First Home Improvements review: best installer for long-lasting quotes
In this First Home Improvements review, we look at one of the most established uPVC window installers in England. With a long-standing reputation, competitive pricing, and a rare two-year quote validity, First Home Improvements stands out as a top choice for homeowners — especially if you're comparing options based on UK window prices and the cost of double glazing.
Why choose First Home Improvements?
Area covered: Most of England, particularly the South and East.
Founded: 2008 (original business roots date back to the 1970s)
Guarantee: 12 years
Best for: Good reviews and long quote validity
First Home Improvements is one of the longest-standing names in the UK's window installation market, with roots in the 1970s and its current form established through a 2008 management buyout.
What sets First apart is its two-year quote validity, which is far longer than that of most competitors. This gives homeowners time to save or consider other options without losing their initial quote. It's one of the reasons why First made it onto our best double glazing companies list.
If you're looking for wooden or aluminium windows, First Home Improvements may not be the right choice — they focus solely on uPVC products. But for homeowners who prefer uPVC and aren't served by installers like Coral Windows or Britelite, First could be the best fit.
There's plenty of choice within the realm of uPVC, however, including casement, sash, tilt and turn and even Tudor windows. First Home Improvements also markets oval, triangle, round and arched windows. The company also offers a wide range of colours and textures, so there's no need to stick with white if you want a more contemporary look.
Its 12-year guarantee is one of the longest in the industry, and combined with competitive pricing, helped First Home Improvement place third in our UK window prices comparison.
In addition to windows, First also installs doors, porches and conservatories, and offers a handy online door designer tool, which is very useful if you can't get to a showroom.
Like many competitors, First Home Improvements often runs 30% off promotions, so it's worth timing your quote to coincide with these offers.
First Home Improvements also offers financing, but details on the website are limited. This often suggests higher-than-average rates, so it may be worth considering independent lenders.
For example, for loans of £7,500 to £20,000:
TSB offers 5.9% APR over 1–5 years
Novuna Personal Finance offers 6%
M&S Bank offers 6% over 1–7 years
Borrowing £10,000 over 7 years at 6% APR will cost around £2,271 in interest, with monthly repayments of £146.
Pros:
12 year-guarantee
Good reviews
Broad choice of uPVC styles and finishes
Cons:
No timber or aluminium products
Limited transparency on financing
What to look for in a quote
According to our research, the average three-bed house should cost about £4,500 to fit with new double-glazed uPVC windows, depending on location and window sizes.
It's important to haggle, perhaps more than many with other purchases. Windows are more of a buyers' market, since unless the panes themselves are broken, it's a purchase you can put off, at least for a little while.
This gives you the upper hand and allows some time to research the best price and options.
Depending on the installer and how tricky your installation is, you may be able to shave up to half off the initial quote you are given.
This may seem unlikely, but it's true. That's because many firms rely on Britons' general discomfort over asking for discounts to make expensive initial offers. They also rely on their competitors doing the same.
Smaller outfits that feel they need to be more competitive may not be able to drop by as much – use your judgement.
As well as this guide, it is also worth getting personal recommendations. If a company has done a good job at a fair price for a friend or colleague, they will probably do the same for you.
How we made this guide
We spoke to customers and fitters across the UK, as well as insiders in the double glazing market to find you the average prices for windows of all styles.
They gave us tips on how to negotiate and save money and they told us never to say yes to the first quote you are offered.
Why trust us?
The Independent has been reporting on green energy and climate matters since it was founded in 1986. Since then, we have written hundreds of reviews and news stories on energy, including the best window fitters, the best window finance and other guides on green power.
FAQs
While double glazing is the usual choice for a home outside of a heavily restricted planning area, triple glazing could be a good option for some buyers, especially those in windy locations or those on busy, noisy roads. Expect to pay 15-30 percent more than for double glazing.
These windows are heavier and available in fewer styles. Finding triple glazed windows in timber and aluminium is difficult.
What is the average cost for double glazing?
The average cost of a new set of eight uPVC windows for an average three-bedroom home in the UK is currently about £4,500, according to research by The Independent.
The price you will pay for a new set of double glazing depends heavily on the style, materials, colours and glazing type of your windows, together with how many you need and where you are in the country.
Most buyers opt for white uPVC, which is a type of plastic. It does not rust or rot, an advantage over wood, and it is cheaper than aluminium, the other popular low-maintenance material. It also doesn't bend like aluminium can.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of double glazing?
