logo
What is MAX, the state-owned app Russia's Vladimir Putin is trying to replace WhatsApp with?

What is MAX, the state-owned app Russia's Vladimir Putin is trying to replace WhatsApp with?

First Post17 hours ago
Russia has ordered its officials to switch over to the Max app by September 1. Moscow has, in recent years, been trying to reduce its use of foreign apps such as Telegram, WhatsApp, and YouTube. Russia, after the invasion of Ukraine, designated Meta – which owns Facebook and WhatsApp – as an 'extremist organisation'. What is the Max app? read more
Russian President Vladimir Putin has given Russian officials until September 1 to switch over to Max. Reuters
Russia is set to ban WhatsApp in favour of its own chat app.
This comes after Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered officials to switch to a Russian app being developed known as Max.
But what happened? What do we know about the Max app?
Let's take a closer look:
What happened?
Russia has been trying to reduce its use of foreign apps such as Telegram and WhatsApp.
Facebook and Instagram are already banned in Russia. Russia in 2024 blocked Viber messenger.
Russia after the invasion of Ukraine designated Meta – which owns Facebook and WhatsApp – as an 'extremist organisation'.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Moscow is now set to ban WhatsApp, which is used by around 68 per cent of Russians every day.
Putin in June signed a law mandating the development of a state-sponsored messenger.
The Max app is being designed by state-run VK Company, which owns VK Video, a rival to YouTube.
VK Company was founded by Pavel Durov, the creator of Telegram.
The law also calls for apps to be banned from nations that have imposed sanctions on Russia.
He gave Russian officials until September 1 to switch over to Max.
Authorities are now telling WhatsApp to be prepared to stop services in Russia.
Moscow is now set to ban WhatsApp, which is used by around 68 per cent of Russians every day. AP
"The presence of such services in Russia's digital space is, in fact, a legal violation of national security," Anton Nemkin, a member of the State Duma IT Committee, said.
The Kremlin this week published a list of instructions from Putin, including an order to introduce additional restrictions on the use in Russia of software, including communication services, produced in 'unfriendly countries' that have imposed sanctions against Russia.
Russian lawmakers also approved sweeping legal amendments, proposing fines of up to $63 for anyone searching for material online that the government deems extremist - which includes not just the likes of Instagram and Facebook, but many opposition politicians and activists.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The move drew criticism, including from some Kremlin backers such as Margarita Simonyan, a state media executive who said journalists would be unable to investigate activities of opposition groups such as the Anti-Corruption Fund of late opposition figure Alexei Navalny.
What do we know about Max app?
Not much.
Officials say it is a messaging app much like WhatsApp, but with a huge difference.
The Max app is said to have full control over users' microphone, camera, contacts, geolocation and files. It does not turn off by standard means, uses root access and system files. It also sends data automatically to its parent company which is controlled by Russian authorities.
Pravda.com quoted one official as saying, 'The authorities have already created a new element of the centralised digital tracking system – messaging app Max from VK. All officials were ordered to switch to Max. The application has full access to the microphone, camera, contacts, geolocation and files. Does not turn off by standard means, uses root access and system jar files – signs of malicious software. The data is automatically transmitted to servers linked to VK, which is under the control of the secret services of the Russian Federation".
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Many are worried that the state is going to use Max to further tighten its grip on the lives of its citizens.
Some also fear that the authorities could hinder access to WhatsApp to encourage people to switch to Max.
Russia has done this in the past.
YouTube has seen its audience in Russia drop sharply after Russia has slowed download speeds.
The user base, which was over 40 million daily users in mid-2024, is now just under 10 million.
Anton Gorelkin, deputy head of the lower house of parliament's information technology committee, said in a statement on Telegram that the state-backed app, MAX, could gain market share if WhatsApp left.
'It's time for WhatsApp to prepare to leave the Russian market,' Gorelkin said.
Russian Senator Artem Sheikin last year had said that Moscow may block the app if it refuses to fall in line with Russian laws.
Telegram, ironically, is also under the eye of the authorities.
The app was created by Russian entrepreneurs Pavel and Nikolai Durov.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
While it does not have end-to-end encryption by default, it is known for its 'secret chats' that can protect users' privacy.
With inputs from agencies
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Weaker dollar, bond yields lift gold to more than 5-week high
Weaker dollar, bond yields lift gold to more than 5-week high

