logo
Where Is Pearl Fernandez Now? What Happened to the Mom of 3 After Brutally Murdering Her Son Gabriel 12 Years Ago

Where Is Pearl Fernandez Now? What Happened to the Mom of 3 After Brutally Murdering Her Son Gabriel 12 Years Ago

Yahoo24-05-2025

Pearl Fernandez was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole for the horrific murder of her son, 8-year-old Gabriel Fernandez.
Twelve years ago, on May 22, 2013, emergency personnel responded to a 911 call from Pearl, who alerted paramedics that her son was not breathing. When they arrived at the home she was then sharing with her boyfriend Isauro Aguirre in Palmdale, Calif., paramedics found that the little boy had sustained serious injuries including a fractured skull, broken ribs and BB gun pellet marks on his body.
Pearl and Aguirre were quickly arrested for their presumed involvement in Gabriel's death and were both charged with first-degree murder with special circumstances of torture when he was taken off life support on May 24, 2013.
In court proceedings in the years to follow, many of Gabriel's family members, including his siblings Virginia and Ezequiel, testified about the torturous abuse the child experienced at the hands of his mother and her boyfriend.
Social workers were even implicated after being accused of neglecting Gabriel, although charges against them have since been dropped, per the Los Angeles Times.
But, where is Pearl Fernandez now? Here's everything to know about what happened after Gabriel Fernandez's tragic murder in 2013.
Gabriel was an 8-year-old boy who was severely abused to the point of torture by his mother, Pearl, and her boyfriend, Aguirre, until his horrific death on May 24, 2013.
According to TIME, Gabriel spent the majority of his childhood living with his uncle and later his grandparents. In 2012, however, Pearl regained custody of her son, which The Atlantic reported in 2018 was allegedly done so she could gain welfare benefits, much to the dismay of family members who were concerned for Gabriel's well-being because of Pearl's alleged history of drug abuse and neglect.
When testifying years later in court, Gabriel's grandfather, Robert Fernandez, claimed that it was within Pearl's legal right to take her son back and that deputies had told him that his custody was not valid, per CBS. So, the then-7-year-old boy moved to his mother's house, where months of horrifying abuse began.
According to the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office, Gabriel was often beaten by Aguirre because he believed that he was gay. Prosecutors said that he had suffered several injuries from the abuse, including 12 broken ribs, burn marks and a fractured skull. The young boy was also forced to eat cat litter and feces, and slept 'bound and gagged inside a small cabinet,' the DA's Office added.
On May 22, 2013, Los Angeles County Fire Department personnel arrived at Pearl's home after she called 911 to report that Gabriel was not breathing. She and Aguirre had beaten him extensively that day, allegedly as punishment for not cleaning up his toys. Gabriel was declared brain dead that day and was taken off life support two days later.
A day after Pearl called police to alert them that her son was unresponsive, she and Aguirre were arrested for their involvement in his abuse.
At the time, Aguirre was charged with attempted murder while Pearl was arrested for felony child endangerment and abuse, per Newsweek. However, when Gabriel was taken off life support the next day, Aguirre and Pearl were then both charged with first-degree murder with a special circumstance of torture.
Following court proceedings, a jury found Aguirre guilty of first-degree murder and the special circumstance of the infliction of torture in November 2017. He was then sentenced to death by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge George G. Lomeli.
Meanwhile, Pearl pleaded guilty in February 2018 and was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole in June.
'This case showed how evil can not only inflict lasting damage to those who loved Gabriel but our society as well,' Los Angeles County District Attorney Jackie Lacey said in a June 2018 statement. 'The horrific nature of Gabriel's abuse and murder has been seared into our minds and the defendants will now spend the rest of their lives in prison for their reprehensible actions.'
After Gabriel's death, four social workers were accused of failing to protect him and were each charged with one felony count of child abuse and one felony count of falsifying public records.
Prosecutors alleged that social workers Stefanie Rodriguez and Patricia Clement ignored evidence of Gabriel's abuse, including calls from his teacher, and falsified reports that were intended to document signs of his abuse. Meanwhile, their supervisors, Kevin Bom and Gregory Merritt, were also accused by prosecutors of approving false reports that contradicted evidence of the abuse Gabriel was suffering. All four employees pleaded not guilty to the charges.
'I think Gabriel could have been saved about a dozen different ways and that's what's so intense and so heartbreaking about his story,' Brian Knappenberger, the director of Netflix docuseries The Trials of Gabriel Fernandez, told PEOPLE in 2020. 'I think you see that in a lot of the pictures of Gabriel. If you look at him, it's easy to understand the kind of warmth and potential he had.'
Gabriel's case ended up with Rodriguez after his teacher, Jennifer Garcia, called the Los Angeles County child abuse hotline to report signs of abuse she was witnessing, including bruises and alarming conversations. According to a 2018 investigative report from The Atlantic that cited L.A. County Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) records, neither Rodriguez nor Bom reviewed Pearl's history, despite four previous, unrelated calls being made to the agency with claims of abuse, nor did Rodriguez go to Gabriel's school or talk to his neighbors.
Moreover, the social worker reportedly never interviewed Gabriel or his siblings alone, which is standard, required department policy. In a brief statement to The Atlantic, Rodriguez said she was supervising other cases at the time that presented equal or greater danger.
Four years after being charged, an appellate panel ruled in January 2020 that the social workers could not be prosecuted in Gabriel's death because they would not have been able to control the actions of his parents, nor did they have custody or care of Gabriel. A few months later, in July, their charges were officially dismissed by a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge.
In 2018, Aguirre was admitted to San Quentin State Prison following his death sentence.
It seems, however, that he has moved facilities since as the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation inmate search showed that he is in California State Prison, Corcoran, as of May 2025.
While Aguirre is still on death row, California Governor Gavin Newsom announced in March 2019 that the state would have a moratorium on capital punishment, meaning Aguirre's execution date is yet to be determined.
According to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation inmate search, as of May 2025, Pearl was serving her sentence at the Central California Women's Facility located in Chowchilla, Calif.
In April 2021, she attempted to make a bid for resentencing, arguing that she could no longer be convicted of first or second-degree murder because of changes to California's penal code. Her petition was denied, however, a few months later in June by Judge Lomeli, who said Pearl was 'not entitled to resentencing relief,' according to the Los Angeles Daily News.
'It has been established by her own admission during her guilty plea that the murder was intentional and involved the infliction of torture over a period of several months,' the judge continued, adding that records show Pearl was a 'major participant in the murder of a child victim.'
Read the original article on People

