Should you take a day off or work from home with a mild cold? What if you can't do either?
But what about if your symptoms are mild? Are you sick enough to take the day off, or should you push through it? And what if you feel pressured to work?
Here's what to consider.
Are you likely to spread it? While it may seem like a good idea to continue working, especially when your symptoms are mild, going to work when infectious with a respiratory virus risks infecting your co-workers. If you are in a client-facing role, such as a teacher or a salesperson, you may also infect others, like students or customers. The risks may be even greater for those working with vulnerable communities, such as in aged care work, where the consequences can be severe. From an organisational perspective, you are likely less productive when you are not feeling well.
So, whenever possible, avoid going into work when you're feeling unwell.
Should I work from home? The COVID-19 pandemic normalised working from home. Since then, more people work from home when they're unwell, rather than taking sick leave.
Some employees join Zoom or Teams meetings out of guilt, not wanting to let their co-workers down.
Others — and in particular, some men — feel the need to maintain their performance at work, even if it's at the expense of their health.
A downside of powering through is that workers may prolong their illness by not looking after themselves.
Can you take leave when you need it? Employees in Australia can take either paid or unpaid time off when they are unwell. Most full-time employees get 10 days of paid sick leave per year, while part-time employees get the equivalent pro rata. Employers can ask for reasonable evidence from employees to show they are unwell, such as asking for a medical certificate from a pharmacy or GP, or a statutory declaration. The type of evidence required may differ from organisation to organisation, with some awards and enterprise agreements specifying the type of evidence needed. While taking a sick day helps many workers recuperate, a significant proportion of workers engaged in non-standard work arrangements do not receive these benefits.
There are, for example, 2.6 million casual employees who don't have access to paid sick leave.
Many workers, such as casual employees and self-employed people, often don't have much choice about whether or not to take a sick day. Source: Getty / FG Trade Similarly, most self-employed people, such as tradies and gig workers, do not have any paid leave entitlements. Although these workers can still take unpaid leave, they are sacrificing income when they call in sick. Research from the Australian Council of Trade Unions has found more than half of insecure workers don't take time off when injured or sick.
So a significant proportion of workers in Australia simply cannot afford to call in sick.
Why pushing through isn't the answer 'Presenteeism' is the phenomenon of people reporting for work even when they are unwell or not fully functioning, affecting their health and productivity.
While exact figures are hard to determine, since most organisations don't systematically track it, estimates suggest 30 to 90 per cent of employees work while sick at least once a year.
People work while sick for different reasons. Some choose to because they love their job or enjoy the social side of work — this is called voluntary presenteeism. But many don't have a real choice, facing financial pressure or job insecurity. That's involuntary presenteeism, and it's a much bigger problem.
Research has found industry norms may be shaping the prevalence of 'involuntary presenteeism', with workers in the health and education sectors more likely to feel obligated to work when sick due to 'at work' caring responsibilities.
What can organisations do about it? Leaders set the tone, especially around health and wellbeing. When they role-model healthy behaviour and support time off, it gives others permission to do the same. Supportive leaders can help reduce presenteeism, while pressure from demanding leaders can make it worse. Your co-workers matter too. When teams step up and share the load, it creates a culture where people feel safe to take leave. A supportive environment makes wellbeing a shared responsibility. But for some workers, leave isn't an option. Fixing this requires policy change across industries and society more broadly, not just inside the workplace.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
4 hours ago
- ABC News
Suicide prevention leader and senior researcher outline why lived experience is vital for national strategy
When it comes to suicide prevention, Samantha McIntosh knows more than most. With a lived experience of suicidality, a long career in suicide prevention and a recent foray into academia on the subject, the Darwin woman has seen multiple facets of what she described as a still highly stigmatised issue. As opposed to coming from a purely clinical perspective, she says having both personal and professional experience of suicidality — defined as the risk of suicide, indicated by suicidal ideation — can be crucial to engaging with patients and devising solutions. Ms McIntosh has long advocated for people with lived experience to be central when it comes to drafting strategies and other prevention efforts. And governments and independent commissions are starting to agree. According to a June 2025 report from the Productivity Commission, the federal government's National Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Agreement is failing to meet the mark. While the expenditures of governments on mental health has grown by around 30 per cent over the past 10 years, suicide rates over that period of time remain unchanged. The Productivity Commission recommended greater inclusion of people with lived and living experience of suicidality in drafting and implementing policy. For Ms McIntosh, the recommendations present a rare opportunity for change. At the other end of Australia — in the regional Victorian town of Warragul — Anton Isaacs, a senior lecturer at Monash University's School of Rural Health, has been helping bring Ms McIntosh's ideas to life. "It's rare for somebody to have the kind of expertise that Sam has," he said. "She has the lived experience of suicidality, she has supported people who have attempted to take their lives, she has been a suicide prevention worker and she worked in leadership positions in programs." The pair recently co-authored a peer-reviewed perspective paper on challenges to suicide prevention, merging Dr Isaacs's experience of drafting strategies with Ms McIntosh's experience of navigating them. It focuses on broadly on stigma surrounding suicide, diving specifically into the careless reporting of suicide in news media, access points of care, and a general lack of understanding in the community when it comes to helping at-risk