
Giant tunnelling machine is lifted to the surface after finishing HS2 tunnels (no wonder it's costing so much)
The huge metal device has spent more than a year underground working on sections of the new high-speed rail network beneath the capital, finishing its project in June.
The so-called tunnel boring machine (TBM), named Emily, had been tasked with a 3.4-mile drive, starting at Victoria Road in the west London borough of North Acton.
It has now resurfaced as of Saturday, at its final destination of Green Park Way in the town of Greenford in neighbouring borough Ealing.
Since launching in February last year, it has completed one bore of the eastern section of the Northolt Tunnel, the second longest on the HS2 network at 8.4 miles.
It has removed 775,000 tonnes of clay and installed 17,514 tunnel segments in the passage, which stretches from Ealing to neighbouring borough Hillingdon.
Emily - weighing a huge 1,700 tonnes with a 9.11m diameter - is the third of four machines to work on the tunnel, with the final one expected to finish later this year.
But such enormous machines carry a hefty price tag - the entire network could end up costing as much as £80billion to build.
Shocking pictures show the device dwarfing the workmen supervising its removal from the ground.
Heavily reinforced ropes, hanging from a huge red metal structure, drag the machine from what appears to be an incredibly deep shaft leading down to the tunnel below.
The revelation of the truly imposing size of the machinery involved in HS2, or High Speed 2, is a stark reminder of the eye-watering cost of the project.
The Department for Transport's 'estimated range' for HS2's total cost in November 2023 was £45-54billion, a report by the Committee of Public Accounts published in February this year noted.
The latest estimate by HS2 Ltd - the government-funded company responsible for HS2 - was £54-66billion in June last year, it added.
The report concluded: 'With their competing cost estimates still in 2019 prices, then once adjusted for inflation the total programme costs might be close to £80billion.'
This came just before another damning report on the cost of the project, published last month.
It was discovered last month HS2 is set to be delayed for another two years as a report revealed costs for the project had increased by £37billion.
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander announced last month the line between London and Birmingham would no longer be completed in the target time of 2033.
She claimed the cost of the project shot up £37billion between 2012 and the last general election, The Telegraph reported.
The minister accepted 89 recommendations from an independent review into infrastructure projects, spearheaded by former Crossrail chief executive James Stewart.
Mike Brown, former Transport for London (TfL) commissioner, became the new chairman of HS2 Limited - the company in charge of the project.
A damning dossier of the project's shortcomings said the previous government spent £2billion on the original network between Birmingham, Manchester and Leeds before scrapping it.
After the Birmingham to Leeds and Birmingham to Manchester legs were scrapped in 2021 and 2023 respectively, HS2 will now just connect London and Birmingham.
More than £250million was spent by HS2 Ltd on failed designs for a new station at Euston by HS2 Ltd, the report also revealed.
The company was reportedly asked to provide a cheaper alternative but ended up nearly doubling the price in the second design.
A HS2 statement said Emily got through around 38 metres of the Northolt Tunnel each day 'at peak production'.
Had this pace been consistently maintained, the 3.4-mile route would have been completed in just over 140 days, or nearly five months.
Emily has in fact been working for 14 months.
The machine was manned by three teams of 48 working round the clock to dig the tunnel before lining it with concrete segments weighing up to seven tonnes each.
It came after two other TBMs, named Sushila and Caroline, worked on the western section of the tunnel from the West Ruislip area of Hillingdon.
Sushila and Caroline's drives were completed in December 2024 and April 2025 respectively.
The final machine, still working, will complete the work Emily started on the eastern end of the passage this summer.
Some 34 cross passages between the eastern and western bores will then be finished, before a flat surface is laid on the tunnel's base for tracks to be laid on.
Tunnel shafts for ventilation and emergency access will finish off the Northolt Tunnel project.
This passage will eventually take HS2's new high-speed trains from the outskirts of London to the new Old Oak Common station in west London.
All four devices finish at Green Park Way, lifted out of the ground like Emily.
It comes after Mary Ann, the first of two machines excavating the Bromford Tunnel from Warwickshire to Birmingham, finished work in early May.
The 3.5-mile passage stretches from the village of Water Orton to the West Midlands city's Washwood Heath area.
HS2 project client director Malcolm Codling said of the completion of Emily's work: 'HS2's tunnelling drives in London for the Northolt Tunnel are nearing completion and it is a real achievement for our team to complete this 3.4-mile section on the tunnel safely and with such efficiency.
