
Danes reluctant to embrace retirement at 70
Denmark's parliament in May adopted a law raising the retirement age to 70 by 2040, from the current age of 67.
But Evans, a 53-year-old bank employee with a solid financial footing, said she plans to retire around 65 or 66 even if it means she won't earn a full pension.
"I think 70 is old," she told AFP. "You want to benefit on the other end and still have a good life afterwards," she said.
As many Western countries grapple with how to stretch pensions to cover ageing populations, Denmark indexed the official retirement age to life expectancy in 2006 and has revised it every five years.
In 2030, the retirement age will increase to 68 and in 2035, it will rise to 69.
But those born after December 31, 1970 including Evans will have to wait until age 70.
- Widening gap -
Few people actually work to the legal retirement age in Denmark.
In 2022, when the official retirement age was 67, the actual average retirement age was around 64, according to the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
About 20% of retirees in Denmark retire because they can't find a job or are too sick to continue, according to Aske Juul Lassen, an ethnologist at the University of Copenhagen who specialises in senior working life.
"For those 20%, it makes a big difference whether the retirement age rises again," he said, stressing that "inequities are rising with age".
The gap risks widening between those able to retire early thanks to strong finances and others, said Damoun Ashournia, chief economist at the Danish Trade Union Confederation.
"Very few people actually retire at the official retirement age. But that is not an opportunity our members have," Ashournia said.
Camilla Rasmussen, a 37-year-old union member who works as a gastroenterology nurse at a Copenhagen hospital, is convinced that she will not be physically able to work until age 70.
"That would be really hard for me, walking 10,000 steps every day," she said.
"If I'm here when I'm 70, I think it's not fair for the patients," she added.
"Already today, we see that two-thirds of our members have retired prior to the official retirement age. And that's due to them being worn out and doing hard physical work," Ashournia said.
- System review -
Denmark's pension system is made up of several parts. There is a universal public pension, currently set at 7,198 kroner ($1,130) per month, plus two complementary employer-funded pensions invested in pension funds—one mandatory and one optional.
Finally, some people also save money privately for retirement.
Ashournia said he believed that raising the retirement age to 70 was the only way to finance Denmark's cradle-to-grave welfare state.
"As the population ages and life expectancy increases, if we want to deliver the same public services we do today, we need to secure public finances," he said.
However, he criticized the automatic five-year increases in the retirement age, a practice in place since 2006.
Under these rules, the retirement age in 2070 will be 74.
For Erik Simonsen, deputy head of the Confederation of Danish Employers, this is the only way forward.
"It would be the most intelligent way to go on, to keep the system. So the older we get, then we have to work a little bit more," Simonsen said.
Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, 47, has said she believes a review of the system will be needed once the retirement age hits 70.
"We no longer believe that the retirement age should be increased automatically," she told daily Berlingske in August 2024.
In line with a review by a government-appointed working group, the Danish Trade Union Confederation said it would like to see a slowdown in the rate of increases.
"In the future, we can raise it by only half a year for every year that life expectancy increases," said Ashournia.
