US Army rolls out $13M smart rifle scopes that auto-target and take down enemy drones in combat
During a live-fire training exercise on June 6 in Germany, a soldier with the 3rd Squadron, 2nd Cavalry Regiment used the SMASH 2000L smart scope mounted on an M4A1 rifle to target drones in the sky.
The demo was part of Project Flytrap, a multinational training event.
The SMASH 2000L, made by Israeli company Smart Shooter Ltd., is no ordinary sight.
It uses cameras, sensors, and artificial intelligence to track targets and decides the perfect time to fire, according to reporting from Army Recognition.
Once a drone is locked in, the system controls the trigger and only fires when a hit is guaranteed.
In May, the Army awarded Smart Shooter a $13 million contract to begin delivering these scopes to troops under its Transformation In Contact (TIC 2.0) program.
The goal is to quickly get new, useful tech into soldiers' hands.
The smart scope weighs about 2.5 pounds and fits onto standard-issue rifles.
3 A soldier with the 3rd Squadron, 2nd Cavalry Regiment, tested a SMASH 2000L smart scope mounted on an M4A1 rifle during a training exercise on June 6.
U.S. Army photo by Spc. Elijah Magaña
It has already been used by NATO partners and tested in combat zones.
In the ongoing Ukraine war, both sides use less expensive drones to drop explosives or spy on troops. In Israel, terrorists have flown quadcopters into military positions.
These small drones are fast, quiet, and deadly.
3 The smart scope helps target drones in the sky.
U.S. Army photo by Spc. Elijah Magaña
3 Rifles with this new technology only fire when a hit is guaranteed.
U.S. Army photo by Spc. Elijah Magaña
Until now, stopping drones often meant using big, complex systems but SMASH changes that.
With SMASH, a single soldier can knock a drone out of the sky without needing backup.
The Army did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Journals
a day ago
- Business Journals
The Colorado-Israel Chamber of Commerce, a Binational Innovation Gateway
Bridging Innovation Between Dynamic Ecosystems: The Colorado-Israel Business Connection By Jordan Kastrinsky, Co-Founder & Israel Director, Colorado-Israel Chamber of Commerce On a sun-filled morning in a Tel Aviv cafe this past March, I sat across from the founder of an energy tech venture capital firm who was raising a fund to help bring innovative technologies to market. His goal was simple: to support and develop some of the most forward-thinking energy solutions available. He asked me directly, 'Where should we go for partnerships and growth opportunities?' My answer came quickly: Colorado. Not because I was born in Colorado or because I represent the Colorado-Israel Chamber of Commerce. But because I've come to believe that something extraordinary is happening between Colorado and Israel, and it is only beginning to take shape. Together with Jeremiah Baronberg, a fellow Coloradan from Denver, I co-founded the new Colorado-Israel Chamber of Commerce (CO-IL) in February 2024 as a binational platform to bring two thriving, yet under-connected innovation ecosystems closer together. Israel is known globally for its startup ingenuity as The Startup Nation, where its tech firms punch above their weight for such a relatively small country when it comes to investments raised, IPOs, and degree of innovation. Israel is also home to hundreds of international firms' R&D centers. Likewise, Colorado is a U.S. leader in agriculture, energy, aerospace, bioscience, and quantum technologies and home to 33 federally funded national laboratories, making it one of the U.S.'s leading hubs for scientific research and innovation and contributing significantly to the state's economy. Together, Colorado and Israel are well-positioned to turn high-tech breakthroughs into real-world resilience. In building CO-IL, we have stayed true to our business-oriented focus by working in close partnership with both government and industry to help founders identify and engage partners, public agencies find pilot programs, and investors find deals. We've seen how powerful this work can be. At Denver Startup Week, we hosted Colorado-Israeli biotech founders and investors to engage directly with Colorado's entrepreneurial community while discussing lessons learned from Israel's innovation economy. At the Colorado State Capitol, we convened legislators with the CO-IL community around a shared mission: to deepen economic collaboration rooted in innovation and shared goals. Across dozens of meetings, introductions, and follow-ups, we've helped Israeli startups secure meaningful business opportunities and connect with active