
‘Toxic soup': Food dyes set for US phase out under Robert F. Kennedy Jr. health push still on Aussie shelves
Announced this week, the move away from artificial to natural colouring alternatives is expected to affect a wide range of US products that includes the famously bright, rainbow coloured Skittles.
'For the last 50 years, American children have increasingly been living in a toxic soup of synthetic chemicals,' FDA Commissioner Marty Makary said at a press conference discussing the move.
He said the FDA would work with industry to eliminate food dyes Green No. 3 (known in Australia as Fast Green FCF), Red No. 40 (Allura Red AC) , Yellow No. 5 (Tartrazine), Yellow No. 6 (Sunset yellow FCF), Blue No. 1 Brilliant Blue FCF), and Blue No. 2 (Indigotine) by the end of next year.
The FDA will also revoke authorisation within months for synthetic colourings Citrus Red No. 2 and Orange B — which are already banned in Australia — and speed up the planned removal of Red Dye 3, which is permitted only in limited foods in Australia, including preserved cherries and icing/frosting, sooner than already planned.
It's expected the US changes will require a potentially costly overhaul of recipes and their new look may affect their attractiveness to consumers.
A spokesperson for FSANZ said it was aware of the FDA announcement, but said that the six new dyes targeted by the FDA were not harmful in the quantities allowed in the Australian food supply.
'The six colours in the FDA statement are all permitted under Schedule 16 of the Code under defined conditions of use in specific foods,' the spokesperson said.
'FSANZ surveys show that dietary exposure to food colours remains far below the acceptable daily intake, with levels under 5 per cent even including for children. These findings confirm there is no public health concern related to the use of approved food colours.'
In Australia, food dyes are required to undergo a safety assessment by FSANZ before being added to food and drinks sold. A safety limit is set to ensure no-one will be able to eat the additive to an unsafe level.
Backlash against artificial colours has been brewing in the US for more than a decade but the industry argues that claims the dyes were dangerous lack evidence.
Last month, newly appointed Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. told top food executives that removing artificial dyes from the food system was an urgent priority of the Trump administration.
He has previously used Kellogg's Froot Loops as his primary example when railing against artificial colourants.
Under his so-called Make America Healthy Again platform he has argued a corrupt alliance of drug and food companies and the federal health agencies that regulate them are making Americans less healthy.
He has pledged to end the chronic disease epidemic in children and adults, and has been vocal about making nutritious food, rather than drugs, central to that goal.
Rather than an outright ban, Mr Makary said the FDA would work with industry to do it voluntarily.
Mr Makary said the agency plans to authorise four additional colour additives using natural ingredients in the coming weeks, while also expediting the review and approval of other natural ingredient colours.
He cited a Lancet study that concluded that artificial colours in the diet 'result in increased hyperactivity'.
'The F in FDA stands for food,' he said. 'Now, there's no one ingredient that accounts for the child chronic disease epidemic. And let's be honest, taking petroleum-based food dyes out of the food supply is not a silver bullet that will instantly make America's children healthy, but it is one important step.'
— with CNBC

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
28 minutes ago
- ABC News
What does lifting trade restrictions on US beef mean for Australia?