Economic Times

time14 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Weaker dollar, bond yields lift gold to more than 5-week high

(What's moving Sensex and Nifty Track latest market news, stock tips, Budget 2025, Share Market on Budget 2025 and expert advice, on ETMarkets. Also, is now on Telegram. For fastest news alerts on financial markets, investment strategies and stocks alerts, subscribe to our Telegram feeds .) Subscribe to ET Prime and read the Economic Times ePaper Sensex Today. Top Trending Stocks: SBI Share Price, Axis Bank Share Price, HDFC Bank Share Price, Infosys Share Price, Wipro Share Price, NTPC Share Price

'Weak attempt at distraction': Obama offers rare rebuke on Trump's ‘treason' claims; Democrats call it Epstein diversion
'Weak attempt at distraction': Obama offers rare rebuke on Trump's ‘treason' claims; Democrats call it Epstein diversion

Time of India

time26 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'Weak attempt at distraction': Obama offers rare rebuke on Trump's ‘treason' claims; Democrats call it Epstein diversion

Former President Barack Obama 's office issued a rare public response to President Donald Trump 's accusations of "treason" and election manipulation in 2016 and 2020. "Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response. But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one. These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction," said Obama spokesperson Patrick Rodenbush, as quoted by NBC News. This comes as Trump was questioned about Jeffrey Epstein but redirected the conversation alleging "criminality" by Obama. Trump stated that Obama had been directly implicated and claimed the actions in 2016 and 2020 were criminal at the highest level. Read more: Trump slams ex-US president; dodges Epstein question Trump's assertions stemmed from claims by National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard and CIA Director John Ratcliffe, who suggested Obama administration officials had manipulated intelligence and undermined Trump's 2016 electoral victory. Gabbard initiated a criminal referral to the Justice Department on Friday. At a subsequent meeting with congressional Republicans, Trump continued his criticism of Obama and others, calling them "vicious, horrible people." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This Could Be the Best Time to Trade Gold in 5 Years IC Markets Learn More Undo Rodenbush countered that the administration was misrepresenting information. He noted that recent documents did not contradict the established conclusion about Russian influence in the 2016 election, as confirmed by the 2020 bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report under then-Chairman Marco Rubio. "Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes. These findings were affirmed in a 2020 report by the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee, led by then-Chairman Marco Rubio," Rodenbush further said. The controversy extends to various interpretations of a December 8, 2016, intelligence assessment regarding Russian cyber activities. Representative Gabbard alleges that documents demonstrate Russia did not seek to interfere in the 2016 election to benefit Donald Trump, contradicting multiple investigations that indicated otherwise. 'On December 8 2016, IC officials prepared an assessment for the President's Daily Brief, finding that Russia 'did not impact recent U.S. election results' by conducting cyber attacks on infrastructure. Before it could reach the President, it was abruptly pulled 'based on new guidance.' This key intelligence assessment was never published,' Gabbard wrote in a post. The Obama administration did not assert that Russian cyberattacks affected the election results. 'I can assure the public that there was not the kind of tampering with the voting process that was of concern … the votes that were cast were counted — they were counted appropriately,' President Obama said from the White House, days after receiving the December 2016 brief referred to by Gabbard. The Obama White House stated that Russia attempted to interfere in the campaign by leaking hacked documents and utilising bots and troll farms to disseminate misinformation about the election—a finding later supported by Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation and a Senate report. Meanwhile, Democratic officials characterised these developments as diversionary tactics. House Democratic Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar suggested the focus on these matters was intended to deflect attention from the Epstein case. Recent activities include Trump's social media posts targeting political opponents and the Justice Department's release of files concerning Martin Luther King Jr.'s assassination, alongside information about James Comey's investigation of Hillary Clinton's handling of classified information.

