
Reform's new woman MP: ‘We will stand up to sexual violence from illegal migrants'
Sarah Pochin, the newly elected MP for Runcorn and Helsby, said that she was concerned by the attitudes of those in migrant hotels which she said was 'anti-Western women'.
She vowed to 'stand up for women' on the issue, which she said had been brought up to her by numerous female voters during her successful by-election campaign.
Mrs Pochin and Dame Andrea Jenkyns, the newly appointed Mayor of Greater Lincolnshire, became the first senior female politicians to be elected for Reform.
The Runcorn MP accused Labour of having 'let down' women and girls, suggesting it was because the party did not sufficiently address sexual violence by migrants.
She told The Telegraph: 'It's really important that we stand up for women. One of the relevant things here in Runcorn particularly, is we have a problem – which people don't want to talk about, but I will talk about – of illegal immigration.
'We have a problem of houses of multiple occupancy (HMOs), and the hotel that we have here, and the private landlord housing that's now being used to move them out into the community.
'That is a problem for women's safety, and that certainly is an issue that I would like to very much raise.'
The party's popularity had previously been found to be higher among men than women, particularly younger voters.
Analysis from the end of last year found that 12.9 per cent of young men in the age group voted for Reform at the general election compared to just 5.9 per cent of women.
Asked what kind of issues Reform would pursue that were of importance to women, Mrs Pochin said that she would champion the tackling of sexual violence against women and girls.
Ms Pochin said that several women in Runcorn had visited her campaign office to discuss with her 'how threatened they feel now walking home, how they don't want to let their children of either sex, but particularly girls walk home from school.'
The former magistrate of more than 20 years said that 'law and order' would be a key concern of hers.
She added: 'The more HMOs we get with these legal immigrants in them, the more the threat of drug dealing goes on, the more the threat of grooming gangs starts.
'It's very very real, and anybody that, as I say, doesn't agree with that is in utter denial.'
An asylum hotel in Daresbury, in the Runcorn and Helsby constituency, had become one of the key issues of the by-election, with both Reform and Labour's candidates calling for it to close.
'Anti-Western women'
Mrs Pochin said: 'We know that Labour has let down these issues for women's safety, and we know as well that the culture of the people in these HMOs or hotels is very much one of anti-women, and particularly anti-Western women.
'I would say it will be something that will be absolutely on my radar.'
It comes after Labour came under fire over its handling of the grooming gangs scandal, and the Government's rejection of demands for a national public inquiry.
Ministers are awaiting the findings from an audit by Baroness Casey into grooming, its scale, nature and profile of the gangs behind it, including the characteristics of offenders.
But they have come under pressure from opposition figures, including Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform UK, on the issue.
Data released in March by the Ministry of Justice revealed that 15 per cent of sexual offences, including rape, were accounted for by foreign nationals between 2021 and 2023.
Two nationalities – Afghans and Eritreans – were found to be more than 20 times more likely to account for sexual offence convictions than British citizens, according to the data.
The highest numbers of sex offence convictions were accounted for by Romanians, Poles, Indians and Pakistanis, according to data drawn from the police national computer.
Overall, foreign nationals were 71 per cent more likely than Britons to be responsible for sex crime convictions.
The Government has announced that the nationalities of foreign criminals in the UK will be published for the first time by the end of this year, under orders by the Home Secretary.
Last week, Yvette Cooper also announced that foreign sex offenders will be barred from gaining asylum.
The Home Office will receive powers to exclude any foreigners convicted of sex offences in the UK or abroad from protection under the Refugee Convention, even if their sentence is less than 12 months.
The plans were understood to have been drafted a year ago after it emerged that Abdul Ezedi, the Clapham chemical attacker, was granted asylum despite previously receiving two consecutive suspended jail sentences – of less than 12 months – for sexual assault and indecent exposure.
The announcement of the policy was seen as an attempt to stop Labour voters from abandoning the party for Reform ahead of the local elections.