By Camille Bas-wohlert
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
11 hours ago
- IOL News
Boeing evades MAX crash trial with last-minute settlement
Boeing evades MAX crash trial with last-minute settlement. Image: AFP Boeing has reached a settlement with a man whose family died in a 737 MAX crash in 2019, a law firm told AFP on Friday, meaning the US aviation giant will avoid a federal trial slated for Monday. Paul Njoroge, who lost his wife and three children in the Ethiopian Airlines disaster in which 157 people died, was to seek damages from Boeing in a case in Chicago. "The case has settled for a confidential amount," said a spokesperson for Clifford Law, the firm representing Njoroge, whose mother-in-law also died in the crash. "The aviation team at Clifford Law Offices has been working round-the-clock in preparation for trial, but the mediator was able to help the parties come to an agreement on behalf of Paul Njoroge," added Robert Clifford, a senior partner at Clifford, in a statement. Until now, Boeing has succeeded in avoiding civil trials connected to the 737 MAX crashes of 2018 and 2019, reaching a series of settlements, sometimes only hours before trials were set to begin. The crash of Ethiopian Airlines flight 302 on March 10, 2019 took place six minutes after departing Addis Ababa for Nairobi. Njoroge lost his wife Carolyne, who was 33, his mother-in-law Ann Karanja, and the couple's three children: six-year-old Ryan; Kelli, who was four; and nine-month-old Rubi. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Njoroge told a congressional panel in July 2019 he was haunted by ideas of the final moments of the flight, how his children "must have clung to their mother, crying, seeing the fright in her eyes." "It is difficult for me to think of anything else but the horror they must have felt," he said. "I cannot get it out of my mind." The trial set for Monday was expected to last five to seven days. Between April 2019 and March 2021, family members of 155 Boeing victims joined litigation charging the aviation giant with wrongful death and negligence. Boeing has accepted responsibility for the Ethiopian Airlines crash, blaming the design of the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS), a flight handling system that malfunctioned. That system was also implicated in the Lion Air crash in 2018, when the 737 MAX 8 fell into the sea after taking off from Jakarta, Indonesia, killing all 189 people on board. The Lion Air crash also spawned dozens of lawsuits in the United States. But as of July 2025, only one case remained open. Boeing has said it has reached out-of-court agreements with more than 90% of civil complainants in the MAX cases. The company also has a settlement pending that would resolve a long-running Department of Justice criminal probe connected to the MAX crashes. Some MAX families are contesting the Department of Justice's accord with Boeing, arguing that the company should face federal prosecution. US District Judge Reed O'Connor, in Texas, has yet to make a final decision on the proposed accord. AFP

IOL News
18 hours ago
- IOL News
Trump's 30% tariff on South African imports: A politically motivated move?
Donald Trump slammed SA with a tariff hike Image: Jim Watson / AFP US President Donald Trump's plan to impose a 30% tariff on South African imports is drawing sharp criticism from economists, many of whom argue the move is politically motivated rather than based on real trade imbalances. Economist Dawie Roodt believes the United States' planned 30% tariff on South African goods is being driven more by geopolitical tensions than trade data — and warns that the move could signal deeper diplomatic shifts. "This is, without a doubt in my view, driven primarily by politics — not economics," said Roodt. "South Africa is economically irrelevant to the U.S., but we play a much bigger role internationally, especially in terms of our support for certain organisations and countries the Americans don't like." Roodt's comments follow a formal letter sent by Trump to President Cyril Ramaphosa, informing him of the impending tariff, which is set to take effect on 1 August 2025. In the letter, Trump criticised South Africa's 'persistent trade deficits' and suggested that the tariff could be adjusted — up or down — depending on the country's willingness to change its trade practices and political stance. Roodt, however, argued that the logic behind the tariff doesn't hold up under economic scrutiny. 'All the economic calculations behind this are wrong. This is Trump trying to pressure South Africa to change its international political stance. Of course, there are also local factors — like the land expropriation issue — but the bigger picture here is clearly political.' While the broader economy may not feel the immediate effects, Roodt warns that the agriculture and motor industries will be hit hardest. 'For an economy that's already in ICU, this is certainly not good news,' he said. President Ramaphosa has acknowledged receipt of Trump's letter and reiterated South Africa's commitment to ongoing negotiations. The Presidency also challenged the U.S. interpretation of trade data, noting that 77% of U.S. goods enter South Africa duty-free, while the average tariff on imports stands at 7.6%. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ As both governments prepare for further talks, Roodt said the focus should remain on diversifying trade partners — though he warns this won't be easy. 