logo
NGOs count the cost of lost United States funding

NGOs count the cost of lost United States funding

Mail & Guardian06-06-2025

No service: The US government's funding cuts have put further strain on already overloaded clinics and forced some to close their doors. (Delwyn Verasamy)
South Africa's non-profit organisations are still counting the costs of the cessation of US funding earlier this year, with financial shortfalls leading to healthcare job losses while critical HIV vaccine services and research have been heavily scaled back.
US President Donald Trump announced in January that he was cutting US Agency for International Development (
According to official data, USAid disbursed $24.5 billion to organisations in the 2024 financial year.
Accountability Lab, a global network for transparency and open government, ran a survey of 266 organisations affected by the freeze from 1 to 18 May, and a third reported being 'at imminent risk of closure', with African countries — Kenya, Nigeria, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Uganda and Ghana — the most affected.
'Nine of the top 10 most affected are African countries, with El Salvador rounding out the top 10. Others include South Africa, Cameroon, Senegal and the US,' said Accountability Lab's global communications director Sheena Adams.
'Worryingly, 21% have only one month of financial resources remaining, while 24% report a three-month financial runway.
'In terms of job losses, almost 55% of respondents reported having furloughed or laid off staff, with a further 14% confirming that layoffs were under consideration.
According to the state department, the US government committed $330 million in aid to South Africa last year, with $318.2 million coming from USAid.
The lion's share, $219.7 million, was for HIV/Aids, followed by $43.11 million for basic health, $31.8 million for operating expenses, $7.512 million to environmental protection, $7.006 million for trade policy and regulation, $3.677 million for agriculture, $3.512 million for government and civil society and $1.608 million to basic education.
The aid suspension will roll back progress in the fight against HIV/Aids, says activist group Treatment Action Campaign (TAC).
'The USAid and Pepfar [the US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief] funding freeze has had a chilling effect on the global fight against HIV/Aids, particularly in countries like South Africa that bear a high burden of disease,' TAC spokesperson Xabisa Qwabe said.
'Many community-led organisations — including treatment literacy programmes, support groups and outreach initiatives — have had to scale down or suspend operations.
'Pepfar funding [disbursed by
TAC received substantial support from USAid/Pepfar through the Ritshidze Project, which enabled it to monitor service delivery, engage communities and hold the health system accountable.
'At its peak, up to 60% or more of TAC's operational budget was supported through this funding stream,' Qwabe said, adding that dozens of jobs had been lost.
'Staff retrenchments have occurred, particularly among community health educators and coordinators working in high-burden districts. The exact number may vary by province, but it has affected dozens of livelihoods.
'TAC's presence in many communities has been scaled back, meaning fewer workshops on treatment literacy, weaker monitoring of medicine stockouts and reduced mobilisation for treatment access and rights-based advocacy.'
Pepfar funding didn't directly pay for medication in South Africa but funded crucial support systems.
'The funding freeze has disrupted these support structures, leading to reduced testing, longer turnaround times and greater strain on overburdened clinics. Patients are increasingly falling through the cracks, especially in under-resourced communities,' she said.
TAC is actively seeking alternative funding, including local philanthropic partners, international donors, and development agencies, and has urged the government to step up support for civil society organisations.
'While some government departments have expressed willingness to explore support avenues, this is yet to materialise in substantial funding,' Qwabe added.
The solution, she said, is the urgent resumption of Pepfar funding with clear transition plans.
'We also need a stronger financial commitment from the South African government to support community-led health programmes. There should be greater investment in building sustainable, locally owned health infrastructure that doesn't rely solely on foreign aid. Civil society must be recognised as a vital partner in achieving these goals.
'This funding crisis is not just a bureaucratic issue — it's a humanitarian emergency.
'Patients are losing access to services and dedicated community health workers are losing jobs they've held for years. These are the very people who ensured South Africa's HIV treatment scale-up succeeded.'
'We're beginning to hear reports that HIV testing is not being done as much as it was before, viral load testing and CD4 count testing is coming down, which obviously will have an impact on our ability to keep people virally suppressed.
'People will get sicker, and once they are no longer virally suppressed, they are also at risk of transmitting the virus,' Gray warned.
'We will probably see both an increase in morbidity and, if we're not careful, mortality in both children and adults who are not properly in care.'
She noted that USAid and National Institute of Health (NIH) funding had supported scientific trials, adding: 'This has huge effects on HIV science and TB science, because we were involved in everything from vaccine research and development in both HIV and TB, as well as HIV cure, TB treatment trials and HIV treatment trials.'
'It also affects the NIH funding that supported clinical trial research infrastructure, laboratory research infrastructure and the whole ecosystem required to do innovation in HIV and TB — from discovery to pre-clinical testing to clinical trials to biomarker discovery.
'That whole ecosystem of innovation is severely hampered. The NIH funding was substantial — up to $250 million per annum.'
There have been job losses affecting a range of people involved in the work, from scientists and master's students to nurses and drivers.
'It has a huge impact on the human resources for research. That has an effect both at a macro and micro level on the economy. Drivers, counsellors, recruiters — all of them get retrenched, which means their families are thrown into poverty.
'If you have a quarter of a million US dollars of revenue coming in, all of that gets taxed, so there's also an impact on revenue collection.'
For example, the Perinatal HIV Research Unit at Baragwanath Hospital in Johannesburg has retrenched 70 staff members after losing NIH funding, which comprised 66% of its income.
'A lot more people will be retrenched over the next couple of months as the money dries up.
'Unless the research unit is able to diversify its funding stream it faces even further closure,' Gray said.
The loss of its USAid funding also forced the Brilliant Consortium to hal
'The vaccine manufacturing has been put on hold but we managed to find funding [from the Gates Foundation] to conduct a smaller study at a single site in South Africa,' Gray said.
The
'Many of our partners have completely shut down programmes and had to retrench staff and we are already feeling that we have to fill some of those gaps.
'Even testing kids the other day, we were down to one … how can you turn someone away from knowing their status? In the community there are concerns about whether people will be able to get their medication for their children,' she said.
'As a community-based organisation that has been serving our local community for 35 years, it's just heartbreaking to see the ripple effects of what has progressed.
'It's those who don't have options who are going to suffer the most.
'It is tragic. HIV has always been a global initiative with global targets and countries working together as a global community — and that has been destroyed.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