But voters appeared to ditch the party in droves, including in Runcorn and Helsby, where Ms Pochin overturned a majority of over 14,000 to win by just six votes.
Reform also seized control of 10 councils, including Doncaster council from Labour.
Both Dame Andrea and Ms Pochin rejected the suggestion of a 'boys' club' image of Reform and that their election would put an end to it.
'I'm not a feminist'
Dame Andrea, a former Tory minister, said: 'I'm not a feminist. I'm a meritocrat anyway, so I won't care if the whole cabinet was men or women.'
Mrs Pochin said: 'I certainly don't consider myself as a woman in the sense of that's why I'm here. I just consider myself as a business person and with a lot to contribute.'
A Home Office source said: 'Those who come to our country should respect our laws. We are bringing in new legislation so we can more easily deport those who commit vile sexual offences.
'The Prime Minister has set out a historic mission to halve violence against women and girls in the next decade, with new plans for better protection for women and to ensure the police relentlessly pursue the perpetrators of violence against women and girls, including sexual violence.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
24 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Ukrainians are losing confidence in Zelensky
Ukraine's wartime unity has frayed. On Tuesday, hundreds of protesters congregated in Kyiv, Lviv, Dnipro and Odesa to campaign against the Verkhovna Rada's quick-fire passage of Bill 12414. This legislation subordinates Ukraine's two primary anti-corruption bodies, the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (Nabu) and Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (Sapo), to the control of a prosecutor general appointed by president Volodymyr Zelensky. Bill 12414 is provoking outrage in Ukraine for two reasons. First, it is regarded as a major step backward in Ukraine's anti-corruption struggle. During his first years in power, Zelensky was accused of using criminal investigations to undermine political rivals like pro-Russian Opposition Bloc leader Viktor Medvedchuk and former president Petro Poroshenko. This perception of selective justice reduced his popularity and sullied his reputation as a reformer. Since Russia's invasion began in February 2022, Zelensky has tried to transform that image through bold anti-corruption crackdowns. After reports were released about the Ukrainian defence ministry procuring eggs for soldiers above market prices, Zelensky dismissed his widely praised defence minister Oleksii Reznikov in September 2023; though Reznikov was not personally accused of corruption, he failed to tackle it. Zelensky also fired officials in charge of military recruitment over men escaping conscription. The Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) opened investigations into five individuals for purchasing $40 million in mortar shells that were not delivered to the Ukrainian army. While these grand gestures were widely praised by the international community and corruption-weary Ukrainians, Bill 12414 has reignited old criticisms of Zelensky's politicised approach to crime-fighting. The heated turf war between the SBU and Ukraine's anti-corruption agencies, which has seen Nabu agents raided for alleged collaboration with Russia, will only polarise Ukrainian society further. Second, it deals a major blow to Ukraine's aspirations of joining the European Union (EU), and could jeopardize long-term American support for Ukraine. The EU's enlargement commissioner Marta Kos described Bill 12414 as a 'serious step back' and insisted that Ukraine's European path hinged on independent anti-corruption agencies. Critics within the Maga movement of president Donald Trump's pro-Ukraine pivot also keenly pounced on Zelensky's decision. Georgia congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, for example, called upon Ukraine's protesters to overthrow Zelensky and reiterated her opposition to military aid to Ukraine. Bill 12414 is likely to revive calls within the Republican Party for closer auditing of arms transfers to Ukraine, which could delay vital weapons supplies to the frontline. While these rationales are ample grounds for protest, the unrest we are seeing also reflects a broader cleavage within Ukrainian society. Due to wartime martial law restrictions and the indefinite postponement of presidential elections, Zelensky has been able to consolidate near-absolute power in Ukraine. It is telling that even Zelensky's long-standing political opponents enthusiastically supported Bill 12414. Former prime minister Yulia Tymoshenko, who came third in the 2019 Ukrainian presidential elections after Zelensky and Poroshenko, accused Ukraine's Western partners of trying to control Kyiv through Nabu and Sapo. Aside from co-opting once potent opposition forces, Zelensky has also concentrated power in the hands of his unelected advisor Andriy Yermak and taken insufficient action against the harassment of anti-corruption whistleblowers. In January 2024, Transparency International Ukraine warned that 'attacks on journalists are becoming systematic' and in April 2024, 16 Ukrainian human rights organisations published a manifesto against these practices. These heavy-handed actions are fuelling the perception that Zelensky is becoming increasingly power-hungry and authoritarian. The slogans 'We chose Europe, not autocracy' and 'My father did not die for this' on the streets of Kyiv exemplify this trend. Even if the SBU finds hard evidence of pro-Russian activity in Nabu, which is plausible given Opposition Bloc MP Fedir Khrystenko's alleged networks, Zelensky will find it hard to play down concerns that he is exercising power for its sake. Zelensky's support for Bill 12414 is an unforced error that threatens Ukraine's greatest strength: its unflappable wartime resolve.