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

If Zohran Mamdani is the future of the Democrats, they're doomed
If Zohran Mamdani is the future of the Democrats, they're doomed

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

If Zohran Mamdani is the future of the Democrats, they're doomed

It would be easy to call San Francisco mayor Daniel Lurie the 'anti-Zohran Mamandi,' but that would fail to do the first-term leader justice. Sworn into office this past January, Lurie – like Mamdani – hails from a storied family, in this case the founders of the Levi Strauss denim dynasty. But that is where the similarities end. Lurie was elected to City Hall last November following nearly a decade of decay across San Francisco. Fuelled by the soft-on-crime policies of former district attorney Chesa Boudin, San Francisco – an urban jewel of technology and wealth – was close to becoming a failed state. Violent crime, open-air drug camps, hundreds of annual drug overdose deaths, a declining population base and desolate downtown plagued the city where I was born and raised. San Francisco's ills were akin to many large American urban centres: Philadelphia with its gruesome 'Tranq' crisis; the epidemic of deadly violent crime devastating Chicago. And, of course, Los Angeles – similarly battling an inhospitable mix of homelessness, drugs and criminality. But sized a mere 49 square miles (one-tenth that of Los Angeles), San Francisco's blight has felt uniquely acute and everywhere – all at the same time. Back in 2022, fed up voters ousted district attorney Boudin, whose laissez-faire prosecutorial approach directly led to the city's spiralling quality of life. Former San Francisco mayor London Breed attempted, honourably, to steer San Francisco back to sanity. But with a record 806 drug-related deaths in 2023 alone – and San Francisco's abandoned business core dubbed a 'ghost town' by major media – Breed lost to Lurie last November. Despite a lack of formal political experience, Lurie is hardly new to politics. His career has been shaped by public service, mostly leading large non-profits focused on tackling urban ills – often in association with scions of other local family dynasties. Lurie's flagship $500 million Tipping Point Community organisation, for instance, was established alongside the daughter of Financial Services billionaire Charles Schwab. The reliance on – rather than rejection of – the private sector for public good has been a key Lurie manoeuvre and stands in sharp contrast to Mamdani's platform. Indeed, much like former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg a decade ago, Lurie has tapped major corporations and philanthropists to fund ambitious city programs hit hard by San Francisco's $800 million budget deficit. Earlier this month, for instance, he set up an entire department, the San Francisco Downtown Development Corporation, to steer private funding to city projects. Lurie has also heavily leaned into San Francisco's abundance of visionary innovators, most notably – and understandably – in the tech world. OpenAI head Sam Altman helped lead Lurie's transition team after his election last year. Such schemes – and there are many – stand in sharp contrast to the economic expansion plan touted by Mamdani, which mostly relies on added taxes levied on New York's wealthiest residents and corporations. And not just any wealthy residents and corporations: Mamdani's own website describes his strategy as shifting 'the tax burden from overtaxed homeowners in the outer boroughs to more expensive homes in richer and whiter neighbourhoods.' Such taxes would then be used to pay for low cost basic services including housing, transport and child care, even groceries. In other words – DEI meets Socialism. If this is the future of the Democrats, they are doomed. The problem with Mamdani's plans is that they rarely benefit – or are even desired – by those for whom they are designed. How else to explain the mostly white, mostly affluent New Yorkers who voted for Mamdani this week. Poor people don't need cheap housing – they need quality housing. They don't want free subway services, but reliable – and never more so – safe public transport. This requires funding, which taxes would supply, but also know-how, supply chains, available workforces and long-term commitments. And these