New laws complicate Wyoming's abortion situation as bans set to be argued in state Supreme Court
Wellspring Health Access had stopped providing abortions that same day, responding to a slew of new requirements for the Casper clinic to become a licensed surgical center.
'It was kind of really bad timing on my part,' said the woman, who declined to be named because of abortion's stigma in her community.
Though abortion remains legal in Wyoming, it has become increasingly difficult because of new requirements for abortion clinics and women seeking abortions. In this case, the woman had to go to Colorado, which partially borders southern Wyoming.
On Wednesday, the Wyoming Supreme Court is set to hear arguments over state abortion bans that a lower court judge has suspended and struck down as unconstitutional. But even if the state high court agrees with those rulings, access to abortion in Wyoming stands to remain uncertain.
New state laws make getting abortions much harder
One new law targets Wellspring Health Access as Wyoming's only abortion clinic, requiring licensure as an outpatient surgical center at a cost of up to $500,000 in renovations, according to the clinic.
The law also requires the clinic's physicians to get admitting privileges at a hospital within 10 miles (16 kilometers). A hospital three blocks from the clinic is under no obligation to admit its doctors, however.
'This is an abortion ban without banning abortion,' said Julie Burkhart, founder and president of Wellspring Health Access.
A second new law requires women to get ultrasounds at least 48 hours before a medication abortion, costing them $250 or more plus gas money and travel time in a state where ultrasounds are unavailable in many rural areas.
The Wyoming Legislature is well within its rights to regulate abortion to protect women from even the small chance of an abortion mishap, argued an attorney for the state, John Woykovsky, at a recent court hearing on the new laws.
Unsettled abortion laws have far-reaching effects
In most cases, a transvaginal ultrasound is required to obtain a fetal image in the earliest stages of pregnancy, when most abortions are done. That invasiveness, especially for victims of rape and abuse, caused Gov. Mark Gordon, a Republican, to veto the ultrasound bill a few days after he signed the surgical center requirement into law Feb. 27.
The Republican-dominated Legislature overrode his veto, leading Wellspring Health Access, the Wyoming abortion access advocate Chelsea's Fund and others to sue over it and the licensing law.
Meanwhile, the legal uncertainty caused Wellspring Health Access, which opened in 2023 after an arson attack delayed the original date by almost a year, to halt both medication and surgical abortions.
Several dozen abortion opponents attended a Tuesday hearing in Casper on whether to suspend the laws while the lawsuit moves ahead. If that happens, clinic abortions will resume, to the dismay of opponents, said Ross Schriftman, president of the local Wyoming Right to Life chapter.
'No inspections, no confirmation of whether the people committing the abortions are licensed doctors for Wyoming and no continuity of care to the hospital,' Schriftman said by email.
Abortion proponents claim support among Wyoming women
A former Wyoming resident who, in 2017, got an abortion in neighboring Colorado, her closest option at the time, sympathized with rural Wyoming women seeking abortions now.
' God forbid it's the winter,' said Ciel Newman, who now lives in New Mexico. 'Wyoming's a huge, rural state without much interstate coverage.'
The amount of business at Wellspring Health Access shows that the lawmakers who passed the abortion laws are out of step with their constituents, Burkhart said.
'We have had people coming in our doors each and every week that we've been open,' Burkhart said. "If people who come from Republican states, or more traditional-leaning states, didn't approve of abortion, we would go out of business because people just wouldn't show up.'
Is abortion access a Wyoming health care right?
In the case about to be argued before the state Supreme Court, the same groups and women are suing over laws banning abortion that Wyoming has passed since 2022. They include the first explicit ban on medication abortions in the U.S.
In November, a judge in Jackson ruled the bans violated a 2012 constitutional amendment guaranteeing the right of competent adults to make their own health care decisions.
Even if the justices agree, Wellspring Health Access stands to suffer. Before the new laws, the clinic saw as many as 22 patients a day, 70% of whom were there for abortions: half surgical, half by pills.
Now, Wellspring Health Access doesn't offer abortions and sees about five patients a day, all of whom are transgender people receiving hormone replacement therapy, according to the clinic.
