Will Camp Blanding be the 'Alligator Alcatraz' of Northeast Florida? Here's what we know.
To support his claim, DeSantis said the Camp Blanding facility will bolster both state and federal efforts to crack down on illegal immigration, calling it a key component in Florida's broader immigration enforcement strategy.
Criticism of 'Alligator Alcatraz": Florida lawmaker calls immigrant detention centers 'concentration camps' on CNN
Camp Blanding, located southwest of Jacksonville, serves as the primary training site for the Florida National Guard. Additionally, the site includes weapons ranges, educational facilities, simulation platforms, and maintenance support, serving not only the state's National Guard but also a wide range of federal, state, and local agencies across the Joint, Interagency, Intergovernmental, and Multinational (JIIM) spectrum.
Originally, the idea of using the site as a second immigration detention center was proposed during a news conference on June 25th by Gov. Ron DeSantis. He argued that a dedicated facility is necessary, saying, 'We can't have every illegal housed in our jails because we actually have non-illegals who need to be housed there.'
However, aside from being a training center, the facility also has an operating museum for civilians. However, the question remains whether turning Camp Blanding into an immigration detention center will disrupt its current daily operations.
Yes, Camp Blanding played a big role during World War II as one of the U.S. Army's major training centers. It started in 1939 as a training area for the Florida National Guard, but as the U.S. prepared for war, it quickly expanded into a federal military base.
During the war, Camp Blanding became home to two full infantry divisions and many smaller units. In 1944 and 1945, thousands of soldiers trained here before heading overseas to join combat. The camp also included a large hospital with 2,800 beds, a German POW camp, and later, a Separation Center to help soldiers return to civilian life after the war. Due to its history, the camp was turned into a museum for civilians to indulge in history.
After the war ended, Camp Blanding returned to state control. Today, it's still an important training site for the National Guard, Reserves, and even some active-duty military units.
Whether you're a history buff or just passing through, Camp Blanding offers a fascinating glimpse into America's wartime past.
More Camp Blanding history: Black Panther Division back at Camp Blanding, 75 years later
The Camp Blanding Museum features uniforms, weapons, vehicles, and aircraft dating back to the 1940s. According to its website, plans are underway to expand exhibits to include the Korean War, Vietnam, Desert Shield/Desert Storm, and the Global War on Terror.
Visitors can also browse a gift shop offering history books, patches, pins, and military memorabilia. Outside, the Memorial Park displays large artifacts and monuments honoring those who trained or served at Camp Blanding throughout the decades.
As of now, the museum is open to civilians daily from noon to 4 p.m. Located at 5629 SR 16 West, Building 3040, in Starke. Admissions are currently free, with tours available before or after normal hours by appointment, according to the website.
As of now, DeSantis has said it will be fully funded by the Federal government, and the construction of Alligator Alcatraz can give a general estimate of the costs that building a facility in Northeast Florida could look like.
For what we know now, the remote facility in South Florida, which is composed of large tents and other planned facilities, will cost the state around $450 million a year to run. However, to reduce some of the costs, Florida can request some reimbursement from the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
DeSantis has stated that the project will be fully funded by the federal government. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem told USA TODAY that a significant portion of the center and its facilities will be financed through FEMA's Shelter and Services Program, and while the state has confirmed that FEMA will reimburse costs for the Everglades facility, it has not yet addressed whether additional sites will also qualify for reimbursement.
To place things into perspective, the 'Alligator Alcatraz' facility, designed to hold up to 5,000 detainees, was created in roughly one week under the direction of state Attorney General James Uthmeier. In comparison, Camp Blanding is expected to hold up to 2,000 detainees.
During a tour of the facility on July 1, Todd Lyons, the acting director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, told NBC News that the site can now hold 500 detainees and will be expanded to fit as many as 3,000. As of now, there were rows of bunk beds inside fenced-in areas under a white tent structure with air conditioning.
Being present in the U.S. without proper authorization is generally a civil violation, not a criminal one. This means it's handled through immigration proceedings, like deportation, rather than criminal court.
Criminal Offenses Include:
Illegal Entry: Entering the U.S. without authorization, like crossing the border illegally, is a misdemeanor for the first offense, potentially punishable by fine or imprisonment.
Illegal Reentry: Reentering the U.S. after being deported or removed is a felony, with potential penalties of fines and imprisonment.
