CalAssist Mortgage Fund provides $105M in aid for California Disaster Survivors
The fund provides grants of up to $20,000 to cover three months of mortgage payments for eligible homeowners. The state has allocated $105 million for the program.
'California is extending this ongoing support to disaster victims in Los Angeles and beyond, by assisting with mortgage payments to relieve financial pressure and stress as families rebuild and recover,' Governor Gavin Newsom said in a press release.
The grants do not need to be repaid and will be sent directly to mortgage companies, minimizing the steps required for processing and allowing homeowners to focus on recovery.
Major fires, floods, and other government-declared disasters or states of emergency that occurred between January 2023 and January 2025 are qualifying events for the grants, including the Eaton and Palisades fires that burned thousands of homes.
Research by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, which analyzed wildfire losses in California between 2017 and 2021, found that nearly 40% of damaged homes were underinsured by more than $100,000, and more than 1 in 5 had shortfalls exceeding $200,000.
The prevalence of these types of insurance gaps, combined with the emotional and financial toll of losing a home, highlights the importance of programs like the CalAssist Mortgage Fund.
'Homeowners whose home was destroyed in a recent fire, flood or other disaster deserve support in their recovery. We know that recovery takes time, and the state is here to support,' Newsom said in the release.
The California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA) is administering the program.
In addition to the mortgage grants, CalHFA is also providing $25 million in housing counseling support through its National Mortgage Settlement (NMS) Housing Counseling program. This program is designed to help homeowners understand their options, complete applications, and navigate the recovery process.
To be eligible for financial assistance through the CalAssist Mortgage Fund, an applicant's primary residence must be a single-family home, condo, or permanently affixed manufactured home. Properties with up to four units are included.
Disaster survivors must also have an active mortgage or reverse mortgage, and the property cannot currently be in foreclosure.
Applications for the CalAssist Mortgage Fund open on June 12, 2025. Homeowners are encouraged to apply as soon as possible before funds are exhausted.
Steps to Apply
For more information on eligibility and the application process, visit CalAssistMortgageFund.org. Disaster survivors who need assistance can also call 1-800-501-0019 between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday.
The LA County Department of Consumer and Business Affairs' foreclosure prevention expert can help homeowners facing difficulty paying their mortgage. You can also discuss other relief options with a U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)-certified housing counselor.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
7 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Letters to the Editor: Edison's shareholders, not its customers, should be replenishing wildfire fund
To the editor: Let me get this straight: Southern California Edison is opposed to a plan that would reduce the profits its shareholders receive in order to replenish a fund that exists to pay for the fire damage Edison's equipment may have had a hand in causing ('Newsom's plan to raise $18 billion for state wildfire fund faces tough opposition,' July 31)? This from a utility whose negligence and mismanagement caused the Thomas and Woolsey disasters and possibly the Eaton fire. I don't know which is worse: Edison's unabashed greed or Gov. Gavin Newsom's idea that customers should pay for Edison's past and potential misdeeds. The entire proposal should be scrapped. Bill Waxman, Simi Valley .. To the editor: Help me understand economics and politics: Southern California Edison profits for 2024 came in at $1.69 billion, an increase of 9.8% from 2023. The total compensation for Steven D. Powell, CEO of SCE, was $3,950,818 in 2024. The total comp for Pedro J. Pizarro, CEO of Edison International, was $13,809,571 for 2024. But they want customers of SCE to help pay for wildfire damage? All through a minimum increase some of us need to help feed our families. Instead, why doesn't the governor concentrate more on rooftop solar, which would lower those consumers' monthly costs and help prevent wildfires? Kenneth Brown, Pasadena .. To the editor: Newsom's plan to pay for fire damage is shortsighted because it doesn't address the root causes of the Eaton and other fires. Had we not dumped tons of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, we wouldn't be so frequently stuck with billions of dollars in damage. Looking forward, making electricity more expensive discourages investment in heat pumps, electric vehicles and other clean technologies. The big polluters are all of us with gas cars. But the governor is right in that California needs new revenue to pay for past and future damage. A better solution is to make polluters pay for the damage they cause, which is right in the name of Senate Bill 684/Assembly Bill 1243, the Polluters Pay Climate Superfund Act of 2025, authored by Sen. Caroline Menjivar (D-Panorama City) and Assemblymember Dawn Addis (D-Morro Bay). Of course, profitable fossil fuel companies will object, but lawmakers with guts should be told to care about those of us who breathe this air — and our grandchildren, who will suffer more if we stay on our same polluting path. John Schaefer, Santa Rosa
Politico
19 hours ago
- Politico
Newsom's big pivot on Big Oil
