logo
‘The streets are empty, no one dares go outside': Syria's Alawites terrorised by revenge killings

‘The streets are empty, no one dares go outside': Syria's Alawites terrorised by revenge killings

The Guardian15-03-2025
When armed men entered Hayan's house last Friday, he thought he was going to be killed like his neighbours before him. Militants dragged him outside, threw him to the ground and started shooting right above his head, making it so he could no longer hear the insults they lobbed at him for being a member of the country's minority Islamic Alawite sect.
Hayan was lucky – they chose merely to scare not kill him – but by the time the rampage finally ended, 25 residents of the Alawite town of Salhab, northwest Syria, were dead. They included a 90-year-old local religious figure whom militants killed after forcing him to watch them murder his son.
Such massacres had become a feature of Syria's 14-year civil war, but Salhab's violence last week took place during some of the country's deadliest days since the beginning of the war itself. Besides the high death toll, what marked these killings as different — and a dark omen for the country's future — is that many were carried out by militants nominally a part of the new Syrian army created by the country's new president.
The massacres brought into question the ability of Syria's government to control its ranks and the challenges of reining in the patchwork of militias that currently control the country.
Fighting started when fighters loyal to ousted Syrian president Bashar al-Assad launched a coordinated attack on Syrian government forces across the country's coast on 6 March, prompting the government to call for help. Thousands of armed individuals and several rebel groups answered the call. The incensed militias and crowds carried out a wave of revenge attacks against members of Syria's Alawite community, the same sect from which Assad hailed, though most had nothing to do with the former regime. Massacres in most Alawite villages ensued.
In total, the four days of fighting left more than 1,000 people dead, including 745 civilians, many of whom were killed in revenge attacks targeting the sect. In addition, Assad loyalists killed 211 members of the Syrian security forces and 228 civilians.
Experts have pointed to two factions, Abu Amsha's Sultan Suleiman Shah brigade and the Hamzat division, as being responsible for the bulk of killing of civilians and unarmed prisoners during the explosion of violence on Syria's coast last week. Both rebel groups were previously affiliated with the Turkish-backed Syrian National Army. Both factions and their leaders are under US sanctions for alleged serious human rights abuses, including rape and torture.
Abu Amsha said in a post on x that his division adhered to orders from Syria's ministry of defence and said that news of their participation in massacres was 'propaganda.' He added that every member of his faction are 'subject to the law and accountability.'
'The vast majority of the violations were committed by Abu Amsha's [faction] and Hamzat. Lots of residents were asking government security forces to defend them from those factions,' said Fadel Abdulghany, the founder of the Syrian Network for Human Rights (SNHR).
Along with dozens of other armed groups, the two factions have only recently been integrated into Syria's new army, led by the now-disbanded Islamist rebel group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS).
HTS, the leader of the rebel coalition which ousted the Assad regime on 8 December, dissolved all armed factions in the country, including itself, and announced they would be integrated into the new Syrian army.
In practice, however, the government has struggled to integrate military factions and exercises limited control over them.
'Currently it appears that the integration of SNA factions into the ministry of defence has only occurred at a symbolic level,' said Alexander McKeever, researcher and author of a weekly newsletter on northern Syria. 'The institutional ties are weak so HTS's tools in terms of cracking down are limited,' he added.
Syria's president, Ahmed al-Sharaa, has promised that all those who killed or abused civilians on Syria's coast last week will be held accountable, even if they are allies of HTS.
'We will hold accountable, with full decisiveness, anyone who is involved in the bloodshed of civilians, mistreats civilians, exceeds the state's authority or exploits power for personal gain. No one will be above the law,' Sharaa said.
It's unclear if Sharaa can indeed hold accountable some of the very same factions who helped bring him to power, for fear of alienating militias who could provoke instability or even conflict in Syria. If he does not punish those militias who massacred civilians, he will alienate many citizens of Syria, who would be reminded of regime figures slaughtering their countrymen with impunity.
The slaughter of civilians on Syria's coast has also given the international community pause about lifting sanctions. Syria has been under US sanctions since 1979, which intensified after the Assad regime's brutal crackdown on protesters in 2011.
Syria's new authorities have made the lifting of sanctions one of its top priorities, to help its ailing economy and allow it to build a functional state with a professional army.
The killing of Alawite civilians deeply disturbed evangelical members of the Trump White House, who viewed the protection of Syria's religious minorities as a key benchmark for the new government.
'They only have one agenda about Syria and that's Christians. They don't care if the rest of the country goes to hell. And they were furious about what happened last week,' said Kamal Alam, a non-resident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council who advises the evangelical members of the Trump team on Syria and support to Christians in the Levant.
Alam added that after last week's killings, these members of the Trump administration have sought to add the protection of all minorities to their portfolio, not just Syria's Christians. This could in turn, blunt the efforts of congresspeople who have been trying to get US sanctions lifted.
To many members of Syria's Alawite community, the damage has already been done. Almost 11,000 Syrians have fled into Lebanon since the violence on the coast, according to the UN.
'The streets are empty. No one dares go outside. All of us here cannot sleep from the fear that we will be killed in our beds,' Hayan said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gaza's aid crisis: Looting, blame and the fight for control
Gaza's aid crisis: Looting, blame and the fight for control

