
Trump's unprecedented immigration crackdown is leaving children terrified and ‘truly alone'
Hundreds of thousands of unaccompanied children have arrived at the US southern border in recent years, seeking refuge. The Trump administration is now targeting them – and their caregivers – for deportation.
In the past few months, the administration has enacted a series of punitive policies to expedite the removal of unaccompanied minors and strip them of legal representation. It has attempted to tear down the basic rights and protections for children under the government's care, while simultaneously issuing new restrictions on who can take custody of them – leaving children to languish in detention. In several troubling cases across the US, advocates say the children are being used as 'bait' to arrest and deport the adults around them.
Taken together, advocates and lawyers say the changes represent a terrifying new strategy in the government's crackdown on immigrants, designed to instill fear and chaos in families.
'The level and intensity of the attacks on children that we're seeing currently is unprecedented in my legal career, which has spanned over 10 years,' said Marion Donovan-Kaloust, director of legal services at the Immigrant Defenders law center (ImmDef). 'It's not just one thing – it's a concentrated attack on children from so many different angles. And it's really shocking to the conscience.'
Children who come to the US without their parents – classified as 'unaccompanied minors' by the government – have always been among the most vulnerable people navigating the US immigration system. Some, fleeing poverty, war, gangs, violence or environmental catastrophes in their home countries, have made the journey alone. Others become separated from their parents or guardians along the way.
During Joe Biden's administration, when record numbers of children were arriving at the southern border, human rights advocates and internal government monitors raised alarms that children were held in overcrowded, jail-like facilities. Now, Donovan-Kaloust said, the Trump administration is attempting to strip these children of basic human rights and legal protections – exposing them to harm and isolating them from loved ones and lawyers who can advocate for their needs.
'Our team works with unaccompanied children every day who are detained, and we're seeing an incredible increase in just the emotional distress that the children are expressing,' said Donovan-Kaloust. 'They're talking about how they're not able to sleep, not able to eat. They're crying a lot, unable to participate in attorney-client meetings.'
In Santa Paula, California, one family experienced the compounding consequences of the administration's new policies.
Maria, the primary caregiver and sponsor for her 10-year-old daughter who had arrived in the US as an unaccompanied minor, didn't have any legal status in the US. But she had submitted all the required documents to show that she was a safe caregiver, provided fingerprints and opened her home up for vetting from officials at the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR).
On 2 April, she took her daughter in for a routine check-in at a nearby immigration office. Agents arrested her on the spot. 'They arrested her in front of her 10-year-old,' said Primitiva Hernandez, the Executive Director of 805 UndocuFund – a nonprofit that has been helping the family navigate their immigration cases.
Within hours, Maria was transferred to a detention center in Otay Mesa – nearly five hours away. When volunteers from 805 UndocuFund realized what had happened they rushed to help Maria's mother, Lilia, drive over to the immigration office and pick up her granddaughter. Lilia also took custody of Maria's two-year-old son.
The Guardian is not printing the women's last names, or naming the children, in order to protect their safety and privacy.
After Maria's arrest, things took a turn for the worse. Lilia's case for asylum in the US was denied, and she was told to return to Mexico immediately. 'I have to leave, because if I don't leave, they'll come looking for me,' Lilia said in a video message she shared with the Guardian. Her granddaughter was already distraught after seeing her mother cuffed, and whisked away by agents. Immigration and Customs Enforcement knew where she lived – she didn't doubt they'd come knocking.
'I have two children at home. I want to spare them the trauma,' she said. 'My little girl keeps crying because of how they grabbed her mother…I want to stay for my daughter and my grandchildren, but I just can't.'
The children were sent to stay with other family members – but some of those relatives are immigrants too, and they worry they could be targeted for enforcement next.
Advocates say that these sorts of cases exemplify how unaccompanied children are becoming both targets for immigration enforcement – and collateral, as immigration agents move to seek and arrest the adults who care for them.
In a leaked Ice document, agents were instructed to first locate children who have been released by ORR into the care of relatives, and then evaluate whether they can be removed from the country. Officers are advised to seek out 'unaccompanied alien children (UAC)' who could pose potential threats to public safety, and to look for 'UAC with gang or terrorist ties/activities', according to the document. Ice officers were also told to both remove children who may have missed an immigration appointment, and to target sponsors who are not of blood relations.
At the same time, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has enlisted the FBI and other criminal investigators to conduct 'wellness checks' on children and young people who came to the US without their parents – alarming and unsettling children who have encountered armed agents at their homes.