Reuters
24 minutes ago
- Reuters
Ukraine's Zelenskiy promises joint plan to fight corruption
KYIV, July 23 (Reuters) - Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy met anti-corruption and security officials on Wednesday and promised the creation of a joint plan to fight corruption within two weeks. "We all hear what society is saying. We see what people expect from state institutions — ensured justice and the effective functioning of each institution," he said after nationwide protests on Tuesday over limits to the independence of anti-graft bodies.


Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Labour 'can't win in Scotland' because of North Sea oil and gas ban, warns union chief
Gary Smith, whose union is a major donor to Labour, said "people don't get that energy is an emotional issue in Scotland". Labour will lose next year's Holyrood election because of the UK Government's opposition to new oil and gas developments in the North Sea, a trade union chief has predicted. Gary Smith, general secretary of the GMB, said Keir Starmer's party had failed to understand the energy sector was an "emotional issue in Scotland". The UK Government is expected to grant permission for the giant new Rosebank and Jackdaw oil and gas fields in the North Sea to go ahead as they already have licenses approved. But Ed Miliband, the UK Energy Secretary, has repeatedly said no future licenses will be granted by Labour - meaning the North Sea sector will continue to shed jobs over time. Smith, whose union is a major financial donor to Labour, said the party's opposition to oil and gas was a gift to Nigel Farage. "On the current policies, I don't believe that Labour can win in Scotland," the union chief, who lives in Paisley, told the New Statesman. "People don't get that energy is an emotional issue in Scotland. We went hundreds of miles out in this inhospitable sea and built this incredible, groundbreaking energy infrastructure. "If you're on the west coast of Scotland, most people of a certain age have a drop of oil from Sullom Voe because there are so many families who were involved in building that project when they landed the oil in Shetland. This was an emotional story about Scotland. It's important to its sense of self and the economy, and I don't think people have really got that." Asked if he thought Labour would ultimately be forced to rethink its policy, Smith added: "They will have to rethink it because the consequences in terms of energy prices, in terms of national security, in terms of the economy and jobs, are so profound. "What we should be doing is taking a public stake in what is left of the oil and gas sector and using the profits for that sector, or part of them, to invest in a new green future. "We should be talking about North Sea Two, how we're going to collaborate with Norway – not just decarbonising the North Sea, but what comes next. Oil and gas is not the enemy: it's actually the gateway to whatever comes next, and we've got to stop seeing it as a threat.' But Smith said his union was not reconsidering its donations to Labour as a result. It comes after Unite members voted to review its financial relationship with the party. The union chief said: "It's up to Unite what they do. We're not interested in what other unions do. "For us, a relationship with government should be contentious, there should be disagreement and debate. But I'd much rather have a Labour government in power than the alternative. And let's be clear about the Tories – they're done – the alternative is going to be Reform." The Record asked Scottish Labour for comment.