
75 years after he was kidnapped to North Korea, these sisters still hope to see their brother
Min Young-jae has not seen or heard anything about her eldest brother for 75 years. He was 19 and she was only 2 when, during the early days of the Korean War, he was kidnapped to the North.
'We were known in the neighborhood as a happy family,' the now 77-year-old told CNN, as her older sister Min Jeong-ja nodded in agreement.
Their peaceful days were shattered on June 25, 1950, when North Korea invaded the South. The three-year war would kill more than 847,000 troops and about 522,000 civilians from both sides, and tear apart more than 100,000 families, including Min's.
After the war, the family kept the rusting doors of their tile-roofed house open, in hopes that their eldest would one day return. But over time, barbed wire has been installed between the two Koreas, and a modern apartment complex has replaced the house.
Though 75 years have passed without a single word about or from the brother, Min and her siblings remain hopeful that they will hear about him some day. Or, if not him, then his children or grandchildren.
A happy family
The family lived in Dangnim village, nestled between green mountains on the western side of Chuncheon city, nearly 100 kilometers northeast of Seoul. It was a village of chirping birds, streaming water and chugging tractors.
It was also dangerously close to the 38th parallel, which divided the peninsula after the Second World War.
Min Young-jae, the youngest of seven, does not remember fighting with any of her siblings growing up; only sharing tofu that her parents made, splashing in the stream and being carried around on her eldest brother's shoulders.
Handsome, kind and smart, Min Young-sun was studying at the Chuncheon National University of Education, following in the footsteps of his father, the principal of Dangnim Elementary School.
'His nickname was 'Math Whiz.' He excelled in math, even his classmates called him Math Whiz,' Min Jeong-ja, the fifth child of the family, said.
Some days, students followed him all the way home, as he commuted via train and boat, asking him to teach math, the sisters recalled.
The sisters remember Min Young-sun as a caring brother. They caught fish and splashed in the nearby stream, now widely covered with reeds and weeds and almost out of water.
'We grew up in real happiness,' Min Jeong-ja said.
Torn apart
Living near the frontier between the newly separated Koreas – backed by the rival ideological forces of communism or capitalism – Min's family was among the first to experience the horrors of the Korean War.
When Kim Il Sung's North Korean troops invaded, Min Jeong-ja remembers seeing her grandmother running in tears, with a cow in tow, screaming: 'We're in a war!'
'We all spread out and hid in the mountains, because we were scared. One day, we hid the 4-year-old, Young-jae, in the bushes and forgot to bring her back because we had so many siblings. When we returned that night, she was still there, not even crying,' Min Jeong-ja said.
While the family was running in and out of the mountains, taking shelter from the troops coming from the North, Min Young-sun was kidnapped, taken to the North by his teacher.
'The teacher gathered smart students and hauled them (away). He took several students, tens of them. Took them to the North,' Min Jeong-ja said.
It is unknown why the teacher would have kidnapped the students to North Korea, but the South Korean government assumes that Pyongyang had abducted South Koreans to supplement its military.
'People called the teacher a commie,' Min Jeong-ja said.
That heartache was soon followed by another: the death of the second-eldest brother. He died of shock and pain, in deep sorrow from the kidnap of his brother, according to the sisters.
'The grief was huge. Our parents lost two sons… imagine how heartbreaking that would be,' Min Jeong-ja said.
For their father, the pain of losing two sons was overwhelming. He developed a panic disorder, she said, and would struggle to work for the rest of his life.
'He couldn't go outside; he stayed home all the time. And because he was hugely shocked, he struggled going through day-to-day life. So, our mom went out (to work) and suffered a lot,' Min Young-jae said.
The mother jumped into earning a living for the remaining five children and her husband. Still, every morning she prayed for Min Young-sun, filling a bowl with pure water as part of a Korean folk ritual and leaving the first scoop of the family's rice serving that day in a bowl for a son whom she believed would return one day.
'She couldn't move house; in case the brother cannot find his way back home. She wouldn't let us change anything of the house, not even the doors. That's how she waited for him… We waited for so long, and time just passed,' Min Jeong-ja said.
The pain continues
Min Jeong-ja was 8 years old when the war started, but witnessed brutality that would overwhelm many adults.
'So many kids died. When I went out to the river to wash clothes, I occasionally saw bodies of children floating,' she recalled.
She remembers witnessing North Korean soldiers lining up people in a barley field, and shooting at them with submachine guns. 'Then one by one, they fell on the barley field.'
'I saw too much. At one point – I didn't even know if the soldier was a South Korean or North Korean – but I saw beheaded remains.'
The Min family is one of many torn apart by the war. More than 134,000 people are still waiting to hear from their loved ones believed to be in North Korea, which is now one of the world's most reclusive states, with travel between the two countries nigh-on impossible.
Years after the Korean War, the two Koreas discussed organizing reunions for the separated families that have been identified from both sides through the Red Cross and both governments.