are best delivered by partnering with the private sector. Earlier this month, for instance, crypto billionaire Chris Larsen gave $9.4 million to fund a Real Time Investigation Centre for the SFPD. Investment in law enforcement is another key area where Mamdani could learn from Lurie. Last month the mayor announced that the SFPD would be spared the 15 per cent budget cut he's implementing across city departments. Lurie has also signed an executive order to add 500 police officers to the department by, among other strategies, re-hiring recently retired officers. Lurie's law-and-order focus appears to be working: this week the SFPD made 97 arrests in a single day in San Francisco drug dens – 'the largest one-day fugitive-focused enforcement in recent history,' according to the city. While Lurie boosts officer numbers in San Francisco, Mandani has pledged to slash them. In their place, he will create a Department of Community Safety that relies on social-service schemes – 'evidence-based strategies that prevent violence and crime before they occur,' as he has described it – to maintain public order. This is a city that has finally seen a decrease in spiralling violent crime numbers – precisely because of an increase in police patrols. In 2023, for instance, New York City experienced a 20 per cent rise in arrests, a five-year record according to NYPD Chief John Chell. San Francisco may be far smaller than New York City, but its challenges – rising costs, a decreasing tax base, middle- and upper-class population declines – are eerily similar. Five years after Covid decimated both cities' business bases, mayor Lurie appears to understand that fixing San Francisco requires, above all else, public safety and a robust private-sector. Zohran Mandani should pay attention. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Philippines VP Duterte must go on trial due to severity of charges, prosecutors say
Philippines VP Duterte must go on trial due to severity of charges, prosecutors say

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Philippines VP Duterte must go on trial due to severity of charges, prosecutors say

MANILA (Reuters) -Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte must be tried, and ultimately convicted, over serious charges, including an alleged threat to have the president killed, prosecutors argued in a submission to a Senate impeachment court on Friday. Duterte is facing removal from her post and a lifetime ban from office if convicted. She has denied wrongdoing and maintains her impeachment is politically motivated and the result of an acrimonious falling out between her and President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. Lower house prosecutors said the weight of the evidence against Duterte justifies a full-blown trial, rejecting her defence that the allegations against her in an impeachment complaint were unsubstantiated. "The severity of the charges leaves no room for technical evasion. A trial is not only warranted but necessary to reinforce justice, uphold democratic principles, and affirm that no individual, regardless of rank of influence, stands above the law," they said in their response to Duterte's defence. "It is obvious from a simple reading of (Duterte's response), which relies on misleading claims and baseless procedural objections, that the only legal strategy of the defence is to have the case dismissed and avoid trial," the prosecutors said. Duterte, who was impeached by the lower house in February, has described the impeachment complaint as unconstitutional and "nothing more than a scrap of paper." Included in the complaint were allegations she misused public funds while vice president and education secretary and had plotted to assassinate Marcos, the first lady and the house speaker based on remarks during a November press conference about hiring an assassin. Duterte's impeachment is widely seen in the Philippines as part of a broader power struggle ahead of the 2028 election, which Marcos cannot contest due to a single-term limit for presidents and will likely seek to groom a successor to protect his legacy. Marcos has distanced himself from the impeachment. Duterte, the daughter of former President Rodrigo Duterte, is expected to run for the presidency in 2028 if she survives the impeachment and would be a strong contender.

