Canada discusses joining US Golden Dome missile defence programme
Canada's openness to joining the proposed Golden Dome system comes amid ongoing trade and security negotiations between the two countries, after Trump threatened steep tariffs on Canada and said it would be better off as a US state.This galvanised a wave of national patriotism in Canada that ushered in a historic election win for Carney's Liberal government."Canadians gave the prime minister a strong mandate to negotiate a comprehensive new security and economic relationship with the United States," said Audrey Champoux, a spokesperson for Carney."To that end, the prime minister and his ministers are having wide-ranging and constructive discussions with their American counterparts," she said. "These discussions naturally include strengthening NORAD and related initiatives such as the Golden Dome."But Ms Champoux added it is too early to say what Canada might pay into the programme, or how it would work for the country.Earlier on Tuesday, Trump said that Canada has expressed interest in being part of the Golden Dome."We'll be talking to them," the US president said. "They want to have protection also, so as usual, we help Canada."Trump said that the new Golden Dome defence missile programme would be operational by the end of his time in office, and that it would come with a price tag of $175bn. He added that he his administration is looking for Canada to "pay their fair share."Canada and the US already partner on the North American Aerospace Defense Command, also known as NORAD - a system that is responsible for aerospace and maritime surveillance, warning and defence of the region, and that can detect and shoot down cruise missiles.NOARD has been in place since 1958, and both countries in recent years have been engaged in discussions to modernise it.Trump said the proposed Golden Dome is meant to target increasingly sophisticated aerial weapons, and will include space-based sensors and interceptors.He said the system would be "capable even of intercepting missiles launched from the other side of the world, or launched from space".It is partly inspired by Israel's Iron Dome, which the country has used to intercept rockets and missiles since 2011.Experts have expressed doubts on whether the US would be able to build a similarly comprehensive defence system, given its larger land mass. Shashank Joshi, defence editor at the Economist, told the BBC that one way the Golden Dome could work was by using thousands of satellites to spot and track missiles and then use interceptors in orbit to fire at the missiles as they take off and take them out.He said the US military would take the plan seriously but it was unrealistic to think it would be completed during Trump's term, and the huge cost would suck up a large chunk of the US defence budget.The Congressional Budget Office has estimated the eventual price tag could be $542bn over 20 years, on the space-based parts of the system alone.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Celtics minority owner reaches deal to buy Connecticut Sun for record $325 million, AP source says
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
Telegraph
28 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Home Office tried to silence Robert Jenrick after small boat terror claims
The Home Office tried to silence Robert Jenrick after he said terror suspects had arrived in Britain on small boats. In an article for The Telegraph last year, Mr Jenrick, the former immigration minister, claimed that individuals linked to Islamic State had 'waltzed right in' to Britain across the Channel. It can now be revealed that a fortnight later, the Home Office's most senior civil servant reprimanded him over the disclosure. Sir Matthew Rycroft, the department's then permanent secretary, wrote to Mr Jenrick to tell him the information 'should not have been made public' and warned him against 'any further disclosure' of sensitive information from his time in government. On Saturday, critics said the move showed that the Government was trying to 'suppress' concerns about the security implications of mass migration. During his spell as immigration minister between October 2022 and December 2023, Mr Jenrick would have had access to sensitive information and security briefings, including about migrants crossing the Channel. The Home Office has neither confirmed nor denied the veracity of Mr Jenrick's claims and is understood to have had concerns that they could undermine national security. In his letter, Sir Matthew argued that the former immigration minister was bound by rules that prohibit the disclosure of sensitive information, including the ministerial code and the Official Secrets Act. Sir Matthew is also understood to have confirmed that Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, was personally aware that he was issuing the reprimand. The revelation comes amid wider concerns about the Government's attitude towards free speech, especially on contentious topics such as migration. This week it emerged that a secretive Whitehall 'spy' unit has been used to target social media posts criticising migrant hotels and 'two-tier policing'. That prompted the White House to say it was monitoring the situation surrounding freedom of expression in the UK 'closely and with great concern'. Allies of Mr Jenrick expressed concern that the Home Office was trying to deter him from speaking out on security concerns around migration. Bradley Thomas, the Tory MP for Bromsgrove, said: 'Any attempt by the Home Office to suppress news of such significant national security importance is a disgrace. 