Trump rehashes years-old grievances on Russia investigation after new intelligence report
Trump rehashes years-old grievances on Russia investigation after new intelligence report

Time of India

time29 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Trump rehashes years-old grievances on Russia investigation after new intelligence report

Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel President Donald Trump rehashed longstanding grievances over the Russia investigation that shadowed much of his first term, lashing out Tuesday following a new report from his intelligence director aimed at casting doubt on long-established findings about Moscow's interference in the 2016 election."It's time to go after people," Trump said from the Oval Office as he repeated a baseless claim that former President Barack Obama and other officials had engaged in was not making his claims for the first time, but he delivered them when administration officials are harnessing the machinery of the federal government to investigate the targets of Trump's derision, including key officials responsible for scrutinizing Russia's attempts to intervene on Trump's behalf in backward-looking inquiries are taking place even as the Republican administration's national security agencies are confronting global threats. But they have served as a rallying cry for Trump, who is trying to unify a political base at odds over the Jeffrey Epstein case, with some allies pressing to disclose more information despite the president's push to turn the attack prompted a rare response from Obama's post-presidential office."Our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response," said Patrick Rodenbush, an Obama spokesman. "But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one. These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction."Gabbard's new report on the Russia investigation Trump's tirade, a detour from his official business as he hosted the leader of the Philippines, unfolded against the backdrop of a new report from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard that represented his administration's latest attempt to rewrite the history of the Russia investigation, which has infuriated him for report, released Friday, downplayed the extent of Russian interference in the 2016 election by highlighting Obama administration emails showing officials had concluded before and after the presidential race that Moscow had not hacked state election systems to manipulate votes in Trump's Obama's Democratic administration never suggested otherwise, even as it exposed other means by which Russia interfered in the election, including through a massive hack-and-leak operation of Democratic emails by intelligence operatives working with WikiLeaks , as well as a covert influence campaign aimed at swaying public opinion and sowing discord through fake social media report appears to suggest the absence of manipulation of state election systems is a basis to call into question more general Russian interference. By issuing it, she appeared to recover her standing in Trump's orbit, which just one month ago had seemed uncertain after Trump said she was "wrong" when she previously said she believed Iran wasn't building a nuclear weapon."She's the hottest one in the room right now," Trump said Tuesday night. "Tulsi, great job - and I know you have a lot more coming."Democrats, for their part, swiftly decried the report as factually flawed and politically motivated."It is sadly not surprising that DNI Gabbard, who promised to depoliticize the intelligence community, is once again weaponizing her position to amplify the president's election conspiracy theories," Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee , wrote on investigations found Russian interference in 2016 Russia's broad interference in 2016 has been established through a series of investigations, including special counsel Robert Mueller's report, which concluded that the Trump campaign welcomed the Kremlin's help but also found insufficient evidence to establish a criminal conspiracy.A House Intelligence Committee report also documented Russia's meddling, as did the Senate Intelligence Committee, which concluded its work in 2020 at a time when the panel was led by Republican Sen. Marco Rubio, who's now Trump's secretary of state.A different special counsel appointed by the Trump Justice Department to hunt for problems in the origins of the Russia investigation, John Durham, did find flaws, but not related to what Gabbard sought to highlight in her report."Few episodes in our nation's history have been investigated as thoroughly as the Intelligence Community's warning in 2016 that Russia was interfering in the election," said Rep. Jim Himes, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence added that every legitimate investigation, including the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee probe, "found no evidence of politicization and endorsed the findings" of an intelligence committee assessment on Russian interference made public in document was released weeks after a CIA report that reexamined that earlier intelligence community assessment. That new review, ordered by CIA Director John Ratcliffe, did not dispute Russia had interfered but suggested officials were rushed in the assessment they administration is seeking investigations of former officials Ratcliffe has since referred former CIA Director John Brennan to the Justice Department for investigation, a person familiar with the matter has said. The department earlier this month appeared to acknowledge an open investigation into Brennan and former FBI Director James Comey in an unusual statement, but the status and contours of the inquiries are Obama, Trump on Tuesday rattled off a list of people he accused of acting criminally "at the highest level," including Comey, his 2016 Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton and former national intelligence director James accused Obama, without evidence, of being the "ringleader" of a conspiracy to get him. Obama has never been accused of any wrongdoing as part of the Russia investigation, and, in any event, a landmark Supreme Court opinion from last year shields former presidents from prosecution for official acts conducted in launched his tirade when asked about the Justice Department's effort to speak with Ghislaine Maxwell, the former girlfriend of Epstein, who was convicted of helping the financier sexually abuse underage girls."I don't really follow that too much," he said. "It's sort of a witch hunt, a continuation of the witch hunt."Trump is under pressure from conspiracy-minded segments of his political base to release more about the Epstein case. Democrats say Trump is resisting because of his past association with Epstein. Trump has denied knowledge of or involvement with Epstein's crimes and said he ended their friendship years ago.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store