New limits for personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits may become a reality in Texas
A proposal to limit how much an accident victim can recover in lawsuits for medical care won preliminary approval from the Texas House on Monday, but not without changes that leave open monetary awards beyond medical bills and preserve the court's ability to decide what evidence is relevant.
The bill passed 94-52 on Monday with the support of at least five Democrats.
Senate Bill 30, authored by Georgetown Republican Sen. Charles Schwertner, intends to curb 'nuclear verdicts,' or jury rulings that award victims more than $10 million, which proponents say makes doing business in Texas unpredictable.
If the proposal becomes law, those who sue in personal injury or wrongful death cases can submit only the amount paid for medical services, and directs juries to limit the amount of damages based on a set of options such as the maximum that can be charged to Medicare.
The bill was a priority of Texans for Lawsuit Reform, a well-funded group representing oil and energy companies that has spent the last two decades trying to curb what they see as frivolous lawsuits.
For the bill to become law, the House must vote on it again. Then the Senate must agree to changes, or request a committee hash out differences.
At a committee hearing in April, business owners shared their experiences of getting sued in accidents where the damage appeared minimal — according to poster-sized photos they brought to the hearing — but the damages sought were in the millions.
Opponents argued that there's already an appeals process in the civil lawsuit process that parties can use to reduce the damages owed.
The bill overcame resistance from some conservative activists who previously supported the efforts by Texas for Lawsuit Reform's namely, restricting medical malpractice lawsuits.
The version of the bill that passed the House removed language that drew concern from opponents, such as a provision that would have barred juries from awarding money for 'noneconomic damages' such as mental anguish. That was raised by some accident victims and sexual assault survivors who said the impacts of their injuries could not be placed neatly into the economic damage categories the previous version of the bill outlined.
On the House floor Monday, lawmakers also approved an amendment by Rep. Greg Bonnen, R-Friendsburg, who is carrying the bill in the House, to remove a portion of the bill that would have only allowed damages on services that have health care industry billing codes, which not all services an accident victim needs would have.
Another Bonnen amendment changed the requirement for an itemized list by the provider of a plaintiff to a summary list. Lawmakers unsuccessfully tried to further narrow that requirement, though an amendment by Rep. Matt Morgan, R-Richmond, reaffirming privacy protections between doctors and patients, and attorneys and clients was adopted.
A pair of amendments by Reps. Mitch Little, a Lewisville Republican, and Joe Moody, an El Paso Democrat, also passed, over the objection of Bonnen, to no longer require some evidence related to medical history be automatically admitted. The amended bill leaves it to a judge to decide whether the evidence is relevant – something Bonnen said defeated the purpose of that part of the bill.
The Texas Trial Lawyers Association, which lobbied for months against the bill, said the changes since it was first introduced were a sign of how Texans felt about efforts to curb lawsuits.
'This result sends a clear message that Texans of all walks of life support the fundamental value of accountability embodied in our civil justice system,' Jack Walker, president of the association, said in a statement.
Disclosure: Texans for Lawsuit Reform and Texas Trial Lawyers Association have been financial supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.
