The last Hong Kong pro-democracy party holding street protests disbands
HONG KONG (AP) — Hong Kong pro-democracy political party League of Social Democrats announced on Sunday it had disbanded due to immense political pressure, the latest casualty in a years-long crackdown that has already quieted much of the city's once-vocal opposition.
Following massive anti-government protests in 2019, many leading activists were prosecuted or jailed under a 2020 national security law imposed by Beijing. Dozens of civil society groups dissolved. Media outlets critical of the government shuttered.
The League of Social Democrats was the only pro-democracy party that still staged small street protests from time to time and held street booth activities to carry on its advocacy despite the risks.
Its chairperson, Chan Po-ying, said the disbandment decision was made after careful deliberation, especially taking into account the consequences to its members and comrades. Chan refused to elaborate on the pressure but said she was proud to say that the party had still contributed to the city's pro-democracy movement in these few years.
'We have stayed true to our original aspirations and haven't let down to the trust placed in us by those who went to prison,' she said. 'While we are now forced to disband and feel an ache in our conscience, we have no other choice,' she said.
Protests became rare under Beijing's grip
Hong Kong, a former British colony, will mark the 28th anniversary of returning to Chinese rule on July 1. The city used to hold annual pro-democracy protests that day and other various demonstrations demanding better policies.
But those were ceased after most organizing groups were disbanded and the leading activists were jailed. Critics say the drastic political changes under the security law reflect that the freedoms Beijing promised to keep intact in 1997 are shrinking.
The Beijing and Hong Kong governments insist the law is necessary for the city's stability. A Chinese official overseeing Hong Kong affairs in 2023 said protests are not the only way for people to express their views, signaling Beijing's stance toward demonstrations in the city.
In April, Hong Kong's biggest pro-democracy party, the Democratic Party, also voted to give its leadership the mandate to move toward a potential disbandment. Party veterans told The Associated Press that some members were warned of consequences if the party didn't shut down. A final vote is expected at a later date.
A party known for confrontational tactics
Founded in 2006, the League of Social Democrats was a left-wing political party that opposed collusion between government and business, upheld the principle that people have a say and was firmly committed to the interests of underprivileged residents.
It was widely known for its more aggressive tactics when fighting for change. Its members have thrown bananas, eggs and luncheon meat at officials or pro-Beijing lawmakers as a protest gesture. Its party platform said the group advocated non-violent resistance but would not avoid physical confrontations — a stance that set it apart from older, traditional pro-democracy groups.
It once had three lawmakers in office. Its longest-serving lawmaker, Leung Kwok-hung — Chan's husband — was disqualified from the legislature due to his manner of taking his oath in office in 2017.
Members arrested and jailed over activism
On the streets, the group's activism led to the arrests and jailing of its members from time to time.
Last year, Leung and prominent LGBTQ+ activist Jimmy Sham, a former party leader, were sentenced to nearly seven years and more than four years over their roles in an unofficial primary election under the sweeping security law. Sham was freed from prison last month.
In recent years, the party has had limited political influence, no longer holding any seats in the legislature or local district councils. Even a bank ceased to provide bank account services to the group.
But it continued to stage small protests from time to time, despite sometimes those activities leading to arrests. On June 12, Chan and other members were fined after being found guilty over their street booth activities.
