Bad Week for Wall Street's Old Guard as Crypto Burns the Haters
hacks
, and more.
And yet this week, as the
Treasury market
rebelled against Donald Trump's 'big beautiful bill' — bringing the equity market rebound to a halt — crypto looked like the adult in the room. While stocks, government bonds and corporate credit sold off on
fiscal fears
,
Bitcoin
rallied almost 5% amid a market pattern with no real precedent. Another insult to orthodoxy: crypto deepened its institutional street cred as DC policymakers normalised dollar-linked tokens for mainstream use.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Trekking pants for mountain sports and adventure travel
Trek Kit India
Shop Now
Undo
Treasuries — long the ballast of diversified portfolios — proved a big loser in a week marked by rising fears of fiscal profligacy. By contrast, Bitcoin briefly surpassed $112,000 for the first time, poised for its sixth weekly gain in seven.
Crypto Tracker
TOP COIN SETS
DeFi Tracker
10.22%
Buy
BTC 50 :: ETH 50
4.03%
Buy
Smart Contract Tracker
3.44%
Buy
NFT & Metaverse Tracker
3.20%
Buy
Web3 Tracker
0.77%
Buy
TOP COINS
(₹)
Tether
85 (
-0.67%
)
Buy
Bitcoin
9,206,592 (
-3.01%
)
Buy
BNB
56,774 (
-3.6%
)
Buy
XRP
199 (
-5.35%
)
Buy
Ethereum
216,949 (
-6.0%
)
Buy
None of this is to say Bitcoin is safe or a reliable diversifier. But facts are facts. Allocators are starting to believe, with the largest
ETF
tracking the world's original digital currency nabbing $10 billion this year. Like it or not, the number keeps going up.
Did you Know?
The world of cryptocurrencies is very dynamic. Prices can go up or down in a matter of seconds. Thus, having reliable answers to such questions is crucial for investors.
View
Details
»
'It's hard to keep fighting it, or at least not acknowledging it as a viable asset class,' said Rich Weiss, the 65-year-old chief investment officer for multi-asset strategies at American Century Investment Management. 'Maybe that's enough to get haters like me to jump on the train because in our business, you cannot fight the tape forever.'
Live Events
It was a week that losses piled up across old-school markets — stocks, bonds and credit posted the worst synchronised selloff since March, going by the major exchange-traded funds tracking them. The dollar slipped, on course for a fifth straight monthly decline — the worst streak in almost five years. Traders instead flocked to an asset whose connection to the economic cycle is tenuous.
Bloomberg
That may have been a virtue this week. Bond yields rose globally — 30-year rates touched 5.09% — amid concern that sovereign finances are being stressed by President Trump's push for deglobalization. In the US, fears were fanned by a poorly received 20-year bond auction, Moody's downgrade of the country's credit rating and House passage of a multi-trillion-dollar tax plan few see doing much to tame the deficit.
'It's the initial rumblings. It's the market warning the US government that something has to change,' said David Schassler, head of multi-asset solutions for investment manager VanEck. 'If we're going to be in a situation where there's going to be a flight out of the dollar, fixed income and stocks at the same time, then you want to bias your portfolio towards decentralised assets.'
Crypto isn't subverting the political or financial system. It's getting plugged in through legislation, ETFs, custodians, model portfolios, and more. And that's fueling faith in
digital assets
as a strategic allocation.
Also read:
India's Defence Renaissance: Riding the next wave of growth
As stablecoin legislation advanced in Congress and Trump welcomed meme-coin enthusiasts to a private
dinner
in Washington, Bitcoin rose five straight days before paring gains Friday. The online currency is now up 16% in 2025, compared with losses of around 1% in the S&P 500 and 3% in the iShares ETF (TLT) tied to long-dated Treasuries.
This week marked the second time in a month that Bitcoin rallied while traditional asset classes retreated — a cluster of divergences with no precedent in Bloomberg's dataset going back to 2010.
