Rooibos, tea or coffee? What South Africans like to drink
When it comes to hot beverages, different demographic groups in South Africa tend to choose between coffee and various types of tea, including Rooibos.
What do South Africans like to drink when they take a break? Some of us cannot do without the early morning pick-me-up coffee, but other drink only tea. And if they drink only tea, which kind of tea do they prefer?
Eighty20 spills the tea on what South Africans like to sip by looking at the data. Andrew Fulton, director at Eighty20, says while coffee may be the go-to morning pick-me-up for many, tea remains the true global favourite, second only to water as the most consumed beverage in the world according to the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD).
'In South Africa, it is common to ask if people want Rooibos or regular when offering a cup of tea, and this shows how popular Rooibos is. Grown exclusively in the Cederberg region of the Western Cape, this naturally caffeine-free tea has become a global favourite. Just like Champagne, only products from this region can proudly carry the Rooibos name.'
The data shows that over 22.6 million South African adults enjoy Rooibos, green tea or traditional tea every day. And they do not only stick to just one type of tea, Fulton says. Almost 30% of traditional tea drinkers also sip some Rooibos daily, and almost half of them pair their tea habits with a daily cup of coffee.
Fulton says for brands this is a clear signal that tea time is all the time and for grocers, it is also important to look at complementary products, such as sugar. South Africans consume on average 4.2 teaspoons of sugar in tea, coffee, beverages or cereal per day.
ALSO READ: Why experts recommend Rooibos for better health
Who drinks what when it comes to coffee, tea and Rooibos tea?
Coloured and Afrikaans-speaking people in the Western Cape and Free State consume considerably more, while isiXhosa and isiZulu speakers in the Eastern Cape and KZN consume considerably less. This table shows what South African consumers drank yesterday and how many chose tea or coffee.
ALSO READ: Five tips to make the best cup of tea
Where tea comes from
When it comes to traditional tea, China is in the lead, producing nearly half of the world's tea, followed by India, Kenya and Sri Lanka (formerly known as Ceylon until 1972, a term still used interchangeably in South Africa for traditional tea).
Fulton points out that tea is a massive industry, with global production valued at $17 billion, while the industry employs approximately 13 million people worldwide.
Kenya is famous for its high-quality black tea, with its tea sector contributing over a quarter of the country's annual export earnings and providing employment to nearly 2 million people. South Africa's tea market is also brewing strong, projected to hit $447.29 million in revenue by 2025 with a steady annual growth of 3.07%.
Joko tea and Glen tea are the market leaders for traditional teas in South Africa, while Freshpak remains the top pick for over half of all Rooibos drinkers.
ALSO READ: 10 surprising facts about Rooibos
More people are drinking tea
Fulton says the consumption of traditional tea is increasing in East Asia, Africa and Latin America, but declining in Europe and North America. In North America, herbal teas and other ready-to-drink beverages are becoming more popular.
'This trend also positively affects our local tea substitute, Rooibos. The global Rooibos tea market is estimated to be worth approximately $1.3 billion in 2023, thanks to Rooibos Limited, the largest producer and distributor of Rooibos tea, exporting to 50 countries worldwide.
What is the difference between traditional tea and Rooibos? Traditional teas like black, green and Oolong all come from the Camellia sinensis plant, but Rooibos tea is different. It is technically not a true tea but a tisane, a caffeine-free herbal infusion made by steeping plant materials in hot water.
According to Fulton, people are switching to Rooibos all over the world, not only because it is a delightful drink but also due to its numerous health benefits. 'This naturally caffeine-free beverage is rich in antioxidants, helps to reduce blood pressure and improves cholesterol levels, soothes an aching stomach and can help to clear your skin.'
ALSO READ: Rooibos industry paid R12 million to Khoi and San community in historic move
What the data shows about tea drinkers
There is also tea drinking demographics that show how much people all over the world love a cuppa. Using data from MAPS, a survey of 20 000 South Africans conducted by the MRF, Eighty20 a consumer analytics and data science agency, shows that women, Indians and Asians are over-indexed for all types of tea.
The data also shows that Rooibos tea drinkers have marginally higher personal and household incomes than people who drink traditional tea, but the average household income of people who prefer green tea is nearly twice that of other tea drinkers. Green tea drinkers are also younger and better educated.
Fulton says looking at the Eighty20 National Segmentation groups, poorer segments, such as the Humble Elders and Mothers of the Nation, tend to drink traditional tea, while Comfortable Retirees prefer Rooibos tea and the Heavy Hitters and Middle Class opt for green tea. This table shows the preferences of the different groups:
'Tea remains a cultural staple and commercial powerhouse in South Africa, with over 22 million adults drinking it daily. The growth of Rooibos tea locally and globally signals a shift in consumer preferences towards healthier, caffeine-free alternatives, offering valuable opportunities for brands looking to connect with evolving lifestyles and demographics,' Fulton says.
