
HAMISH MCRAE: Behind the scenes in the US, there are lots of reasons for concern
And then on Friday it was the Independence Day holiday, not something we particularly celebrate in the UK, but I was glad to be watching the fireworks on a beach in Florida – the state that thanks to Trump and his Mar-a-Largo resort, can now make a decent pitch to have become the place where it all happens.
It's certainly a long way from that miserable news from Blighty about soaring Government borrowing costs, a tearful Chancellor and the prospect of more swingeing tax rises in her Autumn Budget.
And yet, and yet. Behind the scenes, there are lots of reasons for concern. Start with trade.
Next Wednesday is the deadline for countries to agree trade deals or be hit by much higher tariffs. The timing is absurdly tight, and Trump has said that countries where there is no agreement will get letters imposing tariffs of 20 to 30 per cent. This matters for Europe, which unlike the UK doesn't yet have even a basic agreement on future levies.
The markets in the US seem to think it will all be sorted: another case of the TACO trade, Trump Always Chickens Out. They have been encouraged by the fact that, so far, tariffs that have been imposed have not led to a significant increase in inflation. In theory, that's bound to happen, but in practice importers seem to be shouldering the burden by cutting their margins. You can only do that for a while.
Then there's the budget. In the UK, we are profoundly concerned about maintaining our credibility in the markets, and rightly so. In the US, they don't seem to care, and at the moment can get away with it. The budget, with tax cuts for the better-off and some small trimming of outlays, will inevitably increase the fiscal deficit.
I'm always suspicious of precise calculations about the impact of tax changes, and the overall effect may turn out to be quite modest. But the truth is that the US government plans to borrow around 6 per cent of gross domestic product for years to come.
Some of that money has to come from abroad, with foreigners currently owning about 30 per cent of the national debt. So far, they have been prepared to do so, but the mood could shift.
The main sign of such a change in attitude towards investment in US government securities has come in the exchange rate. So far this year, the dollar has fallen at the fastest rate since 1973. It is down more than 10 per cent on its trade-weighted average, and the lowest it has been for three years. You can soften the story a bit by pointing out that it was overvalued then, and it probably still is. As argued here last week, thanks to further dollar weakness, I expect the pound to go to $1.50.
To be clear, this is not a panic run on the dollar; more a sensible reassessment of what it ought to be worth. But coming on top of the tariffs, a weaker currency will push up prices, and like the rest of us, Americans are feeling pretty battered by inflation.
There's another warning signal: the housing market. It's gone soft. Prices are steady, nationally up just 0.6 per cent on a year ago. But the number of sales is down by 5 per cent, and there are 16 per cent fewer homes on offer. It's such a huge country that it's hard to generalise, but there is a feeling that the market has shifted from boom to stagnation, and in some areas, notably here in Florida, there's a slump.
So there are cracks in the feet of the US giant. But let's not kid ourselves. The rest of the world does not seem important from this side of the Atlantic. The money is here. New York dominates global finance, and as far as equities are concerned, it has utterly squashed London. It has been a humiliating week for the UK and rather a triumphant one for the US.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
31 minutes ago
- The Independent
Home Secretary on UK extremism ahead of 7/7 anniversary
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has stated that Islamist and right-wing extremism remain Britain's most significant threats, speaking ahead of the 20th anniversary of the July 7 London bombings. The July 7, 2005 attacks involved four suicide bombers targeting London's transport network, resulting in 52 deaths and over 770 injuries. Ms Cooper reflected on the evolution of counter-terrorism measures since 7/7, including the Prevent programme, and noted emerging threats from hostile states, organised crime, cyber criminals, and online radicalisation. The Terrorism Protection of Premises Act 2025, known as Martyn's Law, has officially become law, compelling UK venues expecting 200 or more people to prepare for terror attacks. Martyn's Law was campaigned for by Figen Murray, whose son Martyn Hett was killed in the 2017 Manchester Arena bombing, with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer acknowledging her pivotal role.

The National
34 minutes ago
- The National
New Scottish left wing party to be set up after Corbyn announcement
It comes after former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn confirmed plans to form a new party earlier this week. He is set to be joined by Zarah Sultana, a suspended Labour MP who quit the party earlier this week, saying she would "co-lead the founding of a new party" with the ex-Labour leader. Corbyn did not directly confirm he would be co-leading with Sultana, instead saying that "discussions are ongoing" and that he was "delighted" that Sultana "will help us build a real alternative". (Image: Stefan Rousseau/PA) After Sultana's announcement, Govanhill writer and poet Jim Monaghan wrote on Twitter/X that he is part of the "interim Scottish Secretariat" of the group. He later went on to clarify that he is part of the working group in Scotland which has been working in Scotland and UK-wide to prepare for the new party. Monaghan is one of several figures to have shared a statement by Collective Scotland on Saturday evening, which indicated the group is looking to build "a full-fledged electoral alliance of the Scottish left" to run in next year's election. READ MORE: Cabinet minister refuses to confirm if two-child cap will be scrapped It is not clear if this is part of Corbyn's new party or a separate entity. The statement did not mention the Islington North MP directly, but said that "as the left across Britain comes together to form a new political party, the Scottish left now has a similar opportunity to unite". It added: "With the SNP stagnant after 18 years of government, with the Labour party a hollow shell of itself, and the looming threat of Reform and the far-right, the time is ripe for a new progressive, left-wing consensus to form in Scotland. "Collective Scotland is already engaged in discussions towards a conference of progressives and socialists to take place on October 4th in Glasgow. We invite all those groups and parties not already engaged in this project to join us. "At that conference, we will look to build a full-fledged electoral alliance of the Scottish left to run in the 2026 Scottish parliament elections, and build towards longer-term campaigns in our local communities for the 2027 Scottish local elections. "In partnership with our left allies, we will seek to present a programme which takes away greed and personal enrichment from Scotland's political structures, and gives renewal to our local public services and democracy." READ MORE: 'Stupid': Journalists blast BBC after binning 'high risk' Glastonbury shows The statement continued: "A trend that must be broken in our political traditions is to assume that all politics happens at just Holyrood or one's local council chamber. We want to be more than just an electoral alliance for Scotland's left; we want to be the link to a wider progressive social movement. "We look forward now, as an autonomous party of Scotland's progressives and socialists, to the coalition and partnerships we must build for all of Scotland's left to succeed, not just as a set of parties, but as a wider movement." Other figures to have shared the statement include pro-independence outlet Bella Caledonia and the Scottish Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition.


The Independent
42 minutes ago
- The Independent
Will Keir Starmer scrap the two-child benefit cap? What to know
Sir Keir Starmer 's Labour Party has reportedly decided against scrapping the controversial two-child benefit cap. This decision follows a U-turn on welfare cuts, which has left a significant £5bn hole in Labour's spending plans. Senior Labour figures have indicated that potential tax increases may be necessary to offset the financial implications of not approving welfare changes. Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson stated that recent decisions have made future spending choices, particularly those aimed at tackling child poverty, more challenging. The move is expected to cause further discontent among Labour backbenchers, while critics argue the cap contributes to child poverty.