Leary claims minister not doing job for seniors
Answers by the Minister to Official Information requests and Written Parliamentary questions show she has not taken any papers under the Seniors portfolio to cabinet between taking office in late 2023 and the end of March this year.
A search on the Beehive website shows only one press release from Costello as the Minister for Seniors since the term started.
Leary is the Labour Party's spokesperson for Seniors and said Costello had done more to "help big tobacco than the older New Zealanders she has responsibility to protect the rights and interests of".
"One of the very first things Casey Costello announced as minister was to overturn ground-breaking smokefree legislation that would have saved thousands of lives.
"She also championed a $216 million tax break to encourage use of a tobacco product without proof it would reduce smoking rates, but would definitely profit big tobacco."
By contrast, Leary said Costello "hadn't presented a single Cabinet paper to Cabinet, her party or ministerial colleagues since coming into government in late 2023 to March 2025" and she needed to "prove she's worth her portfolio" by advocating for the rights and interests of seniors.
Leary suggested that could be done by bringing forward the Retirement Villages Act review and by advocating for pay equity in the care and support workforce who look after "many of our grandparents, parents and ourselves in our later years".
But Costello, a New Zealand First MP, rejected the accusation, saying it showed the Labour MP did not know what the government was doing to support older Kiwis.
The Office for Seniors (OFS) was a small office that did not administer legislation and "has never been a large generator of Cabinet papers", she said.
"Cabinet papers are not a measure of either the government's commitment to older New Zealanders, or my focus and effort as Minister for Seniors."
The OFS helped her work across government to deliver better results for older people, Costello said.
Some of that work required her to work with other ministers including, for example, the changes to allow people to build subsidiary dwellings and the Retirement Village review.
"And a substantial part of our policy programme for seniors is around improving aged care, which I'm responsible for as Associate Health Minister."
Costello said older New Zealanders could be assured every commitment made to them in the NZ First-National coalition agreement would be met this during this government's term.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
2 hours ago
- Newsroom
When it's worth waiting for democracy
Undemocratic and a breach of human rights. That's what most experts and officials think of the Government's proposed changes to the electoral law. Last week Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith announced a suite of changes around who can vote and how they do so. Those include more opportunity for digital enrolment methods and introduce automatic enrolment updates. But the big one is the moving of the enrolment deadline. At the last election, you could rock up on election day, enrol and cast your vote at the same time. But under this bill New Zealanders would have to enrol 13 days before election day to be eligible to vote. Goldsmith says it's to ensure a final election result is achieved sooner but he's being met with fierce critics, including from some within his own party who think the change takes things a step too far. While entities like the Ministry of Justice can, and do, offer advice in the form of policy papers and regulatory impact statements, electoral law expert Graeme Edgeler says the final decision falls on the shoulders of who New Zealanders have elected to represent them – the politicians. 'The Government and the MPs are the ones that are elected, so they get to make the policy calls and argue for them and the opposition, if they want to, gets to argue against them,' he says. Edgeler says the Ministry of Justice had its own suggestions for reducing the number of special votes, for example, automatic enrolment updates. 'So if you tell MSD, 'Here's my new address,' they'll tell the Electoral Commission, 'Hey, this person has updated their address with us'; the Electoral Commission will see person's already enrolled … and so your enrolment should be updated automatically now,' he says. The Government took this suggestion on board, but Edgeler says stopping enrolment 13 days before election day takes things a step further. Goldsmith told RNZ that people don't start coalition negotiations until they know the final outcome. But while it might be a political preference to wait until the special votes are counted, Edgeler says there's nothing legally stopping politicians from starting negotiations as soon as election day finishes. 'The John Key-led National government, when it was first elected, it had its coalition negotiations complete and John Key was sworn in as Prime Minister before the special votes were announced,' he says. Edgeler says that's because the initial count on election night made the result clear, and he thinks that was the case with the last election as well. 'Prime Minister Chris Hipkins came out on election night and said, 'We've lost, we're not going to be the next government,' he says. National, Act and NZ First could have started coalition negotiations that same day if they had wanted to, so Edgeler doesn't think special votes delaying coalition negotiations is a good enough reason to push the enrolment deadline out to 13 days. Newsroom's political editor Laura Walters confirms that waiting until the final result is announced before starting negotiations is the preference of some political leaders. 