'Ridiculous and lame': South Africans mock Trump proposals
On Friday, Trump cut off aid to South Africa and claimed, without evidence, that the Pretoria government is seizing white-owned land and persecuting Afrikaners, descendants of European settlers.
South African-born billionaire Elon Musk, the world's richest person and Trump's right-hand man, has in the past echoed far-right conspiracy theories about a "white genocide" in the country.
"Trump doesn't know anything about this. I feel like Elon Musk is pushing him behind and saying: 'There's something there. Go look at it,'" said Lulusuku Mahlangu.
"Its greed," the electrical engineering student said.
"When you have too much power, you think you can control everyone."
Many have expressed indignation and bemusement that whites could be assigned victim status in South Africa.
The white-supremacist apartheid government, headed by an Afrikaner nationalist party, ruled the country until 1994.
Whites still own two-thirds of farmland and on average earn three times as much as black South Africans.
"I find it funny because I live here and I don't see that sort of persecution in any way," said Lwandle Yende, 34.
- 'Borderline lame' -
"It's ridiculous, funny and weird," said Yende, a telecommunications specialist with neat black and brown dreadlocks and a chin-curtain beard.
"I think we've been quite accommodating with everything that has happened in our past," said Yende, adding: "There is no such thing like apartheid 2.0."
Trump's criticism centres on a new law that allows the South African government, in certain particular circumstances, to seize property without payment if this is ruled to be in the public interest.
The law mainly clarifies an existing legal framework. Legal experts have stressed it does not give new powers to the government.
Trump's offer to accept Afrikaners as refugees caught many off guard, including right-wing white lobby groups.
The suggestion "has some racist undertones," said Reabetswe Mosue, 22.
"It is uninformed and borderline lame."
Trump's executive order pulls the plug on all US funding to South Africa, including a major contribution to the country's HIV programme.
"America has betrayed us by bringing him back," 56-year-old pastor Israel Ntshangase said of Trump.
"He messed up with Africa and he is doing it again," he said, warning that Trump's policies "will haunt him".
- Life in America 'not cheap' -
The South Africa government has sought to allay fears about the fallout from Trump's resettlement proposal, saying it was "ironic" that it came from a nation embarking on a deportation programme.
"Who wants to leave this beautiful country?" posed Yende as he adjusted his designer shades, adding that his white friends found the proposal laughable.
Trump's scheme appears to offer much to Afrikaners but may ultimately deliver little, said Matthew Butler, a 62-year-old tax and insurance specialist.
"America is not cheap," the white man with a calm demeanour told AFP. "Are you going to have work? How are you going to make a living?"
Nonetheless, the South African Chamber of Commerce in the United States reported a surge in inquiries about resettlement, estimating that 50,000 people may consider leaving South Africa.
None of them should be stopped from leaving, opined University of the Witwatersrand lecturer Hannah Maja, on her way from shopping for a staff party.
"Let them do whatever they want to do in order for them to get the fresh air that they need and want," the 28-year-old said sardonically.
"I think there's something interesting when white people get together and decide to fight. Because at the end of the day, black people still suffer," she said.
It was a call that did not resonate with film student Clayton Ndlovu, however.
"We do need those Afrikaans. As much as we don't get along, we actually do need them," said the 22-year-old.
"Trump is just trying to scare people."
ho/gs/gil
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Modi Urges Indians to Buy Local Goods After Trump Tariffs
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi urged citizens to buy locally made good to cushion the economy during heightened global uncertainty. The comments came days after Trump slapped a 25% tariff on Indian exports to the US and imposed higher duties on several countries, stoking concerns about a slowdown in global growth and market volatility. He didn't refer to US tariffs directly in his speech at a rally in the northern state of Uttar Pradesh on Saturday.
