Lesley Riddoch slams Labour benefits cuts on Question Time
Appearing on Thursday's programme in St Andrews, the journalist and broadcaster said that society has become more "precarious" and "adversarial" as she hit back at Labour's "unnecessary" plans to make it harder for people with disabilities to access benefits.
Riddoch appeared on the programme alongside Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville, Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar, Scottish Conservative MP Andrew Bowie and Reform UK councillor Thomas Kerr.
READ MORE: 'Bizarre': Question Time called out as Reform councillor joins Scottish panel
Shortly after the programme was broadcast, the UK Government announced it had partially U-turned on its proposals in a bid to win over more than 100 Labour rebels who were set to block the bill from passing.
In a late-night letter to MPs, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall confirmed that people who currently receive the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) disability benefit would be exempt from planned cuts to eligibility, while all current recipients of the Universal Credit health element – and any new applicants meeting the "severe conditions criteria" – will have their incomes protected in real terms.
However, new claimants from November 2026 will still be subject to these changes in eligibility requirements, leading critics to condemn the decision as creating a "two-tier" welfare system.
During a segment of the programme debating why Labour is cutting welfare and increasing defence spending, Riddoch told the Question Time audience: "There's been a 25% increase in the number of people committing suicide, dying of alcohol, of, of drugs since before Covid.
"This is not like a snowflake generation. This is serious, serious mental health issues which I think are also related to a dog-eat-dog adversarial society where people are in precarious renting situations, precarious jobs. Everything's precarious that for my generation was not.
"So you put that all together and you get, if you're unfortunate enough to be on Universal Credit, £100 a week. I'd like to see people managing on this.
"For sure, this all needs to be looked at again, but in terms of the kind of benefits that Britain gives compared to other countries across Europe, we're still bumping along at the bottom."
Riddoch added: "This seems to me to be a completely unnecessary attack on people who have got no capacity to come back and argue about this.
"It's demeaning to end up being allocated points according to whether or not you can basically wash your undercarriage or not, because that's what it's coming down to.
READ MORE: John Swinney rejects Reform UK coalition but leaves door open for Scottish Labour
"I cannot believe that anybody who stood in any way as a socialist could possibly be looking at this as a viable solution to anything."
Meanwhile, Somerville hit out at the Scottish Labour leader's continued support for the welfare cuts, even with one third of Scottish Labour MPs expressing their opposition.
Addressing Sarwar directly, she said: "You can try and make this up as you go along, but you have for months, for months talked about your support for Keir Starmer on this issue.
"Labour's own policies, which Anas in the past has defended, has meant that 250,000 people will get put into poverty, a Labour Government pushing 50,000 children into poverty.
"That's why we've taken the decision not to do this in Scotland, because let's be very clear – this has nothing to do with helping people into work.
"Adult Disability Payment, or PIP as it is in the rest of the UK, is a benefit that's there to ensure that the additional costs you have from being disabled or having a long term condition are assisted with. That's what it's about.
"And actually, what the disabled people's organisations say, is if you cut that you're going to hamper people from getting to work.
"The irony is we're going to have a Labour Government cutting money from disabled people, and what will happen? They'll struggle more to get into work, the pressure will build on our NHS, pressure will build on social care.
"This will not deliver £5 billion worth of savings, even if (Keir) Starmer, with Anas's support, goes ahead with it."
READ MORE: Scottish Labour lose by-election as minority administration under threat
When asked by host Fiona Bruce if she was "happy" to see the welfare bill also increasing north of the Border, Somerville said: "Well what we've said up in Scotland all along is you have to have a robust social security system, but it is an important safety net for people."
Bruce interrupted: "Ok, but that's not answering the question. Would you like to see reforms and cuts to the size of the welfare bill here in Scotland?"
Somerville responded: "Well, with respect, it is answering that question, because we have to have a system that supports people who need it, so I will not support cuts if it takes away from the vulnerable.