Particularly notable was the parting in prices between crypto and equities, which tend to reflect similar risk appetites, according to Owen Lamont, a portfolio manager at Acadian Asset Management. With stock investors in retreat — perhaps anticipating higher inflation and borrowing costs courtesy of Trump's tax policy — Bitcoin sailed along, reaching levels that some see as unsustainable.
'It's like there's a crypto thing, which is crazy, and the US stock market, which is like pretty normal,' Lamont said. 'It is indisputable that we have an extremely high policy uncertainty. And policy uncertainty is not generally a good thing for the stock market or the economy.'
The split in sentiment was also visible in the ETF space. Crypto enthusiasts continued to pile in, with BlackRock Inc.'s iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) luring more than $2 billion of fresh money during the week through Thursday. Over the same stretch, traders pulled back from the riskier edges of the stock market, as ProShares' triple-leveraged Nasdaq 100 ETF (TQQQ) — a popular vehicle among day traders — saw sharp outflows amid a broader retreat from aggressive equity bets.
Bloomberg
Flows into crypto may reflect a broader belief: that investors must look further afield for gains, as larger public markets show their age. Wealthy investors are pouring hundreds of billions of dollars into private and illiquid assets after a 16-year bull market in stocks that has taken valuations to the highest since the dot-com bubble.
Momentum behind digital-asset adoption is building. A Bloomberg analysis of regulatory filings shows that over the past year, the number of
institutional investors
— ranging from family offices and endowments to hedge funds and pensions — engaged in IBIT has doubled.
Also read:
Short covering spurs relief rally, but even bulls may need caution
As for American Century's Weiss, he's still on the sidelines for now, deterred by Bitcoin's notorious volatility and lack of intuitive valuation methods.
'You have to have a risk tolerance level in the short term like Superman to be able to hold onto that thing,' he said. 'To me, it still comes off like something you'd want to put in your gambling portfolio, not necessarily your retirement money.'
Yet while still heresy to many, this week it held up. And in a market built on belief, that behavior may be enough to earn legitimacy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 minutes ago
- First Post
Jobs data firestorm: Trump blasts ‘rigged' numbers after poor hiring revisions
President Trump fired the BLS commissioner after accusing the agency of rigging job numbers. The firing follows sharp downward revisions to job data for May and June, raising concerns about political interference and economic data reliability read more The monthly jobs report is already highly watched on Wall Street and in Washington, but it has taken on additional importance since President Donald Trump sacked the officer in charge of it on Friday. Trump said that June's job data were 'RIGGED' to make him and other Republicans 'look bad,' but he offered no evidence. Erika McEntarfer, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) commissioner nominated by former President Joe Biden, was fired following Friday's employment report, which revealed that hiring was poor in July and had practically came to a halt in May and June, just after Trump imposed massive tariffs. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Economists and Wall Street investors have traditionally regarded job data as credible, with share prices and bond yields frequently responding dramatically when they are announced. However, Friday's revisions were extraordinarily large, the greatest outside of a recession in five decades. In addition, the surveys utilised to generate the report face issues due to diminishing response rates. Despite this, most economists do not doubt them. 'The bottom line for me is, I wouldn't take the low collection rate as any evidence that the numbers are less reliable,' Omair Sharif, founder and chief economist at Inflation Insights, a consulting firm, said. Heather Boushey, a top economic advisor in the Biden White House, noted that without Trump's firing of McEntarfer, there would be more focus on last week's data, which points to a slowing economy. 'We're having this conversation about made-up issues to distract us from what the data is showing,' Boushey said. 'Revisions of this magnitude in a negative direction may indicate bad things to come for the labour market.' Here are some things to know about the jobs report: Economists and Wall Street trust the data Most economists say that the Bureau of Labor Statistics is a nonpolitical agency staffed by people obsessed with getting the numbers right. The only political appointee is the commissioner, who doesn't see the data until it's finalized, two days before it is issued to the public. