C. M. Naim and the Many Lives of Urdu
One of the foremost scholars of Urdu, the American professor Choudhri M. Naim was born in Barabanki (Uttar Pradesh); educated at the University of Lucknow and the University of California, Berkeley. In an era when language was weaponised for purity, he stood for mongrel beauty, a courageous stance that continues to inspire. In Urdu Texts and Contexts, Naim reads like a cartographer of vanished worlds – his essays tracing not just meaning, but the silences history left behind. Each page holds the precision of scholarship and the pulse of a language resisting its forgetting.
To read Naim was to be reminded that literature, like faith, is at its most potent when it unsettles rather than assures. His essay ' Be Crazy with God...', which is a deceptively light fragment of reflection, now feels like a spiritual testament. The phrase it orbits, a Sufi injunction laden with peril and paradox, invites the believer to abandon propriety in divine intimacy while anchoring themselves in the sober ethics of the prophetic example. In that one line, 'Don't be proper with God. Be crazy with God," Naim captured an entire theology of resistance: resistance to the bureaucratisation of belief, to the domestication of the sacred, and to the garish pieties that too often pass for devotion in our time.
Naim's Politics
And yet, even that daring essay would be misunderstood without its echo in another of his masterworks, his 2009 chronicle of visiting Palestine. Here, the literary grace that characterised all his prose collided with the urgency of moral witness. ' A visit to Palestine' is not merely travel writing; it is a text of quiet outrage. What Naim sees, and what he forces the reader to see, is the theatre of occupation dressed in the language of civility. His is not the anger of slogans but the grief of a man trained to notice erasures: of language, of memory, of the human. In Palestine, he confronts a world where even metaphors are policed, and he writes as one who has known, from the long arc of the subcontinent, what it means to watch a culture vanish behind walls of steel and ideology.
It was this capacity to bear witness, to see clearly and still write lovingly, that marked Naim's intellectual and moral sensibility. In his 2023 reflection on the bicentenary of the Urdu press, published in The Wire, he lamented what might seem to others a mere demographic detail:
'It is sad to note that there is now no major Urdu newspaper or magazine that is edited by a non-Muslim.'
But in that line lies a vast and tragic diagnosis. For Naim, the Urdu language had once been the shared inheritance of Hindus and Muslims alike, a mother tongue unbothered by lineage. That this pluralism had withered was not a footnote, it was a wound. The familial, interfaith intimacy of the Urdu reading public had been quietly extinguished, another victim of the postcolonial compact that married linguistic identity to religious purity.
Naim resisted that false marriage for the rest of his life. He wrote, taught, and translated as though Urdu still belonged to everyone – and perhaps more poignantly, to anyone willing to love it with care. In his final years, he turned his attention to what many might consider a literary cul-de-sac: Urdu Crime Fiction, 1890–1950: An Informal History. But this book, published in 2023, was no detour. It was a love letter to the populist, unpretentious roots of the language, a defence of storytelling that refused to be sanitised or stratified. In treating pulp fiction with the same seriousness he gave to Ghalib or Intizar Husain, Naim demonstrated the egalitarian ethics of his literary gaze. There was no hierarchy in his affection – only the unwavering belief that language, like humanity, deserved to be seen in full, a commitment that reassures us about the future of Urdu.
For four decades at the University of Chicago, Naim shaped minds not with dogma, but with questions. He taught students to read Urdu not as a script, but as a way of seeing – through the lilt of a ghazal, the satirical sting of a short story, the elegiac murmur of a marsiya. As chair of the South Asian Languages and Civilisations Department from 1985 to 1991, he transformed an academic field still half-bound in Orientalist habits into a space of serious self-reflection. His founding of Mahfil and The Annual of Urdu Studies created rare sanctuaries for Urdu scholarship in the West – places where the language could breathe without having to prove its utility.
But Naim was never an apologist. He refused both the nostalgia of the diaspora and the sentimentality of cultural nationalism. His was a critical love – tender, exacting, and utterly unsentimental. He believed Urdu was not just a language of emperors and courtiers, but of thieves, lovers, and tricksters. 'It is a language of emperors and pickpockets,' he once said, not to degrade it, but to reveal its democratic soul, a belief that instills a sense of equality and inclusivity.
Naim's Thought
It is tempting, in the aftermath of such a life, to reach for easy epithets. Secularist. Humanist. Cosmopolitan. But these labels collapse before the specificity of his thought. Naim was not interested in abstract pieties; he was concerned with the real. With how belief is lived. With how language bruises and binds. His secularism, if it can be called that, was not a retreat from religion but an embrace of its paradoxes. He understood, well before it became fashionable in academia, that faith was not always dogma—that it could be interior, chaotic, even mad. And that this madness could be beautiful.
