Waning US power
The US is accelerating its own decline through a toxic cocktail of fiscal recklessness, diplomatic retreat and humanitarian abandonment. By voluntarily withdrawing from the world order, the US has created space for several other countries to raise their international profiles, particularly in terms of economic stability, alliance leadership and moral authority.
At home, American debt has reached $36 trillion, and for the first time ever, net interest payments are exceeding defence spending — 3.1% of GDP and 2.9%, respectively. Some historians see this as a sign of a country's global power waning.
In May, credit rating agency Moody's downgraded the US for the first time since 1919, citing the country's rising debt and erratic trade policies. The addition of over $3 trillion in debt via tax cuts for the ultra-rich and destabilising funding cuts for foreign aid and domestic social services, passed last week, may lead to another downgrade.
China, Russia, Brazil and other regional and emerging powers, such as the BRICs bloc — which includes all three countries — are among the biggest beneficiaries of Washington's erratic polices regarding things such as NATO, the WHO and the entire concept of foreign aid. As many academics and experts have noted, USAID is probably the best thing to ever come out of Washington. The decision to gut it is expected to cause at least 14 million additional deaths around the world by 2030.
Depending on their regional geopolitics, most countries around the world have shifted their focus away from the US and are now looking to China and the EU for assistance and leadership over the past decade. China, in particular, has capitalised on this, by expanding the scope of its Belt and Road Initiative and using aid, particularly vaccine diplomacy, to fill critical gaps around the world.
The end result of this US withdrawal is that now, as BRICs and other international alliances work to further their own interests, the US sits alone, reduced to barking threats that, if implemented, will spell disaster for its own citizens.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
7 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Was Superman a migrant?
In the highly anticipated new Superman, which stars David Corenswet in the title role, the Man of Steel first appears lying bloodied and bruised in an Arctic wasteland, reports DW. "We do have a battered Superman in the beginning. That is our country," director James Gunn said at a press event following the release of the film's first trailer. This Superman symbolises an America that's in a beat-up state yet still stands for goodness, Gunn explained. Superman has often been considered the archetypal US superhero, embodying ideals of truth and justice, as well as the American dream. However, in the new film, Gunn decided to focus on "universal morality" instead of American exceptionalism. Instead of being a national hero, Superman aims to protect and save the weak around the world. "Even if it gets him into trouble," noted the director. "Yes, it's about politics," Gunn told British daily The Times, before adding that it's also "about human kindness." "Obviously there will be jerks out there who are just not kind and will take it as offensive just because it is about kindness," he said. "But screw them." Those comments had right-wing commentators worrying that Gunn, who also directed Guardians of the Galaxy, had turned the iconic superhero into a "woke" figure. They are calling for a boycott of the film, which hit theaters on July 11. Similarly, Fox News anchor Kellyanne Conway said on the talk show The Five: "We don't go to the movie theatre to be lectured to and to have somebody throw their ideology onto us. I wonder if it will be successful." Marvel versus DC Blockbuster superhero films typically avoid openly showcasing anything that would brand them as conservative or liberal. But one popular theory among superhero fans is that the film universes of the two largest North American comics publishers, DC and Marvel Comics, are polarised along the ideological fault lines that define an era of culture war. The DC universe, which includes Superman and Batman, has been described as more conservative-authoritarian, with its superheroes portrayed as the ultimate protectors of order. As extensions of the law, they act above the people and without accountability. "There's no sense of any democratic participation in the Batman world," points out film critic AO Scott in the 2025 podcast X Man: The Elon Musk Origin Story. Meanwhile, the same podcast exposes the film critic's theory that heroes "from the Marvel Universe films - Iron Man, Captain America, Ant Man, the Avengers - are a team of do-gooders: These films represent an Obama-Biden view of the world." Outspoken Trump critic As the writer and director of the Guardians of the Galaxy films, James Gunn used to belong to team Marvel. He also made enemies in the MAGA camp as an outspoken Donald Trump critic. Back in 2017, he shared his views in various tweets: "In my years on social networking, I have never spoken out politically," Gunn tweeted. "But we're in a national crisis with an incompetent President forging a full-blown attack on facts and journalism in the style of Hitler and Putin." The alt-right news site Daily Caller then dug up offensive tweets Gunn had posted nearly a decade earlier. Social media users called on Disney, which owns Marvel, to drop the filmmaker. Gunn was removed from the third "Guardians of the Galaxy" film but was later reinstated after a public apology and talks with Disney studio heads. But he moved on to the other comics' camp, becoming the co-chairman of DC Studios in 2022. Gunn is the head creator of the DC Universe that was rebooted in 2024 with a slate of new films including Superman. 'Undocumented alien' Nevertheless, Superman's origin story was not written by Gunn to provoke "anti-woke" movie-goers, but rather by second-generation Jewish immigrants, Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster, who created a superhero that defended the weak in reaction to the rise of Hitler and antisemitism in Europe. Superman first appeared in Action Comics #1, published in 1938. Born Kal-El on the planet of Krypton, Baby Superman's biological parents manage to send him off to Earth before they die in the destruction of their planet. The family who takes on the orphan then fraudulently claims him as their biological son, Clark Kent, to cover up the fact that the child is literally an undocumented alien, a term that is otherwise seen as degrading for migrants. This aspect of the superhero's biography was reiterated in 2018 when the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees published a book discussing the theme that Superman was also a refugee. A year earlier, Superman protected a group of undocumented immigrants from an armed white supremacist in issue #987 of Action Comics — which came out shortly after Trump had announced the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) policy would be ending. The program allowed hundreds of thousands of immigrants brought to the US as children to live and work without fear of deportation. The government's use of the term "alien," which had been banned under the Biden administration, was reinstated at the beginning of 2025. The current Trump administration is also ramping up its crackdown on immigration — raising alarm over the state of US democracy and dividing people in the country.