Twenty-three other states, including 14 that have not totally banned abortion, have passed requirements similar to Wyoming's that opponents call 'targeted regulation of abortion providers,' or TRAP, laws. Surgical center licensing and hospital admitting privileges are typical requirements, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a research group that advocates for abortion access.
Few states have passed TRAP laws since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, but abortion remains an unsettled issue in several. A licensing law in Missouri stood to curtail abortions until it was blocked by a judge, pointed out Kimya Forouzan, state policy advisor for the Guttmacher Institute.
'They still have a major impact on the ability to provide care," Forouzan said in an email.
An even longer drive to get an abortion
The Wyoming woman recently seeking a surgical abortion at Wellspring Health Access had to drive more than twice as far from her hometown, more than four hours each way, to have the procedure at the Planned Parenthood in Fort Collins, Colorado.
'Even though I support abortion fully, it's not something that I thought I personally would ever do,' the woman said, adding that Wellspring Health Access helped cover her costs.
'It was a humbling experience,' she said. 'It just gave me a lot more compassion for people who have experienced abortions as well as people who aren't able to take that route.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
2 days ago
- Daily Mirror
Donald Trump's mental state 'clear to see' as lawmakers urged to 'act now'
While Republican lawmakers have grilled Joe Biden's former doctor over his health, a retired Navy commander has called for more scrutiny over Donald Trump mental state Donald Trump is facing fresh calls for a full investigation into his mental fitness after a string of bizarre public appearances left even his own supporters baffled. While Republican lawmakers continue to grill Joe Biden's former doctor over the president's health during his time in office, one US military veteran says they're targeting the wrong man. Retired Navy commander Paul Mazich has slammed Congress for focusing on the past, arguing that Donald Trump 's mental state poses a far greater risk to the nation right now. Speaking out in a scathing column, Mazich said: 'Does it really matter whether Congress investigates former President Joe Biden 's health in office? He's retired. Leave him alone. Here's a better idea: Investigate the health of our current president.' Trump, who returned to office earlier this year, has already raised eyebrows after a series of wild and rambling speeches, including one in which he claimed his late uncle taught the Unabomber, despite the timelines making that impossible. The jaw-dropping remark is just one of many disturbing moments experts have flagged in recent months, sparking fears the former reality TV star turned commander-in-chief may not be mentally up to the job. Mazich continued: 'Clues to Trump's mental state have been plainly observable for many years. During his first term, dozens of psychiatrists and mental health professionals tried to warn the public.' He called on lawmakers to finally take action and fast, adding: 'If they determine that Trump suffers from a health issue that makes him unfit for office, they must act for the nation's good and not for political advantage." Despite the growing concerns, Trump has repeatedly brushed off any questions about his cognitive fitness, bragging that he 'aced' a memory test and insisting, 'I got every answer right.' Dr. Bandy Lee, a former Yale psychiatry professor who's studied Trump for years, said she first noticed signs of cognitive decline as early as 2017. She now chairs the World Mental Health Coalition, which last year issued a chilling warning, signed by over 50 top psychiatrists, neurologists, and dementia experts. The statement read: 'What's alarming is how the rate of Trump's bizarre speech and political decisions have been increasing. He gave an answer about childcare to the Economic Club of New York so incoherent that even his supporters were concerned.' They also pointed to physical and verbal symptoms, including a strange gait, increasing difficulty speaking clearly, and a marked decline in vocabulary and thought complexity, common red flags for dementia.
