One in five first home buyers turn to the bank of Mum and Dad
New research from comparison site Finder has revealed that almost 20 per cent of new home buyers dipped into the bank of mum and dad to purchase their new home.
The Finder's First Home Buyer Report 2025 - based on a survey of more than 1000 first home buyers in Australia - found almost 1 in 5 (17 per cent) of first home buyers received financial help from their parents to save their deposit.
Know the news with the 7NEWS app: Download today
This equates to almost 20,000 first home buyers a year who are now lucky enough to receive financial assistance from their parents.
The report also revealed that the proportion of new buyers tapping into the bank of mum and dad has increased significantly from just 11 per cent in 2022.
Sarah Megginson, personal finance expert at Finder, said millions of Aussies are now counting on the bank of mum and dad to secure a home in Australia.
"The bank of mum and dad has become one of the biggest unofficial lenders in the country," Megginson said.
"For many young Australians, homeownership feels like a dream that won't be realised, unless you've got parents who can tip in some financial help - sometimes up to six figures," she added.
She said first home buyers with parental help aren't just getting into the property market earlier, they are also getting in "with more savings, bigger budgets, and a huge head start."
The report reveals first home buyers who receive financial support from their parents had 41 per cent more money left over in savings after buying their first home, compared to those who didn't receive any money from their parents.
The research also found that for buyers without family support, 40 per cent took five years or more to save a deposit.
In comparison, among buyers who received assistance, just 29 per cent took five years or more to save for a house.
The other top strategies young Australians use to save for their first home include living at home with their parents (21 per cent of first home buyers); spending less on dining out (20 per cent); and taking on a second job (17 per cent).
Meanwhile, the number of first home buyers who said they simply saved slowly over a long period of time fell from 23 per cent in 2022 to 17 per cent.
While increasing numbers of parents are supporting their children to buy their first home,
Megginson warned that too much generosity from parents' could hurt their own standard of living in retirement.
"Supporting your kids is part and parcel of being a parent, but you need to do it in a way that's sustainable for everyone," she said.
"I've heard of parents who end up working longer than they planned, delaying retirement or leaving themselves financially short once they retire, because they were too generous when giving their kids a financial leg-up," she warned.
The report also found that the percentage of first home buyers who bought out of a worry that property prices would soon become too expensive has increased from 31 per cent in 2022 to 38 per cent in 2025.
Meanwhile, 60 per cent of first home buyers say recent interest rate cuts influenced their decision to buy now.
However, the survey also revealed that nearly two in three, or 65 per cent of first home buyers, spend or expect to spend 30 per cent or more of their income on mortgage repayments, placing them in mortgage stress.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
3 hours ago
- Sky News AU
'Wake up call': Securty expert says Australians must take security more seriously following ASIO boss' espionage warning
Strategic Analysis Australia founder and Director Peter Jennings told Sky News host Steve Price that comments made by the boss of ASIO should be a wake-up call to all Australians on the threat foreign espionage poses. ASIO chief Mike Burgess at a conference in Adelaide revealed foreign espionage was costing the Australian economy $12.5 billion a year as he unveiled the inaugural cost of espionage report. Reacting on Sky News on Friday, Mr Jennings told host Steve Price that it was not surprising. 'This is industrial level espionage and intellectual property theft," he said. 'And of course it's being directed against Australia because we're a high technology country with very significant alliance relations with the United States and other developed economies, and it will be happening all the time.' Mr Jennings said that Australia needed to be taking steps to protect its military and economy from people who were looking to take advantage of the situation, adding that businesses needed to be aware of the risks they are facing. 'Mike Burgess touches on this in his speech as well, how naive Australians are to imagine that it couldn't possibly happen here or it wouldn't happen to my business,' he said. 'And Mike actually quotes Australian officials saying, oh, well, no one would be interested in going after my information. This is industrial level espionage and intellectual property theft' Mr Burgess on Thursday said "Many entities do not know their secrets have been stolen, or do not realise they've been stolen by espionage, or do not report the theft.' He also said that there were many countries that were committing this espionage. 'The obvious candidates are very active – I've previously named China, Russia and Iran – but many other countries are also targeting anyone and anything that could give them a strategic or tactical advantage, including sensitive but unclassified information.' Mr Burgess also said that he could not understand why some people were mentioning on social media that they carried a security clearance. "On just one professional networking site, the profiles of more than 35,000 Australians indicate they have access to sensitive and potentially classified information. Around 7,000 reference their work in the defence sector, including the specific project they are working on, the team they are working in, and the critical technologies they are working with," he said. "Close to 400 explicitly say they work on AUKUS, and the figure rises above 2,000 if you include broader references to 'submarines' and 'nuclear'.