'Winston Peters, the New Zealand First Leader, he doesn't like to actually start negotiations proper, if you will, until they have that final result back,' she says. Walters says Peters told her advanced enrolment also benefited political parties. 'He said if people don't enrol ahead of that voting period how do they know who they're campaigning to, who their message should be pushed towards,' she says. David Seymour was more blunt in his support of the change, saying only 'dropkicks' enrol on election day. But Walters says those 'dropkicks' include quite a broad sector of society. 'What we do know from Electoral Commission data is that these people tend to be younger, we've also seen a higher proportion of Māori and Pasifika and Asian, but especially Māori,' she says. Walters adds renters and people who move around a lot and forget to update their enrolment details as people who might also be caught out by these changes. Exactly how many people will be impacted by this change is unclear, but if last election is anything to go by, Walters expects the number of people impacted is in the hundreds of thousands. 'There were 450,000 people who registered or enrolled to vote during that advanced voting period and 110,000 people did that on election day,' she says. It's these figures the Attorney-General Judith Collins referred to in her report examining whether or not there was enough justified reason behind the changes to the election law. She ruled that denying voters the political franchise is a 'heavy price' to pay just to have the election result a week or two sooner. Aside from the automatic enrolment update Walters says reaction to the bill has been mostly negative. 'Essentially people are saying nothing should ever be done to suppress or reduce the number of people who are able to vote. Anyone who is eligible to vote, eligible to register to vote, should be given every opportunity to exercise that right. 'Is this worth it? Should the Government and the Electoral Commission be bearing a little bit more administrative cost, a little bit more administrative burden, maybe waiting a little bit longer after the election to get the results, isn't that just the cost of democracy?'
Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
Greens Launch Petition Against Govt's Attack On Democracy
The Green Party has launched a petition calling on the Government to keep its hands off voting rights. 'We cannot allow this Government to rob New Zealanders of their democratic rights,' says the Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson. 'Make no mistake, the Government is making calculated changes to electoral law that erode the democratic rights of regular people and play into the hands of a wealthy few. 'By blocking voters and also opening the floodgates for anonymous donations from the rich, this Government is distorting the settings of our democracy in their favour. 'Who gets to vote and who gets to influence Parliament, decides the future of our country. These laws slam the door on everyday people while rolling out the red carpet for wealthy donors who bankroll parties in this Coalition Government. 'We are calling on the Prime Minister and the Minister of Justice to drop this anti-democratic legislation. 'A Green Government will reverse these rollbacks: restoring same-day enrolment, reinstating voting rights for prisoners, cleaning up campaign finance and extending the vote to 16-year-olds. 'Democracy is for everyone, we should be expanding voting and participation, not restricting it,' says Marama Davidson.
RNZ News
7 hours ago
- RNZ News
Oral Questions for Wednesday 30 July 2025
Questions to Ministers Hon MARAMA DAVIDSON to the Prime Minister: E tautoko ana ia i nga korero me nga mahi katoa a tona Kawanatanga? Does he stand by all of his Government's statements and actions? Dr VANESSA WEENINK to the Minister of Finance: What recent announcements has she made about competition? Rt Hon CHRIS HIPKINS to the Prime Minister: Does he stand by all of his Government's statements and actions? CATHERINE WEDD to the Minister of Transport: What steps has he taken to reduce councils' use of road cones in New Zealand? Hon PEENI HENARE to the Minister of Foreign Affairs: Does he stand by his statement that "It is a matter of when, not if, New Zealand will recognise Palestine Statehood"; if not, why not? CHLÖE SWARBRICK to the Prime Minister: E tautoko ana ia i nga korero me nga mahi katoa a tona Kawanatanga? Does he stand by all of his Government's statements and actions? GRANT McCALLUM to the Minister of Agriculture: What recent reports has he seen on farmer confidence? Hon Dr AYESHA VERRALL to the Minister of Health: Does he stand by his statement that "Patient safety is critical to ensure Kiwis have confidence in our healthcare systems"? CAMERON BREWER to the Minister of Commerce and Consumer Affairs: What recent announcement has the Government made about increasing transparency at the checkout? Hon WILLOW-JEAN PRIME to the Minister of Education: Does she agree with Erica Stanford, who said in 2023 that "we're in a cost of living crisis and everyone is feeling the pinch really, really badly. Teachers are no different than anyone else"; if so, how will a proposed one percent pay increase help secondary teachers with the cost of living crisis? LAURA McCLURE to the Minister for Workplace Relations and Safety: What recent announcements has she made on health and safety reform? DEBBIE NGAREWA-PACKER to the Prime Minister: Does he stand by all his Government's statements and actions? To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