Naim was something subtler, more enduring: a man of ethical imagination. His secularism was not a posture of distance but a closeness to complexity – Hindu and Muslim, believer and sceptic, bhakti and baroque. And yet, he also anticipated what scholars like Talal Asad and Saba Mahmood later theorised: that to understand the entwining of faith, subjectivity, and politics in the post-colonial condition, one had to move beyond liberal pieties about religion's privatisation. In his work, as in his life, Naim recognised that tradition could be both constraint and resource, and that piety – genuinely held – deserved neither romanticisation nor contempt.
He stood, ultimately, for what might be called the aesthetics of ethical clarity. His writing was never merely beautiful, it was responsible.
And that, in a time like ours, is a rare thing. Even his satire, sharp as it was, aimed not to humiliate but to awaken. His mischief had a purpose. It made space for contradiction, for delight, for sorrow unencumbered by ideology. But his mischief was never nihilistic. It was the mischief of a man who still believed language could heal, that meaning could be made in the rubble of broken worlds.
In an age that rewards noise and scorn, C. M. Naim modelled something else: an exacting tenderness, a commitment to complexity, a willingness to be misunderstood in the service of truth. He leaves behind a body of work that speaks not only to lovers of Urdu but to anyone who has ever found themselves caught between belonging and estrangement, tradition and critique, madness and meaning.
C. M. Naim did not belong to a single tradition, but to all traditions that refuse to die quietly. His legacy is not institutional; it is intimate. It lives in the strange thrill of a perfectly turned sher, in the patient labor of translation, in the refusal to surrender language to sect or state. He taught us not just to read better, but to live more attentively—to the minor key, the unspoken word, the difficult beauty of what endures.
And so we are left with his words, which were never merely text, but testament. A call to humility. A defence of pluralism without platitude. A reminder, urgent as ever, to be crazy with God, and with language, with justice, with love.
Narendra Pachkhédé is a critic, writer and essayist working across London, Toronto, Paris, and Geneva.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Jhalawar school collapse shatters parents' worlds; Grieving mother cries, 'Wish God had taken me instead'
A heartbreaking silence has fallen over a small house in Rajasthan's Jhalawar district, a house where two siblings once played, laughed, and dreamed. Now, only grief remains. The brother and sister were among seven children who died when a government school building in Piplod village collapsed on Friday morning. The collapse has not only shattered several families, but also cast a harsh spotlight on the crumbling state of school infrastructure in rural Rajasthan. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Artificial Intelligence Data Science others MCA Operations Management Technology Management CXO PGDM Others Leadership healthcare Degree Product Management Data Science MBA Healthcare Public Policy Data Analytics Cybersecurity Digital Marketing Design Thinking Finance Project Management Skills you'll gain: Duration: 7 Months S P Jain Institute of Management and Research CERT-SPJIMR Exec Cert Prog in AI for Biz India Starts on undefined Get Details As per a PTI report, the mother of the siblings, speaking through tears, said, 'I had only two children, a boy and a girl. Now both are gone. My house is empty. There's no one left to play in the courtyard. I wish God had taken me instead.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Blood cancer is taking our curious baby away from us! Donate For Health Donate Now Undo Her anguish is just one of many heartbreaking stories that have emerged from the tragedy. On Saturday morning, the air outside the mortuary at SRG Hospital was filled with cries of grieving parents. Some held the bodies of their children, wrapped in white sheets, refusing to let go. Others sat silently, still unable to grasp the suddenness of their loss. Live Events In a powerful gesture of shared grief, five of the children were cremated together on a single pyre. The remaining two were laid to rest separately. A mother who lost her child questioned the school's staff: 'Why were the teachers outside? Why did they leave the children alone?' Her words reflected the anger and confusion that many parents now feel. The children who lost their lives have been identified as Payal (12), Priyanka (12), Kundan (12), Harish (8), Kartik, and siblings Meena (12) and Kanha (6). Most were students of Classes 6 and 7. The youngest was just six years old. The state government has taken some immediate steps. Five school staff members have been suspended, and a high-level probe has been ordered. Rajasthan's School Education Minister also announced a compensation of Rs 10 lakh for the families of each child who died. District Collector Ajay Singh visited the families and assured them of full support. Speaking to reporters, he said, 'If needed, an FIR will be filed. The suspension of staff could lead to full dismissal. We are not taking this lightly.' Singh added that the administration would ensure a new school building is constructed and that financial assistance would reach families within 10 days. However, serious concerns remain. Singh admitted that no prior warning or complaint was received about the unsafe condition of the school building. 'Had we known, we would have repaired it. This tragedy could have been avoided,' he said. Reacting to a viral video showing rushed patchwork on the road outside SRG Hospital ahead of the minister's visit, Singh said he was not aware of it but would look into it. The collapse happened just as the children had gathered for morning prayers. Over 35 students were buried under the debris. Locals and school staff scrambled to rescue them. In total, 28 children were injured. The scene was one of chaos and heartbreak. Concrete slabs, stones and dust covered the ground as anxious parents, teachers and villagers dug through the rubble. The sorrow quickly turned into anger. Protests broke out at Guradi Circle and outside SRG Hospital. Locals blocked roads and demanded answers. Congress leader Naresh Meena joined the protest briefly before being detained by police. Tensions escalated when protestors clashed with police. Stones were thrown, and a policeman was injured. Authorities used mild force to disperse the crowd. Inputs from PTI


