
Family's decision to sell Barne Estate influenced by young son's healthcare needs, High Court told
John Magnier
over the purported sale of a
Co Tipperary
estate broke down in the
High Court
on Thursday when explaining they had decided to sell the property in order to move to Australia to tend to their son's health needs.
Anna Thomson-Moore's husband, Richard, is being sued by Mr Magnier, who claims he had a handshake agreement with the Thomson-Moores to buy Barne Estate for €15 million in August 2023.
Ms Thomson-Moore told the High Court on Thursday that her five-year-old son, who has cerebral palsy and epilepsy, is in need of 24-hour care, cannot walk or crawl and is non-verbal. She said his care was behind the decision to sell the estate.
She told her barrister, Martin Hayden SC, she did not want her son to be 'defined by his disabilities' but that his condition meant the family had chosen to move to Australia where she has a large family that could support him.
READ MORE
The Barne Estate in Co Tipperary. Photograph: Savills
Ms Thomson-Moore became emotional as she described her thoughts as to how Teddy would be cared for should she and her husband, as 'older' parents, die or have anything happen to them.
Teddy was a 'delightfully happy and inquisitive child' but he had a number of diagnoses, she said. She said he was not capable of doing things other children of his age would be expected to do.
The decision to move to her native Australia was influenced by the fact healthcare services for children in their area of Co Tipperary were under-resourced, difficult to avail of and over-subscribed.
Ms Thomson-Moore said there was a national scheme available there with individualised budgets for children with her son's diagnoses, but that the family would have to be in Australia to avail of these.
She said Mr Magnier had visited Barne before the purported handshake deal of August 22nd, 2023, and had asked if the family was being put under pressure by a bank to sell.
Ms Thomson-Moore, a lawyer, said she told Mr Magnier it was a family decision to sell the estate and that the trustees of the estate were involved.
Mr Hayden asked Ms Thomson-Moore if Mr Magnier expressed any surprise upon learning of the involvement of trustees in the estate, to which Ms Thomson-Moore replied 'no'.
The Magnier side claims a €15 million deal was struck for Barne Estate, which the Magniers believed they had shook hands on in August 2023.
However, a sale was later agreed with the Irish-born, US-based construction magnate Maurice Regan, who offered €22.25 million.
Businessman John Magnier at the High Court. Photograph: Collins Courts
The case centres on Mr Magnier's claim that Mr Regan engaged in a 'full-frontal assault' on Mr Magnier's claimed deal to buy the 751-acre tract and that Barne Estate reneged on the deal.
Barne Estate has been held for the benefit of Richard Thomson-Moore and others by a Jersey trust.
The Magnier side has sued the Barne Estate, Mr Thomson-Moore and three companies of IQEQ (Jersey) Ltd group, seeking to enforce the purported deal, which they say had been 'unequivocally' agreed.
The Barne defendants say there was never any such agreement, as they needed the consent of trustees to finalise any agreement and subsequently they preferred to sell the estate to Mr Regan.
Mr Regan is not a party to the case.
The case continues before Mr Justice Max Barrett.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
21 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Irish exports climb to €134.4bn as US pharma sales surge
Ireland exported goods with a total value of €134.4 billion in the first five months of the year, an increase of almost 50 per cent on the same period last year, as companies rushed to send goods to the US to get out ahead of tariffs. The Central Statistics Office (CSO) said on Thursday that the value of exports of pharmaceutical and medicinal goods climbed by almost three-quarters to €13.7 billion in the five months to the end of May compared with last year. The sector, which is dominated in the Republic by multinational companies, has been bracing itself for impact from US President Donald Trump's trade policy. Although the White House has so far declined to place tariffs on pharmaceutical imports to the US, Mr Trump said this week that he was likely to impose levies as soon as the end of the month. In anticipation of those duties, pharmaceutical companies have been stockpiling goods in the US. READ MORE Jane Burmanje, statistician in the CSO's international trade in goods division, said the overall increase in Irish exports has largely been driven by ballooning exports to the US. 'Year to date, January to May 2025 exports of goods to the US increased by 153 per cent (€42.8 billion) to €70.8 billion compared with the same period last year (€28 billion),' Ms Burmanje said. [ Trump says tariffs on pharma and computer chip are likely by August 1st Opens in new window ] Robert Purdue, head of dealing at global financial services firm Ebury, said the threat of 'punitive tariffs' has driven a 'rush to accelerate shipments' to the US. 'It suggests 2025 will be a year of two halves with an artificial spike in H1 likely to be followed by a slump as exporters re-stock and take stock of the new global trade environment,' he said. David McWilliams on how 'big incentives' to build could save Dublin city Listen | 36:51 'New threats of significant tariffs on pharmaceutical products will be hugely concerning for the economy given the critical role this sector plays in Ireland.' Mr Trump told reporters on Tuesday that the White House could introduce tariffs on pharmaceutical goods simultaneously with the introduction of 10 per cent levies on a range of goods next month. 'Probably at the end of the month, and we're going to start off with a low tariff and give the pharmaceutical companies a year or so to build, and then we're going to make it a very high tariff,' he said.