In New York, plainclothes officers banged on a mother's door at 6.30am one morning in April, asking to speak to her 14-year-old son, who had entered the US as an unaccompanied minor. 'It didn't cross my mind that it was immigration,' she told the Guardian. 'I opened the door and one of them showed me the phone and there was a photo of my son.'
So, she woke him up – and they asked him some questions. Later, they said something about a pending court hearing – but her son didn't have any upcoming hearings because his petition for asylum had been approved.
The Trump administration has said these surprise visits are meant to ensure that the children 'are safe and not being exploited', according to a DHS spokesperson. Trump has falsely accused the previous administration of losing more than 300,000 migrant children, claiming that they are 'slaves, sex slaves or dead'.
Agents have even shown up on school campuses. In April, federal officials with DHS attempted to enter two elementary schools in Los Angeles and asked to speak with five students – but school officials denied them entry. 'What interest should a Homeland Security agent have in a first grader or a second grader? A third grader or a fourth grader, for that matter?' said Alberto Carvalho, then-superintendent of the Los Angeles Unified school district.
Advocates say the visits have done little other than unnerve families. 'Ice is basically using those addresses from the Office of Refugee Resettlement to go door to door and instill terror,' said Ann Garcia, staff attorney at the National Immigration Project.
The government has struggled for years to shelter and care for the thousands of unaccompanied minors who arrive in the US. But the Trump administration is exacerbating the problem by making it exceedingly difficult for relatives to take custody of children in ORR facilities.
Under new policies implemented in January, anyone seeking to sponsor unaccompanied minors will have to meet stringent new requirements for DNA testing and documentation. It has become nearly impossible for undocumented people to take custody of their children.
In a lawsuit challenging the policies, advocacy groups said the 'changes have resulted in children across the country being separated from their loving families, while the government denies their release, unnecessarily prolonging their detention.'
One of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit is a 17-year-old girl, referred to as Angelica, who arrived pregnant at the US southern border in November. ORR has refused to release her – and her newborn baby – to her older sister Deisy's custody, because her sister did not have required documentation, including a passport with an attached immigration document.
Some of the other relatives Deisy has approached to sponsor Angelica have been too afraid to provide their information to ORR, fearing that the agency will share information with immigration enforcement agencies.
Another plaintiff, 14-year-old Eduardo, has been held with his 7-year-old brother in a transitional foster care program for months, while his mother Rosa has tried to submit all the documents needed to take custody of them.
'It's heartbreaking,' said Donovan-Kaloust of ImmDef. 'These are children in pain, they don't understand why they can't be with their families. And we can't really explain it to them, because there's not a good justification for what the government's doing.'
Meanwhile, the government has tried to wrench funding for programs that provide legal representation for unaccompanied immigrant children – leaving tens of thousands of infants, toddlers and teenagers to represent themselves in immigration court. After ImmDef and other legal aid non-profits sued to challenge the move, a judge ordered the administration to temporarily restore the funding – saying that denying children legal counsel violated an anti-trafficking law – but the administration has aggressively appealed.
Already, only about 50% of unaccompanied children have any legal representation in immigration court. Now, advocates say toddlers and teens alike are increasingly having to appear before an immigration judge by themselves – with little understanding of what is going on.
Judges, meanwhile, are left to explain to confused kindergarteners and intimidated teens that the government of the US will decide whether they have to leave, or whether they can stay. Children without lawyers are much more likely to be deported.
'These children are truly alone. They have no one to speak for them,' Donovan-Kaloust said.
At the same time, the government has tried to more swiftly remove unaccompanied children from the US, scheduling deportation hearings almost immediately after they are taken into ORR custody – sometimes before they have had a chance to recover from their journeys, she said.