It might not be on our plates or menus just yet, but US beef has been a hot topic of conversation across the nation after this week's decision to lift import restrictions that had been in place for more than two decades. Australia banned beef imports from the US in 2003 after the fatal neurological disease bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), also known as mad cow disease, was discovered in American cattle. The blanket ban was lifted in 2019, however restrictions remained on beef that was sourced from Canada or Mexico and slaughtered in the US, amid concerns it could carry the disease. "The Americans were unwilling to … do the traceability work to make sure that beef that was coming to Australia wasn't actually rebranded from somewhere else," veterinarian and former NSW Farmers Association president, James Jackson, said. "We don't want foot and mouth disease in this country, we don't want our consumers to eat beef and get Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, which is the disease you get from eating cattle with mad cow disease." While some in the industry were optimistic that lifting the restrictions would open up trade opportunities for Australian producers, others raised concerns that Australia's biosecurity could be compromised. The federal government said the move was the result of a decade-long biosecurity review that found more robust movement controls had been introduced in the US. "The Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry is satisfied the strengthened control measures put in place by the US effectively manage biosecurity risks," Agriculture Minister Julie Collins said. "The Albanese Labor government will never compromise on biosecurity." Nationals leader David Littleproud questioned the timing of the decision, saying it looked as though it was a trade to appease US President Donald Trump. The biosecurity restrictions on beef imports from the United States were one of the key grievances that led the Trump administration to impose tariffs on Australia. Red Meat Advisory Council chair John McKillop said while the decision may have been pushed through "slightly quicker" than expected, he was confident it was the result of a long-running assessment. Global AgriTrends analyst Simon Quilty said the risk of US beef imports introducing diseases to Australia was now much lower. "They have improved their traceability methods within America and I think, in all honesty, that the degree of risk is significantly low," he said. Mr McKillop said any risk would also be mitigated by the limited amount of beef Australia was likely to import from the US. "They have the lowest beef herd in 70 years in the US at the moment [due to drought]," he said. "The most [beef] that was ever brought in, and this was pre-BSE … was 210 tonnes … in contrast to the 395,000 tonnes we exported to the US last year." Mr McKillop said the US was also experiencing near-record beef and cattle prices, and it was unlikely Australians would want to pay high prices for their product. While the amount of beef coming into Australia from the US may be limited, Mr Jackson said there could be a market for it. "There may be some lines [of product] come into Australia, people who want to sell American beef on a restaurant menu or something like that," he said. Mr Jackson said Australia must be open to accepting American beef if it wanted to maintain a trade relationship with the US. "Part of a trade deal is that you're willing to take product from other countries," he said. "Are we happy with Australian consumers eating American beef? Well, probably we're not that happy, but the reality is that if you trade, you've got to be happy to take other people's product as well." The trade restriction on US beef has been a key grievance for the Trump administration, which placed a 10 per cent tariff on all Australian imports earlier this year. Professor Ben Lyons, from the University of Southern Queensland's Rural Economies Centre of Excellence, said it was difficult to know how the move would impact that tariff. "Nothing would surprise us at the moment because that's the new paradigm under the Trump administration — full of surprises," he said. Dr Lyons said he was confident the Australian beef industry would maintain a strong export market, regardless of US-imposed tariffs. "If past performance is the best indicator of the future, we always seem to find a way with our export markets," he said. "Even the announcement of this tariff on Australian beef at the beginning of the year hasn't really had any economic impact as yet on our exports. "I think we should just carry on calmly and do what we do best. I don't really see this as being a long-term issue for Australian agriculture."

Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Donald Trump signs executive order forcing homeless off America's streets
President Trump signed an executive order Thursday calling on states and cities to end 'endemic vagrancy' — and rehouse homeless people including drug addicts and those suffering from mental problems in 'treatment centers.' The order redirects federal funding to prioritize 'shifting homeless individuals into long-term institutional settings for humane treatment through the appropriate use of civil commitment.' On average, more than 274,000 people were sleeping on the streets each night last year under then-President Joe Biden, the order says. 'The overwhelming majority of these individuals are addicted to drugs, have a mental health disorder, or both,' the document says. 