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
New Ukrainian PM seen as potential bridge between Washington and Kyiv
Ukraine 's appointment of Yulia Svyrydenko as prime minister highlights the country's need to balance defence with economic development and modernisation, and the crucial role that relations with the United States will play in the coming years. Ms Svyrydenko (39) was approved by parliament in Kyiv on Thursday to replace Denys Shmyhal as premier, in a cabinet reshuffle that Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy said should energise innovation and production in the defence sector and other fields while streamlining the state and slashing bureaucracy. In her previous post as economy minister and deputy prime minister, Ms Svyrydenko shot to prominence by leading the delegation that signed a controversial agreement with the US on joint exploitation of Ukraine's natural resources in April. The deal – which gives the US preferential access to Ukraine's rare earth minerals and other commodities, and foresees the creation of an investment fund for postwar reconstruction – helped rebuild ties between Washington and Kyiv after a meeting between Mr Zelenskiy and US president Donald Trump had ended in acrimony two months earlier. READ MORE Ms Svyrydenko, an experienced economist, drew praise for clinching the difficult deal, and Kyiv hopes the connections she made with Mr Trump's administration will strengthen Ukraine's vital – but often strained – relationship with the White House.


Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Paschal Donohoe defends decision not to repeat cost-of-living payments in upcoming budget
Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe has defended the Government's plans for the upcoming budget , including the decision to not repeat the one-off cost-of-living payments provided last year. Mr Donohoe told RTÉ radio's Morning Ireland that there was a need to rein in spending and to focus on permanent measures to support the vulnerable. 'Spending in Government departments has grown by around 8 or 9 per cent each year for the past few years. Is that going to have to be reined in? So we are going to have to reduce the level of current spending growth that we have within our economy,' Mr Donohoe said. Earlier on Newstalk Breakfast Mr Donohoe had emphasised the challenges facing the economy due to uncertainty stemming from US President Donald Trump's one/off trade war READ MORE 'We're facing many challenges to the future of our economy. It's not that we don't want to help. It's that we need to help and intervene in a way that we're conscious that we'll be able to afford and that won't create further difficulties for us in the future.' 'I've never seen the kind of uncertainty we have at the moment. That is generated by economic policy, which is why I want to ensure that the budget that we bring forward is safe, doesn't add to uncertainty we have in the future, and above all, focuses on investment.' [ The cost of living in Ireland is nuts. Even nuttier are the reasons supposed to explain it Opens in new window ] 'I do think it is important to acknowledge that there are things that could happen to our economy that would pose real periods of challenge that we would then need to work together to overcome.' The Minister said on RTÉ in relation the possible impact of US tariffs. 'We brought forward an economic forecast that said if there were 10 per cent tariffs in place within our economy between the US and the European Union and 60 per cent tariffs between China and America, it would mean a lower level of growth within our economy and it would mean up to 75,000 fewer jobs being kept or created within our country.' David McWilliams on how 'big incentives' to build could save Dublin city Listen | 36:51 'Progressively the scenario that we now face could involve an even more significant effect on growth. It could involve further effect on the job creation and number of jobs within Ireland,' the Minister said. 'But that is why we continue to negotiate so hard through the European Union to try to avoid that happening. And thankfully, we are approaching these moments of great challenge with our economic finances in good condition, our public finances in good condition and a record number of people that work in Ireland. When asked about concerns expressed by the Irish Business and Employers Confederation about the impact of the Occupied Territories Bill on Irish businesses, Mr Donohoe said: 'We've always acknowledged that there are consequences in any decision that we make. It is important to be clear that in the bill that we are bringing forward, it's referring to an extremely limited amount of trade that has taken place from the territories into Ireland.' 'And I believe that if you look at the enormous trauma and the awful, awful loss the people of Gaza have endured due to the action that has been taken against them, always acknowledging of course the hurt and violence that happened in October, that was also the catalyst of much of this, that it is so important that the Government of Ireland makes clear that we are diplomatically acting to try to lessen and weaken the harm.' '