"I am happy that we have a Government that has the backs of disabled people, unlike Labour."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
How the future of the Right is being shaped... over exquisite lunches at London's most exclusive clubs
The future of Right-wing politics in Britain is being decided on the cigar terraces of Mayfair. As the opinion poll surge of Nigel Farage 's Reform UK shakes the foundations of the Conservatives, power-brokers from both parties are cutting deals and war-gaming defections on adjoining tables in the capital's most salubrious salons. The Tories have been described as the most successful political party in the world, on the back of 200 years of near-electoral dominance. But if leader Kemi Badenoch is going to maintain that reputation until the next election, it will require a revival of Lazarus-like dimensions. According to a YouGov poll last week, Mr Farage would win 271 seats if an election were held now – well ahead of Labour on 178. The Conservatives would trail the Liberal Democrats on a dismal rump of just 48 seats. It has led to long, dark nights of the soul for Tory grandees and donors: do they stick with the Conservatives, even if they are sleepwalking to electoral doom? Do they try to form a pact with Mr Farage? Or do they just jump ship completely? The result has been a series of lunches and dinners in ultra-exclusive clubs such as 5 Hertford Street and its sister institution Oswald's, both owned by entrepreneur Robin Birley. Oswald's, which is frequented by the likes of the Prince of Wales, Tony Blair, Boris Johnson and the Beckhams, was the venue for a splashy £1 million fundraising event for Reform earlier this year. And on a single day this month, the same lunch service at Oswald's boasted former prime minister David Cameron, his ex-chancellor George Osborne and Tory leadership hopeful Robert Jenrick all dining together, next to Mr Farage and his treasurer Nick Candy in deep conversation on a nearby table – and with former Tory Cabinet minister Jacob Rees-Mogg, who has urged the two parties to form a pact, offering greetings from a third table. In the same week, a short walk across Berkley Square at 5 Hertford Street, popular with Eurocrats and stars such as Hugh Grant, a single lunch sitting offered the spectacle of billionaire Michael Spencer, Lord Cameron's former treasurer, dining with Francis Maude, an ex-Tory chairman, under the watchful eyes of Mr Farage's inner circle, including Arron Banks and Andy Wigmore – the self-styled 'bad boys of Brexit' who helped fund Mr Farage's Brexit campaign in the 2016 referendum – and Mr Farage's mysterious fixer, 'Posh' George Cottrell. As the wine flowed – full-bodied red for the Tories, chablis for the Faragistes – it represented a neat microcosm of the shifting tectonic plates: Lord Maude – tipped to return to the chairman role – is understood to have been lobbying Lord Spencer for funds for the party, while the Faragistes were drawing up a list of Tory donors to target for defection. At the centre of this venn diagram of plotting is Mr Jenrick, who is more open than Mrs Badenoch to cutting a deal with Reform – and is said to have received Lord Cameron's backing to succeed her as leader. Meanwhile, at The In & Out private members' club, a more traditional Armed Forces venue situated at the other end of Piccadilly, allies of Mr Farage and Mr Jenrick have met for informal discussions about 'uniting the Right'. Conspirators have even floated the idea of Mr Jenrick acting as chancellor in a Farage administration, although both sides furiously deny any such plans. Mr Jenrick has also lunched at 5 Hertford Street with Rupert Lowe, the Great Yarmouth MP who lost the Reform whip after a spectacular bust-up with Mr Farage. Even many moderate Conservatives, facing the loss of their seats, are now considering a merger. One member of the Leftish One Nation group said: 'A pact with Reform is inevitable now.' The MP added: 'There should be a non-aggression pact where we agree to not stand in the five seats Reform already have, and we let Nigel take his pick of seats where he is coming second to Labour. And Reform would stand down in seats we are more likely to win. 'It would end up giving them the North to save the Home Counties.' An insider said Tory leader Mrs Badenoch 'would not be able to do the deal' but added that the timing had to be right for her successor to do so. The source said: 'At the moment there no point doing any type of deal because Reform is on a high. Labour has imploded too early – all the benefit is going to Reform. Kemi isn't nimble enough to capitalise on it.' Mrs Badenoch is continuing to pursue a 'slow and steady' approach, and regularly speaks to Lord Maude. 'He tells her to be patient and give the public the chance to come around,' the source said. Even Mrs Badenoch's most vociferous critics say a leadership challenge is unlikely in the near future. Says one: 'She's 99 per cent safe until May. 'No one will want to own the next disaster – and there are a number coming down the line.'