individuals access services. Dr Isaacs said the work being done is just the beginning, but he noted that integrating lived experience into suicide prevention would require the sector to confront some "basic truths". "Suicide has traditionally fallen under the remit of mental health services, which are clinical services. In clinical medicine, the focus is to arrive at a diagnosis and treat it," he said. "In suicide prevention, the focus is not on arriving at a diagnosis and treating, the focus is care and compassion — that is not clinical. Ms McIntosh agreed, and said the key to effective suicide prevention was a matter of striking the right balance. "That combination of clinical and lived experience doesn't exist in a lot of places," she said. Last month, the Mental Health Commission published its National Suicide Prevention Strategy for the next 10 years, which emphasised the inclusion of people with lived experience in prevention efforts. "People with lived and living experience have the greatest insights into what works, what does not work, and what is missing in suicide prevention," it reads. But Dr Isaacs and Ms McIntosh explained that such inclusion must be considered and meaningful, rather than a "tick-box exercise". "If people don't consider lived experience to be central or core to their work, then they don't give it the importance that they need," Dr Isaacs said. "If that happens, the people with lived experience at the table will feel disillusioned or could be re-traumatised." Ms McIntosh also said any plan to centralise lived experience in prevention efforts would have to be tailored to the needs of various communities, especially in a unique landscape like the NT. "The geographical layout of the territory itself poses problems," she said "We know that there's workforce challenges across the [NT] in all sectors and being able to support the diversity of the territory and communities is also something that we face." While the obstacles to change are numerous, she said there was plenty of support across the sector to make lived experiences central to new prevention strategies. "I think that they would be more successful, I think that they would be more achievable, and I think you would have higher client rates," Ms McIntosh said.
ABC News
4 hours ago
- ABC News
Family that had three organ transplants advocates for more donors
The anxious wait for an organ transplant is something no family wants to experience, but the Stolker family has endured it three times. Joe Stolker has had a kidney transplant and his wife Leonnee and their son Levi have both had heart transplants. She said waiting for an available organ and undergoing transplant surgery were incredibly difficult and having to watch her child go through the same process was even harder. But after three successful organ transplants, the Stolkers say they've been given a new lease on life. The Tamworth family is campaigning for organ donation awareness for the 1,800 other Australians who remain on the transplant waitlist. In 2011, Ms Stolker began suffering heart failure just weeks before giving birth to her son. Doctors informed her she would require a heart transplant after she gave birth. "We spent almost six weeks in the hospital after Levi was born, doctors couldn't figure out why a young fit mum suddenly had heart failure," Ms Stolker said. She said she could barely nurse her newborn as doctors searched for a new heart. It took roughly eight months after Levi was born for a suitable heart to be found. "It was scary, there was lots of unknowns, what was causing it or why," Ms Stolker said. "I almost felt selfish in a way. You are so looking forward to that call but at the same time, you know what needs to happen for that organ to become available. "You definitely feel the grief, excited isn't the right word, but it gives you a chance at a future." Ms Stolker later underwent genetic testing in 2016 and was diagnosed with a rare genetic mutation of the phospholamban (PLN) gene in the heart. The condition occurs when the heart is missing an essential protein, making it pump harder and become enlarged. Ms Stolker's sister was also diagnosed with the rare condition and had to have a heart transplant. Ms Stolker said it was likely their father died from the same disease. Earlier this year, Ms Stolker and her husband discovered Levi was suffering from similar heart failure symptoms. Ms Stolker found out her son Levi had inherited the mutation. "I always hoped I would never have to go through it again with Levi … emotionally it's different when it's your own child," she said. Levi had experienced shortness of breath after a school hike, prompting a visit to the hospital where doctors told him he would need to be placed on the transplant list. "It was pretty scary, I was anxious, but I felt like I was more confident it would be fine after having two parents who were transplant patients," Levi said. Ms Stolker said the doctors gave them a timeframe of 12 to 18 months for a new heart. Luckily, it only took a fraction of that time. "We tried to suppress our emotions [during the wait], just so we could be there for Levi and support him," Ms Stolker said. After undergoing the lifesaving transplant in May, the 14-year-old is checking off recovery milestones quicker than anyone could have expected. A keen rugby union player, Levi hopes he'll be back on the football field as early as next month. "I love being active, getting around, playing sports and just getting amongst it all," he said. Mr Stolker knows all too well the experience of an organ transplant, not only from watching his wife and son go through it, but from his own experience having a kidney transplant in 2017. He had focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), which led to kidney failure and being placed on dialysis for six years. "My kidneys basically deteriorated over time … it might have been hereditary, it might have been because of a knock to the kidneys," he said. Mr Stolker said the entire family was incredibly grateful to the people who donated their organs and the medical staff who ensured they had successful transplants. Mr Stolker said the family wanted to raise awareness of the life-changing impact an organ donation could have and encourage Australians to be donors. The Stolkers are launching a rugby union match next month in Tamworth, with all the proceeds going towards Transplant Australia. Not-for-profit organ donation awareness organisation DonateLife said just a small conversation could lead to amazing stories like the Stolker family's. "On average, 50 people a year will die whilst waiting on the transplant list," said Juliana Celcer, DonateLife's director of nursing. She encouraged people to have a conversation with their family about becoming an organ donor. When a family member is a registered donor, eight out of 10 families agree to donation.