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Erica Groshen, the BLS commissioner from 2013 to 2017, said she suggested different language in the report to 'liven it up', but was shot down. She was told that if asked to describe a cup as half-empty or half-full, BLS says 'it is an eight ounce cup with four ounces of liquid.' The revised jobs data that has attracted Trump's ire is actually more in line with other figures than before the revision. For example, payroll processor ADP uses data from its millions of clients to calculate its own jobs report, and it showed a sharp hiring slowdown in May and June that is closer to the revised BLS data. Trump and his White House have a long track record of celebrating the jobs numbers — when they are good. Securing the data Rigging the numbers would be difficult. Hundreds of economists and statisticians are involved in compiling the monthly jobs report, and they follow 'transparent, well-established methodologies,'' Heidi Shierholz, the Labor Department's chief economist in the Obama administration, wrote in a commentary Friday. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'It is very, very difficult to tamper or to interfere with these numbers,'' Elaine Chao, Labor secretary in the George W. Bush administration, told CNBC Monday. In the week before the numbers are released, she said, 'the process is very much locked down'' with about 40 people involved in the final preparations. 'If anything were to be awry, I think one of these 40 people in the final analysis would have spoken up,'' Chao said. The BLS commissioner only sees the numbers after they are final — usually the Tuesday before the report comes out on Friday. The White House Council of Economic Advisors gets a look and a briefing from the commissioner or BLS staff on Thursday, Groshen said. These are the figures Trump is attacking Trump has focused on the revisions to the May and June data, which on Friday were revised lower, with job gains in May reduced to 19,000 from 144,000, and for June to just 14,000 from 147,000. Every month's jobs data is revised in the following two months. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump also repeated a largely inaccurate attack from the campaign about an annual revision last August, which reduced total employment in the United States by 818,000, or about 0.5%. The government also revises employment figures every year. Trump charged the annual revision was released before the 2024 presidential election to 'boost' Vice President Kamala Harris's 'chances of Victory,' yet it was two months before the election and widely reported at the time that the revision lowered hiring during the Biden-Harris administration and pointed to a weaker economy. Here's why the government revises the data The monthly revisions occur because many companies that respond to the government's surveys send their data in late, or correct the figures they've already submitted. The proportion of companies sending in their data later has risen in the past decade. Every year, the BLS does an additional revision based on actual job counts that are derived from state unemployment insurance records. Those figures cover 95% of US businesses and aren't derived from a survey but are not available in real time. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Betsey Stevenson, a University of Michigan professor and former chief economist at the Labor Department, stressed that the government also needs to be able to release the data in a timely manner, so that companies have a sense on a monthly basis about how the economy is faring. The revisions help to ensure the timely release while improving accuracy over time, she said, adding that lawmakers need to make investments to modernize data collection. 'The trade offs between cost, speed, and accuracy are decisions made by Congress,' she said. 'The president seems frustrated by his own party's policy choices around national statistics.' Factors that cause revisions Figuring out how many new jobs have been added or lost each month is more complicated than it may sound. For example, if one person takes a second job, should you focus on the number of jobs, which has increased, or the number of employed people, which hasn't? (The government measures both: The unemployment rate is based on how many people either have or don't have jobs, while the number of jobs added or lost is counted separately). STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Each month, the government surveys about 121,000 businesses and government agencies at over 630,000 locations — including multiple locations for the same business — covering about one-third of all workers. Still, the government also has to make estimates: What if a company goes out of business? It likely won't fill out any forms showing the jobs lost. And what about new businesses? They can take a while to get on the government's radar. The BLS seeks to capture these trends by estimating their impact on employment. Those estimates can be wrong, of course, until they are fixed by the annual revisions. The revisions are often larger around turning points in the