NOW READ: Is coffee a luxury? Jacobs Coffee explains the price increase
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
8 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Media must help reposition the promise of NHI
South Africa stands at the threshold of the most consequential health reform in its democratic history: national health insurance (NHI). Its promise? A society where healthcare is not a privilege of the wealthy but a guarantee for all. Yet, what dominates headlines and talk shows is not the vision of equity NHI represents but a stream of narratives steeped in distrust, dysfunction and fear. The phrase 'If it bleeds, it leads' has long held sway in media circles, and when applied to NHI, it has too often bled perspective dry. Coverage tends to centre on stories of mismanagement, fears of a collapsing private healthcare system, and projected costs. These deserve attention. But they cannot be the whole story. What is equally, if not more, newsworthy is this: millions of South Africans live without consistent access to primary care, quality hospitals or affordable medication. That inequity should lead to action, not fearmongering. NHI is not just a bureaucratic policy — it is a moral reckoning. It seeks to right the deep structural injustices in our health system, many of which still mirror apartheid-era geography and class divides. The child in Mthatha should have the same chance at survival as the child in Sandton. That is the essence of NHI. As we approach the Finance for Development Conference in Sevilla, Spain, this Monday and the Brics Leaders Summit in Brazil shortly after, there will be high expectations of our health financing narrative as the Group of 20 presidency. In the wake of the dramatic withdrawals in official development assistance, leading policymakers have emphasised the need to sustain the gains towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) 3 target — universal health coverage — through state-led health financing as guided by the evidence-based policies of normative bodies such as the World Bank and the World Health Organisation. The world will be looking to us to lead by example: not just rhetoric. NHI is not just a bureaucratic policy — it's a moral reckoning. It seeks to right the deep structural injustices in our health system, many of which still mirror apartheid-era geography and class divides. The child in Mthatha should have the same chance at survival as the child in Sandton. That is the essence of NHI. We are not naive about the challenges ahead — governance, financing and implementation must be watertight. But scepticism must not become sabotage. South Africa has defied the odds before. We built the world's largest HIV/Aids treatment programme when many said it could not be done. We led globally on Covid-19 vaccine equity. We know how to turn a national crisis into a national triumph — when the narrative fuels solutions, not cynicism. That is where the media comes in. You are not just storytellers. You are story shapers. You can hold policymakers accountable while also giving voice to the underserved, platforming progress, and illuminating the moral argument behind reform. You can ask: 'What's broken?' — but also, 'What's possible?' NHI will not succeed without the public's understanding and engagement. And the public cannot engage with what they do not hear or see. So, I invite you — editors, journalists, broadcasters, producers — to reposition and reclaim its role. Tell the truth, but tell the whole truth — frame narratives, which can either build trust or fuel scepticism, amplify voices, especially those often excluded — such as marginalised communities. In essence, your role isn't just to report on reforms like NHI — you can influence whether society embraces or resists them. In the end, what will define us is not how loudly we argue but how we see our common humanity — and whether we act on it.
TimesLIVE
9 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Media must help reposition the promise of the NHI
South Africa stands at the threshold of the most consequential health reform in its democratic history: the National Health Insurance (NHI). Its promise? A society where health care is not a privilege of the wealthy but a guarantee for all. Yet, what dominates headlines and talk shows is not the vision of equity the NHI represents but a stream of narratives steeped in distrust, dysfunction and fear. The phrase 'If it bleeds, it leads' has long held sway in media circles, and when applied to the NHI, it has too often bled perspective dry. Coverage tends to centre on stories of mismanagement, fears of a collapsing private healthcare system, and projected costs. These deserve attention. But they cannot be the whole story. What is equally, if not more, newsworthy is this: millions of South Africans live without consistent access to primary care, quality hospitals or affordable medication. That inequity should lead to action, not fearmongering. The NHI is not just a bureaucratic policy — it's a moral reckoning. It seeks to right the deep structural injustices in our health system, many of which still mirror apartheid-era geography and class divides. The child in Mthatha should have the same chance at survival as the child in Sandton. That is the essence of NHI. As we approach the Finance for Development Conference in Sevilla, Spain, this Monday and the Brics Leaders Summit in Brazil shortly after, there will be high expectations of our health financing narrative as the G20 presidency. In the wake of the dramatic withdrawals in Official Development Assistance, leading policymakers have emphasised the need to sustain the gains towards the SDG 3 target — universal health coverage — through state-led health financing as guided by the evidence-based policies of normative bodies such as the World Bank and the World Health Organisation. The world will be looking to us to lead by example: not just rhetoric. The NHI is not just a bureaucratic policy — it's a moral reckoning. It seeks to right the deep structural injustices in our health system, many of which still mirror apartheid-era geography and class divides. The child in Mthatha should have the same chance at survival as the child in Sandton. That is the essence of NHI. We are not naive about the challenges ahead — governance, financing, and implementation must be watertight. But scepticism must not become sabotage. South Africa has defied the odds before. We built the world's largest HIV treatment programme when many said it couldn't be done. We led globally on Covid-19 vaccine equity. We know how to turn a national crisis into a national triumph — when the narrative fuels solutions, not cynicism. That is where the media comes in. You are not just storytellers. You are story-shapers. You can hold policymakers accountable while also giving voice to the underserved, platforming progress, and illuminating the moral argument behind reform. You can ask: 'What's broken?' — but also, 'What's possible?' The NHI will not succeed without the public's understanding and engagement. And the public cannot engage with what they do not hear or see. So, I invite you — editors, journalists, broadcasters, producers — to reposition and reclaim its role. Tell the truth, but tell the whole truth — frames narratives, which can either build trust or fuel scepticism, amplify voices, especially those often excluded — such as marginalised communities. In essence, your role isn't just to report on reforms like the NHI — you can influence whether society embraces or resists them. In the end, what will define us is not how loudly we argue but how we see our common humanity — and whether we act on it.