Other Immigration-Related Crimes: Other crimes like smuggling aliens, harboring aliens, or marriage fraud for immigration purposes can also be prosecuted under criminal law.
This article originally appeared on Florida Times-Union: Camp Blanding: What to know about Florida's second 'Alligator Alcatraz'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The House gives final approval to Trump's big tax bill in a milestone for his second-term agenda
WASHINGTON (AP) — House Republicans propelled President Donald Trump's big multitrillion-dollar tax breaks and spending cuts bill to final passage Thursday in Congress, overcoming multiple setbacks to approve his signature second-term policy package before a Fourth of July deadline. The tight roll call, 218-214, came at a potentially high political cost, with two Republicans joining all Democrats opposed. GOP leaders worked overnight and the president himself leaned on a handful of skeptics to drop their opposition. Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York delayed voting for more than eight hours by seizing control of the floor with a record-breaking speech against the bill. Trump celebrated his political victory in Iowa, where he attended the kickoff for a year of events marking the country's upcoming 250th anniversary. 'I want to thank Republican congressmen and women, because what they did is incredible,' he said. The president complained that Democrats voted against the bill because 'they hate Trump — but I hate them too.' Trump said he plans to sign the legislation on Friday at the White House. The outcome delivers a milestone for the president and for his party. It was a long-shot effort to compile a lengthy list of GOP priorities into what they called his 'one big beautiful bill,' at nearly 900 pages. With Democrats unified in opposition, the bill will become a defining measure of Trump's return to the White House, aided by Republican control of Congress. 'You get tired of winning yet?' said House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., invoking Trump as he called the vote. 'With one big beautiful bill we are going to make this country stronger, safer and more prosperous than ever before,' he said. Republicans celebrated with a rendition of the Village People's 'Y.M.C.A.,' a song the president often plays at his rallies, during a ceremony afterward. Tax breaks and safety net cuts At its core, the package's priority is $4.5 trillion in tax breaks enacted in 2017 during Trump's first term that would expire if Congress failed to act, along with new ones. This includes allowing workers to deduct tips and overtime pay, and a $6,000 deduction for most older adults earning less than $75,000 a year. There's also a hefty investment, some $350 billion, in national security and Trump's deportation agenda and to help develop the 'Golden Dome' defensive system over the U.S. To help offset the lost tax revenue, the package includes $1.2 trillion in cutbacks to the Medicaid health care and food stamps, largely by imposing new work requirements, including for some parents and older people, and a major rollback of green energy tax credits. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the package will add $3.3 trillion to the deficit over the decade and 11.8 million more people will go without health coverage. 'This was a generational opportunity to deliver the most comprehensive and consequential set of conservative reforms in modern history, and that's exactly what we're doing,' said Rep. Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, the House Budget Committee chairman. Democrats united against the big 'ugly bill' Democrats unified against the bill as a tax giveaway to the rich paid for on the backs of the working class and most vulnerable in society, what they called 'trickle down cruelty.' Jeffries began the speech at 4:53 a.m. EDT and finished at 1:37 p.m. EDT, 8 hours, 44 minutes later, a record, as he argued against what he called Trump's 'big ugly bill.' 'We're better than this,' said Jeffries, who used a leader's prerogative for unlimited debate, and read letter after letter from Americans writing about their reliance of the health care programs. 'I never thought that I'd be on the House floor saying that this is a crime scene,' Jeffries said. 'It's a crime scene, going after the health, and the safety, and the well-being of the American people.' And as Democrats, he said, 'We want no part of it.' Tensions ran high. As fellow Democrats chanted Jeffries' name, a top Republican, Rep. Jason Smith of Missouri, chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, called his speech 'a bunch of hogwash.' Hauling the package through the Congress has been difficult from the start. Republicans have struggled mightily with the bill nearly every step of the way, quarreling in the House and Senate, and often succeeding only by the narrowest of margins: just one vote. The Senate passed the package days earlier with Vice President JD Vance breaking the tie vote. The slim majority in the House left Republicans little room for defections. 'It wasn't beautiful enough for me to vote for it,' said Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky. Also voting no was Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, who said he was concerned about cuts to Medicaid. Once Johnson gaveled the tally, Republicans cheered 'USA!' and flashed Trump-style thumbs-up to the cameras. Political costs of saying no Despite their discomfort with various aspects of the sprawling package, in some ways it became too big to fail — in part because Republicans found it difficult to buck Trump. As Wednesday's stalled floor action dragged overnight, Trump railed against the delays. 