Russia ramps up drone strikes on Ukraine in June: AFP analysis
Kyiv is appealing to the United States and European allies for more air defence systems to defend its critical infrastructure as talks spearheaded by Washington to secure a ceasefire falter.
The AFP analysis of Ukrainian air force data showed that Russia fired 5,438 long-range drones at Ukraine in June -- more than in any month since Moscow launched its invasion in February 2022.
That figure was up 37 percent from the total in May, when Russia launched 3,974 drones, according to the Ukrainian air force.
Moscow's army also fired 239 missiles in overnight attacks, almost twice as many as a month before, the data showed.
The attacks, which trigger air raid sirens in towns and cities across the country and spur civilians to spend sleepless nights in shelters, occurred every night in June.
Russian President Vladimir Putin underscored last month that drones are an increasingly integral part of his country's military might.
'Hellish' night
During a televised meeting on armaments convened by the Kremlin, he touted Russian drone units' attacks on armoured vehicles, fortified positions, and personnel.
Putin claimed that up to 50 percent of all attacks that "destroyed and damaged equipment and facilities" in Ukraine were launched by Russian drone units.
"Their effectiveness is constantly growing," he said, noting the military was creating a separate drone forces branch.
But Ukraine, which has been forced to adapt its defences to fend off Russia's larger army, is also changing how it deals with increasing Russian drone attacks.
"Ukraine is introducing new developments -- interceptor drones -- as well as other tools that are deliberately not disclosed," defence minister Rustem Umerov told journalists, including from AFP last week.
"All work on counter-drone systems is a continuous cycle of innovation and improvement."
Ukrainian air defence units destroyed 81 percent of all drones and missiles launched by Russia in May.
Even as attacks escalated over June, Kyiv's intercept rate of drones and missiles increased to 86 percent.
Assessing the impact of the larger Russian drone attacks is complicated in part because Ukraine is secretive about what, if anything, was targeted by Russia or hit.
That was up from two killed in Russian bombardments of Kyiv in May.
The Kremlin's spokesman Dmitry Peskov called on Kyiv to give into Moscow's hardline demands for peace if it wanted the attacks to stop.
"Kyiv knows perfectly well what needs to be done to end the fighting," Peskov said in response to a question from AFP about the increased drone attacks.
Kyiv says Moscow's ceasefire requirements -- to cede territory and renounce Western military support -- amount to capitulation.
Alina Shtompel, a 20-year student in Kyiv, said on June 17 that the night she had survived was "hellish".
That country-wide attack from 440 drones and 32 missiles ripped open an apartment building in Kyiv, where at least 28 people were killed.
"It is indescribably painful that our people are going through this right now," Shtompel added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fashion Network
35 minutes ago
- Fashion Network
Green claims: confusion surrounds the EU's anti-greenwashing directive
The EU's 'Green Claim' directive is designed to regulate the sustainability claims made by brands and combat greenwashing. But as the parliamentary debate under way since January was about to end, the European Commission has withdrawn its support for the text. Before specifying its position. After U-turns on the duty of vigilance directive and later on the need to display the environmental score on apparel products, the EU's tendency to back down on its green deal has once again been confirmed. This time, it all started on June 18, with a request from the European People's Party (EPP) to drop the so-called 'Green Claim' directive. The directive originally targeted vague marketing expressions such as 'green product', 'biodegradable', 'climate-neutral' and '100% natural', aiming to force brands to demonstrate the veracity of their sustainability claims. The European Council stated its position on it a year ago, and its approval was eagerly awaited by brands, NGOs and industry associations, including European textile industry association Euratex. On Friday June 20, it came as a surprise when a European Commission representative confirmed, following the EPP's request, its 'intention to withdraw its proposals' for defining the terms associated with sustainability. It was enough to stop short the debate on the directive, which had begun in 2023, despite the fact that a final meeting was scheduled for June 23 between the Commission, the Council and the European Parliament. A few hours later, the EU Commission clarified its position, saying it is still willing to push forward the directive, but not if it incorporates provisions for micro-companies, as was the case in the text's last draft. There are 30 million such companies active in Europe. This back and forth is consistent with the simplification drive the European Commission has been pushing since January. A politically motivated drive that notably led to a first package of comprehensive measures being presented in March. Measures which included a watering down of the duty of vigilance directive, and which have enraged NGOs while also not convincing companies and retailers.