'Everyone's now chasing the same markets. Diversification takes time, but it's more important than ever,' he said. Economist Ulrich Joubert agreed, explaining that the proposed 30% U.S. tariff on South African imports is significant, especially given that the United States is South Africa's second-largest export market, accounting for $8.21 billion or 8.2% of total exports in 2024. While South Africa has a $1.23 billion trade surplus with the U.S., Joubert argued this is insignificant in the context of America's global trade. He believes the tariff is politically motivated, driven by Trump's push to reduce trade deficits with multiple countries — a goal Joubert said is unrealistic. 'Trump wants balanced trade with every country, which is economically impossible,' Joubert said. 'This move is more about politics than economics.' Joubert stressed the need for market diversification and consistent diplomatic engagement, warning that future investment could suffer if trade uncertainty persists. He also raised concern over AGOA possibly ending soon, which could further hurt key export sectors like agriculture and textiles. He called for ongoing negotiations and strategic diplomacy, stating that uncertainty and rising protectionism pose a growing threat to South Africa's export-led growth. Weekend Argus


Eyewitness News
a day ago
- Eyewitness News
Canada just can't win in trade war with Trump
MONTREAL - Try as it might to appease President Donald Trump, Canada remains a prized target in his trade wars and subject to the whiplash of his changes of heart. The giant North American neighbors are rushing to conclude a new trade accord by July 21 but the process is proving painful for Canada. Overnight Thursday, Trump threatened to slap a 35 percent tariff on imports from Canada starting August 1. But products complying with an existing accord, the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), are expected to remain exempt, a Trump administration official and a source in Canada told AFP. "An agreement is of course possible but that shows how difficult it is for the Canadian government to negotiate with the US president," said Daniel Beland, a political science professor at McGill University in Montreal, referring to Trump's sudden announcement. -Six months of ups and downs- Canada has been a key trading partner and ally of the United States for decades. But along with Mexico, it now wears a bull's eye for Trump in his second stint in the White House as he tries to reorder the global system of largely free trade by slapping tariffs on friends and foes alike to address what he calls unfair trading practices. Trump has also spoken frequently of his idea of absorbing Canada to make it the 51st US state, a concept most Canadians find repugnant. Canada was rocked by Trump's first attacks after he took power in January. And bad blood between him and then-prime minister Justin Trudeau seemed to pour gas on the fire. Some degree of hope emerged when Mark Carney was elected in late April to replace Trudeau, pledging to stand up to Trump and defend Canada, its jobs and its borders. Since then, Carney and Trump have held two more or less cordial meetings -- at the Oval Office in May and at a Group of Seven summit in western Canada last month. Many people thought a new era was opening, and Carney won praise for his diplomatic and negotiating skills. During the second of those meetings, the two sides agreed to sign a new trade agreement by July 21. But in late June Trump angrily called off the trade talks, citing a new Canadian tax on US Big Tech companies. Canada scrapped the tax two days later so the trade talks could resume. Now they have been rocked again by Trump's new threat of 35 percent tariffs on Canadian goods. -Stay calm- Canada has taken to not reacting to everything Trump says. After Trump's latest outburst, Carney simply said, "the Canadian government has steadfastly defended our workers and businesses." But among Canadian people, Trump's threat-rich negotiating style elicits contrasting reactions, said Beland. "There are people who want a firmer response while others want to keep negotiating," he said. Since the beginning of this tug of war, Canada has responded to US action by imposing levies of its own on certain American products. Philippe Bourbeau, a professor at HEC Montreal, a business school, said people have to realize Trump has an underlying strategy. "You can criticize the aggressiveness of the announcements and the fact that it is done out in the open, but it is a negotiating tactic," said Bourbeau, adding that the relationship between the two countries is asymmetrical. "It is illusory to think this is a negotiation between parties of the same size. Canada will surely have to give up more to reach an agreement," he said. Before Trump came to power, three quarters of Canada's exports went to the United States. This was down to 68 percent in May, one of the lowest such shares ever recorded, as shipments to other countries hit record levels. "We are Donald Trump's scapegoats," said Genevieve Tellier, a professor of political science at the University of Ottawa. "He sees us as vulnerable, so he increases the pressure. He is surely telling himself that it is with us that he will score the big win he wants on tariffs," Tellier said.