Telegraph

time2 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Gaza's aid crisis: Looting, blame and the fight for control

The grainy video shows a flat-bed lorry piled high with cardboard boxes, surrounded by Palestinians. Standing on top of the boxes, clear enough against the sandy backdrop, are two masked figures, both armed with Kalashnikov rifles. The IDF published the footage on Tuesday, saying it showed Hamas 'violently looting humanitarian aid' and 'preventing it reaching the civilian population of Gaza'. Purportedly shot on Friday, the video acts as 'further evidence that Hamas is the primary obstacle to the delivery of humanitarian aid', the military said. In the maelstrom of claim and counterclaim over Gaza – where foreign journalists are banned – pictures and footage such as this have taken centre stage in the propaganda battle over what is really going on with the delivery of aid. It is an argument that entered a new phase this week, after Israel enacted daily pauses in fighting in three highly populated areas, and established 'safe' corridors, following a torrent of international criticism Hamas says it provides security for aid from looters and gangs. The UN, WHO, dozens of other NGOs, and several of Israel's key allies (Britain included) say that escalating starvation in the Strip is principally caused by Israel's two-and-a-half-month total blockade up to the second half of May, followed by the lethally ineffective US-backed replacement scheme, coupled with a 'trickle' of NGO aid trucks since then. Further arresting imagery emerged on Tuesday, this time taken from a satellite and showing what appeared to be hundreds of people swamping aid trucks in Khan Younis. Gaza's famine was thus 'visible from space'. One thing all sides agree on is that looting is a widespread problem. Mobile phone footage taken on top of a truck also showed hundreds swamping an aid vehicle. Israel claims Hamas is looting the aid in a concerted effort to steal it for its own fighters and to fill its coffers, with a parallel aim of depriving civilians of food, thus enabling 'useful idiots' in the West to accuse the Jewish state of deliberately starving Palestinians. Hamas denies this. However, given the terror group's track record of using Palestinians as human shields, critics say it is unlikely they will not be seizing the food and supplies for themselves when opportunities arise. The UN and the international humanitarian community concedes that there is significant looting of its vehicles, including since the IDF improved access on Sunday. They put this down to a number of factors, including the inevitable instability caused by, they say, Israel's starvation of the civilian population through its military blockade. The organisations also blame what they describe as the IDF's reluctance to work with them to ensure the safety of their convoys, thus reducing the number of truck deliveries they can even attempt, let alone complete. In one sense, this current row was triggered, or at least escalated, by the IDF's publication last week of drone footage of a vast open-air storage site just inside the Gaza perimeter at the Karem Shalom Crossing in the south of the enclave. According to the military, it showed enough aid to fill 1,000 lorries which had been cleared for delivery but left languishing by the UN. The implication was – and this was briefed off the record by certain officials – that the UN either was not capable or could not be bothered to pass the food, clean water, medical supplies and fuel to ordinary Gazans. Some anonymous officials even suggested the UN was privately supportive of Hamas. The UN hit back, saying that, in practice, Israel was placing practical and bureaucratic hurdles in the way of successful deliveries. Towards the end of last week, the UN's Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs published a more detailed explanation of what those hurdles allegedly were. One of the principal accusations was that, amid a disintegrating situation in the Strip, the IDF was effectively refusing to work with the UN to provide safe routes for its trucks. Last week, the Times of Israel newspaper quoted one senior Israeli defence official as saying that nearly all of the trucks heading to warehouses of aid organisations and the UN were being looted by Gazan mobs, not Hamas. Barak Ravid, an Israeli journalist renowned for his access to senior officials, reported on the N12 channel that, prior to last week, Israel had, in practice, allowed only one route for the 'safe' transfer of aid – where trucks were routinely looted. Some have suggested that this looting was in part instigated by a gang led by Yasser abu Shabab, the Bedouin leader of an anti-Hamas gang which has links to organised crime, and which it has been alleged is armed by Israel. On Tuesday, Al-Araby al-Jadeed, a London-based Arab news outlet, reported that more than half of the Egyptian aid trucks that entered Gaza on Sunday, the first day of the improved access regime, were looted, with their contents sold in local markets. Out of 130 trucks, 73 were looted on or near the Morag Corridor, a key military axis that separates Rafah from Khan Younis and is controlled by the IDF. For those who accuse Israel of a deliberate policy of starvation, which Israel strongly denies, this is further evidence. Images were also released last week of air drops of aid into Gaza. For the first time, Israel, the country controlling access on the ground, participated, sending cargo aircraft to parachute in emergency aid. The IDF published impressive footage showing infrared footage of the drops, emphasising its role in 'facilitating humanitarian assistance'. Inevitably, however, there was a counter-narrative. 'Humiliation', screamed sections of the Israeli press, referring to what they described as Benjamin Netanyahu's volte-face on the ever acrimonious question of aid.