The first reunion happened in 1985, more than 30 years after the ceasefire agreement was signed, and the annual reunions kicked off in 2000, when many first-hand war victims were still alive, but occasionally halted when tensions escalated on the peninsula.
Once the two governments agree on a reunion date, one of the two Koreas selects families, prioritizing the elderly and immediate relatives, then shares the list with the other, which would cross check the family on its side to confirm the list of around 100 members.
The selected families would meet at an office specifically built for reunions at the Mount Kumgang resort in North Korea.
The Min siblings applied to the Red Cross at least five times and listed themselves under the South Korean government as a separated family. But there was never any word on their brother's whereabouts from the other side.
As 75 years passed, the siblings grew up, got married, and formed their own families – but questions about their stolen brother linger.
Even worse, the annual reunions of separated families have been halted since 2018, following failed summit between US President Donald Trump and North Korea's leader Kim Jong Un in Hanoi, while first-hand victims of the war age and pass away.
The Kumgang resort was dismantled by the North in 2022, also amid strained tensions.
But the siblings, following their parents' wishes, still hope to connect with Min Young-sun, who would now be 94 years old.
'My brother Young-sun, it's already been 75 years,' Min Young-jae said into a CNN camera, taking her glasses off so that he would recognize his sister's face.
'It's been a long time since we were separated, but I would be so grateful if you're alive. And if you're not, I still would love to meet your children. I want to share the love of family, remembering the happy days of the past… I love you, thank you.'
She and the siblings remember the kidnapped brother by singing his favorite song, 'Thinking of My Brother,' a children's song about a brother that never returned.
'My brother, you said you would come back from Seoul with silk shoes,' Min Young-jae sang, while her sister wiped away tears.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

CBC
a day ago
- CBC
South Korean pilot may have shut off less-damaged engine in crash that killed 179 people
Social Sharing The initial results of an investigation into December's devastating Jeju Air crash in South Korea showed that while the plane's both engines sustained bird strikes, its pilots turned off the less-damaged one just before its crash-landing. The finding, which implied human errors, drew quick, vehement protests from bereaved families and fellow pilots who accuse authorities of trying to shift responsibility for the disaster to the dead pilots. South Korea's Aviation and Railway Accident Investigation Board initially planned to publicize the results of an investigation of the plane's engines on Saturday. But it was forced to cancel its news briefing in the face of strong protests by relatives of crash victims who were informed of the findings earlier in the day, according to government officials and bereaved families. "If they want to say their investigation was done in a reliable, independent manner, they should have come up with evidence that backs up their explanation," said Kim Yu-jin, head of an association of bereaved families. "None of us resent the pilots." The Boeing 737-800 operated by Jeju Air landed on its belly without its land gear deployed at South Korea's southern Muan International Airport on Dec. 29. It overshot the runaway, slammed into a concrete structure and burst into flames. It was the deadliest disaster in South Korea's aviation history in decades, killing all but two of the 181 people on board. According to a copy of an unpublished briefing report obtained by The Associated Press, a South Korean-led multilateral investigation team said it found no defects in the plane's engines, built by France's Safran and GE. The report said thorough examinations of the engines found the plane's right engine suffered more serious internal damage following bird strikes, as it was engulfed with big fires and black smoke. But the pilots switched off the plane's left engine, the report said, citing probes on the cockpit voice recorder, the flight data recorder and engine examinations. Officials earlier said the black boxes of the Boeing jetliner stopped recording about four minutes before the accident, complicating investigations into the cause of the disaster. The cockpit voice recorder and the flight data recorder cited in the briefing report refers to data stored before the recording stopped. The report didn't say why the pilots shut off the less-damaged engine and stopped short of saying whether it was an error by the pilots. Pilots' union slams finding Bereaved families and pilots at Jeju Air and other airlines lambasted the investigation findings, saying authorities must disclose the cockpit voice recorder and the flight data recorder. "We, the 6,500 pilots at civilian airlines, can't contain our seething anger against the preposterous argument by the Aviation and Railway Accident Investigation Board that lost neutrality," the Korean Pilot Unions Alliance said in a statement Tuesday. Unionized pilots at Jeju Air also issued a statement urging authorities to present scientific evidence to show the plane should have landed normally if it flew with the less-damaged engine. The latest report focused only on engine issues and didn't mention other factors that could also be blamed for the crash. Among them is the concrete structure the plane crashed into. It housed a set of antennas called localizers designed to guide aircraft safely during landings, and many analysts say it should have been made with more easily breakable materials. Some pilots say they suspect the government wouldn't want to prominently blame the localizers or bird strikes for mass deaths as the Muan airport is under direct management of the country's Transport Ministry. The Aviation and Railway Accident Investigation Board and the Transport Ministry have offered no public response to the criticism. Kwon Bo Hun, dean of the aeronautics college at the Far East University in South Korea, called the government's planned announcement "clumsy" because it didn't disclose evidence that supported its finding on the pilots. He said it only irritated "emotional parts of us that the investigation puts the whole blame on dead people." A former Transport Ministry-turned-university professor reached by the AP said the engine investigation report must be "reliable" as it's based on an analysis of cockpit voice and flight data recorders that "don't lie." He spoke on condition of anonymity citing the delicate nature of the issue.