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
New evidence suggests Russian forces caused Azerbaijan Airlines crash
Russian military forces were involved in the missile strike on Azerbaijan Airlines Flight 8432 which crashed on 25 December 2024, a new audio recording and a letter published by an Azerbaijani news website on Tuesday purport to prove. Azerbaijani news outlet Minval claims it received an 'anonymous letter ... containing testimonies, audio clips, and technical details' pointing to 'technical deficiencies in the communications equipment used at the time. Minval claims the letter includes a written statement 'allegedly signed by Captain Dmitry Sergeyevich Paladichuk, a Russian air defence officer (who) was acting under direct orders from Russia's Ministry of Defence when he authorised the missile strike.' Euronews cannot independently verify the authenticity of the claims in the Azerbaijani news outlet's report. Minval's news report on Tuesday quoted the letter claiming that 'Captain Paladichuk was stationed near Grozny on duty from 24 to 25 December. At 05:40 on the day of the incident, his unit was ordered to enter full combat readiness." "Due to poor mobile reception and a lack of functional wired communication, coordination relied heavily on unstable mobile connections," the letter added. "A potential target was detected at 08:11 and tracked using radar. Two missiles were reportedly fired at the object after Paladichuk was instructed via phone to destroy it — despite heavy fog obscuring optical confirmation.' According to the letter, 'the coordinates, speeds, and directions of the target at the time of both missile launches were provided in detail in the written explanation. The first missile is said to have missed, while the second one allegedly detonated close enough for shrapnel to strike the aircraft.' Minval also claimed that it reviewed "three voice messages" believed to support the claims made in the letter. The voices reportedly confirm that operational orders were given, two missiles were fired, and shrapnel from the explosion struck the aircraft, according to the outlet. The outlet has released one audio recording purporting to depict the sequence in which a voice in Russian gives military directions, orders a missile to be fired, followed by the sound of what appears to be a firing sequence, the same voice saying 'target missed', and allegedly ordering another missile to be fired. On the day of the tragedy, Azerbaijani government sources told Euronews that a Russian surface-to-air missile was fired at Flight 8432 during drone air activity above Grozny, the flight's destination. The same sources said that the shrapnel hit the passengers and cabin crew as the missile exploded next to the aircraft mid-flight, disabling it. The damaged aircraft was not allowed to land at any Russian airports despite the pilots' requests for an emergency landing, the same sources said, and it was ordered to fly across the Caspian Sea towards Aktau in Kazakhstan, where it crashed while attempting an emergency landing, killing 38 and injuring 29. Subsequent reports after the tragedy claimed that Flight 8243 was downed by a missile from a Russian Pantsir-S1 system. Putin calls crash 'tragic incident', stops short of apology Three days after the crash, in an address to the nation, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev said, "we can say with complete clarity that the plane was shot down by Russia (...) We are not saying that it was done intentionally, but it was done.' At that time, on 29 December, Aliyev stated that Baku had made three demands to Russia in connection with the crash. 'First, the Russian side must apologise to Azerbaijan. Second, it must admit its guilt. Third, punish the guilty, bring them to criminal responsibility and pay compensation to the Azerbaijani state, the injured passengers and crew members,' Aliyev outlined. Aliyev noted that the first demand was 'already fulfilled' when Russian President Vladimir Putin apologised to him on 28 December. Putin called the crash a 'tragic incident," though he stopped short of acknowledging Moscow's responsibility. The Kremlin said at the time that air defence systems were firing near Grozny, where the plane attempted to land, to deflect Ukrainian drone strikes. In the days following the tragedy, Russian military bloggers claimed that the said explosion happened over the Naursky District of Chechnya, where several Russian military units were posted at the time, including those with air defence systems, basing their conclusions on open-source data. The new claims linking the Russian military to the Azerbaijan Airlines Flight 8432 tragedy appear at a time of a fast-moving escalation of judicial measures between Russia and Azerbaijan, as relations between the two countries reach a new low.
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
Polish supreme court ratifies nationalist's presidential vote win
In the country's highly polarised political landscape, concerns had also been voiced over the legitimacy of the court chamber which will issue the verdict. Karol Nawrocki, backed by the Law and Justice (PiS) party, scored 51 percent of votes to win the June 1 runoff election, according to official results -- a major blow for the pro-EU government of Prime Minister Donald Tusk and LGBTQ rights campaigners. Warsaw mayor Rafal Trzaskowski, the candidate put forward by the government, lost out by 369,000 votes in the country of 38 million people. "All of the circumstances clearly demonstrate that Karol Tadeusz Nawrocki garnered more votes than Rafał Kazimierz Trzaskowski during the second round of the vote," judge Krzysztof Wiak announced after a hearing, also confirming the election result. Prosecutors had alleged that the vote count was falsified in Nawrocki's favour at some polling stations, fuelling calls for a national recount. PiS dismissed doubts about the vote as an attempt to "steal the election". According to the Polish constitution, the Supreme Court had to validate the ballot before the winner could be sworn in at a joint session of parliament -- a ceremony planned for August 6. However, European courts and legal experts have questioned the legitimacy of the Exceptional Supervision and Public Matters Chamber, the Supreme Court body that issued the ruling on Tuesday. The European Court of Human Rights said in 2023 that the Chamber does not fulfil the definition of "an independent and impartial tribunal established by law". Justice Minister Adam Bodnar, who is also the prosecutor general, had asked in vain for all of the chamber's judges to be excluded. Tusk has criticised the chamber, but recognised on Monday that "it is the Supreme Court's responsibility to rule whether an election is valid or not". "It is not possible... for the Supreme Court to be replaced in this matter... by the prosecutor general or the government," the prime minister said. 'Paralyse the Supreme Court' The Supreme Court had received around 56,000 election protests since the second round of voting. Judges have already dismissed, without taking further action, more than 50,000 complaints, many of which were based on protest templates shared on social media. Supreme Court chief justice Malgorzata Manowska criticised the sending of template-based protests as an "operation meant to... paralyse the Supreme Court". Bodnar complained that prosecutors were not given access to all of the 56,000 protests and suggested that the chamber's examination of those could be nothing more than a "facade". Still, the court ordered the results from 13 polling stations to be recounted earlier this month. National prosecutors later said that in some of those polling stations votes were transferred from one candidate to another, mainly in Nawrocki's favour. Government coalition lawmaker Roman Giertych authored one of the protest templates, claiming that votes had been reassigned to Nawrocki and alleging ballot rigging. Giertych and several experts have demanded a national recount and called for the presidential inauguration to be postponed in order to clarify the alleged irregularities. These experts assert that the previous nationalist government and outgoing president Andrzej Duda introduced reforms which have undermined the rule of law in Poland. The reforms have long put Poland at odds with the European Commission, but the victory of a pro-EU coalition in October 2023 parliamentary elections mitigated the conflict. Parliament speaker Szymon Holownia, like other members of the ruling coalition, has so far firmly rejected the idea of postponing the presidential oath ceremony. Independently, Bodnar has ordered a group of prosecutors to examine "irregularities" in the vote counting. © 2025 AFP