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Ignoring sexual health costs South Africa $34bn, and counting
South Africa's failure to adequately invest in sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) for young people is costing the nation a staggering $33.7 billion. Image: Lebohang Mashiloane/Supplied A DAMNING new report by UNAIDS revealed that South Africa's failure to adequately invest in sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) for young people was costing the nation a staggering $33.7 billion (about R599bn) over a cohort's lifetime, equivalent to 10.1% of the country's annual gross domestic product (GDP). The report, titled The Cost of Inaction and funded by the Swedish government, painted a grim picture of how policy failures in adolescent health were creating long-term economic consequences that far outweigh the costs of intervention. The numbers told a devastating story. South Africa's cost of inaction on youth SRHR exceeded the country's entire annual education budget and was more than double its health budget. 'For every R100 spent in the country over a year, the cost of inaction on youth SRHR is equivalent to R8 in financial outlays paying for the effects of the lack of SRHR services, or opportunity costs of future value and income foregone,' the report stated with alarming clarity. This economic burden manifested across three critical areas: early pregnancy, HIV transmission, and gender-based violence (GBV) — each creating ripple effects that extended across generations. The report revealed that one in three South African girls who would fall pregnant during adolescence dropped out of school, with catastrophic consequences for their earning potential. A girl who completed secondary school would earn 3.1 times more annually than one who dropped out, creating a lifetime earnings gap of about $150 198 per individual at present value. The situation was particularly dire because adolescent mothers faced multiple disadvantages. 'They are less likely to complete secondary school and more likely to have a higher fertility rate, with more negative health outcomes,' the report stated. The children of teenage mothers also suffer, being more likely to experience poor health, educational challenges, and economic hardship, perpetuating intergenerational cycles of poverty. The Health Department confirmed receipt of questions from the Sunday Independent, but did not respond by the time of compiling this report. The Department of Social Development also did not respond to questions by the time of compiling this report. While the UNAIDS report highlights significant gaps and costs associated with inaction, it is important to note that the South African government has, in recent years, made substantial new investments in health and social development, particularly since the 2025/26 national budget. In May this year, Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana announced that the total health budget would rise from R277bn in 2024/25 to R296bn in 2025/26, with a projected increase to R329bn by 2027/28. This expanded allocation is specifically aimed at strengthening public health infrastructure, improving access to chronic medications, and addressing critical staffing shortages. Notably, an additional R20.8 billion over three years is being used to employ 800 post-community service doctors and 9 300 healthcare professionals in public hospitals and clinics, a move intended to address the chronic shortage of medical staff and improve service delivery in underserved areas. Further, more than R6 billion has been allocated for strategic health infrastructure projects, including the construction and refurbishment of hospitals and allied health facilities, with the aim of reducing disparities in access to tertiary care. The government is also maintaining and increasing funding for the central chronic medication dispensing and distribution programme, which now benefits an estimated 40% of antiretroviral treatment (ARV) clients by improving access to chronic medications through alternative pick-up points. In addition, R9.9bn has been earmarked for the rollout of National Health Insurance (NHI), reinforcing the government's commitment to universal health coverage and improved access to essential health services. While South Africa had made progress in HIV treatment, the disease continued to take a heavy toll on young people, particularly adolescent girls and young women who accounted for a disproportionate share of new infections. The lifetime cost of HIV for young South Africans aged 15-24 totalled $11bn, with young women bearing the brunt at $8.2bn compared to $2.7bn for young men. 'A delayed HIV diagnosis results in the delayed start of antiretroviral therapy, with negative impacts on a person's health and higher long-term treatment costs,' the report cautioned. The economic impact extended beyond healthcare, as people living with HIV faced reduced productivity and earning potential. Perhaps most shocking were the figures on GBV, which cost South Africa $12.4bn per cohort of young women aged 15-24. This includes direct costs to survivors ($11bn), government expenses ($224 million), civil society costs ($387m), and business impacts ($796m). 'GBV has serious consequences for women's physical health, as well as their sexual and reproductive health and mental health,' the report found. 'It is also a fundamental violation of women's human rights and has adverse economic and social consequences for men, women, their children, families and communities.' The report highlighted how GBV intersected with other issues — survivors were at higher risk of HIV infection, and women with less education faced greater vulnerability to violence. 