Israel has deliberately starved the people of Gaza. It couldn't have done it without the west's help
Israel has deliberately starved the people of Gaza. It couldn't have done it without the west's help

The Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Israel has deliberately starved the people of Gaza. It couldn't have done it without the west's help

What have we done? As the UN-backed monitor declares that 'the worst-case scenario of famine is currently playing out in the Gaza Strip', this should have been the question ricocheting between the walls as Keir Starmer met Donald Trump this week. Israel's deliberate starvation of Gaza is, after all, a crime confessed to, designed and implemented in plain sight. Starmer has said the UK will recognise Palestinian statehood if Israel doesn't agree to a ceasefire and a two-state solution, but don't be beguiled: Palestinian national self-determination is an inalienable right, not a bargaining chip, and it's the most symbolic action he could take rather than, say, imposing sweeping sanctions and ending all arms sales. The hand-wringing of western politicians and media outlets will not feed Gaza's emaciated children, any more than it will absolve them of guilt. Israel's leaders have said, explicitly, repeatedly, from the very beginning, that they are deliberately starving Gaza's people. 'Man-made famine is not something that I've seen in my lifetime,' Martin Griffiths, the UN's former humanitarian chief, tells me. On 9 October 2023, Israel's then defence minister, Yoav Gallant, announced 'a complete siege on [Gaza]: no electricity, no food, no water, no fuel', justified on the grounds: 'We are fighting human animals and we act accordingly'. The next day, the Israeli general charged with humanitarian affairs in Gaza and the West Bank – Ghassan Alian – declared that the 'citizens of Gaza' were 'human beasts' who would suffer 'a total blockade on Gaza, no electricity, no water, just damage. You wanted hell, you will get hell.' The following week, the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, promised 'we will not allow humanitarian assistance in the form of food and medicines from our territory to the Gaza Strip'. These statements were not reported at all by many western media outlets – or, if they were, it was in passing and with no explanation given about their objectively illegal intent. It's as though these statements were being uttered in a parallel universe, because if they were accurately covered with due prominence, then our media would have been forced to cover Israel's onslaught as a criminal enterprise, rather than a war of self-defence. Israel's western allies knew exactly what it was up to. In March 2024, our then foreign secretary, Lord Cameron, wrote a letter setting out many ruses used by Israel to block aid from entering Gaza, yet Britain took no action. In April 2024, two US government departments concluded that Israel was deliberately blocking aid, which legally required the administration to stop supplying weapons. This was overruled by Joe Biden's team. Later that year, that same administration sent a public letter detailing Israeli aid obstructions, but Tel Aviv correctly calculated this was political posturing during the presidential election, largely ignored the demands and suffered no consequences for doing so. Israel has perpetrated the biggest slaughter of aid workers in history, killing more than 400 by the spring. It waged a relentless war against Gaza's main humanitarian agency – Unrwa, the UN's Palestinian refugee agency – and banned it from the occupied territories last October. Its military killed police officers charged with escorting aid and preventing looting. It's not just the blocking of aid from entering. Israel's onslaught has left nearly all agricultural land unusable, as well as damaging 80% of cropland. Nearly all livestock and most plant life is dead. Gaza's port and fishing vehicles have been destroyed, and Palestinians defying Israel's ban on fishing face slaughter. The massacre of starving Palestinians looking for aid has been a consistent theme. In February 2024, more than a hundred civilians waiting for flour were butchered by the Israeli military, yet – as been the case throughout the genocide – media outlets treated its denials, deflections and lies as credible claims. A detailed investigation by CNN weeks later concluded what should always have been obvious – the Israeli military was to blame – but by then attention had moved elsewhere. In March this year, Israel imposed a total siege, and replaced the UN's effective aid system with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, whose 'distribution sites' are dystopian killing fields. As the UN-backed IPC notes, that aid is not only far too little, but it is often unusable because Israel has left Palestinians without cooking gas and clean water to prepare it. More than a thousand civilians have been butchered trying to access this aid. As aid agencies have noted, the GHF is designed to coax a starved population to the south, so they can be confined in what the former Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert described as a 'concentration camp', before being deported. Despite Israel's obvious, transparent, shameless guilt, its lies are indulged by western politicians and media outlets. On Monday, Donald Trump repeated that 'a lot of the food is stolen' by Hamas. This lie has been contradicted by Cindy McCain, director of the World Food Programme, and widow to the hawkishly pro-Israel late Republican senator John McCain. An internal US government analysis found no proof, and Israeli officials have briefed that their military reached the same conclusion. Perversely, it is criminal gangs backed by Israel – which Netanyahu's own former deputy noted are linked to Islamic State – that are stealing aid. The international criminal court's arrest warrants, issued eight months ago, centred on Israel's deliberate starvation for a reason: the evidence is overwhelming. Yet even if Gaza were suddenly flooded with aid, many Palestinians would die because their bodies have been irreversibly ravaged by hunger. And that is not even on the agenda. The 73 trucks allowed in on Monday were forced to take an unsafe route, and then looted. Our own prime minister has been promoting airdrops of aid. These are pinpricks, badly targeted and have killed Palestinians when they've fallen on their heads. All they really achieve is cover for Israel, to pretend it is doing something, deflecting from its deliberate mass starvation. But what else should we expect from Starmer, who backed Israel's right to impose a siege on Gaza at the beginning of the genocide, then tried to gaslight us into believing he hadn't? What have we done? If western elites had any shame, this question would be robbing them of sleep. And the answer would be straightforward. You facilitated the mass starvation of an entire people. You knew what was happening, because of a deluge of evidence for 21 months, and because the perpetrator – your friend – repeatedly boasted to the world about its crime. Alas, the architects of this abomination will not hold themselves to account. That will be left to history – and the courts. Owen Jones is a Guardian columnist