'There is still much more to do in the tunnel to get it HS2 ready and we will be focusing on productivity to continue with our work safely to get the HS2 route in London ready for track to be laid, and systems installed.'
Emily's work was completed by HS2's London Tunnels contractor Skanska Costain STRABAG JV (SCS JV).
The firm's tunnels and routeway project director, Dave Hannon, said: 'The arrival of TBM Emily at Green Park Way marks a significant milestone in the programme.
'We are now approaching completion of the Northolt Tunnel - an exciting achievement and a testament to the collaboration, dedication, and technical capabilities of our teams.
'With our continued focus we are pressing ahead at pace to complete the remaining works, including cross passages, tunnel walkways, ventilation shafts, headhouses, and portals, as we deliver on part of the HS2 project.'
Teams manning Emily removed the clay from the ground on a conveyor belt.
The excavated soil has since been reused on sites in Cambridgeshire, Kent and Warwickshire, where it was transported by train.
Emily was made by world-leading tunnelling experts, German firm Herrenknecht.
This latest machine to finish was named Emily after Emily Sophia Taylor, who established Ealing's Perivale Maternity Hospital in 1937.
She became the borough's first female mayor a year later.
HS2, or High Speed 2, was proposed in 2009 to build a high-speed railway to connect London, the Midlands and the north of England.
The project was announced in 2010 by then Conservative Transport Secretary Philip Hammond.
But ever since it has been beset by controversy amid ballooning costs.
It was originally divided into phase one, from London to Birmingham; phase 2A, from Birmingham to Crewe; and phase 2B, from Crewe to Manchester.
The network will now just connect London and Birmingham.
And a particularly bizarre element of the works included spending £100million on a tunnel for bats.
This is despite there being 'no evidence' the trains will interfere with the mammals, ex-HS2 chairman Sir Jon Thompson said.
He claimed this is an example of the UK's 'genuine problem' with completing major infrastructure projects.
The company also came under fire when £20,000 was spent on a model station made out of Lego.
The company spent the equivalent of £1 per plastic brick - and used it at 20 events in two years.
The toys were used to recreate a planned site to help inform communities, businesses and the public about a new train station.
The Lego version turned out to be roughly the size of a kitchen table, and consultants Bricks McGee were paid to construct it.
In June, a whistleblower who lost his job after accusing HS2 executives of fraud over the true cost of the project won more than £300,000 in compensation.
Risk management expert Stephen Cresswell repeatedly raised concerns that the cost of the high speed rail line - which could end up landing the taxpayer with a bill of more than £80billion - was being 'actively misrepresented'.
The consultant was told by one HS2 executive to 'disregard' scenarios he had prepared which forecast a 'significant' increase in the price to the public, an employment tribunal heard.
As a result, Mr Cresswell warned he found himself in a 'very uncomfortable position' of having a 'very different' view to the high speed rail line company's 'documented position'.
The tribunal heard that in a meeting with bosses he said 'fraud had been committed because he understood fraud to be making false statement so as to secure a benefit'.
After losing his job, Mr Cresswell took HS2 to an employment tribunal, claiming he had his contract terminated and been denied other work as a result of blowing the whistle.
After the rail firm admitted that he had not given adequate levels of protection following his disclosures he has now been awarded £319,070 in damages.
In response, campaigners said it was not to late for Labour to consider scrapping high speed rail over years of 'catastrophic mishandling'.
HS2 Ltd previously said investigations into Mr Cresswell's claims found no evidence of fraud or illegal activity.
In a statement it said: 'HS2 Ltd has accepted that Mr Cresswell raised concerns as a whistleblower and was not then given the appropriate level of protection when his contract came to an end.
'This is regrettable and HS2 Ltd is committed to ensuring that staff and others can raise concerns in confidence.
'This admission does not mean that HS2 Ltd accepts the specific allegations around cost estimating practices raised by Mr Cresswell.
'However, the company is under now under new leadership and a comprehensive review of its skills and structures is being carried out.'
In May, a DfT spokesperson said: 'We take all whistleblowing allegations seriously and it is important that individuals are given appropriate levels of protection, which clearly was not the case for Mr Cresswell.