economy. For example, when the economy is growing, there may be more startups than the government expects, so revisions will be higher. If the economy is slowing or slipping into a recession, the revisions may be larger on the downside. Revisions seem to be getting bigger STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The revisions to May and June's job totals, which reduced hiring by a total of 258,000, were the largest — outside recessions — since 1967, according to economists at Goldman Sachs. Kevin Hassett, Trump's top economic advisor, went on NBC's 'Meet the Press' on Sunday and said, 'What we've seen over the last few years is massive revisions to the jobs numbers.' Hassett blamed a sharp drop in response rates to the government's surveys during and after the pandemic: 'When COVID happened, because response rates went down a lot, then revision rates skyrocketed.' Yet calculations by Ernie Tedeschi, an economic advisor to the Biden administration, show that while revisions spiked after the pandemic, they have since declined and are much smaller than in the 1960s and 1970s. Other concerns about the government's data Many economists and statisticians have sounded the alarm about things like declining response rates for years. A decade ago, about 60% of companies surveyed by BLS responded. Now, only about 40% do. The decline has been an international phenomenon, particularly since COVID. The United Kingdom has even suspended publication of an official unemployment rate because of falling responses. And earlier this year the BLS said that it was cutting back on its collection of inflation data because of the Trump administration's hiring freeze, raising concerns about the robustness of price data just as economists are trying to gauge the impact of tariffs on inflation. US government statistical agencies have seen an inflation-adjusted 16% drop in funding since 2009, according to a July report from the American Statistical Association. 'We are at an inflection point,' the report said. 'To meet current and future challenges requires thoughtful, well-planned investment … In contrast, what we have observed is uncoordinated and unplanned reductions with no visible plan for the future.
The Hindu
2 minutes ago
- The Hindu
India's presence amid a broken template of geopolitics
It is time for India to punch its weight and enhance its global presence at a time when global geopolitics is being reset. But, as of now, it is not moving India's way. Operation Sindoor was a reality check when many of India's strategic partners were not willing to call out Pakistan for harbouring United Nations-sanctioned terrorist groups and terrorists. It is now known that three of the perpetrators of the Pahalgam attack (April 22, 2025), who were eliminated recently, were Pakistanis belonging to the Lashkar-e-Taiba. While India's retaliation against terror camps in Pakistan was decisive, it struggled to get this narrative out in the face of United States President Donald Trump repeatedly claiming that it was he who had brought about a ceasefire using trade as a weapon — a claim contradicted by the Government in the recent parliamentary debate. In an unkind twist, Pakistan's Field Marshal Asim Munir was invited to lunch with Mr. Trump after Operation Sindoor. However, the U.S. designated The Resistance Front (TRF), which claimed responsibility for the Pahalgam attack, as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) and Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT). And in a welcome recognition, the report by the UN Security Council's Monitoring Team also named the TRF for the Pahalgam attack. A path with Trump-created hurdles But all is not well. On a historic day when the NISAR satellite (India-U.S. collaboration) was launched, Mr. Trump hit India with a 25% tariff. However, he made a purely trade issue, which could have been resolved in negotiations, into a geopolitical issue, threatening India by 'substantially' raising tariffs for its importing Russian oil when Ukrainians are being killed by the 'Russian War Machine.' India was being trumped especially when Mr. Trump himself is a strong votary of U.S.-Russian rapprochement. While one can dismiss this as typical Trump-style last minute pressure, he has already called on U.S. companies not to invest in India but only in the U.S., and hire only Americans. This comes on the heels of the U.S.'s lopsided security and trade deals with its Indo-Pacific allies and the European Union (EU). American tech giant Nvidia has been permitted by the U.S. to resume sales of its H20 AI chips to China, stopped earlier due to national security concerns. More time has been given to China to get the deal done. After getting bogged down in Ukraine and West Asia, the U.S. has less focus on East Asia. Consequently, if a broader geopolitical understanding between the U.S. and China on East Asia was to come about, it would constrict the space for India. East Asian countries are already hedging their bets. The U.S.'s posturing on South Asia has not helped either. Growing U.S.