Kazakhstan and Turkey discussed an increase in oil exports via BTC
Kazakhstan and Turkey discussed an increase in oil exports via BTC

Reuters

time2 hours ago

  • Reuters

Kazakhstan and Turkey discussed an increase in oil exports via BTC

MOSCOW/ASTANA, July 30 (Reuters) - Talks between Kazakhstan's President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev and Turkish leader Tayyip Erdogan on Tuesday included a possible increase in Kazakh oil exports via the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) oil pipeline, the press service of the head of Kazakhstan reported. "The delegations discussed issues of cooperation in the energy sector, including prospects for increasing exports via the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline," the statement said, without providing additional details. The agenda of Tokayev's visit to Turkey for a meeting of the two countries' high-level strategic cooperation council also included cooperation in power generation, agriculture and mining. Kazakhstan increased oil exports via BTC in the first half of 2025 by 12% compared to the same period last year to 785,000 tons (34,000 barrels per day), according to the state statistics. Oil is delivered to Baku by tankers via the Caspian Sea from the port of Aktau, which would need upgrading to increase export levels. Also, oil exports via BTC are limited by the quality requirements for Kazakh crude to join the pipeline. Kazakhstan in its development plan until 2029 considered the possibility of building a trans-Caspian oil pipeline and marine terminals on the Kazakh and Azerbaijani coasts of the Caspian Sea. Kazakhstan, whose main income comes from oil exports, is the world's biggest landlocked country, and the two main routes for exporting its oil to international markets pass through the Russia to its Black Sea and Baltic ports. Exports of Kazakh oil circumventing Russian ports made up just 5.9% of the total exported volume of 32.6 million tonnes in the first 6 months of 2025 and this share remained unchanged from 2024, according to state statistics. In 2022, President Tokayev called for an increase of oil exports bypassing Russia. Following this, Kazmunaigaz and Azerbaijan's state oil company SOCAR concluded an agreement, envisaging the transport of 1.5 million tonnes of oil per year from the Tengiz oil field to the BTC.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store