'There is a lot of hard work still to do to get this project back on track, which is why we are overseeing a total reset of HS2, and reviewing the programme's costs, schedule and culture.'
A HS2 Ltd spokesperson told MailOnline: 'Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) Emily achieved a peak production rate of around 38 metres per day during her journey beneath London.
'However, this rate reflects the machine's performance during optimal conditions and does not account for the full range of operational factors that determine overall tunnelling progress.
'In practice, the speed of a tunnelling operation is influenced by several variables, including ground conditions, maintenance requirements, logistics, and the careful set-up and commissioning phases at the start of the drive.
'These all contribute to the total time taken to complete a tunnel section.
'TBM Emily's tunnel drive was completed safely and successfully over 14 months, delivering a vital section of the HS2 route that will help to improve rail capacity and connectivity across the country.'
They added: 'Our Chief Executive Mark Wild has been clear that the overall delivery of HS2 has been unacceptable and significant changes are clearly needed to break the cycle of cost increases and delays.
'He is now embarking on a comprehensive review which will lead to a full reset of the company and project - ensuring the railway is delivered to the lowest reasonable cost.
'The multi-year financial settlement for the project - set out in the recent spending review - provides greater certainty to the delivery of HS2 and lays the foundations for the reset.
'This work is essential to ensure that HS2 can deliver the transformational benefits of economic growth and vital new rail capacity between our two biggest cities.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
10 minutes ago
- The Sun
Chelsea have spent eye-watering £360MILLION on defenders in three years – but how many of them were worth it?
THE arrival of £37million Jorrel Hato takes Chelsea's spending on defenders under their new owners past a record-shattering £360m. Yet the Blues back four which lines up against Crystal Palace on the opening weekend of the new season may well include just one player who cost a fee. Marc Cucurella, who came in from Brighton three years ago in a deal worth up to £62m, is the biggest success of Chelsea 's hit-and-miss defensive recruitment. The signing of Hato is a major coup for the Blues, with Liverpool and Arsenal among the other major clubs who wanted the talented and versatile teenager. The young Dutchman is the 12th defender brought in since the consortium led by Clearlake Capital and Todd Boehly took over the club in May 2022. But Cucurella, a Euro 2024 winner with Spain, is the only member of the current Chelsea back four that you would describe as world class. And if Chelsea are to win domestic and European titles, they will need more defenders to reach that level. To be fair, Enzo Maresca 's side can already claim to be world champions. To beat a flair-filled Paris Saint-Germain side 3-0, just weeks after they had spanked Inter Milan 5-0 in the Champions League final, was an impressive achievement. The back four which started the Club World Cup final was left back Cucurella, homegrown centre backs Levi Colwill and Trevoh Chalobah, and right back Malo Gusto. The Frenchman, now 22, could end up costing Chelsea £30.7m after signing from Lyon in January 2023 and spending the rest of that season on loan back at the French club. Gusto has done a decent, sometimes very good, job at right back. He covered for the long injury-related absences of Reece James over the last two seasons and kept his place when James was employed in midfield - as he was against PSG. 8 8 But if you believe Moises Caicedo and Enzo Fernandez will start the biggest games in front of the defence, and James will mostly play as an inverted right back when he is fit, then Gusto will not be in Enzo Maresca's strongest 11. Chalobah did well after returning from half a season on loan at Crystal Palace, but could yet find himself being sold this summer. As a product of the Chelsea Academy, he would generate pure profit for financial rules purposes and there could be clubs willing to pay £40m for him. If Chalobah left, his replacement as right-sided centre back at the start of the season would almost certainly be Tosin Adarabioyo. The free transfer from Fulham last summer has carved a niche for himself off the pitch as well as on it. At just 27 he is one of the senior members of the squad, and plays an 'Uncle Tosin' role to the youngsters, enjoying a particularly close relationship with fellow Mancunian Cole Palmer. But no-one, not even Tosin himself, would claim that he is one of Europe's best defenders. If Wesley Fofana is able to put his injury hell behind him and rediscover his previous form, he could yet meet those standards and become a Chelsea stalwart for years to come. Fofana, still just 24, has made only 34 appearances for the Blues since arriving from Leicester in the summer of 2022 in a deal worth up to £75m. He is the most expensive of all Chelsea's defensive signings and that means, through no fault of his own, he has also been the biggest let down. But only just. The Blues really have had trouble finding a settled and satisfactory centre back pairing. Within weeks of the 2022 takeover, Kalidou Koulibaly became the new regime's first defensive signing. The Napoli star's £35m fee felt a little steep for a player about to turn 31, but the Senegal international was highly-rated and on the radar of other big clubs. Koulibaly failed to live up to his billing, although he could point to the chaos of playing under three different managers and a hamstring injury as decent explanations. He was offloaded after just one season to Saudi Pro League side Al-Hilal - and played for them in this year's Club World Cup. When Chelsea set a new record for winter window spending in early 2023, Benoit Badiashile 's £35m arrival from Monaco went a little under the radar in the wake of massive deals for Enzo Fernandez and Mykhailo Mudryk. The Frenchman did fine in a struggling team in the remainder of the 22/23 season, but not well enough to seal his spot. And when injury kept Badiashile out of the start of the following campaign, Colwill took his chance after returning from loan at Brighton. 