Colorado investors, universities, municipalities, and major corporations. It is also important to emphasize that the interest comes in both directions—Colorado stakeholders are increasingly looking to Israel not only for advanced solutions but also for resilient partners. In the aftermath of October 7, the Israeli innovation ecosystem has been building under extraordinary pressure. Founders have not stopped even as they rush to the frontlines. If anything, they have accelerated their entrepreneurial ambitions with an acute sense of mission and urgency to forge sustainable partnerships. As Israel faces the threat of a nuclear-armed Iran, its resilience—rooted in unity and innovation—is being tested and strengthened in profound ways. That is where Colorado comes in. This year, CO-IL is working to launch two binational flagship initiatives. First, a water-tech accelerator designed to connect Israeli startups with utilities across Colorado for real-world pilot program deployment. Second, a Colorado-Israel cybersecurity business center to provide Israeli cyber-tech companies with a launchpad into the U.S. market and offer Colorado stakeholders early access to tested technologies. These programs point to a new kind of collaborative, business bridge between Colorado and Israel centered around addressing critical, timely challenges through innovation. As we look ahead, CO-IL is working to organize delegations of Colorado and Israeli industry leaders for visits to both regions to meet their Israeli counterparts, tour laboratory and pilot sites, and shape the future of these collaborations. Our vision is to grow Colorado's value as an anchor for Israeli innovation and to champion Israel as a trusted launchpad for Colorado-based technologies. We know the work is only beginning. But we are proud of what's already been built and excited about what's ahead. We believe we are building more than a chamber and something that can become a shared platform for resilience, innovation, and trust. So when an Israeli founder asks where to go next, I don't hesitate. Come to Colorado. We are ready to build with you.
Gizmodo
4 days ago
- Gizmodo
Big Brother at the Border Is Searching for a ‘Hidden Language' in People's Text Messages
United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has a bad snooping habit, and it's looking for a little help to get its fix. According to a report from Wired, the agency is currently asking tech companies to pitch it ideas for a digital forensics tool that would allow it to process and analyze data from seized phones and computers and potentially uncover 'hidden' patterns. In a federal registry listing from June, CBP said it is seeking a tool that can scan text messages, pictures, videos, contacts, and other information stored on devices seized from people at U.S. borders. But more than just process all that data, it wants a tool that can find patterns within it. The agency wants to be able to find 'hidden language' in a person's text messages, like coded terms that 'may not be obvious at first look.' It also needs to be able to identify specific objects that appear across videos and photos, and the agency wants the tool to be able to quickly process the data for 'intel generation.' The request, which seems like it borders on a Pizzagate level of conspiratorial thinking, comes as the agency is looking to expand its digital forensics tools, in part because it is seizing considerably more devices from people. In 2015, it searched 8,500 devices. That figure skyrocketed to 41,500 devices in 2023, according to the agency's data. It also performed 4,200 'advanced' searches, which include a digital forensic deep dive into a device, in 2024. CBP currently uses tools from Israeli intelligence firm Cellebrite to scan devices, but it appears open to newcomers if someone has a more powerful tool to offer. The agency claims to use 'a wide variety of digital data extraction tools,' per Wired, so it's not like it's been monogamous with Cellebrite thus far anyway. The agency hasn't exactly been shy about snagging phones and other devices from people under Trump's second term. CBP agents can and will ask travelers to hand over and unlock their devices so that they can be searched, which has led to some travelers opting to pack a burner phone on trips to the U.S. to avoid unnecessary scrutiny when they come to the border. In its request for information on this potential new tool, CBP suggested that it will pick a vendor and sign a contract to build the system in the third quarter of 2026. So keep your eyes out for that, a new authoritarian dystopia feature might be dropping sometime in 2027.