Undeterred by their convictions, they kept pressing on and protested against the ruling outside the court.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Sportswear Brand Actively Black Reshores Operations to the U.S. as Juneteenth Launch Nears
Actively Black is shifting part of its manufacturing to the U.S. and out of China, aligning with broader national efforts to bring production stateside. On Thursday, the sportswear brand, owned by former Sacramento Kings player Lanny Smith, will debut a new collection designed by an all-Black creative team. Unlike previous drops, every piece in the collection—which includes graphic T-shirts, shorts and hoodies—will be made from 100 percent certified Black-grown cotton and produced entirely in the U.S. through a fully Black-owned supply chain. More from Sourcing Journal Can Tech Plug the Gaps Between Immigration Policies and Reshoring Aspirations? Veteran's Carbon Holdings Pledges $1.1 Billion to US Farmers for Carbon Soil Program Trump Says US Should Produce Tech and Tanks, Not T-Shirts and Sneakers This venture kicked into high gear earlier this year after Donald Trump's global trade war gave Smith the push he needed to pivot. 'The idea of working with a fully Black-owned, U.S.-based supply chain [first crossed my mind] last year, but it didn't really accelerate until all the tariff talk began. That's when we had to start looking at some pivots just for operational survival,' Smith told Sourcing Journal. 'But overall, so many industries in America were built off profits made from slavery and cotton. Our people unwillingly participated in the wealth generation that created the U.S. economy, but we never got to enjoy the fruits of that labor or share in the upside of that wealth creation. There are scars, there's trauma… but I see this venture as reclamation.' To onshore its operations, Actively Black partnered with Bridgeforth Farms, a fifth-generation Black-owned and operated cotton farm and manufacturer. Based in Tanner, Alabama, the farm was established almost immediately after the Civil War, when former slave George Bridgeforth began purchasing land in North Alabama to build a legacy. Together with his wife, Jennie, he laid the foundation for what would become one of the oldest Black-owned farms in the country. Fast-forward to today, the farm is now run by Carlton and Kyle Bridgeforth—along with a few other family members—who were 'vital assets' in bringing the collection to life. 'The Bridgeforth family has been an amazing partner. Their capability to produce the products we're releasing is incredible, and the fact that they've kept this going for 150 years is just remarkable,' Smith said. 'We're also working with another company, Comoco Cotton, which is aggregating Black farmers in North Carolina. By working with both, we see an opportunity to hopefully scale [our operations] into an ecosystem.' This collection was intentionally timed to drop on Juneteenth, the annual June 19th holiday that commemorates the end of slavery in the United States. 'I think of Juneteenth and what it means for our people and the continued fight for freedom and equality…that's part of what this [collection] represents,' Smith said. 'We're not asking for a handout or for anyone to give us anything. We're building our own supply chain so we can generate wealth and power ourselves.'


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Trump says he found a TikTok buyer
President Trump said in a Sunday interview that he has found a buyer for TikTok, the popular video-sharing app that Congress voted to ban if China-based parent company, ByteDance, did not divest from the platform. 'We have a buyer for TikTok, by the way,' Trump said in an interview on Fox News's 'Sunday Morning Futures' with Maria Bartiromo. 'I think I'll need probably China approval, and I think President Xi will probably do it,' he added. Asked who the buyer is, Trump said, 'I'll tell you in about two weeks.' The president added that the buyers are 'very, very wealthy people.' 'It's a group of very wealthy people.' The law requiring ByteDance to divest from the platform or face a ban on U.S. networks and app stores was signed by former President Biden last year. Trump signed an executive order earlier this month extending the divestiture deadline by 90 days. The new deadline is set for Sept. 17. The order instructed the Department of Justice not to enforce the law or impose penalties related to it, and it marked Trump's third extension since taking office in January. The Supreme Court upheld the divest-or-ban law in early January, prompting the measure to take effect January 19, the day before Trump was sworn in for his second term. The platform was brought back online hours later after Trump vowed to sign an executive order once back in office to give the company an extension. Trump made good on that promise, and his first order gave ByteDance 75 days beyond the January deadline to divest from the platform amid national security concerns. A deal was finalized by the White House in early April but was never completed amid Trump's tariff fight with China. The president then signed another executive order in April, extending the deadline by another 75 days, which was set to expire June 19, when he issued the most recent extension.