From groceries to bonds: How a 3% inflation target will affect you
From groceries to bonds: How a 3% inflation target will affect you

Mail & Guardian

time4 hours ago

  • Mail & Guardian

From groceries to bonds: How a 3% inflation target will affect you

A weaker dollar could lower South Africa's import costs, especially oil, which affects everything from fuel prices to transport tariffs. South Africa is on the cusp of a quiet, but profound, policy revolution, one that will probably not dominate headlines, but could change the cost of living, investment climate and policy credibility for years to come. The South African Reserve Bank is preparing to reset the country's inflation target, narrowing it from the traditional 3% to 6% band to a firm 3% anchor. In May 2025, inflation fell to 2.8%, its fourth consecutive month below the lower bound of the current target. With inflation subdued, the Reserve Bank has not only cut the repo rate to 7.25% but is also strongly signaling that a tighter target could offer greater stability, clarity and long-term growth prospects. This shift is not just academic. It would affect household budgets, food prices, interest rates, job creation, government debt and even South Africa's credibility in global markets. With inflation globally easing, and trading partners adjusting their own macroeconomic targets, the time is ripe for South Africa to follow suit. The current 3% to 6% target band was introduced in the early 2000s when South Africa was grappling with higher inflation volatility and external shocks. But, today, the inflation landscape has changed: Headline CPI has consistently remained below the 4.5% midpoint for the past year and recently fell under 3%. Core inflation, a better measure of persistent pressures, also dropped to 3.0%, suggesting deeper disinflation. With fuel and food prices stabilising, and the rand holding steady, the reserve bank has a rare opportunity to re-anchor inflation expectations at a lower and more credible level. A firmer inflation target provides clarity to markets, businesses and consumers. It helps reduce long-term borrowing costs, improves policy predictability and enhances investor confidence. South Africa's trade and investment flows are deeply influenced by the policies of its largest global partners, all of whom are recalibrating inflation expectations in a post-pandemic world. The US Federal Reserve is expected to begin cutting interest rates by Q3 2025, after inflation fell close to its 2% target. A weaker dollar could lower South Africa's import costs, especially oil, which affects everything from fuel prices to transport tariffs. The European Central Bank began its first rate cuts in June 2025, with inflation now hovering around 2.3%. As the EU is South Africa's top trading partner, stable prices in Europe support South African exports (cars, fruit, metals) and reduce price instability on imports. China faces an opposite problem: deflation. With consumer prices rising just 0.7%, its stimulus measures are designed to boost demand. This could temporarily reduce prices for South African imports, like electronics and machinery, but it could also dampen demand for key exports such as coal and iron ore. While inflation remains volatile in countries like Nigeria and Ghana, South Africa's ability to target and sustain a low rate would position it as a regional anchor of stability attracting investment and strengthening its voice in Africa's financial future. While discussions about inflation targets might seem removed from everyday realities, the effects of this policy will touch every household, small business and worker in South Africa. Here's how. When inflation is high, the prices of essentials like bread, maize meal, oil and meat often rise uncontrollably. A firm 3% anchor can slow these increases. This translates to more predictable household budgets and less pressure on working-class families. 'At 3% inflation, a typical R500 grocery basket would increase by just R15 a month, far less than the R40 to R50 jumps seen in high-inflation periods,' notes economist Reitumetse Mofokeng. Stable inflation contributes to a stronger rand and lower fuel price volatility. For taxi users, truckers and rural commuters, this means fewer fare hikes and transport cost spikes, a key driver of inflation for poor households. Lower inflation usually leads to lower interest rates. Over time, a 3% anchor could bring mortgage and car loan rates down. A R1 million home loan at 11.5% costs about R10 600 a month. At 9.5% (if inflation stabilises), that drops to R9 000 a month, a saving of R1 600 a month. That's money in the pocket for middle-income families struggling with high debt burdens. When inflation is under control, businesses can plan better, borrow more affordably and take investment risks. This spurs new hiring, especially in construction, retail and agriculture. Predictable prices are oxygen for township entrepreneurs,' says Khanyisa Nxumalo, a Sowet bakery owner. 