‘We are not going to stand for this': Trump demands Israel drops ‘witch hunt' case against Netanyahu
‘We are not going to stand for this': Trump demands Israel drops ‘witch hunt' case against Netanyahu

News24

timean hour ago

  • News24

‘We are not going to stand for this': Trump demands Israel drops ‘witch hunt' case against Netanyahu

Donald Trump demanded that Israel drop its corruption case against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Trump hinted that the US would tie the case to US aid to Israel. Netanyahu and his wife Sara are accused of accepting more than $260 000 worth of luxury goods in exchange for political favours. US President Donald Trump on Saturday lashed out at prosecutors in Israel over the corruption trial that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has faced, saying Washington, having given billions of dollars worth of aid to Israel, was not going to 'stand for this'. Netanyahu was indicted in 2019 in Israel on charges of bribery, fraud and breach of trust - all of which he denies. The trial began in 2020 and involves three criminal cases. 'It is INSANITY doing what the out-of-control prosecutors are doing to Bibi Netanyahu,' Trump said in a Truth Social post, adding that the judicial process was going to interfere with Netanyahu's ability to conduct talks with Palestinian militants Hamas, and Iran. Trump's second post over the course of a few days defending Netanyahu and calling for the cancellation of the trial went a step further to tie Israel's legal action to US aid. 'The United States of America spends Billions of Dollar a year, far more than on any other Nation, protecting and supporting Israel. We are not going to stand for this,' Trump said. READ | Trump demands Israel pardons 'great hero' Netanyahu, or abandons corruption case against him Netanyahu 'right now' was in the process of negotiating a deal with Hamas, Trump said, without giving further details. On Friday, the Republican president told reporters that he believed a ceasefire is close. Various sources/AFP Hamas has said it is willing to free remaining hostages in Gaza under any deal to end the war, while Israel says it can only end if Hamas is disarmed and dismantled. Hamas refuses to lay down its arms. Interest in resolving the Gaza conflict has heightened in the wake of the US and Israeli bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities. A ceasefire to the 12-day Israel-Iran conflict went into effect early this week. AFP reported that an Israeli court on Friday rejected Netanyahu's request to postpone giving testimony in his corruption trial, ruling that he had not provided adequate justification for his request. In one case, Netanyahu and his wife Sara are accused of accepting more than $260 000 worth of luxury goods such as cigars, jewellery and champagne from billionaires in exchange for political favours. In two other cases, Netanyahu is accused of attempting to negotiate more favourable coverage from two Israeli media outlets. AFP Netanyahu has denied any wrongdoing and has thanked Trump for his support in Israel's war with Iran, which saw a ceasefire agreement earlier this week. His lawyer had asked the court to excuse the leader from hearings over the next two weeks, saying he needs to concentrate on 'security issues'. Trump on Wednesday sprung to Netanyahu's defence, describing the case against him as a 'witch hunt'. On Saturday, he described Netanyahu as a 'War Hero' and said the case would distract the prime minister from negotiations with Iran and with Hamas, the Gaza-based Palestinian armed group that Israel is at war with. 'This travesty of 'Justice' will interfere with both Iran and Hamas negotiations,' said Trump, although it was unclear what negotiations he was referring to with regard to Iran. Yair Palti/Anadolu via Getty Images The US leader also likened Netanyahu's legal troubles to his own before he took office for his second term. 'It is a POLITICAL WITCH HUNT, very similar to the Witch Hunt that I was forced to endure,' said Trump. The Republican was convicted on 34 counts of falsifying business records in May 2024 in a case related to hush money payments to a porn star. Trump also faced two federal cases, one related to his alleged efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election, which he lost to Democrat Joe Biden.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store