First round of TribFest speakers announced! Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Maureen Dowd; U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-San Antonio; Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker; U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff, D-California; and U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas are taking the stage Nov. 13–15 in Austin. Get your tickets today!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
9 minutes ago
- Forbes
Even More Bad News For Younger Workers: More Unemployment, Less Money
unemployment line, people out of work looking for a job A few days ago, I wrote about 10 college degrees with high unemployment for the recently graduated (ages 22 to 27). The data, presented by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, was from 2023 when the unemployment rate was 3.8% and some of the highest rates of unemployment were among people with STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) degrees. Some of the examples that had upwards of double the overall unemployment rate were physics (7.8%), computer engineering (7.5%), computer science (6.1%), chemistry (6.1%), and information systems and management (5.6%). As they grow up, young adults repeatedly hear that these 'safe' studies lead to plentiful, good-paying employment. What they don't hear — although likely have a growing sense of given common comments on social media — is the truth of their being fed with a load of bunk. There's more truth in additional New York Fed data about how 22-to-27-year-olds are faring. Start with the distribution of annual wages for recent college graduates. This data runs from 1990 through 2024 and is in the form of constant dollars to allow for a direct comparison that accounts for inflation. The graph below shows the data. The grey shaded area shows the 25th to 75th percentile around the bachelor's degree median. Changes in incomes of people 22 to 27 In 1990, those with a bachelor's degree had a median wage of $56,642. The 25th percentile made $43,216 and the 75th percentile wage was $72,027. The high school diploma only median wage was $40,815. Jump to 2024. The bachelor's degree median wage was $60,000, with a 25th percentile of $43,000 and a 75th percentile of $80,000. The high school diploma wage was $40,000. Over the 34 year span, only the bachelor's degree group saw income growth. At the 75th percentile, it was 11%. At the median, it was 5.9%. The 25th percentile showed a roughly 0.5% drop. For high school only, the difference was -5.6%. The college-educated age range among the three points — 25th percentile, median, and 75th percentile — saw at most an 11% increase over the 34 years. However, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation calculator shows that it took $2.36 at the end of 2024 to match the buying power of $1 at the end of 1990. That's 136% inflation, or general increase in the costs of living, compared to the 11% for the top paid in the sample. Can't afford a home or health insurance? It's a marvel people from 22 to 27 can afford a coffee or piece of avocado toast. Now for unemployment, with the graph below, also from the New York Fed. Unemployment rates over time In March 2025, the latest data on the chart, the overall unemployment rate was 4.0%. For all college graduates, it was 2.7%. Recent college graduates, 5.8%. And for all young workers, 6.9%. Over time, the all-college graduates group had the lowest unemployment rate. Then there were some changes starting just before the pandemic. All college graduates started getting a higher unemployment rate than all workers. All young workers still had the highest unemployment rates. Again, the promise of a future for dedication to, and later high expense of, a college education starts sounding like, if not an empty promise, one that is quickly leaking. No wonder, younger adults aren't reaching the same milestones as older generations.
Washington Post
12 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Chief Justice Roberts warns against heated political words about judges
WASHINGTON — Chief Justice John Roberts, speaking at a moment when threats against judges are on the rise, warned on Saturday that elected officials' heated words about judges can lead to threats or acts of violence by others. Without identifying anyone by name, Roberts clearly referenced Republican President Donald Trump and Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York when he said he has felt compelled to issue public rebukes of figures in both parties in recent years.
New York Times
13 minutes ago
- New York Times
Senate Republicans Ready Vote on Tax Bill, Still Awaiting Its Final Cost
If Senate Republicans begin debate as soon as Saturday on their newly retooled tax package, they may do so without a full grasp of its costs, at a moment when fiscal experts are sounding increasingly dire alarms that the measure could severely worsen the nation's ever-expanding debt. The hasty pursuit of a vote is designed to satisfy President Trump's self-imposed deadline to finalize the bill by July 4. But it also means that Republicans are at risk of forging ahead with an incomplete understanding about an economic agenda that could alter the nation's fiscal trajectory for a generation. The latest version of the party's signature legislation arrived just before midnight on Friday. Spanning roughly 1,000 pages, it still seeks to cut federal taxes, scale back safety-net programs such as Medicaid and boost spending on immigration and defense, though Republicans tweaked some of the ways that they would achieve each of those aims. Many of the changes reflect deals cut with individual Republicans who were at risk of voting against the bill and other, more mechanical rewrites to their cuts on Medicaid, energy tax credits and food stamps. Those updates will allow Republicans to try to advance the bill using a fast-track budget process in the Senate without any Democratic support. The revisions, taken together, could add or subtract to the overall costs of the package, but Republicans may not know precisely by how much when they hold their first vote this weekend. There is still no final fiscal breakdown, known as a score, from either the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office or the Joint Committee on Taxation, which advises lawmakers on the budget implication of their legislative agenda. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