'Robert Jenrick resigned from the Home Office on a point of principle and he has been clear that mass migration has not been good for our country. 'Robert's principled stance has seen him consistently challenge the failings of the immigration system to keep our country secure and prosperous.' He said that Ms Cooper's 'implicit awareness' that the reprimand was being issued was 'a dereliction of her duty to the British people'. Lewis Cocking, the Tory MP for Broxbourne, said that the warning to Mr Jenrick represented 'political overreach from the Civil Service'. 'They shouldn't be telling an elected Member of Parliament what they should or shouldn't be saying about illegal immigration,' he said. 'It's just another example of why we need a total overhaul of the Civil Service, to get them back working in the interests of ordinary British people. 'Labour Ministers have failed to give me clear answers on how many small boat arrivals fail criminality checks, and this suggests they are working with civil servants to keep the reality of the situation hidden from the public.' Ministerial code Former ministers continue to be bound by the ministerial code, which sets out the standards for their conduct, after they have left office. Mr Jenrick is also on the Privy Council, which advises the sovereign on matters of state, and whose members are subject to extra confidentiality obligations. It is understood that it is not unusual for officials to remind both current and former ministers of their responsibilities under those rules. Mr Jenrick declined to comment. The news comes as Labour is under growing pressure over its handling of the small boats crisis, with the number of crossings this year having already topped 25,000. Officials were forced to send migrants to a controversial overflow hotel in Canary Wharf on Saturday after almost 900 arrived on Wednesday.
The Guardian
28 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Federal agency opens inquiry into ex-special counsel Jack Smith over Trump investigations
The US office of special counsel, an independent federal agency, confirmed to NBC News on Saturday that it is investigating former Department of Justice prosecutor Jack Smith for possible violations of the Hatch Act. Smith led investigations into Donald Trump's part in January 6 US Capitol riot and alleged mishandling of classified documents. The confirmation of an investigation comes after Arkansas senator Tom Cotton, a Republican, requested last week that Smith, 56, be investigated for 'unprecedented interference in the 2024 election'. The Hatch Act, a federal law passed in 1939, limits certain political activities of federal employees. Trump, along with other prominent Republican lawmakers, have argued that Smith's investigations into Trump amounted to illegal political activity. Smith was appointed as special counsel by then attorney general Merrick Garland in 2022 – three days after Trump announced his bid for a second term – to investigate potential interference with the 2020 election and the handling of classified documents. However, the US office of special counsel, the federal agency investigating Smith, is different from the type of justice department-appointed special counsel position that was held by Smith. As an independent federal agency, it lacks the power to bring criminal charges, but can instead seek disciplinary action for a federal government employee or refer its findings to the justice department for investigation. In a series of social media posts on Wednesday, Cotton said that Smith's legal actions 'were nothing more than a tool for the Biden and Harris campaigns. This isn't just unethical, it is very likely illegal campaign activity from a public office.' Cotton said Smith 'pushed for an out-of-the-ordinary, rushed trial for President Trump, with jury selection to begin just two weeks before the Iowa caucuses. No other case of this magnitude and complexity would come to trial this quickly.' Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion Smith ultimately brought two criminal indictments against Trump in 2023 but resigned in January this year before either came to trial. His resignation came soon after the justice department asked a federal appeals court to reverse a judge's order, blocking the release of his investigative report focused on Trump's alleged efforts to undo the 2020 presidential election. A second Smith-authored report, into Trump's handling of classified documents, was also blocked from publication.