Reuters
2 days ago
- Reuters
Religious freedom laws apply in drug injection site case, court says
CHICAGO, July 24 (Reuters) - An organization doesn't have to be founded with a religious purpose to claim protection under the country's laws governing the free exercise of religion, a U.S. appeals court said on Thursday in a ruling that applies the protections to nearly any group claiming to be practicing religion. A unanimous three-judge panel of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued the decision in a dispute involving a Philadelphia non-profit that has sought to open a supervised drug-injection site in the city. The court gave Safehouse another chance to argue that it has a religious right to do its work after reversing a lower judge's ruling holding that Safehouse, which has said its work is informed by Judeo-Christian beliefs about the need to preserve life and care for the sick, is not protected by the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the free exercise clause of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Safehouse is fighting a long-running U.S. Department of Justice lawsuit seeking to bar it from opening the injection site. The 3rd Circuit panel sent the case back to the district court, directing it to reconsider Safehouse's claims after finding that it does qualify for the protection. Representatives for the Department of Justice did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Ronda Goldfein, an attorney for Safehouse, called the decision "an important milestone for all community-based organizations that save lives by evidence-based, compassionate harm-reduction strategies." The fight between Safehouse and the federal government began in 2019, during Republican President Donald Trump's first administration. At the time, Safehouse was poised to open what would have been the first such safe-injection site in the country, where drug users under supervision by medically trained professionals could obtain clean syringes and inject themselves with heroin, fentanyl or other drugs. New York City instead in 2021 became the location of the first-safe injection sites, and the Justice Department has not pursued an action to close them. Safehouse has said it will open when it has legal permission. The Justice Department argued Safehouse's plans would violate the Controlled Substances Act by maintaining a place that would facilitate illegal drug use. U.S. District Judge Gerald McHugh rejected that argument in 2020, but the 3rd Circuit reversed it a year later, saying that while the U.S. opioid epidemic "may call for innovative solutions, local innovations may not break federal law." The case came back to the 3rd Circuit after McHugh dismissed Safehouse's claims that the threat of prosecution by the DOJ for violating federal drug laws was unconstitutionally chilling its ability to exercise its religious rights. McHugh said Safehouse's articles of incorporation and tax filings said nothing about any religious activity, and while its website mentioned a religious motivation, it did not describe any apparent religious practices or behavior in its activities. But whether Safehouse is a religious entity isn't the right question, the panel said. Under the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark religious rights ruling in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, laws protecting the free expression of religion can apply to any corporations that claim to exercise religion, the court said. The case is U.S. v. Safehouse, case number 24-2027 in the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. For Safehouse: Ronda Goldfein and Adrian Lowe of the AIDS Law Project of Pennsylvania, Ilana Eisenstein and Ben Fabens-Lassen of DLA Piper, Peter Goldberger of the Law Office of Peter Goldberger and Seth Kreimer of the University of Pennsylvania School of Law For the U.S.: Sarah Carroll and Lowell Sturgill, Jr. of the U.S. Department of Justice
The Guardian
2 days ago
- The Guardian
AI-backed medical debt company claims payment plans can help US healthcare costs
The CEO of the artificial intelligence-backed medical debt purchasing company PayZen believes payment plans can be part of the solution to America's high-priced healthcare, even as consumer rights advocates warn third-party financial agreements lack transparency. The company is just one in a sea of healthcare financing companies, whose executives see 'acceleration' in conversations with cash-strapped hospitals facing historic Republican-led healthcare cuts. Signed into law by Donald Trump, the cuts are expected to leave 17 million people without insurance through 2034. As those uninsured people struggle to pay for healthcare, the change is effectively a cut to hospital revenue, and threatens some cash-strapped facilities with closure. 'We believe most people want to pay their bills – they're decent people trying to be responsible,' said Itzik Cohen, PayZen CEO. 'It's not a collections problem – it's an affordability problem.' PayZen's solution is to provide payment plans up to 60-months with 0% interest. 'If you extend the payment plan to three, four, five years … Then more people will pay their bills and successfully,' said Cohen. 'What we're trying to do is make it affordable.' PayZen's business model relies on buying debt from hospitals at a discount, and is backed by venture capital from groups such as New Enterprise Associates, a New York-based firm with big-name partners such as Dr Scott Gottlieb, the president's first-term Food and Drug Administration (FDA) commissioner. NEA and Gottlieb deferred requests for an interview. PayZen may pay as little as 10% and as much as 90% of the value of the bill depending on an AI-backed prediction of whether the patient will pay, according to a 2022 contract with the University of Texas Medical Branch Health (UTMB) at Galveston obtained by the Guardian. The company then collects the full face value of the bill from patients. That same contract shows that PayZen also charges hospitals a transaction based 'platform fee'. 