CNBC
2 hours ago
- CNBC
India to maintain Russian oil imports despite Trump threats, government sources say
India will keep purchasing oil from Russia despite U.S. President Donald Trump's threats of penalties, two Indian government sources told Reuters on Saturday, not wishing to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter. On top of a new 25% tariff on India's exports to the U.S., Trump indicated in a Truth Social post last month that India would face additional penalties for purchases of Russian arms and oil. On Friday, Trump told reporters he had heard that India would no longer be buying oil from Russia. But the sources said there would be no immediate changes. "These are long-term oil contracts," one of the sources said. "It is not so simple to just stop buying overnight." Justifying India's oil purchases from Russia, a second source said India's imports of Russian grades had helped avoid a global surge in oil prices, which have remained subdued despite Western curbs on the Russian oil sector. Unlike Iranian and Venezuelan oil, Russian crude is not subject to direct sanctions, and India is buying it below the current price cap fixed by the European Union, the source said. The New York Times also quoted two unnamed senior Indian officials on Saturday as saying there had been no change in Indian government policy. Indian government authorities did not respond to Reuters' request for official comment on its oil purchasing intentions. However, during a regular press briefing on Friday, foreign ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said India has a "steady and time-tested partnership" with Russia. "On our energy sourcing requirements ... we look at what is there available in the markets, what is there on offer, and also what is the prevailing global situation or circumstances," he said. The White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Trump, who has made ending Russia's war in Ukraine a priority of his administration since returning to office this year, has expressed growing impatience with Russian President Vladimir Putin in recent weeks. He has threatened 100% tariffs on U.S. imports from countries that buy Russian oil unless Moscow reaches a major peace deal with Ukraine. Russia is the leading supplier to India, the world's third-largest oil importer and consumer, accounting for about 35% of its overall supplies. India imported about 1.75 million barrels per day of Russian oil from January to June this year, up 1% from a year ago, according to data provided to Reuters by sources. But while the Indian government may not be deterred by Trump's threats, sources told Reuters this week that Indian state refiners stopped buying Russian oil after July discounts narrowed to their lowest since 2022 - when sanctions were first imposed on Moscow - due to lower Russian exports and steady demand. Indian Oil Corp, Hindustan Petroleum Corp, Bharat Petroleum Corp and Mangalore Refinery Petrochemical Ltd have not sought Russian crude in the past week or so, four sources told Reuters. Nayara Energy - a refinery majority-owned by Russian entities, including oil major Rosneft, and major buyer of Russian oil - was recently sanctioned by the EU. Nayara's chief executive resigned following the sanctions, and three vessels laden with oil products from Nayara Energy have yet to discharge their cargoes, hindered by the new EU sanctions, Reuters reported last week.
2 hours ago
Senate confirms former Fox News host Pirro as top federal prosecutor for the nation's capital
WASHINGTON -- The Senate has confirmed former Fox News host Jeanine Pirro as the top federal prosecutor for the nation's capital, filling the post after President Donald Trump withdrew his controversial first pick, conservative activist Ed Martin Jr. Pirro, a former county prosecutor and elected judge, was confirmed 50-45. Before becoming the acting U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia in May, she co-hosted the Fox News show 'The Five' on weekday evenings, where she frequently interviewed Trump. Trump yanked Martin's nomination after a key Republican senator said he could not support him due to Martin's outspoken support for rioters who stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Martin now serves as the Justice Department's pardon attorney. In 2021, voting technology company Smartmatic USA sued Fox News, Pirro and others for spreading false claims that the company helped 'steal' the 2020 presidential election from Trump. The company's libel suit, filed in a New York state court, sought $2.7 billion from the defendants. Last month, Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee voted unanimously to send Pirro's nomination to the Senate floor after Democrats walked out to protest Emil Bove's nomination to become a federal appeals court judge. Pirro, a 1975 graduate of Albany Law School, has significantly more courtroom experience than Martin, who had never served as a prosecutor or tried a case before taking office in January. She was elected as a judge in New York's Westchester County Court in 1990 before serving three terms as the county's elected district attorney. In the final minutes of his first term as president, Trump issued a pardon to Pirro's ex-husband, Albert Pirro, who was convicted in 2000 on conspiracy and tax evasion charges.
