Union fears federal workers at Red River Army Depot are on the chopping block
BOWIE COUNTY, Texas (KTAL/KMSS) — The National Federation of Federal Employees (NFFE) Local 2189 is raising concerns that employees at Red River Army Depot could become casualties of the broader ongoing reduction in force efforts from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the direction of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
'It's like drinking from a fire hydrant. So there's so much information. So many directives. So many executive orders that are coming out of DC, and we are worried, and we are in fear of our jobs.' says Randy Kirschstein, President of NFFE LL 2189.
The union represents roughly 1,100 of the over 3,500 civilian employees at the depot. They say that these sort of cuts the depot could be facing would be illegal under 10 USC 2472.
'The law basically directs that depot personnel, and maintenance personnel are to be based… based solely on the workload, depending on how much work you have determines how many employees you have.' says Kirschstein, 'And to reduce the workload or the number of workers that we have just so that we can reduce the size of the government is ultimately going to affect the war fighter.'
If anything, they say the depot could benefit from expanding their staff.
'As a matter of fact, right now we are at our one of our lowest levels in probably two decades out there at the depot as far as workforces is considered, and that is because we are at peace time.' says Kirschstein.
They further argue that staffing cuts at the depot would not accomplish what doge is setting out to do.
'What we do isn't affecting the national debt. We provide that service and equipment to the army which pays for itself and operates as a business.' says Kirschstein, 'We don't want to be cut with an ax or a chainsaw. If there has to be changes or there has to be reductions, make sure that we're doing the right thing and that we're going in there with the scalpel and removing the waste fraud and abuse where it's necessary.'
Job cuts could have broad effects to the local economy. The Texas Comptroller estimates that the depot contributes over $1.6 billion to the state's economy.
'So not only do we provide a great asset and service to our army and to our military, but we also do to the four states area.' says Kirschstein.
They want to try to get ahead of any workforce reduction plans by asking people to contact their representatives in Washington.
'What we need them to do right now is that at any moment when they have an opportunity to speak about the good that Red River does and how viable we are to this economy in this area that they're saying positive things and making sure that at all costs Red River is able to avoid a RIF (Reduction in Force) or a BRAC (Base Realignment and Closure).' says Kirschstein.
Congressman Nathaniel Moran, whose District 1 represents parts of northeast Texas, gave us a statement that expresses his support and says quote:
'We strongly support the critical mission of the Red River Army Depot and its workforce—both military and civilian. It is the perfect example of the type of efficiency that President Trump rightly seeks in other areas of the government. The story of Red River Army Depot is one critical to our military readiness, and one that already brings great value to the taxpayer. Our office is fully engaged on the issue and prepared to work hard on behalf of the region to protect the operations and personnel at Red River Army Depot.' – Congressman Nathaniel Moran, (R) Texas
We reached out to the Red River Army Depot for comment but did not hear back.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
5 hours ago
- Politico
Embattled Voice of America employees face termination ‘whiplash'
Several Voice of America employees based in Washington who received termination notices last week had those notices temporarily rescinded on Friday, the latest turn in the Trump administration's chaotic dismantling of the U.S.-funded media outlet. It was not clear how many VOA journalists and employees received the email. Those who received it still expect to be laid off — the email noted that the U.S. Agency for Global Media, VOA's parent agency, will be 'running another RIF in the near future' — but the timeline for when their jobs will now be terminated is now unclear. It's the latest development in a grueling series of back and forths between the embattled employees at the network and Kari Lake, the Trump adviser who has orchestrated the dismantling of VOA and USAGM's other global media networks. Critics have argued that Lake is leading a purge that is weakening the U.S.'s global standing by emboldened propaganda in countries that do not have a free press, including Iran and China. 'This email serves to inform you that the previously issued Reduction in Force notification dated June 20, 2025, is hereby rescinded,' read the email from the human resources department for the USAGM, which was obtained by POLITICO. Employees who initially received RIF notices had a separation date of Sept. 1, and now, there's no clear timeline of when the termination process will be completed. Lake disputed the change in status in a text to POLITICO, saying 'That is not true,' and that 'Employees have the option to work until their last day which I believe is around the beginning or middle of September. Employees who choose to work after receiving RIF notifications are working.' But after receiving a screenshot of the email, Lake said: 'The rescission of a subset of previously issued reduction in force letters allows employees to access and update their personnel files ahead of completion of the RIF which will be helpful as they pursue other employment,' adding that it 'is also part of union negotiations.' Paula Hickey, the president of VOA's American Federation of Government Employees Local chapter 1812, said that the move came after the union met with USAGM on Monday to 'discuss violations of the law and contract in regard to the RIF.' 'The recission is a result of the union's actions,' Hickey added. Employees noted several errors with their termination notices, including wrong dates of birth, wrong start dates and calculating severance payments incorrectly. Hickey said that the agency issued RIF notices without completing bargaining, which she says is a shift in status quo and violation of the federal law. Since a March executive order from President Donald Trump ordering the dismantling of several government-funded news agencies, some employees have sued the administration and Lake, arguing that its dismantling was unlawful. Employees with VOA's Persian-language service were abruptly called back to work after the war between Israel and Iran escalated — and then received RIF notices days after. 'They're failing at running an international media organization and now it seems they're failing at firing us too,' said former VOA White House bureau chief Patsy Widakuswara, one of the lead plaintiffs in the lawsuit against the Trump administration. 'In the meantime, more than 600 people are experiencing whiplash from their incompetence.'