'The Federal Government and the States have spent tens of billions of dollars on failed programs that address homelessness but not its root causes, leaving other citizens vulnerable to public safety threats.' Trump has for years complained about homeless encampments along major roads in Washington, DC, and proposed reopening insane asylums to house the nation's most dangerous street people. It was not immediately clear how much funding would be steered toward the new initiative, or whether there would be a parallel effort to reopen long-shuttered institutions as a public safety strategy. The order identifies 'assisted outpatient treatment' as an option in addition to 'institutional treatment.' States and municipalities that already crackdown on open illicit drug use and urban camping, loitering or squatting, and tracking sex offenders, will be prioritized for grants. 'President Trump is delivering on his commitment to Make America Safe Again and end homelessness across America,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement. 'By removing vagrant criminals from our streets and redirecting resources toward substance abuse programs, the Trump Administration will ensure that Americans feel safe in their own communities and that individuals suffering from addiction or mental health struggles are able to get the help they need.' Tent cities that have particularly upset the president sprung up during his first term between the Kennedy Center and the White House, in an area his motorcade traverses on the way to and from his northern Virginia golf course. Another rat-infested encampment lasted for years in McPherson Square just north of the White House, spooking passersby who regularly spotted occupants staggering around, conversing with themselves and urinating on lamp posts. Trump griped that the grim scenes in DC were on display for visiting world leaders — and DC Mayor Muriel Bowser's administration has since conducted whack-a-mole camp clearances in the capital's core. The Supreme Court ruled last year in a 6-3 decision that localities have a right to impose fines on homeless people who camp without permission on public property. Originally published as Donald Trump signs executive order forcing homeless off America's streets

Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Gaza ceasefire hopes dwindle after US and Israel withdraw from negotiations, accusing Hamas of bad faith
Efforts to secure a ceasefire in Gaza have hit another stumbling block, as both the United States and Israel recalled their negotiating teams from talks, citing a lack of progress and accusing Hamas of failing to engage seriously. US envoy Steve Witkoff announced the American delegation was being recalled for consultations, stating bluntly that "Hamas does not appear to be coordinated or acting in good faith". "We will now consider alternative options to bring the hostages home and try to create a more stable environment for the people of Gaza," Witkoff posted on social media platform X. No official comment was immediately issued by Hamas. The latest setback follows months of stalled efforts aimed at halting the war, securing the release of Israeli hostages, and addressing Gaza's worsening humanitarian crisis. An Israeli official familiar with the negotiations said Hamas' latest position 'does not allow for progress without a concession' but stressed that Israel remained committed to continuing discussions. Both sides remain under growing pressure at home and abroad to reach a deal. For Israel, domestic concern over the condition and fate of hostages taken in the 7 October attacks continues to mount. Meanwhile, in Gaza, the humanitarian situation has turned dire, with food shortages worsening by the day. Dozens have reportedly starved to death in recent weeks, with local health officials describing a catastrophic wave of hunger sweeping the besieged enclave. Gaza's health ministry said two more people had died from malnutrition. Shifa Hospital in Gaza City confirmed the two patients had pre-existing illnesses but perished after going days without food. UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has condemned the deepening crisis, describing the suffering and starvation as an "unspeakable and indefensible" humanitarian catastrophe. "While the situation has been grave for some time, it has reached new depths and continues to worsen. We are witnessing a humanitarian catastrophe," he said in a statement, adding that he would hold urgent talks with France and Germany to discuss coordinated action to 'stop the killing and get people the food they desperately need.' Earlier on Thursday, there had appeared to be some glimmers of hope. A senior Hamas figure told Reuters that a ceasefire deal was still possible within days but accused Israel of stalling. Separately, an Israeli official had indicated to local press that the latest draft proposal was 'workable'. However, Israel's Channel 12 later reported that significant gaps remained between the sides, including disagreement over where Israeli forces should redeploy during any ceasefire. The US delegation, led by Witkoff, did not respond to requests for clarity on what demands from Hamas triggered their decision to walk away from the table. Back in Israel, the Hostages Families Forum voiced alarm over the development, warning that halting the talks could cost lives. "Each day that passes endangers the hostages' chances of recovery and risks losing the ability to locate the fallen or gain vital intelligence about them," the group said. Israel, which sealed off Gaza entirely in March before partially reopening crossings under new restrictions in May, insists it is letting in enough aid. It blames the United Nations for delivery delays - a claim the UN rejects, citing the immense operational challenges under Israeli restrictions. The conflict erupted after Hamas militants stormed into Israel on 7 October, killing around 1,200 people and seizing 251 hostages, according to Israeli figures. Since then, Israeli bombardments and ground operations have left nearly 60,000 Palestinians dead, according to health officials in Gaza. -With Reuters