ABC News
5 hours ago
- ABC News
NT Police urged to prioritise mental health screenings: Inquest into constable's death
Warning: This story contains references to suicide and self-harm and will be distressing for some readers. An expert in trauma and suicide has urged the Northern Territory Police Force to conduct yearly mental health screenings, telling a coronial inquest into the death of a veteran officer that better checks would likely have flagged him as an "officer at risk". At 44 years old, after more than two decades on the front line and stints in remote communities, Constable Michael Deutrom took his own life in April 2022, devastating colleagues and casting a stark light on the toll long years in the service could take. His death was one of three NT police suicide deaths in the first half of 2022. Earlier in the inquest, which began in May, the coroner heard Constable Deutrom was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression around the time of his death — after years of exposure to traumatic jobs, false allegations of sexual assault against him and anxiety over losing his job. On Friday, when the inquest continued in the Darwin Local Court, it was heard that while working in the NT remote community of Kintore, Constable Deutrom had reported he was sleeping just three hours a night, was "virtually on call 24 hours a day" and was burnt out and feeling isolated. A year before his death in 2022, he and a colleague submitted an incident report to the NT Police Force (NTPF) stating that crime in the community was "starting to take its toll" and that he was having "adverse mental wellbeing effects" — triggering the NTPF Support and Wellbeing Unit to reach out. According to court documents, Constable Deutrom was referred to an outside psychologist in Darwin and attended "two or three" sessions. However, PTSD expert Professor Alexander McFarlane testified on Friday that Constable Deutrom had likely been grappling with underlying mental health issues for far longer than recognised, which underscored the need for routine psychological screening within the NTPF. In particular, Professor McFarlane emphasised the importance of support both before and after deployment to a remote community, where isolation was especially acute. The NTPF currently employs a single clinical psychologist, supplemented by a team of social workers and counsellors. But the court heard that level of resourcing was inadequate to meet the mental health screening and support needs of the force. Speaking outside court, Nathan Finn, the president of the Northern Territory Police Association, said that while NTPF policy called for officers to undergo an annual "well check", he had not received a single one during his more than two decades on the front line. He said that despite grappling with his own job-related trauma, he was never offered a mental health check-up, and fear of being seen as unfit for duty kept him from seeking help on his own. Above all, he said, the stigma surrounding mental health was deeply entrenched during his tenure and remained "alive and well" in the force today. During his testimony, Professor McFarlane told the court that — while the police force started off with an "unusually healthy group of people", after many are ruled out during the initial screening process — police officers who worked more than 10 years were almost twice as likely to experience psychological distress, and six times more likely to experience symptoms of PTSD. He said police officers were often symptomatic for "some time" before they simply could not function but, because the job typically attracted people who "naturally walk towards danger" and pride themselves on their ability to function, they often minimised health problems. He said that given the duration of Constable Deutrom's service and exposure to traumatic jobs, the NTPF should have taken his incident report more seriously. "There were other facts in his records … that would have pointed to him potentially being an officer at risk," Professor McFarlane told the court. "If an officer was significantly depressed and had suicidal ideation, I think that's a circumstance where a psychiatrist should immediately be involved. The court heard that numerous reports on suicide prevention had been handed down over the years — including the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide, which last year recommended improved access to timely and quality mental health screenings — yet rates of police suicide had doubled across all Australian jurisdictions over the past eight years. When asked why the rates had continued to climb, Professor McFarlane told the court that the Productivity Commission had uncovered a range of "bureaucratic inefficiencies". "Often there is more than enough information to know about problems, but bureaucratic organisations are essentially very bad at … effectively implementing the necessary systems of care," he said. On top of urging the introduction of routine mental health screenings, Professor McFarlane recommended that officers serving six-month stints in remote communities receive a minimum of three weeks' leave, comparable to the periods defence force personnel receive after overseas deployments. The inquest continues this month.