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
The Most God-Gifted Zodiac Signs with Extraordinary Abilities
There are certain zodiac signs, which are considered to be the most gifted zodiac signs in an astrology and these zodiac signs possess unique qualities and abilities such as spiritual, intuitive, innate skills and sixth sense. Here we are going to talk about these zodiac signs who have so many different qualities which other zodiac signs don't have that's why we are calling them the most gifted zodiac signs so are you ready to know deeply about them? Let's go and check: The Most Gifted Zodiac Signs: Cancer Cancers possess a remarkable psychic skill that allows them to perceive the emotions of others and their surroundings. They may have a different type of emotional intelligence, karmic sensitivity, and spiritual intuition and these are the main characteristics of Cancer that are frequently associated with the capacity for nurturing and healing. They facilitate emotional breakthroughs for both themselves and others and are a great healer. Pisces Pisceans have deep empathy, emotional sensitivity, artistic and creative abilities, a vivid imagination, and a spiritual connection that is often referred to as mystical or visionary. Jupiter-ruled and closely associated with spiritual abilities. renowned for their artistic abilities. Pisces often achieve great success in artistic endeavors like literature, and they have a strong emotional and spiritual connection. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Stylish New Mobility Scooters Available for Seniors (Prices May Surprise You) Mobility Scooter | Search Ads Search Now Undo Scorpio Scorpions are renowned for their strong intuition and deep, enigmatic personality. Because they can see hidden realities and comprehend intense emotions, Scorpios are strong thinkers who frequently succeed as investigators, therapists, or counselors. They have a deep emotional awareness, emotional depth, investigative aptitude, a strong focus on revealing hidden facts, and a powerful intuition. They are considered highly gifted because of their exceptional capacity for concentration and mystery-solving. Leo Leos endowed with a compelling presence and dynamic leadership qualities. Leos' zeal and self-assurance encourage and inspire others. They are positioned as exceptionally gifted and influential due to their innate skill for performance, motivation, and creative expression. They are charismatic, inventive, compelling personality, and talented at inspiring and encouraging people. They are God gifted because they are always guided by their spirit animal Lion and have extremely high intuitive power. Discover everything about astrology at Times of India , including daily horoscopes for Aries , Taurus , Gemini , Cancer , Leo , Virgo , Libra , Scorpio , Sagittarius , Capricorn , Aquarius , and Pisces . Read your detailed Horoscope Today and Horoscope Tomorrow here.


Scroll.in
4 hours ago
- Scroll.in
What a 1944 tally of foreigners revealed about wartime India
In February 1944, with few signs of the Second World War drawing to a close, the colonial authorities in India – who had interned many citizens of Axis nations and held enemy combatants in Indian prisons – requested the Home Department to compile data on the number of foreigners from several countries residing in India. The Intelligence Bureau specifically sought precise figures on Americans, Chinese, French, Iranians, Iraqis and Poles, as well as both interned and non-interned Germans and Italians living in the country. When collating this information across the vast, undivided subcontinent, the Home Department identified 42,673 registrable foreigners. A detailed breakdown by region was provided, revealing the presence of foreigners in places where they were not really expected. Also revealed by the data was the presence of individuals from countries as far-flung as the Philippines, Estonia, Cuba and Uruguay. Chinese presence The Chinese community, numbering over 22,000, was the largest group of foreigners in India and was widely dispersed across the country. The Home Department categorised this population by gender and region, offering fascinating insights. Most were ethnic Han Chinese, though certain cities also had communities classified by the department as 'Chinese Turks', likely referring to people from Xinjiang. There were also ethnic Kazakhs from China residing in the North-West Frontier Province. The majority of Chinese nationals in India at the time were men, with 2,109 women recorded. In the North-West Frontier Province, 1,093 Chinese residents included 444 women, suggesting that families had settled in that region. Bengal had the largest number of Chinese nationals, with the Home Department putting the number at 14,216. Remnants of this community still exist in Calcutta, though they are now Indian citizens. Bombay was home to nearly 3,000 Chinese nationals. The Chinese were present throughout India, with notable populations in Assam, Bihar, Delhi, Madras, Mysore, Sind, Punjab, and