8 8 8 Meanwhile the unfortunate Fofana had suffered the second major knee injury of his short Chelsea career in the summer of 2023. Within weeks, the Blues had gone back to Monaco to bring in Axel Disasi for another £38m. The France international was a first choice under Mauricio Pochettino for much of the 2023/4 season. But new boss Maresca did not fancy Disasi, and he was sent on loan to Aston Villa for the second half of last season. The signing of Hato, 19, fits Chelsea's current transfer philosophy of signing the best young players and trying to turn them into superstars. If they fail, they can usually be sold on for a profit, as is likely to be the case with Renato Veiga. The versatile Portuguese was signed only last summer, did well enough to earn a loan to Juventus for the second half of the season and could find himself joining Atletico Madrid for a chunky fee. In addition to Veiga, Chelsea signed two teenage defenders last summer in centre back Aaron Anselmino and left back Caleb Wiley. The latter has now returned to Watford for a second season on loan, while Anselmino may well also leave on a temporary deal after recovering from injury. Mamadou Sarr, 19, is likely to be loaned back to Strasbourg after the Blues paid £12m to their sister club. Hato is also 19 but at a fee of £37m, he will surely need to deliver for Chelsea this season. The Blues will probably ease him in, perhaps initially as cover for left back Cucurella. In the longer term, Hato should end up challenging Colwill for that left-sided centre back slot or forming a partnership with the England international. And finally, after spending more on defenders than any club, Chelsea could end up with a world-class back four to show for it. 8


The Guardian
10 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on car finance scandal redress: mis-sold loans demand action, not excuses or spin
With its ruling in the car finance case, the UK supreme court sent a clear message: some motorists purchased vehicles with deals that were indeed unfair, but it's not the judiciary's job to redraw the boundaries of consumer protection law. That burden, the justices suggested, rests with regulators and elected governments. This reasoning is in line with a major speech in June by the court's president, Lord Reed, who argued that judges aren't policymakers – and shouldn't be. He led a bench that nonetheless upheld a finding of unfairness in the case of the factory supervisor Marcus Johnson. The court flagged the danger, defined the threshold – but stopped short of imposing redress itself. Now, the baton has been passed. Millions could get payouts if the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) follows the court ruling with its proposed redress scheme, now out for consultation. The regulator admits what courts and campaigners have long suggested: that hidden commissions and opaque contracts were endemic, and that consumers were misled on a large scale. It may be 2025, but the roots of this scandal stretch back decades. More than 90% of new car purchases are financed, and for years, buyers weren't offered the best deal – just the one that earned the broker the biggest cut. Last October, the court of appeal saw hidden commissions as tantamount to bribes – secret incentives to push pricier loans. Banks had been on the hook for potentially £40bn in compensation had that view prevailed. But the supreme court disagreed. Dealers aren't fiduciaries, it said. They're not priests or doctors. They're salespeople and everyone knows it. The Treasury had tried, and failed, to intervene on behalf of banks that feared big payouts. The supreme court dismissed that petition with waspish brevity. Rachel Reeves may argue she was guarding financial stability, but it is not a good look to be siding with lenders over misled consumers, especially when there is a strong case to suggest regulators had been asleep at the wheel. The FCA now admits that many firms broke the rules. It plans a compensation scheme covering loans dating back to 2007, including both discretionary and some non-discretionary commission arrangements. The potential bill? At least £9bn, and possibly double that. Most individuals will probably receive less than £950 in compensation. The court's refusal to stretch the law to encompass issues of trust wasn't a shrug; it was a signal. The law allows unfairness to be addressed. But the heavy lifting must be done by the state. This episode lays bare a deeper malaise. Britain's credit system often runs on skewed incentives and asymmetric information. Brokers pose as advisers but act as commission-driven salespeople. In Mr Johnson's case a £1,650 hidden commission – a quarter of the car's price – went undisclosed. That's not a quirk; it's economics' classic lemons problem. In car finance, consumers didn't know how much brokers were pocketing or how that skewed the deal. Without trust or clarity, quality suffers – and everyone overpays for 'lemons' (duds). The court of appeal did focus minds; and failing to interpret the law robustly in the face of clear wrongdoing is itself a judicial choice. The supreme court smartly redirected the narrative. The regulator is stirring. Ministers must now support a consumer-facing system of redress and not shield the City from the consequences of its own mis‑selling. The public will be watching.