-Pakistan relations have again become an irritant. Even if this is a reset in bilateral relations, the U.S. has displayed astonishing insensitivity to India's security concerns by praising Pakistan for counter-terrorism efforts, and regional stability. In Bangladesh, the U.S. had gone against Indian interests in supporting the ouster of Sheikh Hasina. In Myanmar, U.S. and European support for forces opposing the military government is destabilising India's north-east. After Galwan and Pahalgam, India's hope for better understanding and coordination with the U.S. on regional security interests has been belied. Mutual trust is being rapidly eroded. Acting in concert with the U.S., the EU is targeting India's import-led energy security at a time when India is negotiating an India-EU Broad-based Trade and Investment Agreement. The EU has sanctioned India's Vadinar Refinery, where Russian Rosneft has a large stake, knowing full well that stopping Russian oil into India will lead to huge pressure on oil prices. On the other hand, Hungary, Slovakia, Belgium, Spain and others are importing Russian oil, through pipelines and as LNG, by securing exemptions or under existing contracts. Europe receives 51% of Russian LNG exports. The EU's carbon border tax and digital and other trade barriers on India remain. India hopes that the recently concluded India-U.K. Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) will force the EU to climb down from its asks in its trade negotiations. China's moves All this has given China an opportunity to, once again, become active in India's neighbourhood. China has proposed new groupings and new deals to keep India out. For example, China's meeting with Pakistan and Bangladesh in Kunming on June 19, 2025 proposed formalising a trilateral initiative, but Bangladesh has not agreed. China is also helping Bangladesh revive a Second World War airbase at Lalmonirhat which is close to the Siliguri Corridor. China's support to Pakistan during Operation Sindoor was extensive. China has also standardised Mandarin names for locations within Arunachal Pradesh. And it wants to seize the future of the institution of the Dalai Lama from India. Riding on a huge trade surplus with India, China is squeezing India's crucial supply chains such as rare earths, fertilizers, Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients, tunnel boring machines and technical personnel. More worrying is the planned construction of China's largest dam in Tibet on the Yarlung Zangbo (Tibetan name for the Brahmaputra), which is near the Indian border. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's recent visit to the Maldives has been timely given China's influence. To counterbalance an unpredictable, and even unreliable, U.S., an unresponsive EU and an aggressive China, India is carrying out a tightrope act. It has prioritised accelerating the current thaw in relations with China to reset equations after the Galwan conflict — despite there being no move towards de-escalation on the border after the initial disengagement in October 2024. Further, India should seriously rethink its stand to remain on the margins of global conflicts. India has been largely silent, if not openly pro-Israel, on the ongoing Israel-Gaza war — an unfolding multidimensional human tragedy. India was also largely silent on the recent Israel-Iran conflict and American bombings, despite important relations with both warring parties and huge stakes in the Gulf. Though it rightly abstained on the UN votes on the Ukraine conflict, its overall approach of not taking a proactive stand on world conflicts may hurt its larger interests and diminish its geopolitical clout as long as it remains on the sidelines. Operation Sindoor has shown India that if it seeks a greater engagement of its partners with its conflicts and issues, India needs to engage more with their conflicts and issues. Some argue that India should keep its head down and focus on becoming the third largest economy and that a larger geopolitical role may hurt its economic growth. The contrary is true. In a fragmenting world order, geopolitics, coercion and threats and protectionism are determining economic and technological outcomes — not most favoured nation or free trade or multilateral World Trade Organization-led trade norms. Therefore, to get its economic and technological trajectory right, India needs to get its geopolitics right. The road ahead Realising that the geopolitical space is shrinking, India is finally breaking free and has objected to the 'targeting'. It has called out the double-speak of the U.S. and the EU under the guise of safeguarding their economic interests — the EU for larger trade in goods and services with Russia than India in 2024, and the U.S. for importing Russian uranium, palladium, fertilizers and chemicals. India's call for a ceasefire in Gaza (it abstained on a similar UN General Assembly resolution two months ago), is a realisation that it needs to be assertive in global conflicts to preserve its strategic autonomy. Facing an erosion of trust with the U.S. and a U.S.