CTV News
14-07-2025
- CTV News
Sudbury group to create videos to help trafficking survivors navigate court system
Sudbury charity Angels of Hope has partnered with the southern Ontario organization Timea's Cause to create free videos in both English and French to guide human trafficking survivors through Ontario's legal system. The videos are expected to launch in 2027.


National Observer
09-07-2025
- National Observer
Yukon First Nation calls for accountability over mine disaster
A year after the catastrophic collapse at Yukon's Eagle Gold Mine, a government-commissioned investigation confirms a series of technical failures — including unstable slopes, faulty drainage and construction mistakes which sent nearly two million tonnes of cyanide-laced ore into the valley and local waterways. For the Na-Cho Nyäk Dun First Nation, whose traditional territory surrounds the mine, the disaster only confirmed what they already knew. Chief Dawna Hope said the community raised concerns about the mine's safety for years, but their warnings were not heeded. 'Our lands and our way of life are constantly under tremendous threat, and our treaty partner is failing to take steps to protect our traditional territory,' Hope said. The collapse upended daily life in surrounding communities, including Mayo — a remote town about 400 kilometres north of Whitehorse that sits along the Stewart River and is home to many members of the Na-Cho Nyäk Dun First Nation. The spring grayling fishery, once a seasonal tradition for local families, is now a source of concern, with residents avoiding the area out of fear that the fish may contain elevated levels of cyanide and heavy metals. 'Now we can't trust the land any longer,' Hope said. 'Our citizens are still grieving and trying to understand.' "When the Yukon government fails to act within their responsibility as a regulator, they put all Yukoners at risk, and we end up continuing to pick up the tabs in the end," said Dawna Hope, chief of Na-Cho Nyäk Dun. The First Nation's 1993 modern treaty with Yukon and Canada was supposed to guarantee a meaningful say in land use, but Hope said those promises have not been kept. Since the week of the disaster, the First Nation has called for a full public inquiry — a process that could look at who was responsible and how to prevent future failures, Hope said. After BC's Mount Polley disaster, an immediate public inquiry was launched — something Yukon still hasn't done. 'It's frustrating, of course, because things — I feel — could have been in play already and we could have been halfway to the answer potentially,' she said. The Independent Review Board (IRB), a panel of technical experts appointed by the Yukon government, was tasked with investigating the causes of the June 2024 heap leach failure. The 156-page report concluded that the disaster resulted from 'the accumulation of a series of adverse conditions and events.' In addition to these geotechnical issues, the report found that 'actions and inactions' of the mine's owner, Victoria Gold Corp., and its contractors contributed directly or indirectly to the failure. The Yukon government has not yet agreed to a public inquiry. Mines Minister John Streicker has said the government is reviewing the IRB report and will determine next steps, but there is no timeline. Bill Slater, an independent environmental consultant who has advised the First Nation since the mine's planning stages, said the review board did a solid job explaining the physical reasons for the collapse and confirming the company's failures in construction and operation. The board identified five major technical reasons for the collapse: too much weak ore in a key part of the heap, a drainage system that didn't work, slopes that were steeper than planned, loose and saturated ore that could suddenly liquefy and heavy irrigation that tipped the balance. However, he said it didn't examine why government officials didn't act sooner. 'They did not really have an opportunity or time to delve into the issues of what were the reasons that this was allowed to happen. How did we get to the point where all of those five main contributing factors occurred? How come none of those were stopped? How come nobody noticed that each of those things was happening, or any one of them was happening? Where were the regulators in stopping that from happening?' Slater said. He pointed to missed warning signs, like seepage from the heap leach facility, and the absence of the Yukon government at a key water board hearing in 2019, missing a chance to review the design and provide oversight. The financial impact is another serious concern. Hope said the Eagle Gold collapse has cost each Yukon household the equivalent of just under $13,000 in government costs, based on government figures. She pointed out that most major mines in Yukon have ended up abandoned or in trouble, with the public shouldering the burden for cleanup. 'Eight out of the nine mines that have been approved in the Yukon have resulted in abandoned mine failures. When the Yukon government fails to act within their responsibility as a regulator, they put all Yukoners at risk, and we end up continuing to pick up the tabs in the end,' she said. Nadja Kunz, Canada Research Chair in Mine Water Management and Stewardship and associate professor at the University of British Columbia, reviewed the report and said that she has heard concerns about how quickly new mining projects are being approved in Yukon and whether Indigenous communities are being properly consulted. Smaller governments like Yukon's, she said, may not have enough staff or expertise to keep up with complex mining projects. 'There's anxiety about whether communities are truly being heard,' she said. She said this incident is a warning for the entire Canadian mining sector. 'There's never been a more important time to make sure we're doing this right. This is an absolute warning sign about how we need to do better for the broader industry, and not just here in this case in Yukon.'