Sydney Morning Herald
8 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
We are running the race to retirement riches backward
We've been sold a dream that kicks in at 60, 65 or 67. First by governments promising age pensions back in the early 1900s, and now by the superannuation industry selling glossy visions of leisure and freedom. And the planning for it? That usually happens just before people stop working – often too late to reshape anything meaningful. But for a growing number of Australians, it's not retirement itself that shapes their future. It's the decade or so before it. That's the window where you still have time to make strategic decisions – about money, work, lifestyle, and how you want the next 30 years to feel. The problem is that the word retirement still sounds like the end. It feels old. And for many people in their 50s, thinking too far ahead feels uncomfortable. They put off planning, or assume their super will take care of itself, or just hope things will work out. But by the time they're ready to engage, they're often left asking, 'why didn't I know this sooner?' The truth is, the best retirements don't start at 65 or 67. They start in your 50s, with practical decisions that give you more flexibility and less pressure – now and later. That might mean getting serious about salary sacrificing or topping up your super while you're still earning well and getting it into the position where, if it compounds at a long-term return rate of 7 to 10 per cent over 15 years ahead, before you retire, that it will be 'enough'. And you can even forecast that in your late 40s or 50s. It could mean getting the mortgage under control as early as you can once the kids are (finally) off your hands. Or thinking differently about your home versus investment mix, and perhaps choosing to downsize and shift money into superannuation once the downsizing window, which so many people are unaware of, opens at the age of 55. That's when the government allows you to put in up to $300,000 per person from the sale of your principal residence if you've owned it for 10 years or more.
The Age
8 hours ago
- The Age
We are running the race to retirement riches backward
We've been sold a dream that kicks in at 60, 65 or 67. First by governments promising age pensions back in the early 1900s, and now by the superannuation industry selling glossy visions of leisure and freedom. And the planning for it? That usually happens just before people stop working – often too late to reshape anything meaningful. But for a growing number of Australians, it's not retirement itself that shapes their future. It's the decade or so before it. That's the window where you still have time to make strategic decisions – about money, work, lifestyle, and how you want the next 30 years to feel. The problem is that the word retirement still sounds like the end. It feels old. And for many people in their 50s, thinking too far ahead feels uncomfortable. They put off planning, or assume their super will take care of itself, or just hope things will work out. But by the time they're ready to engage, they're often left asking, 'why didn't I know this sooner?' The truth is, the best retirements don't start at 65 or 67. They start in your 50s, with practical decisions that give you more flexibility and less pressure – now and later. That might mean getting serious about salary sacrificing or topping up your super while you're still earning well and getting it into the position where, if it compounds at a long-term return rate of 7 to 10 per cent over 15 years ahead, before you retire, that it will be 'enough'. And you can even forecast that in your late 40s or 50s. It could mean getting the mortgage under control as early as you can once the kids are (finally) off your hands. Or thinking differently about your home versus investment mix, and perhaps choosing to downsize and shift money into superannuation once the downsizing window, which so many people are unaware of, opens at the age of 55. That's when the government allows you to put in up to $300,000 per person from the sale of your principal residence if you've owned it for 10 years or more.