'You can't hire if you don't know your costs next month.' Stable inflation helps workers negotiate real wage increases. In a high-inflation environment, a 6% raise barely covers the cost of living. At 3%, the same raise leaves workers with more take-home value. Despite its benefits, a 3% target isn't a cure-all. It must be managed carefully or it could backfire. If implemented too quickly, it could strengthen the rand too much, hurting export competitiveness. If productivity doesn't improve, South African goods might become too expensive globally. If fiscal discipline falters, inflation expectations could rise again, undermining the Reserve Bank's credibility. This is why the bank insists that it needs the treasury's backing for the shift and that the transition must be gradual, well-communicated and credible. Looking ahead: What South Africans should watch What to watch Why it matters July 2025 MPC Minutes Could signal formal move to 3% The treasury Finance minister must endorse the change Rand stability Key to keeping import prices and inflation down Repo rate forecasts Declining rates signal confidence in the anchor BER inflation expectations survey Shows if businesses and consumers are buying into the new framework For too long, high and volatile inflation has eaten into the incomes of poor and middle-class South Africans, discouraged savings and stifled investment. A firm 3% anchor is a bold policy pivot, one that aligns South Africa with global norms, encourages responsible governance and offers tangible relief for citizens. This is not just about economic theory. It's about bringing down the cost of living, unlocking credit, stabilising food and fuel prices and creating a more investable South Africa. And, if executed with the clarity and discipline that the Reserve Bank is known for, this could mark the beginning of a new macroeconomic era, one of price stability, public trust and economic inclusion. Anchoring at 3% won't fix everything. But it's one strong, steady hand on the wheel — exactly what this country needs right now. Nkosinathi Mtshali is a bachelor of laws student at University of the Free State.

Trump wins as Supreme Court curbs judges, but may lose on birthright citizenship
Trump wins as Supreme Court curbs judges, but may lose on birthright citizenship

TimesLIVE

time6 hours ago

  • TimesLIVE

Trump wins as Supreme Court curbs judges, but may lose on birthright citizenship

The US Supreme Court's landmark ruling blunting a potent weapon that federal judges have used to block government policies nationwide during legal challenges was in many ways a victory for President Donald Trump — except perhaps on the very policy he is seeking to enforce. An executive order that the Republican president signed on his first day back in office in January would restrict birthright citizenship, a far-reaching plan that three federal judges, questioning its constitutionality, quickly halted nationwide through so-called 'universal' injunctions. But the Supreme Court's ruling on Friday — while announcing a dramatic shift in how judges have operated for years deploying such relief — left enough room for the challengers to Trump's directive to try to prevent it from taking effect while litigation over its legality plays out. 'I do not expect the president's executive order on birthright citizenship will ever go into effect,' said Samuel Bray, a Notre Dame Law School professor and a prominent critic of universal injunctions, whose work the court's majority cited extensively in Friday's ruling. Trump's executive order directs federal agencies to refuse to recognise the citizenship of children born in the US who do not have at least one parent who is a US citizen or lawful permanent resident. The three judges found that the order likely violates citizenship language in the US constitution's 14th amendment. The directive remains blocked while lower courts reconsider the scope of their injunctions, and the Supreme Court said it cannot take effect for 30 days — a window that gives the challengers time to seek further protection from those courts.