Powys County Times
3 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Starmer: Labour will not take away ‘safety net' from vulnerable people
Sir Keir Starmer has said 'everyone agrees' the welfare system needs to be fixed but that Labour will not 'take away the safety net' that vulnerable people rely on. In a speech to the Welsh Labour conference that came after a major U-turn on reforms in the face of a backbench rebellion, he said fixing the 'broken' system must be done in a 'Labour way'. 'We cannot take away the safety net that vulnerable people rely on, and we won't, but we also can't let it become a snare for those who can and want to work,' the Prime Minister said. 'Everyone agrees that our welfare system is broken: failing people every day, a generation of young people written off for good and the cost spiralling out of control. 'Fixing it is a moral imperative, but we need to do it in a Labour way.' He called Welsh First Minister Eluned Morgan a 'fierce champion' and 'the best person to lead Wales into the future' to applause and cheers from the audience. Baroness Morgan had publicly criticised the welfare plans and called for Sir Keir to change tack on restrictions on winter fuel payments, which he also eventually reversed. Sir Keir Starmer told the BBC she was 'right to raise concerns' and promised to 'deliver on those as far as we can'. In her speech to the conference, Baroness Morgan said she was pleased the Government listened to her concerns and reversed planned welfare cuts. 'I'm glad the UK Government is a listening government and they heard our concerns and changed their approach to welfare cuts,' she said. 'We were really concerned about the impact these changes could have on some of our poorest and most vulnerable communities, and we made that clear to our colleagues in Westminster. 'And I am really glad they listened because that decision brings huge and welcome relief to thousands of people in Wales who rely on this support to live with dignity.' Farmers gathered outside the conference in Llandudno to protest ahead of Sir Keir's speech, with about 20 tractors parked on the promenade in the north Wales resort town by late morning. Later, some 150 protesters joined a march for Palestine outside the conference, walking solemnly to the venue where they stood for a few minutes to the beat of a drum. A small group of pro-Israel protesters shouted 'free the hostages' and held signs saying 'free Gazans from Hamas'. Sir Keir also said any deal between the Tories, Reform UK and Plaid Cymru at next year's key elections in Wales would amount to a 'backroom stitch-up'. The elections to the Senedd will use a proportional system for the first time, meaning coalitions are likely. The Prime Minister said it would risk a 'return to the chaos and division of the last decade' and risk rolling back the progress his party is starting to make. He told the Llandudno conference it would be 'working families left to pick up the bill'. 'Whether that's with Reform or with Plaid's determination to cut Wales off from the rest of the country, with no plan to put Wales back together,' he said. 'I know that these are the parties that talk a big game, but who is actually delivering?' Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch has not ruled out making deals with Plaid Cymru or Reform at the next Senedd election. Reform UK is eyeing an opportunity to end Labour's 26 years of domination in the Welsh Parliament. Labour performed poorly in this year's local elections in England, which saw Nigel Farage's party win a swathe of council seats. Sir Keir also took aim at Mr Farage, calling him a 'wolf in Wall Street clothing' who has 'no idea what he's talking about'. He said the Reform UK leader 'isn't interested in Wales' and has no viable plan for the blast furnaces at Port Talbot. More than half of voters think Labour has underperformed since Sir Keir became prime minister, polling released on Saturday showed. The Opinium survey showed 54% think Labour has done a worse job than expected, while 18% think the party has exceeded expectations.
South Wales Guardian
3 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Conservative MP refers himself to watchdog over adviser role
Former minister George Freeman submitted queries to Labour ministers about the sector the firm operates in, The Times reported. The newspaper published what it said were leaked emails that showed exchanges in which Mr Freeman had asked the company's director what to ask about as he prepared written parliamentary questions related to space data and emissions tracking. He reportedly tabled the questions, which are a way for MPs to ask for more information on the policies and activities of government departments, to the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology and the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero. He became a paid adviser with GHGSat, a monitoring service for greenhouse gas emissions, in April last year. The appointments watchdog Acoba advised him that in taking up the role, 'there are risks associated with your influence and network of contacts gained whilst in ministerial office'. 'In particular, this is a company that is interested in government policy and decisions relating to the civil space sector and emissions. 'You noted you have made it clear to the company that you will not lobby government on its behalf, and this will not form part of your role.' Mr Freeman told the Times: 'As a longstanding advocate of important new technologies, companies and industries, working cross-party through APPGs (All-Party Parliamentary Groups) and the select committee, I regularly ask experts for clarification on technical points and terminology, and deeply respect and try to assiduously follow the code of conduct for MPs and the need to act always in the public interest. 'Throughout my 15 years in parliament (and government), I have always understood the need to be transparent in the work I have done for and with commercial clients and charities and am always willing to answer any criticism. 'I don't believe I have done anything wrong but I am immediately referring myself to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards and will accept his judgment in due course.' Mr Freeman and GHGSat have been contacted for comment. A Conservative Party spokesperson said: 'George Freeman MP has referred himself to the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner. 'It would be inappropriate for the Conservative Party to comment further whilst the Commissioner's inquiries are ongoing.' The Lib Dems and Labour called for Tory leader Kemi Badenoch to suspend him. A Labour spokesperson said: 'Cash for questions was a hallmark of Tory sleaze in the 1990s, and three decades on the same issue has raised its head again. 'George Freeman has referred himself for investigation so now Kemi Badenoch must suspend him from the Tory whip.' Liberal Democrat Deputy Leader Daisy Cooper MP said: 'This looks like the same old sleaze and scandal people have come to expect from the Conservative Party. 'Kemi Badenoch should immediately suspend the whip from George Freeman while this is investigated. 'Failure to act would confirm that even after being booted out of government, the Conservatives are still hopelessly out of touch.' The MP for Mid Norfolk is currently on the science, innovation and technology committee and a trade envoy. He was responsible for the UK space agency in his previous role as a minister in the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology under Rishi Sunak.