Forbes
a day ago
- Forbes
Victoria Spartz Blasts Senate Parliamentarian For Blocking Medicaid Cuts In Big Beautiful Bill
Congresswoman Victoria Spartz (R-IN) joined "Forbes Newsroom" to discuss the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, as well as the U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Watch the full interview above.


New York Post
6 days ago
- New York Post
Mamdani, Schumer, AOC battling for most idiotic response to Trump's Iran strikes
Boy is the competition stiff for most idiotic response to Operation Midnight Hammer. NYC lefty 'it boy' Zohran Mamdani is one clear leader of the pack: 'Donald Trump ran for president promising to end wars, not start new ones,' the failed rapper posted on X. And: 'Today's unconstitutional military action represents a dark, new chapter in his endless betrayals that now threaten to plunge the world deeper into chaos.' Wrong on virtually every count: As the president noted Saturday night, Iran's been waging war on our country since it seized the hostages back in 1979, through its sponsorship of the 1983 Beirut barracks bombing, its provision of IEDs to slaughter our troops in Afhganistan and Iraq and on to its efforts to assassinate Trump. By finishing off Tehran's nuclear program, the prez moved decisively to end Israel's strikes on Iran by eliminating their target. And defanging the monsters who run the Islamic Republic is a blow against chaos that opens the door to a brighter future for the entire region. Naturally, Mamdani's less-radical rivals for Democrats' mayoral nomination felt obliged to also condemn Trump, with Andrew Cuomo (Dems' 'it boy' of 2020!) whining about how 'Trump went about this without consulting Congress, without consulting the normal congressional officials' blah-blah-blah. That's the same approach embraced by most national Democrats, including ex-Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Minority Leaders Hakeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer. Which is beyond pathetic, as all of them are on record praising President Barack Obama's various unilateral, left-Congress-in-the-dark actions from doing 'regime change' in Libya by taking out Moammer Khadafy to his multiple drone assassinations of US citizens such as Anwar Al-Awlaki. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez basically sits in the same camp as Mamdani (her preferred mayoral candidate, of course) with the added filip of claiming Trump's actions are 'absolutely and clearly grounds for impeachment.' In fact, the US strikes were plainly legal, covered (like Obama's) by Congress' open-ended authorizations for presidential force back in 2003 — resolutions that neither party has sought to repeal even when both Houses of Congress are held by the presidential-opposition party. Yes, it'd be wonderful if the House and Senate were willing to do their duties in matters of war and peace, but instead they've chosen not to — and to just carp about the other team's leadership. This also means Trump had no responsibility to brief top Democrats in advance of the strikes — and that no word of the coming attacks leaked suggests he was wise to shut them out. We certainly wouldn't trust the likes of Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) to put the safety of Americans headed into a war zone above his partisan desire to undermine anything and everything Donald Trump is doing. Let us not forget the international contestants in the idiot sweepstakes: UN Secretary-General António Guterres (last seen thundering that Israel's strikes on Iran could 'ignite a fire no one can control') denounced Trump's 'dangerous escalation' as 'a direct threat to international peace and security' before droning on about supposed 'rules of international law.' That is: He's still pretending Iran isn't one of the main threats to other nations' safety, and that stopping it is somehow an 'escalation.' Russia and China of course condemned the US strikes, but all should note that that's literally the least they could do to support their ally Iran. We guess British Prime Minister Keir Starmer can represent the countless fools of Western Europe in the competition, adding to the chorus of clueless handwringing over the supposed 'risk of escalation' even as he admitted Iran's nuke program posed a 'grave threat to international security' and called for 'a diplomatic solution to end this crisis.' OK: Tehran should end the crisis by calling it quits on attacking Israel so the Israelis don't need to keep taking out Iranian missile launchers etc., and by foreswearing any response to the US strikes; it certainly shouldn't try to close the Strait of Hormuz to global shipping if it doesn't want half its Navy sunk again (as was its fate the last time it tried that stunt). No one else can or should offer the Islamic Republic a damned thing except what's been on the table from the start: Verifiably end your nuke quest, stop attacking other countries (remember its utterly unprovoked strikes on Israel last year) and other nations will leave you alone. It's all clear as crystal, even if so many idiots insist on pretending otherwise.