Iran voices ‘serious doubts' over Israel commitment to ceasefire
Iran voices ‘serious doubts' over Israel commitment to ceasefire

The Citizen

time6 hours ago

  • The Citizen

Iran voices ‘serious doubts' over Israel commitment to ceasefire

Iran demanded that the United Nations recognise Israel and the United States as being to blame for this month's war. Iran on Sunday said it was not convinced Israel would abide by a ceasefire that ended their 12-day war this week. The most serious escalation to date between the arch-foes erupted on June 13, when Israel launched a bombing campaign in Iran that killed top military commanders and scientists linked to its disputed nuclear programme. Israel said its aim was to keep the Islamic republic from developing a nuclear weapon — an ambition Tehran has consistently denied, insisting it has the right to develop nuclear power for civilian purposes like energy. The fighting derailed nuclear talks between Iran and the United States, a staunch ally of Israel's. 'We did not start the war, but we have responded to the aggressor with all our power,' Iran's armed forces chief of staff, Abdolrahim Mousavi, was quoted as saying by state television, referring to Israel. 'We have serious doubts over the enemy's compliance with its commitments including the ceasefire, we are ready to respond with force if attacked again,' he added, six days into the ceasefire announced by US President Donald Trump. ALSO READ: Iran says no plan for new US nuclear talks, plays down impact of strikes Deadly war In a letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres published on Sunday, Iran demanded that the United Nations recognise Israel and the United States as being to blame for this month's war. 'We officially request hereby that the Security Council recognise the Israeli regime and the United States as the initiators of the act of aggression and acknowledge their subsequent responsibility, including the payment of compensation and reparations,' Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi wrote in the letter. The United States joined Israel in its campaign during the war, carrying out strikes on three key facilities used for Iran's atomic programme. Trump has threatened further strikes should Iran enrich uranium to levels capable of manufacturing nuclear weapons. ALSO READ: US joins Israel-Iran conflict with overnight bombing campaign According to the International Atomic Energy Agency, Iran had enriched uranium to 60 percent in 2021, well above the 3.67 percent limit set by a 2015 agreement from which the United States unilaterally withdrew in 2018. To make a weapon, Iran would need to enrich uranium up to 90 percent. Israel has maintained ambiguity about its own atomic arsenal, neither officially confirming nor denying it exists, but the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute has estimated it has 90 nuclear warheads. According to Iran's health ministry, at least 627 civilians were killed and 4,900 injured during the 12-day war with Israel. Retaliatory missile attacks by Iran on Israel killed 28 people, according to Israeli authorities. During the war, Iran arrested dozens of people it accused of spying for Israel, also saying it seized equipment including drones and weapons. Iran's parliament on Sunday voted to ban the unauthorised use of communications equipment, including tech billionaire Elon Musk's Starlink satellite internet service, according to the official news agency IRNA. 'Unacceptable' An Israeli strike on Tehran's Evin prison during the war killed at least 71 people, Iran's judiciary said Sunday. The strike on Monday destroyed part of the administrative building at Evin, a large, heavily fortified complex in the north of Tehran, which rights groups say holds political prisoners and foreign nationals. According to judiciary spokesman Asghar Jahangir, the victims at Evin included administrative staff, guards, prisoners and visiting relatives as well as people living nearby. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said on Monday that detained French nationals Cecile Kohler and Jacques Paris, held at Evin for three years, were not believed to have been harmed by the Israeli strike, which he described as 'unacceptable'. On Tuesday, a day after the strike, the judiciary said that the Iranian prison authority had transferred inmates out of Evin prison, without specifying their number or identifying them. The inmates at Evin have included Nobel Peace Prize laureate Narges Mohammadi as well as several French nationals and other foreigners. READ NEXT: Did the US strikes succeed, and how will Iran respond?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store