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Canada needs to get serious about digital sovereignty and scrapping the DST won't help
In May, the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC), woke up to an unusual technological problem. Microsoft, which provides enterprise services to the court, had apparently shut down email access for him and his colleagues, as a result of American sanctions meant to punish the tribunal for its investigation into Israeli conduct in Gaza. The news followed reports from earlier this year that Elon Musk had threatened to cut Internet access to Ukraine, which is dependent on his Starlink services, if the country refused to guarantee U.S. control over critical minerals. Although both Musk and Microsoft subsequently denied the reporting, governments around the world are waking up to the fact that their reliance on American technology products can quickly become a liability. Canada cannot afford to be complacent to the threat that the United States has the power to turn off our digital lights. Moves to bolster our digital sovereignty, however, carry their own challenges. The latest evidence of this came on Friday, when U.S. President Donald Trump, through his personal social media company, demanded that Canada rescind the digital services tax (DST), which targets large online platforms, as a precondition to trade negotiations. On Sunday, the Department of Finance announced it would do just that. Trade negotiations are always delicate, and doubly so when dealing with a head of state as mercurial as Trump. But if Mark Carney is serious about ensuring Canadian sovereignty, digital services are the wrong place to start giving ground. Canada's critical digital infrastructure is overwhelmingly dominated by American companies. They control not only the news that Canadians read, but for a number of remote communities, they are virtually the only communications lifeline to the outside world. Even more concerning is the role these tech giants play in the nuts and bolts of how our Internet works. The cloud computing market, which underlies virtually all digital services, is dominated by three American companies, Inc., Microsoft Corp. and Alphabet Inc. (which owns Google). The data-hungry nature of the digital economy means that incumbents are able to use their position to map existing control models onto emerging technologies, like artificial intelligence, further entrenching their market dominance into the next generation. Canada's willingness to accept American control of our digital infrastructure is puzzling considering the pains we take to guarantee the independence of other aspects of our information ecosystem. Canadian content and language laws are stringently enforced, and have even expanded in recent years. The CRTC imposes strict rules protecting our telecommunications market from foreign competition, even if it means higher prices for consumers. And the government has been extremely aggressive in its desire to prevent Chinese companies, such as Huawei, TikTok and most recently Hikvision, from establishing footholds in the country. While it may have made sense to consider American technology as a relatively safe alternative given the strength and longevity of our bilateral relationship, it is time for Canadians to accept that those days are in the past. In Europe, the revelation that American tech products could be used as a point of leverage sent governments scrambling to review their exposure, and to expand their investments into potential domestic alternatives that could better guarantee national security. Canada needs to chart a similar course, and prioritize diversifying away from our reliance on American tech. Some of this work may be done in collaboration with existing efforts among European partners, but there is no reason why Canada should not be leading in the development of innovative alternatives to the present American-dominated ecosystem. In particular, the past year has shown a growing eagerness among consumers to embrace alternatives to the Big Tech status quo, as evidenced by the rapid growth of users of alternative social media platforms such as Mastodon, Bluesky and Pixelfed. Canada should invest in creative solutions to break out of the existing platform-dominated paradigm and empower domestic champions such as the newly launched Gander Social. In particular, decentralized offerings present an intriguing alternative to empower users, and could deliver a new paradigm of digital communications. The government could lead the way by beginning to migrate its own digital presence away from American-dominated tech. However, the ability for new national champions to thrive in the tech space depends on a market that provides fair opportunities to new entrants. This means a need for strong enforcement of competition rules. Canada could also follow Europe's lead through rules around adversarial interoperability, which requires companies to make sure their products interface smoothly with their competitors, and minimizes the cost to consumers of switching. Canada could also consider stronger privacy enforcement, and rules that demand greater transparency and accountability from large online platforms about the decisions they make. If Canada wants to be the world's energy partner, we need to act like it Canada needs more teamwork and fewer turf wars to get major projects built None of this will be easy, and much of it is likely to draw the ire of a U.S. administration that has developed an astonishingly cozy relationship with the same Silicon Valley titans who just a few years ago decried Donald Trump as too dangerous to even give an account to. The DST, which ensures that large tech companies pay their fair share of taxes, should be an important part of Canada's strategy for digital self-reliance, by drawing revenue from the biggest players to seed new alternative information institutions. While it is difficult to backseat drive officials faced with the difficult and delicate task of negotiating with the Trump administration, the speed with which Canada rolled over in cancelling the DST, while apparently getting nothing concrete in return, is a troubling sign. Canada needs a stable and equitable trade relationship with the U.S., but not at the cost of our sovereignty. Michael Karanicolas is an associate professor and the Palmer Chair in Public Policy & Law at Dalhousie University. He previously held positions at UCLA and at Yale Information Society Project, where he remains an affiliated fellow. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