-China deal, India needs to clinch an India-U.S. trade deal soon to prevent a further deterioration of relations and to persuade Mr. Trump to travel to India for the Quad summit (India-U.S.-Japan-Australia). After Mr. Trump's outburst, it is a moot point whether India will revive the RIC (Russia-India-China). However, greater engagement with BRICS (2026 summit in India), the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and with East Asia (having missed the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership bus), will only reinforce India's policy of multi-alignment and push back those who constrain it. No more can India just put our head down, mind its own economic business and expect to grow. That template is now broken. T.S. Tirumurti is former Ambassador/Permanent Representative of India to the United Nations, New York and former Secretary, Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi
Economic Times
2 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Getting along well with China, will meet Xi if we make a deal: Trump
Synopsis Donald Trump stated that the US is nearing a trade agreement with China. He anticipates meeting Xi Jinping if a deal materializes. Trump believes declining energy prices in Russia could pressure Vladimir Putin to end the war in Ukraine. Tariffs on semiconductor and pharmaceutical imports are expected soon. Washington: President Donald Trump said on Tuesday the US was close to a trade deal with China and that he would meet his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping before the end of the year if an agreement is struck. ADVERTISEMENT "He asked for a meeting, and I'll end up having a meeting before the end of the year most likely, if we make a deal. If we don't make a deal, I'm not going to have a meeting," Trump told CNBC in an interview referring to China's Xi. "We're getting very close to a deal. We're getting along with China very well." The US President that declining energy prices in Russia could pressure President Vladimir Putin to halt the war in Ukraine. "If energy goes down enough, Putin is going to stop killing people. If you get energy down, another $10 a barrel, he's going to have no choice because his economy stinks."During the interview, the US President said that tariffs on semiconductor and pharmaceutical imports would be announced "within the next week or so," as the administration prepares to target key economic sectors in its effort to remake global trade. ADVERTISEMENT "We'll be putting a initially small tariff on pharmaceuticals, but in one year-one and a half years, maximum-it's going to go to 150% and then it's going to go to 250% because we want pharmaceuticals made in our country," Trump said. Duties on Chips Soon ADVERTISEMENT "We're going to be announcing on semiconductors and chips, which is a separate category," the President Commerce Department has been investigating the semiconductor market since April to set the stage for possible tariffs on an industry that's expected to generate nearly $700 billion in global sales. Under Trump, the US has already imposed levies on imports of cars and auto parts as well as steel and aluminum. ADVERTISEMENT Levies on imported chips threaten to sharply increase costs for large data centre operators including Microsoft, OpenAI, Meta Platforms, and that plan to spend billions of dollars on purchases of advanced semiconductors needed to propel their artificial intelligence businesses. Trump has emphasised using tariffs to spur investments in domestic manufacturing including chip production, and on Tuesday he hailed Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company's plans to expand its US presence. "You know, we have the biggest in the world, as you know, from Taiwan is coming over and spending $300 billion in Arizona, building the biggest plant in the world for chips and semiconductors," he said. ADVERTISEMENT Trade Gap With China at 21-yr low The US trade deficit narrowed in June on a sharp drop in consumer goods imports, and the trade gap with China shrank to its lowest in more than 21 years, the latest evidence of the imprint on global commerce Trump's tariffs are making. The overall trade gap narrowed 16.0% in June to $60.2 billion, the Commerce Department's Bureau of Economic Analysis said on Tuesday. Days after reporting that the goods trade deficit tumbled 10.8% to its lowest since September 2023, the government said the full deficit including services also was its narrowest since then. Exports of goods and services totaled $277.3 billion, down from more than $278 billion in May, while total imports were $337.5 billion, down from $350.3 billion. (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel) (Catch all the US News, UK News, Canada News, International Breaking News Events, and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.) Download The Economic Times News App to get Daily International News Updates. NEXT STORY