'PayZen charges a 5% platform fee to support outreach, enrollment, underwriting and serving all payment plans,' it reads. Cohen declined to comment on platform fees and said the 5% figure 'is not accurate and is not reflective of how our pricing works'. PayZen is part of an industry of companies, some of which provide interest-bearing financing, that help cash-strapped hospitals with a growing a liquidity problem. 'This is not a new business. It is based on an old model,' said Ge Bai, a healthcare finance professor at Johns Hopkins University's Carey School of Business. 'A hospital takes the unpaid bill to a financial institution, sells these bills to the financial institutions, then the financial institution will give them [the hospital] money immediately… It changes ownership.' Chief among hospitals facing liquidity problems are rural facilities – 153 of which have closed or lost key hospital services since 2010. For these facilities, government cuts, expected to result in an $87bn drop in revenue are only the latest blow. Over the last decade, insurers have increasingly pushed costs onto patients. From 2006 to 2025, the average deductible – an upfront payment that must be made before insurance kicks in – for a single person has grown from $303 to $1,562, outpacing inflation by more than 352%. Those payments represent a hardship for many Americans, more than one-third of whom can't afford an unexpected $400 expense. Unpaid, they also turn into bad debt on a hospital balance sheet. In 2022, people with health insurance became the largest group of patients in debt to hospitals – a sea change in the industry. And those debts, known as 'patient responsibility' or 'self-pay' are very hard for providers to collect. Companies like PayZen come in and pay hospitals up front for bills that might otherwise languish on the hospital balance sheet and become bad debt. 'Because of the growth in high deductible health plans, many people have $2,500, $10,000 [deductibles] for families – so they're really financing so much of their care,' said Richard Grundling, chief mission impact officer at the Healthcare Financial Management Association (HFMA). Consumer advocates question the transparency of such deals for patients. 'I don't think there's any transparency to the patient that PayZen has just acquired this account at a fraction of its face value,' said April Kuehnhoff, senior attorney at the National Consumer Law Center. UTMB Health confirmed that it does not tell patients that PayZen bought their debt at a discount. 'If the hospital was willing to accept this reduced amount, was there a discount that the patient could have accessed by directly paying the hospital instead of paying the full amount to this third party company?' Kuehnhoff asked. Advocates also argue there is a risk that low-income patients, who are often eligible for federally required discounted care, are caught up in payment plans. UTMB Health confirmed that PayZen does not screen patients for what is commonly called 'charity care,' despite performing a 'soft' credit pull and information on their debt and incomes. 'UTMB directs all patients to PayZen to discuss the terms and conditions of the specific agreements with PayZen,' said a spokesperson for the hospital system. 'We provide basic FAQ information, but the relationship is between the patient and PayZen.' Although PayZen relies on purchasing debt, Cohen objects to the label 'debt buyer', which he said refers to companies buying bundles of debt in default. Such companies were highlighted in a segment on John Oliver's Last Week Tonight. 'Calling it debt buying is insulting to patients quite frankly,' said Cohen. 'When you purchase something with a [buy now, pay later] approach, is it debt buying? You're being offered a way to pay for your purchase in a convenient, integrated way that extends payments to you because now you can afford it.' Cohen said his company does not use 'extraordinary collection practices', such as filing debt law suits and objects to describing PayZen as 'buy now, pay later'. 'We never actually called ourselves 'buy now, pay later' for healthcare or 'care now, pay later'.' In fact, Cohen authored a 2021 blog post on the company website headlined: 'PayZen's 'Care Now, Pay Later' Mission.' He later clarified that his company has moved beyond that description. Cohen said PayZen is running a 'pilot' to pre-qualify accounts for charity care, but that only 'two to three' of the roughly 100 healthcare providers it works with participate. Some states require hospitals to screen patients for charity care. If hospitals continue to struggle to collect money from patients, Bai noted that 'hospitals will engage in even more aggressive mechanisms'. 'For example, all upfront payments – no payment, no service – this will happen,' Bai added. UTMB Health instituted one such policy, which was presented in a PayZen-sponsored report as 'masterclass in revenue optimization'. The hospital required patients to pay before seeing a doctor as early as 2019. However, the implementation reportedly led to loud exchanges in waiting rooms, as patients argued they could not afford to pay before seeing the doctor, according to local news outlets. In 2023, UTMB publicly affirmed its payment-first policy, and contracted with PayZen to provide patients with long-term pay plans through its AI-backed debt purchasing model. 'When thoughtfully implemented, pre-service payment policies can significantly increase collections without driving care avoidance,' the PayZen-sponsored report said.