'What are the Republicans waiting for???' the president said in a midnight-hour post. Johnson relied heavily on White House Cabinet secretaries, lawyers and others to satisfy skeptical GOP holdouts. Moderate Republicans worried about the severity of cuts while conservatives pressed for steeper reductions. Lawmakers said they were being told the administration could provide executive actions, projects or other provisions in their districts back home. The alternative was clear. Republicans who staked out opposition to the bill, including Massie of Kentucky and Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, were being warned by Trump's well-funded political operation. Tillis soon after announced he would not seek reelection. Rollback of past presidential agendas In many ways, the package is a repudiation of the agendas of the last two Democratic presidents, a chiseling away at the Medicaid expansion from Barack Obama's Affordable Care Act, and a pullback of Joe Biden's climate change strategies in the Inflation Reduction Act. Democrats have described the bill in dire terms, warning that cuts to Medicaid, which some 80 million Americans rely on, would result in lives lost. Food stamps that help feed more than 40 million people would 'rip food from the mouths of hungry children, hungry veterans and hungry seniors,' Jeffries said. Republicans say the tax breaks will prevent a tax hike on households and grow the economy. They maintain they are trying to rightsize the safety net programs for the population they were initially designed to serve, mainly pregnant women, the disabled and children, and root out what they describe as waste, fraud and abuse. The Tax Policy Center, which provides nonpartisan analysis of tax and budget policy, projected the bill would result next year in a $150 tax break for the lowest quintile of Americans, a $1,750 tax cut for the middle quintile and a $10,950 tax cut for the top quintile. That's compared with what they would face if the 2017 tax cuts expired. ___ Associated Press writers Kevin Freking, Joey Cappelletti and Chris Megerian contributed to this report.


USA Today
38 minutes ago
- USA Today
Gen Z's declining patriotism worries me. Partisanship shouldn't define us.
There is now a massive generational and partisan divide in how much pride people have in being American. I don't know how to solve it, but I know why those who are losing faith in America are wrong. Every year, Gallup conducts a poll on the patriotic leanings of Americans across all sorts of demographics. In recent years, this poll has produced worrying results. There is now a massive generational and partisan divide in how much pride people have in being American. I don't know how to solve it, but I know why those who are losing faith in America are wrong. In the 2025 iteration of this poll, a staggering 92% of Republicans were 'extremely' or 'very' proud to be American, whereas just 53% of independents and 36% of Democrats reported feeling the same. Until 2016, Democrats and Republicans remained rather similar in their patriotism, with both reaching values above 80% before the election of President Donald Trump. However, modern patriotism among Democrats is dependent on who is in the White House, rather than any genuine love of America. During the time that Joe Biden was in the White House, Republican pride in being American bottomed out at 84%. Over the same period, Democrats rose to a peak of just 62%. One significant driver of this decline is Generation Z, born between 1997 to 2012, whose patriotism lags far behind previous generations. Just 41% of Gen Z is extremely or very proud to be American, and among young Democrats, that falls to just 24%. Partisanship is getting in the way of patriotism for Democrats Being proud to be American has absolutely nothing to do with being proud of our current leaders. In their fluctuations in pride depending on who is in the White House, Democrats have lost sight of this. I am one of the most critical people of our government out there, and I think of that as being borne out of my patriotism. Criticizing the government when it does not strengthen America's foundational principles is a patriotic act. My fellow columnist Rex Huppke has the right idea. 'We can love this country and loathe the people in charge,' he wrote in a recent column. 'We can be simultaneously proud of this country and embarrassed of the things being done in its name.' Tell us: This Fourth of July, are you proud to be an American? | Opinion Forum Now, obviously, I am no Democrat, but it saddens me that this same principle apparently does not hold for many of them. To many Democrats in modern times, it seems as if their love for this country is contingent on their preferred candidates being in power. Interestingly, this seems to be a problem unique to Democrats. While some Republicans seemingly faltered in their patriotism over the previous four years, they did not see the massive swing between the Biden and Trump presidencies that Democrats saw over the same period. This is all evidence of the fact that Democrats have attached their pride to a political movement, rather than to a love of America's founding principles. For some, this is a problem of them simply being blinded by partisanship. For others, however, it marks a much deeper problem. America's failures to live up to her founding principles at times are not evidence of those principles being bad; they are evidence of human nature being imperfect. Gen Z doesn't know how good we have it Much of Gen Z has been captured by the