened fire. Muhareb was shot in the leg. Al-Qaddoumi and her friend Mahmoud rushed to carry him to safety.
"But snipers opened fire on us. Ibrahim [Muhareb] was killed. Mahmoud was wounded. I was shot in the back—the bullet exited near my heart. I was clearly marked as press. I wore my vest. And yet, they aimed at us deliberately," Al-Qaddoumi told Ahram Online.
Since October 2023, at least 226 journalists have been killed, 430 injured, 48 detained, and 119 media offices or institutions destroyed in Palestine—mostly in Gaza—according to the Palestinian Journalists Syndicate (PJS). The PJS also reported that the number of journalists killed represents nearly 20 percent of all Palestinian journalists.
"For over twenty months, we've tried to deliver Gaza's image to the world," says Al-Qaddoumi. "But we are exhausted—physically, emotionally, spiritually. We are weary of capturing massacres, of photographing shredded bodies."
"Gaza needed its story told. The displacement was relentless, the bombing spared no neighbourhood, and there simply weren't enough journalists to document every massacre," she explained.
Al-Qaddoumi was nearly killed doing just that.
File Photo: A woman holding her children's hands, with several Israeli Army vehicles behind her in Jenin, the occupied West Bank. Photo courtesy of Obada Tahayna's Instagram .
In the northern West Bank, Obada Tahayna, Jenin-based correspondent for Al Jazeera and Free Palestine TV, faces the same threat.
"In Jenin, being a journalist is extremely hazardous. Every day could be my last," Tahayna told Ahram Online.
Since 21 January, Israel has carried out its most expansive military operation in the West Bank since 2002.
"The vest no longer offers protection," Tahayna says. "It's a target. The occupation forces recognise it. That makes you a target for attack, pursuit, and detention."
He has been beaten, detained, and had his phone confiscated—but persists.
"If we fall silent, it would be as if nothing ever occurred."
Media coverage of the West Bank was severely curtailed after Israel closed the Al Jazeera media office in Ramallah last September.
When did journalists become targets of war?
The deliberate targeting of media workers has become increasingly systematic.
In 2001, the United States bombed Al Jazeera's Kabul office during its invasion of Afghanistan. In 2003, it struck the network's Baghdad bureau, killing Palestinian correspondent Tareq Ayyoub. Both incidents were never meaningfully investigated. In 2007, leaked US military footage—later published by WikiLeaks as "Collateral Murder"—showed a helicopter crew killing civilians, including two Reuters journalists in Iraq, laughing as they opened fire.
In asymmetric conflicts, especially in the digital age, narrative warfare is as decisive as territory.
"The Israeli narrative spreads rapidly and is presented as the sole truth," Tahayna says.
The journalist thus becomes not just an observer but a counter-narrator.
"The Palestinian journalist does not merely transmit news. He is part of the event itself—threatened, under pressure, yet resolute. Perhaps the world doesn't realise how much we risk so people may see—not for personal gain."
Today, journalists are increasingly seen as affiliates, particularly those working for national broadcasters, local agencies, or partisan outlets. Their presence challenges the monopoly of official narratives, and their footage often outpaces state messaging.
The limits of international protection
Despite protections under international humanitarian law, its application remains inconsistent.
The 2002 killing of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl sparked global outrage and immediate diplomatic pressure. The US government launched high-level investigations, resulting in arrests and convictions.
File Photo: Al Jazeera journalist Shireen Abu Akleh. AFP
By contrast, the killing of Shireen Abu Akleh in 2022—filmed, verified, and acknowledged even by Western allies—has led only to prolonged inquiries, tepid statements, and no justice.
Journalists from the Global South are often seen not as independent professionals but as extensions of their geographic or political contexts.
Groups such as Reporters Sans Frontières (RSF), the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ), and CPJ continue to track deaths, demand inquiries, and issue press freedom alerts. However, much of their work yields only expressions of solidarity, rather than justice.
Malekafzali summed it up:
"Reporters can be maimed, killed, obliterated … but they will always be fundamentally untrustworthy to the West unless they've been granted access to its vaulted institutions."
"The Israeli victims are foregrounded," he stressed. "We know many of their names by now, even if we don't live there. But we rarely know about the Palestinians, Lebanese, and now Iranians killed by the Israeli army—except as numbers in the death toll."
"We will not be silenced"
Despite the risks, journalists continue working—not because they are safe, but because the world needs their voices.
"If I could capture just one photo that carries my voice to the world," Al-Qaddoumi says, "I would want it to show Gaza's beauty—the children, the youth, the women. Gaza is full of talent, creativity, brilliance. And yet many of those vibrant young people are now amputees—or martyrs. Why? For what crime?"
"To me, photography is an act of resistance. It is documentation. It is a message of steadfastness. We are here, on the ground. And we will not be silenced," she concludes.
Follow us on:
Facebook
Instagram
Whatsapp
Short link:

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Securing sovereignty: Why Yemen matters for Egypt and the Gulf
Securing sovereignty: Why Yemen matters for Egypt and the Gulf

Al-Ahram Weekly

time7 hours ago

  • Al-Ahram Weekly

Securing sovereignty: Why Yemen matters for Egypt and the Gulf

Real sovereignty demands clarity. Yemen must engage regionally not as a subordinate actor, but as a partner seeking stability, development, and long-term prosperity. The recent 12-day war between Israel and Iran—and the subsequent ceasefire—has reignited urgent questions about fragile states caught in regional crossfires. In Yemen's case, this moment of respite highlights the perils of tying domestic peace to external power shifts. For too long, Yemen's crisis has been viewed mainly through the prism of Iranian interference. This narrow framing oversimplifies the collapse of the Yemeni state and reinforces a failed strategy: waiting for geopolitical winds to deliver national salvation. The Houthis are not merely a proxy. They represent an entrenched authoritarian project with ideological and structural roots that precede their alignment with Tehran. To stake Yemen's recovery on weakening Iran is to gamble its future on forces indifferent to its sovereignty. Moreover, placing full blame on Iran allows Yemeni elites to evade responsibility. State institutions did not fail in a vacuum—they eroded through internal mismanagement, exclusionary politics, and the absence of a shared national vision. Iran exploited that vacuum; it did not create it. Polarization and the erosion of national agency Yemen's political landscape remains fractured by regional alignments that often prioritize external interests over national imperatives. Some actors gravitate toward the Iranian axis, while others lean unconditionally toward Gulf-led coalitions, often without clear terms of engagement or sovereignty safeguards. The core challenge is to distinguish between strategic partnership and political dependency. Gulf engagement is essential—geographically and economically—but it must be rooted in mutual respect and national agency, not transactional subordination. Real sovereignty demands clarity. Yemen must engage regionally not as a subordinate actor, but as a partner seeking stability, development, and long-term prosperity. Yemen and the Gulf: Integration without concession Yemen's future is inextricably linked to the Gulf. Its geography—bordering Saudi Arabia and Oman, and straddling the Red and Arabian Seas—places it at the heart of the Arabian Peninsula's security architecture. But geographic proximity must translate into purposeful policy. Yemen's integration with the Gulf should be deliberate and principled—anchored in fairness, shared interests, and respect for its unique challenges. Integration does not mean abandoning sovereignty. When conducted on equitable terms, it strengthens it. This principle applies beyond the Gulf. The Bab el-Mandeb Strait, connecting the Red Sea to the Gulf of Aden, is vital not only to Yemen and the Gulf states but also to Egypt's maritime and economic security. Instability in Yemen threatens the Red Sea corridor, a strategic waterway essential for Egyptian interests and global trade. Egypt's Red Sea stakes Egypt's strategic posture makes it a natural stakeholder in Yemen's stabilization. As a Red Sea power and a central Arab actor, Egypt has both the interest and capacity to play a constructive role—through diplomacy, economic engagement, and maritime coordination. Securing Red Sea trade routes aligns directly with Egypt's priorities: safeguarding Suez Canal revenues, curbing arms trafficking, and securing its southern maritime flank. As such, Egypt's involvement in Yemen's stabilization should not be peripheral. It is a core national interest. Moreover, Egypt can offer a balancing voice, supporting Yemen's reintegration into the Gulf system while advocating for inclusive political frameworks and respect for national sovereignty. Its historical leadership in Arab diplomacy positions it to bridge gaps and reduce the zero-sum logic that has long plagued Yemen's external engagements. From conflict arena to constructive partner For Yemen to escape its current trap, it must reimagine sovereignty—not as isolation, but as the capacity to choose partnerships that empower national institutions. This shift requires building a political project that unites rather than fragments: development-oriented, citizenship-based, and institutionally grounded. Yemen must not remain a passive arena for foreign rivalries. It must become an active partner in shaping its own region. This means engaging Gulf states from a position of dignity while also cultivating strategic partnerships with Egypt and others committed to Red Sea stability. The opportunity is real. As the Middle East's geopolitical map is redrawn, so too is the space for formerly sidelined states to assert their relevance. Yemen can either be absorbed into the calculations of others or reclaim its rightful place through clarity of vision and strategic diplomacy. With Gulf partnership and Egyptian engagement, Yemen's sovereignty need not be a distant aspiration. It can be a foundational pillar of a new regional order—one based not on axes and dependencies, but on cooperation, balance, and mutual respect. *The writer is a Yemeni diplomat, academic, and political advisor. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:

Trump administration threatens new Harvard cuts over Jewish rights - International
Trump administration threatens new Harvard cuts over Jewish rights - International

Al-Ahram Weekly

time7 hours ago

  • Al-Ahram Weekly

Trump administration threatens new Harvard cuts over Jewish rights - International

The Trump administration on Monday accused Harvard of violating the civil rights of its Jewish and Israeli students and threatened to cut off all federal funding if the university does not take urgent action. Harvard has been at the forefront of Donald Trump's campaign against top US universities after it defied his calls to submit to oversight of its curriculum, staffing, student recruitment and "viewpoint diversity." Trump and his allies claim that Harvard and other prestigious universities are unaccountable bastions of liberal, anti-conservative bias and anti-Semitism. In a letter sent to the president of Harvard, a federal task force accused it of failing to protect the students during campus protests against Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza. Following an investigation, the task force concluded that "Harvard has been in some cases deliberately indifferent, and in others has been a willful participant in anti-Semitic harassment of Jewish students, faculty, and staff," according to the letter. The letter went on to say that the majority of Jewish students at Harvard felt they suffer discrimination on campus, while a quarter felt physically unsafe. "Jewish and Israeli students were assaulted and spit on; they hid their kippahs for fear of being harassed and concealed their Jewish identity from classmates for fear of ostracization," the letter said. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Harvard was in violation of civil rights legislation and "if you break federal law, you should not be receiving federal tax dollars." The school said it strongly disagreed with the government's findings as it "has taken substantive, proactive steps to address the root causes of antisemitism in its community." The Trump administration has also sought to remove Harvard from an electronic student immigration registry and instructed US embassies around the world to deny visas to international students hoping to attend the Massachusetts-based university. Harvard has sued the Department of Homeland Security and other agencies to block the efforts, arguing that they were illegal and unconstitutional and the courts have put those moves on hold for now. International students accounted for 27 percent of total enrollment at Harvard in the 2024-2025 academic year and are a major source of income. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:

PHOTO GALLERY: Israeli strikes shatter Palestinians' moment of escapism at cafe
PHOTO GALLERY: Israeli strikes shatter Palestinians' moment of escapism at cafe

Al-Ahram Weekly

time7 hours ago

  • Al-Ahram Weekly

PHOTO GALLERY: Israeli strikes shatter Palestinians' moment of escapism at cafe

Palestinians check an area of a cafe that was damaged in an Israeli strike, Gaza City. AP Palestinians check an area of a cafe that was damaged in an Israeli strike, Gaza City. AP The mother of the Palestinian journalist Ismail Abu Hatab, who was killed in an Israeli strike on a cafe, mourns over the body of her son as she stands outside the Shifa Hospital, Gaza City. AP The mother of the Palestinian journalist Ismail Abu Hatab, who was killed in an Israeli strike on a cafe, mourns over the body of her son as she stands outside the Shifa Hospital, Gaza City. AP A Palestinian wounded in an Israeli strike is treated in the Shifa Hospital, Gaza City. AP A Palestinian wounded in an Israeli strike is treated in the Shifa Hospital, Gaza City. AP Palestinians check an area of a cafe that was damaged in an Israeli strike, Gaza City. AP Palestinians check an area of a cafe that was damaged in an Israeli strike, Gaza City. AP A man carries a child, who was killed in an Israeli strike, as he walks outside the Shifa Hospital, Gaza City. AP A man carries a child, who was killed in an Israeli strike, as he walks outside the Shifa Hospital, Gaza City. AP Palestinians mourn over the bodies of people who were killed in Israeli strikes, as they stand outside the Shifa Hospital, Gaza City. AP Palestinians mourn over the bodies of people who were killed in Israeli strikes, as they stand outside the Shifa Hospital, Gaza City. AP A man carries a child, who was wounded in an Israeli strike, after being treated in the Shifa Hospital, Gaza City. AP A man carries a child, who was wounded in an Israeli strike, after being treated in the Shifa Hospital, Gaza City. AP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store