Business Recorder
8 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Afghanistan now in very advantageous position
Afghanistan, long a theater of war and humanitarian crises, is re-emerging as a central node in the evolving geopolitics of Asia and Eurasian alignment—the one driven by economics, regional interest, and realism rather than ideological divides. This time the recalibration of the region is driven by the regional stakeholders while the West is taking a back seat in a region it once tried to reshape by force. In a profound shift across the region, Central Asian Republics are reconnecting with Afghanistan after a 50-year hiatus. Russia has extended diplomatic recognition to the Taliban regime. China has secured economic and strategic footholds under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). The United States, though militarily withdrawn, continues to eye Afghan mineral wealth. Most notably, Pakistan, Iran, and Afghanistan have now agreed to cooperate within China's BRI framework—a move that redefines the regional chessboard and redraws lines of influence across Asia. Meanwhile, Pakistan is positioning itself as a bridge between South Asia, Central Asia, and the Middle East, one that passes through Afghanistan. India, watching from the eastern flank, sees both a strategic exclusion and a threat. As regional alignments shift westward and northward, New Delhi faces the reality of being sidelined in a reconfigured Eurasian connectivity map. In South Asia also, it is facing a threat of exclusion as, upon the demise of SAARC, China and Pakistan are exploring a Beijing-led regional alternative to revitalize cooperation in South Asia. This development could redefine regional power dynamics, marginalize India's influence, and establish parallel regional orders. For India, it raises alarms of encirclement along its borders. Moscow's recognition of the Taliban government breaks the ice for other regional actors. Russia's move is not merely symbolic; it, in fact, opens the door for Afghanistan's inclusion in Eurasian multilateral structures such as the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), and the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). For the Central Asian Republics it could mean a historic reconnection particularly for Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, and Tajikistan. For these landlocked nations, the Afghan corridor offers the shortest and most viable land route to the Arabian Sea via Pakistan's Gwadar and Karachi ports. For Pakistan, projects like the Mazar-i-Sharif to Peshawar railway, CASA-1000 power corridor, and even revived interest in the long-stalled TAPI gas pipeline signal a major strategic turn. Central Asia, once reliant on Russian routes or Iranian pathways, now sees Afghanistan-Pakistan connectivity as essential for energy exports, trade diversification, and independence from existing bottlenecks. This renewed regional attention to Afghanistan is not coincidental; it is part of a broader BRI-enabled connectivity model where infrastructure diplomacy supersedes ideological alignment. Three key advantages emerge for Pakistan: Strategic geography is monetized - where instead of serving as a buffer or battleground, Pakistan can now convert its location into an economic asset through transit fees, trade routes, and regional energy flows. Geopolitical leverage - with Iran and China converging on Afghan stability and regional integration, Pakistan's central role gives it enhanced diplomatic weight—especially in multilateral forums like the SCO and ECO. Stabilization through connectivity - by anchoring Afghanistan into a web of economic interdependence, Pakistan also serves its own security interests. Stability in Kabul directly affects security in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan. However, political instability, internal militancy, and inconsistent policy execution could undermine Pakistan's regional potential. Strategic clarity and institutional continuity are the prerequisites. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
9 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Pak embassy hosts mango festival in US
Pakistan's Ambassador Rizwan Saeed Sheikh introduces the flavours of Pakistani mangoes to Deputy Assistant Secretary Mary Bischoping at the Pakistan Mango Festival in Washington. PHOTO: Express The embassy of Pakistan Thursday hosted its annual Mango Festival, welcoming a large crowd to experience the "king of fruits" at the event that was part of the embassy's public outreach efforts. The gathering included diplomats, US government officials, congressional staff, think-tank members, media representatives, and the Pakistani-American diaspora, according to a press release of the embassy. In his welcoming remarks, Ambassador Rizwan Saeed Sheikh highlighted the significance of mangoes in Pakistani culture and society referring to them as "the best mangoes in the world". Pakistan, he said, is the sixth-largest producer globally, with an annual cultivation of approximately 1.8 million metric tons. Speaking at the occasion, Mary Bischoping, Deputy Assistant Secretary (DAS) for the Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs, thanked Ambassador Sheikh for his continued leadership in strengthening the US-Pakistan bilateral relationship. "For decades, the United States and Pakistan have worked together to address some of the world's most critical issues. Looking forward, we are poised to continue to grow our cooperation across a range of shared interests," said the Deputy Assistant Secretary. Ms. Bischoping also welcomed Pakistan's initiatives to enhance trade and investment and affirmed the US commitment to economic cooperation. "We hope to expand mutually beneficial trade and commercial opportunities, especially in Pakistan's growing critical mineral sector," she said. The Deputy Assistant Secretary also underscored the significant contributions of the Pakistani-American community. "In the United States today, over 700,000 hardworking Pakistani-Americans are invaluable members of American society. Our work at the State Department directly benefits from the patriotism, talent, and passion of this community", she said.