With help from Camille von Kaenel and Noah Baustin OIL ABOUT-FACE: Gov. Gavin Newsom spent the last four years provoking the Big Oil boogeyman. Now, it's haunting him. Newsom's casting of oil companies as the villain behind the state's perpetually high fuel prices seemingly signaled the industry's waning influence in Sacramento as recently as last year's special session. But then two of the state's nine refineries announced closure plans, leaving the governor and Democratic lawmakers scrambling to boost in-state oil supply and find potential buyers to keep the facilities pumping out gasoline and avert shortages that some experts estimate could drive gas prices up by as much as $1.21 per gallon by next August — just as midterm elections will be heating up. The pivot is emblematic of a national Democratic party course correction on cost-of-living issues in the wake of the presidential election — and provides a real-time demonstration of the political risks of pursuing an aggressive transition away from fossil fuels. 'The reality is, if those refineries close and we have increased gas prices, it's going to be a problem for everybody,' said Andrew Acosta, a veteran California Democratic campaign consultant. 'Not just Gavin Newsom, but every Democrat running for office.' The shift has left groups that thought they had Newsom on the anti-Big Oil train with whiplash. Newsom announced a fracking ban in 2021, spearheaded a lawsuit to hold major oil companies liable for climate change damages and pushed legislation to consider a cap on oil industry profits — all while castigating the industry as a corrupt force fleecing Californians. 'They have been raking in unprecedented profits because they can,' Newsom said in October while signing a bill requiring refiners to store more gas to prevent shortages, a concept the industry warned would backfire. 'They've been screwing you for years and years and years.' Fast forward to June, when Newsom's administration unveiled a suite of proposals to keep refineries solvent, including streamlined permitting for more in-state drilling in Kern County. Newsom's office has since circulated a draft bill mirroring those recommendations. 'Refineries all across the globe are struggling,' Newsom said after the proposals were released. 'We've got some challenges, and so just require some new considerations.' And even some environmentalists are having second thoughts after Phillips 66 announced in October that it would close its Southern California refinery by the end of 2025, followed in April when Valero announced the planned closure of its Northern California facility in 2026. 'I think Democrats sort of failed to read the room, perhaps in a way that, unfortunately, Trump did,' said Katelyn Roedner Sutter, California director for the Environmental Defense Fund. 'If we're not acknowledging people's day-to-day reality and the challenges they face, it's really hard for them to care about the existential threat that is climate change.' Newsom spokespeople pointed to the governor's comments during a press conference last week where he called the approach 'completely consistent' with the state's climate agenda, which has 'always been about finding a just transition.' While recent polling shows California voters still want their leaders to fight climate change, the state faces a unique set of circumstances that make the transition particularly complicated. California has long operated as a fuel island, meaning it doesn't have the infrastructure necessary to pipe in refined gasoline from its neighbor and quickly respond to gas shortages when refineries go offline. That leads to price spikes like in 2022 and 2023, when average prices soared past $5 per gallon. Colin Murphy, deputy director of the University of California, Davis' Policy Institute for Energy, Environment and the Economy, said that isolation has given the handful of oil companies that operate refineries in the state outsize power to control the market, and that California lawmakers underestimated the industry's willingness to wield that power. The oil industry intends to continue pressing its advantage. Andy Walz, Chevron's president of downstream, midstream and chemicals, said California officials have made the state 'uninvestable' for companies like his and is pushing to unwind key pieces of the state's climate agenda, like its cap-and-trade program and rules aimed at reducing emissions from oil tankers and other ships that dock in the state's ports. 'I don't think they believed the industry was in trouble,' Walz said of California officials. 'I think they misread what was really going on, and it took some real action by some competitors to get them woken up.' Newsom's draft bill does include olive branches to environmental justice groups that have been left feeling burned — including a well stimulation ban and a requirement for drillers to plug two wells for every new well they make — but that hasn't dampened their frustration. EJ advocates are preparing to go to the mat in what's setting up to be an end-of-session brawl. 'It seems like a lot of our elected officials are driven above all by a fear that they'll be blamed for high gas prices,' said Bill Magavern, policy director at Coalition for Clean Air. — AN Did someone forward you this newsletter? Sign up here! REFINING THE LANGUAGE: Environmental justice groups have their counter-offer to Newsom's proposal to bolster in-state oil supply to stop refineries from closing and keep gas prices in check. Fifty environmental and community groups signed onto a Friday letter to Newsom, Senate President Pro Tem Mike McGuire and Speaker Robert Rivas asking to significantly amend Newsom's draft oil legislation. The groups include the Los Angeles chapter of Physicians for Social Responsibility, the Asian Pacific Environmental Network and the VISIÓN Coalition (notably, they do not include major environmental organizations like the Environmental Defense Fund and the Natural Resources Defense Council.) Among their chief asks: if state officials are going to streamline more crude extraction in Kern County, they should cap the number of new wells at 500 (compared to the nearly 3,000 in the local ordinance Kern County adopted earlier this year) and include a 2035 sunset date. They also want to require refiners to disclose more of their business when they tell the state they are considering closing. Faraz Rizvi, APEN's campaign and policy manager, said the goal was to offer a counter-solution to the oil and gas industry's wish list. 