'The prevalence of physical violence was greater among less educated women than those with secondary education or higher,' the report noted, drawing on 2016 Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) data. Health sector experts, including researchers from the South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC), have acknowledged that the 2025 budget boost signals a government that is responding to dire public health needs, particularly for the more than 80% of the population reliant on public health services. They highlight the increased investment in human resources for health, early childhood development, and social grants as positive steps. However, they also stress the need for strong accountability measures and efficient translation of these funds into improved health outcomes. Despite these substantial investments, experts and civil society organisations continue to call for further improvements, including enhanced accountability, more robust monitoring and evaluation, and greater focus on addressing the root causes of health disparities. The government itself has acknowledged these challenges and has committed to ongoing reforms and targeted spending to address them. The report identified several critical areas where government action (or inaction) was exacerbating these problems: The Education-Health Divide: A persistent lack of coordination between the health and education sectors undermined efforts to provide comprehensive sexuality education (CSE). 'This divide needs to be overcome so high-quality, evidence-based, comprehensive sexuality education can be provided both in and out of school to young people,' the report stated. A persistent lack of coordination between the health and education sectors undermined efforts to provide comprehensive sexuality education (CSE). 'This divide needs to be overcome so high-quality, evidence-based, comprehensive sexuality education can be provided both in and out of school to young people,' the report stated. Inaccessible Youth-Friendly Services: Despite legal provisions allowing adolescents to access contraception, many faced judgmental healthcare providers. 'Health care providers believe that young women should not be having sex before marriage,' the report found, leading to limited contraceptive options and missed opportunities for prevention. Despite legal provisions allowing adolescents to access contraception, many faced judgmental healthcare providers. 'Health care providers believe that young women should not be having sex before marriage,' the report found, leading to limited contraceptive options and missed opportunities for prevention. School Retention Failures: While policies existed to allow pregnant learners to remain in school, implementation was inconsistent. 'Only a few schools have formal or effective mechanisms in place to offer opportunities for girls to catch up on missed work,' the report noted, with 33% of pregnant girls not returning to school. The report outlined clear, actionable solutions that would more than pay for themselves through economic benefits: Integrated SRHR Services: Combining HIV prevention, contraception, and GBV services in youth-friendly spaces could dramatically reduce costs. The report highlighted successful models such as the O3 Programme that linked schools with health services. Combining HIV prevention, contraception, and GBV services in youth-friendly spaces could dramatically reduce costs. The report highlighted successful models such as the O3 Programme that linked schools with health services. Comprehensive Sexuality Education: 'School-based CSE, when delivered effectively using engaging and interactive game-based methods, empowers young people to make informed decisions about relationships,' the report stated. This required proper training for educators and collaboration with health providers. 'School-based CSE, when delivered effectively using engaging and interactive game-based methods, empowers young people to make informed decisions about relationships,' the report stated. This required proper training for educators and collaboration with health providers. Economic Support for Young Parents: Programmes that helped adolescent parents complete their education, including childcare support and flexible schooling, could recover millions in lost earnings potential. The report cites Nacosa's successful peer education and remedial teaching initiatives. Programmes that helped adolescent parents complete their education, including childcare support and flexible schooling, could recover millions in lost earnings potential. The report cites Nacosa's successful peer education and remedial teaching initiatives. GBV Prevention Investments: Community-based programmes such as Stepping Stones and Sonke Gender Justice's One Man Can campaign have proven effective at changing harmful gender norms. The report called for scaling these interventions alongside clinical services for survivors. The report's conclusion was unequivocal: 'Business as usual is not going to work. Different approaches are needed to generate change.' It challenged policymakers to view SRHR not as an expense, but as an investment with measurable economic returns. 'Understanding the cost of inaction helps to re-evaluate current approaches,' the report stated. 'Costing activities, including the cost of inaction in the cost-benefit analysis, will enable appropriate investment decisions for activities that provide real change, both now and also in the health and economic livelihoods of the next generations.' For South Africa, the choice is clear: continue paying the astronomical costs of inaction, or invest strategically in the health and rights of young people to unlock their full economic potential. The numbers show there's only one fiscally responsible option. Get the real story on the go: Follow the Sunday Independent on WhatsApp.