'There's so many things happening right now,' Donovan-Kaloust said. 'So the attacks are layered on top of each other in such a way that everything is priority – at a time when our resources to respond are being systematically curtailed by the administration.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
13 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Blair's secret scheme to make immigration more popular
Sir Tony Blair considered a secret plan to make immigration more popular when he was prime minister – just weeks before opening Britain's borders to thousands of Eastern Europeans, newly released files reveal. Labour ministers came up with the 'marketing' strategy to overcome what they described as 'disproportionate' concerns about the issue and to communicate the 'big picture' to the public instead. The plan, which aimed to steer public opinion towards a 'more sensible conversation on immigration', included details of Home Office -commissioned research which found that many Britons believed borders were 'open and overrun' . In a handwritten note, Sir Tony described research he had been reading on immigration as 'pretty grim but utterly believable'. The then prime minister was sent the 15-page strategy document in March 2004 by Lord Blunkett, the then home secretary, who shared it in 'strict confidence' and warned: 'You will see that this research, and the references to it in the paper, could be explosive in the wrong hands.' The paper, titled 'Having a sensible conversation about migration', claimed that the then government had made 'real progress' in reducing the impact of stories about asylum seekers, so that they were 'no longer automatic front-page tabloid material every time'. However, it then detailed public research which 'confirms that immigration is an issue of real concern to people' and noted there were 'no obvious signs of a breakthrough as a result of what has been achieved so far and little recognition or credit for what the government has done on asylum'. It is not clear if the scheme was ever enacted. However, the paper came weeks before Sir Tony opened Britain's borders to thousands of Eastern European migrants. The Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia joined the EU in 2004. The decision by the then government to allow immediate unrestricted access to migrants from those countries was widely seen as having contributed to a major increase in immigration in the years that followed, with net EU migration surging to more than 200,000 a year. 'Public is looking for scapegoats' Summing up the views of the public, the strategy document said: 'People feel they do not have permission to freely express their fears'. It added: 'In a world of rapid change and uncertainty, people are fearful and look for explanations and scapegoats,' while claiming that 'a disproportionate amount of fear and uncertainty' was 'channelled towards' migration. Discussing the communications challenges in getting across a pro-migration message, the paper included a textbook-style graphic of a human eye looking towards a circle with the words 'bogus', 'scroungers' and 'out of control', which blocked out another larger circle labelled the 'big picture'. The paper said the 'big picture' was being crowded out by 'an almost cliched perception of all immigrants being 'bogus' and 'scroungers'.' 'The challenge is finding new ways to package and communicate these issues in a way that circumvents the eclipse and makes it easier for people to see the big picture,' it added. 'More sensible conversation needed' The strategy document recommended a new approach to improve the public's 'understanding' of migration and 'correct public misconceptions about the scale, nature and potential benefits of managed migration' and 'open the way for a more sensible conversation on immigration'. 'Shifting public attitudes on immigration is a huge challenge', it added. 'It requires a radically different communication approach. Media fire-fighting, whilst important, will not be sufficient – there are too many fires to put out and editorial and public opinion are too entrenched. 'In effect, many parts of the media are party to generating and sustaining the eclipse. The more they are fed with immigration stories, the bigger the eclipse becomes and the more the big picture is obscured.' The then government planned a campaign to show action was being taken to tackle the issue and to 'broaden the migration conversation and explain why managed migration is important to us as a nation.' It hoped to 'reduce the impact of the media-driven 'eclipse' by ensuring that the action that the government is taking is seen as a concerted and cohesive programme, and that this package of measures is communicated to the public with impact.' The paper detailed a table showing plans to advertise the advantages of migration and a PR campaign to demonstrate that migrants made a positive contribution to society. The files relating to the strategy have only been released up to March 2004, before its planned launch in July that year. In an annex on the findings of polling and focus group research, the paper revealed that participants were 'overwhelmingly of the view that the UK does not have an effective immigration policy' and that they 'feel that our traditional tolerance has been exploited and become a major weakness'. It said: 'They have a sense that our borders are completely open and overrun. 'Both focus groups and polling suggest that these intolerant views can be held by people who really do value our multicultural society and are genuinely proud of our tolerant heritage. But they feel that the 'uncontrolled flood' of immigrants is undermining these noble aspirations. 'Strongly held negative impressions are more the result of anger that things have 'got to this state' rather than outright racism. There is real resentment of political correctness – which is considered a reason why immigration and race cannot be discussed openly and therefore tackled effectively.'