the United Provinces. Smaller numbers were even found in Orissa and Baluchistan. As China was an Allied Power and had suffered heavily under Japanese aggression, the Chinese presence in British India was not met with suspicion during the war. American community Americans formed the second-largest foreign group in India in 1944, numbering 4,063. Nearly half were women. At the time, there were far more Americans in India than Indians in the United States, owing to severe restrictions on Indian immigration to the US. Bengal hosted the largest number of Americans, with over 1,700 residents. Interestingly, there were relatively few Americans in Bombay (227) and Delhi (82), while the United Provinces, Madras and Mysore had larger American communities. Records show that two American women lived in Kashmir, though no men from the US were recorded in the princely state. Colonial authorities also noted Americans of Mexican and Hawaiian origin, along with a significant number of missionaries, who were widely dispersed across the subcontinent. Russians and Soviet citizens Soviet citizens were mostly classified as Russians in the records, with 707 listed in total. The most famous Russians in India were members of the Roerich family, who resided in the Kulu Valley. The community was broadly dispersed, including 165 in Bombay, nearly half of whom were Tajiks, Uzbeks or other ethnicities labelled by the British as Asiatics. Russian Turks were categorised separately, likely to facilitate racial distinctions in clubs and private institutions that restricted entry to Europeans. Russian visitors to South Asia in the 20th century frequently noted the overt racism of British colonial authorities. Nobel Laureate Ivan Bunin, who visited Ceylon (but not India) in 1911, highlighted this in his short story Third Class, set in Colombo. In it, a European, presumably Russian, demands a third-class ticket to Anuradhapura and is initially refused by a British clerk who insists no white man would possess 'a base and inane desire to sit next to a coloured person' who could infect him with germs. After persistent demands, the traveller receives his ticket, only to find the compartment has been cleared of locals. Russians were among the most widely scattered foreigners in India. Records show three in Assam, four in Balochistan, five in Madras, and even a stateless Russian man in Kashmir. Although Britain and the Soviet Union were wartime allies, the British did not recognise the Baltic states of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia as part of the USSR. In 1944, the three were occupied by Nazi Germany and their citizens in India were viewed with suspicion. Of the seven Lithuanians in India, four lived in Bihar – two of whom were interned – while the only Lithuanian in the North-West Frontier Provience was sent to an evacuee camp in Nainital. None of the 15 Latvians in India were interned. Of the eight Estonians, two were interned in Bombay, and one in Sind. There were 48 Finnish nationals in India at the time. As Finland was aligned with Nazi Germany against the USSR, its citizens were treated with particular caution. Fourteen of the 15 Finns in Bombay were interned, and three each in Kashmir and Sind met the same fate. However, Finns and Balts in Calcutta remained free, likely because they had arrived before the war and were employed by British firms. Scandinavians & Asians The Home Department also documented a significant number of Swedes, Danes and Norwegians. Of the 258 Danes recorded, just a handful were interned. Madras had 56 Danish nationals, including 38 women. Denmark and Norway were both under Nazi occupation at the time. Despite this, only three of the over-300 Norwegians in India were interned. The Norwegian community was scattered, with most residing in Bengal, Bombay and Bihar. More than 300 Swedes were in India, with Madras hosting the second-largest community after Bengal. As Sweden remained neutral during the war, Swedish nationals enjoyed the same freedoms as those from China and the United States. India, under British rule, was seen as a land of opportunity by many foreigners, including those from Southeast Asia. A small Filipino community lived in Bengal, with a few individuals scattered across Assam, Madras and Punjab. Less fortunate were the Javanese – legally Dutch citizens – many of whom were interned by the British. In Bombay, 196 Javanese were interned, while 24 in Rajputana were sent to a camp in Deoli. Still, many Indonesians, including Sumatrans and Javanese, lived freely in India, particularly in the United Provinces, Gwalior and Hyderabad. Despite being Dutch nationals, they were classified as Asiatics and denied privileges afforded to Europeans. Of the 312 Japanese nationals in India at the time, only 71 were interned. Surprisingly, more than 60% of the 1,100 Italians and two-thirds of the 1,859 Germans were 'at liberty'. Global cross-section The Home Department also recorded Arabs, Iranians, Uruguayans, Argentinians, Brazilians, Hungarians, Greeks, Spaniards, Swiss, Turks, Portuguese, Thais, Albanians, Cubans, Czechs and Slovaks residing in India. Bengal, with Calcutta as a major commercial hub, had the largest number of expatriates from around the world. Bombay followed, though it hosted far fewer foreigners in comparison. Bihar emerged as one of the most popular regions for foreigners in British India. It was home to people from across the globe. The once-flourishing Armenian community had dwindled to just 41 members, of whom 26 lived in Bihar, 13 in Mysore and the rest in the United Provinces. After India gained independence in 1947, the foreign population steadily declined. Although pathways to citizenship were available – especially for Commonwealth nationals – limited economic prospects prompted the majority of foreigners to leave the country.