progressive left, many of whom do genuinely believe that America's institutions and system of government need to be torn down completely. These revolutionaries are responsible for the complete lack of patriotism among Gen Z. Opinion: Senate just passed Trump's Big Beautiful Bill – and made it even uglier Gen Z doesn't realize how lucky we are. We live in the greatest country and in the greatest time in history. There is no collective group that has it better at any point in history than we do right now. Many will disagree with me on this point, but they are mistaken. There is no place better constructed to safeguard your individual liberties than here. While we are very obviously imperfect in that goal, no other nation on earth is better equipped to pursue liberty through the freedoms that our Constitution protects. Tearing down the system that has led to such a wonderful place would be a mistake. Within a framework designed to preserve liberty is the best place to enact whatever political change it is that you want, unless your goal is not liberty. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. Those who advocate against America's foundation might feel entitled ‒ in the sense that they believe it is the job of government to provide for them ‒ have taken the freedoms that we have for granted or are delusional about how good others have it. I do not know how to solve the problem of restoring patriotism to those who have lost it. I am sympathetic to the frustrations young Americans have with the state of our politics, and I am hopeful that Gen Z will learn that they are better off trying to change this country, rather than destroy it. America is a wonderful place, and you would do best to fight for your political causes within her structure of liberty, rather than attempting to tear it down. Dace Potas is an opinion columnist for USA TODAY and a graduate of DePaul University with a degree in political science. You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter.


Newsweek
42 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Social Security Responds to Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Social Security Administration (SSA) has celebrated the passage of President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, describing it as "landmark" legislation that provides "long-awaited tax relief to millions of older Americans." On Thursday, Congress passed the legislation in a 218-214 vote in the House, and the bill now awaits Trump's signature in a White House ceremony on Friday. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act will ensure that almost 90 percent of Social Security recipients will no longer be required to pay income taxes on their benefits, according to the SSA. "This is a historic step forward for America's seniors," Social Security Commissioner Frank Bisignano said in a news release. "For nearly 90 years, Social Security has been a cornerstone of economic security for older Americans. By significantly reducing the tax burden on benefits, this legislation reaffirms President Trump's promise to protect Social Security and helps ensure that seniors can better enjoy the retirement they've earned." Why It Matters The SSA's response comes amid fierce political debate over the bill's long-term consequences for retirees and the federal budget. While Trump initially promised to nix Social Security federal income taxes for beneficiaries, the SSA confirmed that the bill instead creates a targeted deduction that varies by income. What To Know The SSA specified that the legislation enacts a $6,000 tax deduction for individuals aged 65 or older with income up to $75,000—or up to $150,000 for married couples. Above these thresholds, the deduction phases out, ending at incomes of $175,000 for individuals and $250,000 for couples. The deduction is temporary and set to expire after 2028 unless extended by lawmakers. On X, formerly Twitter, the White House said on Monday that under the bill, 51.4 million seniors—88 percent of all seniors receiving Social Security income—would not pay any tax on their benefits income as a result of the change. The "big, beautiful bill" also drew intense criticism for its sharp cuts to Medicaid and other low-income programs, components that Democrats say threaten essential safety nets that millions rely on for basic health and nutrition. The bill's overall fiscal impact, according to the Congressional Budget Office, is projected to result in $3.3 trillion in additional deficit spending over the next decade. Social Security Administration office in Salt Lake City, Utah, on May 11, 2023. Social Security Administration office in Salt Lake City, Utah, on May 11, 2023. GETTY What People Are Saying President Donald Trump said in Iowa on Thursday after the bill's passage: "I think when you go over the bill, it was very easy to get them to a 'yes.' … Biggest tax cut in history." Karla Dennis, an enrolled tax agent and the CEO of the tax strategy firm KDA Inc., told Newsweek: "I really believe we need lasting change for seniors, not just quick fixes or one-time payments that grab attention but don't solve anything long term. We should stop taxing Social Security for people who are living on moderate incomes. Seniors making under $100,000 a year should not be taxed. The way Social Security is taxed today doesn't match how people earn income in retirement today." What Happens Next Trump is scheduled to sign the "One Big Beautiful Bill" into law in the Oval Office at 5 p.m. ET on Friday. The new Social Security deduction provisions are set to take effect in tax year 2026 and remain in effect through 2028.