'We are trying to hold the line as best as we can to ensure we're protecting communities while also understanding the way the winds are turning,' he said. — CvK CHARGED UP: California's network of batteries installed at peoples' homes is now capable of moving the needle on the state's entire grid, according to a new industry report commissioned by Sunrun and Tesla. A group of virtual power plant aggregators delivered an average of 535 megawatts to the California grid last Tuesday from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m., according to a report from research firm Brattle. The energy came from over 100,000 residential batteries, mostly Tesla-manufactured. It was the most energy Sunrun, the largest aggregator of the group, has dispatched from a single distributed power plant in a night. The deliveries were part of a pre-planned test to assess the performance of virtual power plants ahead of the state's hottest months, when their services are most needed. And to Sunrun execs, it was a success — and a major step toward the dream of having batteries on everyday people's property provide utility-scale value to the grid. 'This is no longer a future thing, this is a now thing,' said Chris Rauscher, Sunrun's VP of grid services and electrification. The state was rocked by blackouts in 2020. That led to a push for increased storage to help keep the lights on during extreme heat. At the time, California had about 245 megawatts of residential battery storage capacity. That figure has climbed seven-fold to 1,829 MW as of this April, according to California Energy Commission data. — NB GRID GAMES: Environmental groups are opening their pocketbooks in a fight over how much control California should have over a proposed regional energy market. EDF Action and NRDC Action Fund — political arms of the Environmental Defense Fund and Natural Resources Defense Council — announced a six-figure ad campaign Monday pushing state lawmakers to amend Sen. Josh Becker's SB 540, which would establish a West-wide energy market. The ad calls on lawmakers to 'fix' the bill by removing language they argue would dissuade other states from joining an expanded regional market, including a proposed regional council that could remove California energy providers from the market. EDF and NRDC, original co-sponsors, pulled their support last month after Becker amended the bill to include the council after pushback from some unions and ratepayer advocates who argue a regional market could allow the Trump administration to hamper the state's climate goals and expose residents to rate hikes. Backers of the original language say giving California officials too much control of the market would 'make it unappealing or even impossible' for regional energy suppliers to join. Newsom and Assembly Speaker Rivas have committed to getting regionalization over the finish line this session, though the governor has made clear that the policy could come through a different vehicle than SB 540. — AN SETTING THE AGENDA: On Wednesday, Aug. 27, POLITICO is hosting its inaugural California policy summit: The California Agenda. Come see the Golden State's most prominent political figures — including Sen. Alex Padilla and gubernatorial candidates Katie Porter and Xavier Becerra — share the stage with influential voices in tech, energy, housing and other areas at the forefront of the state's most critical policy debates. The live and streamed event is free, but advance registration is required. Stay tuned for more on speakers and discussion topics, and request an invite here. — NASA will announce plans to build a nuclear reactor on the moon, according to documents obtained by POLITICO. — State water regulators told Los Angeles decades ago to take less water from Mono Lake, but the city still hasn't met its requirements. — Are you wondering how tariffs could impact clean energy? Just look at past U.S. solar panel policy.
New York Post
20 hours ago
- New York Post
California, here we come: A new Post is racing to the rescue
Great news for the left coast: California. As the Golden State's decline accelerates, the New York Post Media Group is launching The California Post to expose the causes of the rot. Based in Los Angeles, our new edition will contain daily content in print and online, offering the same intrepid, level-headed, reader-focused journalism that's made the New York Post so indispensable. Advertisement It'll report on news, entertainment, politics, culture, sports and business from a California perspective — and call out the lunatic policies dragging the state down, sending businesses and residents fleeing. For the first time ever, California is shrinking compared to the nation overall: from 12.1% of the US population in 2010 to just 11.9% a decade later, costing it a seat in Congress — and it's looking at losing up to five more seats after the 2030 Census. Since just 2020, more than 500 companies ditched the state or shrank operations while expanding elsewhere, per the Center for Jobs & the Economy. Advertisement Why? Life in California has worsened, thanks mostly to unchecked lefty pols. Taxes are off the charts (the top income-tax rate, 13.3%, is the nation's highest), yet poverty is everywhere. Regulatory rules and litigation block development, leading to sky-high housing costs. Last year, the California Policy Center found the state had America's highest unemployment, lowest income growth and highest poverty rate. Advertisement It highlighted Cali's ranking by Chief Executive magazine as the worst state in America to do business — for the 10th year in a row. Notable, too, are the huge costs of the left's green agenda. Meanwhile, armies of the homeless rule the streets; crime runs rampant. Lefty pols like LA Mayor Karen Bass and Gov. Gavin Newsom actually defend criminal illegal migrants. Advertisement The recent LA riots, and the fires months before, highlight the duo's feckless incompetence. But media there just can't (or won't) manage to call out the pols responsible. Count on The California Post to fill that role. 'Los Angeles and California surely need a daily dose of The Post as an antidote to the jaundiced, jaded journalism that has sadly proliferated,' quips Chief Executive Robert Thomson of News Corp, parent of the New York Post Media Group. Relax. The new paper will still be fun, and appreciative of the state's many allures: its stunning natural beauty, idyllic weather, diverse demographics — as well as the unique spirit that drove California's growth for so long, and still makes it almost a country in its own right. The new Post will honor the state's proud history — as the world capital of film and music and a leader in technology, military production, agriculture and tourism. And, of course, sports. The paper's set to debut in early 2026. Keep an eye out: There's hope for California yet.