Daily Mail
40 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Divorced man awarded only 0.5 per cent of wife's $80million fortune wins 'gender bias' appeal
A city trader who claimed his divorce settlement was 'gender prejudice' after being handed $450K of his ex-wife's $80million family fortune has won an appeal case to have the arrangement reviewed. Simon Entwistle's three-year marriage to Jenny Helliwell ended in 2022 but he was awarded just 0.5 per cent of her fortune. He blamed gender bias for the decision and has won his case at the Court of Appeal in London, meaning his settlement will now be considered again. Appeal judges ruled Jenny had engaged in 'fraudulent' behavior by not declaring almost $64milllion of her £personal fortune whilst making a prenuptial agreement. The couple had a lavish wedding in Paris in August 2019 and Entwistle 'enjoyed the trappings of being married into a family of exceptional wealth,' it was said. They were living in a luxury villa in Dubai gifted to Helliwell by her father, businessman Neil Helliwell. But when they split up, Helliwell got her lawyers to order her husband out of the family home with just 48 hours' notice in August 2022. The pair, both 42, then went to court, with Entwistle asking for $3.3million from his interior designer ex-wife's personal fortune. Entwistle claimed he needed $48K a year for flights and $35K a year 'on a meal plan just for himself' because he said: 'I can't even cook an omelet. The judge told him: 'Being married to a rich person for three years does not suddenly catapult you into a right to live like that after the relationship has ended.' He was left with a 0.5 per cent share of the pot after the judge upheld a pre-nuptial agreement the pair had signed promising they would each keep their own assets in the event of a split. Appealing that ruling, Entwistle said he was a victim of 'gender prejudice' and that the prenup had been invalidated by Helliwell having failed to disclose assets worth almost $64milllion- amounting to 73 per cent of her wealth. Now, Lady Justice King has ruled that the nondisclosure by the heiress amounted to 'fraudulent' behavior which had invalidated the prenup. She allowed Entwistle's appeal and sent the case back to the divorce courts, ordering it to be recalculated as if the pre-nuptial agreement did not exist. The judge said: 'Willful or fraudulent breach of that agreement such that the disclosure made bears no resemblance to the true wealth of a capable of being material non-disclosure, as it deprives the other party of the information that they have agreed is necessary in order for them to decide whether to agree to a pre-nuptial agreement. 'Since the husband in the instant case was deliberately deprived of information which it had been agreed that he should have, in my judgment, the agreement cannot stand.' Challenging the judge's ruling at the Court of Appeal, Deborah Bangay KC, for Mr Entwistle, said: 'The judge was warned against gender prejudice, but failed to heed that warning. 'Had the positions been reversed, it is very unlikely that he would have so ungenerously assessed the needs of a wife after a six-year relationship.' She also argued that the prenup, which had been key to the husband's low award, was invalidated by Helliwell's failure to disclose her full wealth. Lady Justice King, giving her ruling, made no finding on the gender prejudice argument but said: 'The husband and wife entered into the agreement on the day they married, July 12, 2019. Upon divorce, each party would retain their own separate property and split any jointly owned property as to 50 per cent each. 'At the heart of the dispute is whether the wife's undoubted failure to disclose the majority of her substantial wealth should have the consequence that the agreement should not be upheld by the court. 'In the present case, the non-disclosure of the majority of her assets by the wife was undoubtedly deliberate.'