Forbes
3 hours ago
- Forbes
AI Export Shakeup: Strategic Imperatives For The C-Suite
Claudio Saes is a partner and telecom practice leader at Bell Labs Consulting, a group of the award-winning Nokia Bell Labs. In today's ever-changing technology landscape, regulatory shifts can alter competitive dynamics nearly overnight. On May 13, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce rescinded the Biden-era rule for AI diffusion. This export-control policy was designed to impose tiered restrictions on advanced AI chip exports. This policy reversal is set to reshape global AI markets, diplomatic relations and security strategies. As a result, corporate leaders will need to reassess their strategic priorities and risk profiles in real time. From Tiered Control To Targeted Agreements In early January, former President Biden introduced a framework for AI diffusion, classifying countries into three tiers: Tier 1 was most permissive for countries such as Japan, South Korea and Canada; Tier 2 imposed moderate restriction on countries such as Mexico, Brazil and India; and Tier 3 was most restrictive on countries such as China, Russia and Iran. The goal was "to keep advanced computing power in the United States and among its allies while finding more ways to block China's access," per Reuters. The Trump administration is moving away from a broad embargo and appears to be exploring customized bilateral agreements. The New York Times reported that the administration seems to be "interested in using A.I. chips to secure strategic bonds" in the Middle East. If this comes to fruition, this shift could signal a transition to a more streamlined, deal-oriented approach. While it could reduce bureaucratic complications and speed up market entry timelines for hardware vendors, it also introduces some uncertainty. Corporate executives will need to monitor diplomatic negotiations closely, as export privileges may depend on changing agreements between countries rather than fixed, published rules. Revenue Upside And Market Access Chipmakers like Nvidia and AMD now benefit from renewed access to restricted markets. Previous regulations limited exports to Tier 2 and Tier 3 countries, which some said risked the diversion of buyers to non-U.S. suppliers. With these controls rescinded, U.S. firms can gain market share in rapidly digitizing regions like Latin America and Southeast Asia, as well as access the largest AI markets in China and India. Stock markets responded swiftly: Nvidia's share price climbed by 3% on the day of the announcement, reflecting investor confidence in broader global sales prospects. For C-level leaders at technology companies, the challenge now is to recalibrate sales forecasts, re-engage international channels and scale production—while remaining vigilant to potential licensing requirements that might arise under the new bilateral framework. Accelerating Innovation Without Overheating By removing the specter of near-term export limits, we may see a fresh wave of research and development (R&D) investment and product development. Without the looming compliance deadlines and complexity of the tiered structure, engineering teams can focus on performance, integration and customer customization rather than regulatory paperwork. With fewer regulations in place, I believe the speed of AI advancement could surpass companies' ability to properly evaluate and secure their deployments. Corporate strategists need to consider the benefits of innovation against the risks of "overheating" in both market demand and technological development. It is essential to ensure that the rapid rollout of AI technology does not outstrip workforce readiness, graphics or tensor processing units and chipset availability. Diplomatic Ripples And Alliance Management The original tiered system received some pushback from U.S. partners who were assigned to more restrictive categories. By reversing these downgrades, the administration may reduce some political tensions and strengthen certain economic ties; however, not all allies may agree. It's possible that some could push for stricter controls and demand additional safeguards or specific clauses in bilateral agreements. Top executives should keep communication open with government affairs teams to anticipate objections from allies that could result in export vetoes or similar regulations. National Security And Supply Chain Vigilance The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace warned that lifting broad export caps without any type of replacement could result in offshoring AI development in countries that "offer generous subsidies, flexible regulations, and lower wages—but that do not share U.S. interests or values." This could, in turn, allow adversarial states to transform "intelligence and surveillance capabilities," develop "strategically significant weapons" and create "new cyber threats." As a result, corporate risk officers need to intensify supply chain diligence. It's crucial to screen partners and distributors for compliance with temporary licensing regimes, use AI analytics to identify unusual procurement patterns and strengthen internal controls to prevent unauthorized re-exports. Embracing Regulatory Uncertainty The policy reversal has created uncertainty regarding the replacement system. Companies now face a dilemma: Invest in capacity expansion, risking retroactive constraints or wait and potentially lose a first-mover advantage. To address this uncertainty, boards should form cross-functional teams of leaders from legal, finance, sales and R&D to explore different scenarios and develop contingency plans. Flexible contracts with suppliers, tiered hiring strategies and modular manufacturing can help businesses quickly adapt as new regulations emerge. Strategic Imperatives For The C-Suite 1. Reassess go-to-market plans. Update international sales and marketing road maps to capitalize on reopened markets while mapping out potential restrictions under forthcoming bilateral agreements. 2. Strengthen government engagement. Forge closer ties with trade negotiators and regulatory bodies to influence and anticipate the shape of replacement rules. 3. Elevate security posture. Boost supply-chain transparency and compliance monitoring, and consider using AI tools to flag suspicious orders or partner behaviors. 4. Build adaptive operations. Design production and hiring plans with elasticity, so capacity can ramp up or down in response to regulatory fluctuations. Looking Ahead The rescission of the AI diffusion rules marks a crucial shift in U.S. technology policy. The Trump administration said this move was intended to boost American innovation and global competitiveness, but this also raises national security questions and regulatory uncertainty. Executives need to act quickly to seize market opportunities while implementing careful risk management and adaptable strategies for future policy changes. Companies that achieve this balance can thrive in the rapidly evolving landscape of competitive AI innovation. Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?