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
DOJ staffer is fired after feds discover she's married to radical behind anti-ICE app
A Department of Justice employee has claimed she was fired when the feds discovered her husband developed an anti-ICE phone app. Carolyn Feinstein, who is married to ICEBlock developer Joshua Aaron, said she was unfairly removed from her post in 'retribution' against her partner's work. The ICEBlock app sets out warning signals to users when ICE agents are within a five-mile radius of their location, allowing targets to flee. After Aaron was exposed online for creating the app, Feinstein said she was terminated from her post as a forensic accountant after almost a decade working for the DoJ. 'This was retribution. I was fired because of the actions, or activism, of my husband,' Texas -based Feinstein told the Daily Beast on Monday. 'It is insulting to me because I dedicated myself and my career to serving the people of the United States, and now the DOJ is claiming I was attempting to harm some of them. And that's not true.' Feinstein, who specializes in bankruptcy fraud, said she felt 'targeted' because of her husband's app, which has been downloaded almost one million times. Aaron had not been hiding his role in creating the app - he spoke with CNN in June explaining how the app works, and faced fierce criticism from MAGA fans afterward. The ICEBlock app (pictured above) sets out warning signals to users when ICE agents are within a five-mile radius of their location, allowing targets to flee federal agents 'When I saw what was happening in this country, I wanted to do something to fight back,' Aaron told CNN. He went on to compare the Trump administration's immigration crackdown to purges carried out by the Nazi regime in 1930's Germany. 'We're literally watching history repeat itself,' he said. The interview prompted a flood of MAGA rage online, while Trump administration officials like border tsar Tom Homan and ICE acting director Tom Lyon called on the DoJ to investigate the matter. 'We will not be intimidated. We will not be deterred,' Aaron told The Daily Beast at the time. 'As long as ICE agents have quotas, and this administration ignores people's Constitutional rights, we will continue fighting back. No human is illegal.' Feinstein said she responded by telling her bosses about her relationship with Aaron. 'Since we live in the same house, I thought it was pertinent to contact my employer, the DOJ, to notify them of death threats that were coming in and just in case I needed to be out of the office, so they would be prepared,' she told the Daily Beast. Feinstein was then contacted by officials who asked her about her association with the ICEBlock app. 'I informed them in so many words that I really didn't have any relationship or involvement in the app, I was married to the creator,' she said. But Homan said he had contacted the DoJ airing concerns about the connection. He told NewsMax that 'all (Aaron is) doing is giving a heads up to criminals'. 'The DOJ's looking at it, and they need to throw some people in jail,' he said. Feinstein says she received her termination note 'within 24 hours' of Homan's Newsmax interview airing. A DoJ spokesperson told the Daily Beast the department had spent 'several weeks' investigating Feinstein's activities and discovered that she has interests in the company that holds the IP for the ICEBlock app. Feinstein argued that her minority shareholder status in All U Chart Inc is just a safety net so that 'if Joshua were incapacitated, or further, I have the ability to shut it down'. 'ICEBlock is an app that illegal aliens use to evade capture while endangering the lives of ICE officers,' a DoJ spokesperson told the Daily Beast. They added that the department 'will not tolerate threats against law enforcement or law enforcement officers.'


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Man accused of murdering wife and hiding body for weeks said he wanted to 'go big' with first crime
A Texas man who allegedly slaughtered his wife and kept her decaying corpse in their home for weeks said he wanted to 'go big' with his first crime, police claim. Charles Byrd, 49, was arrested on Sunday after a concerned relative told police he 'may have done something' to his wife, Angela Byrd, 44, that ultimately killed her, according to Bexar County Sheriff Javier Salazar. Deputies then swarmed his home and were immediately greeted by the foul odor of rotting flesh. They soon came across what they believe to be Angela's dead body wrapped in plastic. While her family has been notified, Salazar said investigators are still waiting for the medical examiners to confirm the remains are Angela's. After a day-long manhunt, the alleged killer was apprehended about a mile from his house. 'One of the things that left a huge impression on me was when he detailed to the investigator that he had not been arrested before,' Salazar began. 'Then blurted out the comment to our investigator, "go big or go home" and that was pretty shocking to me.' Footage shared by the sheriff's office showed Charles being escorted toward a cop car by police as his hands and ankles were cuffed. Meanwhile, a KSAT reporter questioned Charles about the horrifying situation. In response to her questioning, he mumbled: 'I'm so sorry. I loved my wife.' He also claimed he was having a 'mental break' and apologized to his children. Charles was officially charged with tampering with evidence with intent to impair a human corpse. At least one additional murder charge is pending, but investigators must wait for the medical examiner to rule Angela's death a homicide. Salazar also said 'several other arrests' were made in relation to Angela's case, but he did not name any of the other suspects or how they were allegedly involved. Investigators' had a chilling interaction with Charles, during which he explained 'a physical attack' on his wife that occurred around June 16. No further information about the nature of this altercation was revealed. 'He then over the last 30 days, 32 days if my math is correct, spent that entire time living in this residence with the corpse of Mrs. Byrd, at times taking certain steps to mask the odor,' he claimed. Charles also had allegedly lied to several family members about the source of the gut-wrenching scent. The sheriff also described Charles' demeanor as 'matter of fact' as he outlined the violent encounter between him and his wife. Charles remains at the Bexar County Jail. As of Sunday, when Salazar held a press conference, the suspect does not have a lawyer. He is also awaiting a mental health evaluation.