Pros:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The truth about Britain's 'dark economy': Map reveals how nearly 1,000 businesses were fined £37MILLION for hiring illegal workers last year
Nearly a thousand businesses the length and breadth of Britain were fined more than £37million for employing illegal workers last year. Firms received penalties of up to £360,000 as part of the clampdown, which exposes the vast size of the UK's 'dark economy'. The ability to work without papers is considered a major pull factor for migrants overstaying visas or arriving illegally on small boats and lorries. MailOnline used Home Office data covering the whole of 2024 to name and shame businesses that have been caught out. They range from car washes, barbers, salons, hotels and takeaways to haulage firms, care providers and home renovation services. The biggest fine of £360,000 was given to D&T Hand Car Wash in Leatherhead, followed by £280,000 for a south London real estate company called Arya Rae Ltd and £270,000 for nursing agency Wrexham Care in Staffordshire. Also among the top ten were two more car washes, two construction companies, a haulage firm, one care provider and one restaurant - Portofino in New Brighton, Merseyside. Fines issued by Immigration Enforcement teams totalled £37,625,000, although it is unclear how much of this money has been paid. Businesses found to be employing people illegally face fines of up to £45,000 per worker for the first offence and up to £60,000 per worker for repeat offenders. While many are small firms, inspectors have netted some major names, including the famous Royal China restaurant on London's Baker Street. The well-known eatery has paid fines totalling £470,000 after three visits by immigration officers between 2018 and 2024. At least 20 people were arrested during the raids, which found one staff member who was receiving an hourly rate of £6 while carrying out 66-hour weeks. The council later stripped the venue of its licence to serve alcohol - labelling it 'the worst licensed premises in Westminster'. The latest raid by the Home Office's Central London ICE (Immigration Compliance and Enforcement) took place on May 10 2024, with nine members of staff detained - almost a third of those on duty at the time. The Royal China Group was fined £360,000 on that occasion, with six Indonesian and two Malaysian men deemed to have overstayed visas, and a Chinese woman working in breach of hers. During a raid in Oldham, immigration Enforcement officers found makeshift shipping containers that had been turned into a kitchen and living room In June, the Home Office revealed its officers had visited more than 9,000 businesses in the previous 12 months for checks on paperwork and working conditions. More than 6,400 people were arrested during the raids. The Home Office said there were a range of industries exploiting migrant workers with businesses often subjecting migrants to 'squalid conditions and illegal working hours' and below-minimum wages. In one case, migrants were found living in appalling conditions inside shipping containers at a car salvage yard in Oldham, where they were paid just £2.33 an hour. The illegal workers, from Malaysia, Lithuania and Belarus, were working between 50 and 60 gruelling hours a week. Officers found makeshift sleeping cabins, fitted with small beds and bathrooms, as well as shipping containers that had been turned into a kitchen and living room. Immigration officials said the migrants were promised accommodation and three meals a day - but once these costs were deducted it is suspected they only received £500 a month, or £2.33 per hour. Last year, MailOnline witnessed more than 30 officers raiding a bedding and mattress factory before making a dozen arrests. Specialist immigration enforcement teams in six vans surrounded the large warehouse near Tipton in the West Midlands before rushing in just after 10am. Several workers started running away after spotting the officers and tried to hide between timber pallets and piles of mattresses before they were handcuffed. The name of the business, Giomani Designs, was on a sign outside, and its products - which include leather beds and outdoor rattan furniture - were sold direct to consumers online. Officers interviewed all the men at the factory before arresting seven Indian men for suspected illegal working. Those found to be legally employed were allowed to return to their shift.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Everton sell their women's team to parent company to splash the cash and ease PSR headache - following Chelsea and Aston Villa in controversial move
Everton have sold their women's team to their parent company in a move which will allow them to splash the cash on new signings and stave off profitability concerns. Records on Companies House, first reported by The Times, show that Everton Football Club Women Ltd has been transferred to a company called Roundhouse Capital Holdings, which is controlled by Everton's owner, businessman Dan Friedkin. Roundhouse was the firm The Friedkin Group used to buy the club in December. Insiders have reportedly said the move will help to ensure the women's team is a standalone entity capable of attracting its own investment from the United States. They accept, however, that it will also help the Toffees comply with PSR. Everton have become the third Premier League side to make the most of a controversial law which allows clubs to sell assets, such as their women's team, to related entities and then record the profit in their PSR calculations. Chelsea and Aston Villa were the first to take advantage of this particular ruling. However, both these clubs subsequently breached UEFA's stricter financial rules, which seek to deter teams from shifting around assets in this manner. According to The Times, the Premier League have vehemently insisted the law is not a loophole because they conduct rigorous fair value assessments. Everton were previously deducted six points for breaching PSR in the 2021-22 campaign and two points for a breach in 2022-23. Football finance expert Kieran Maguire, via The Times, said Chelsea's eyebrow-raising sale of their women's team for £200m, ten times their annual revenue, means Everton could put a valuation of £60m on their own women's side. The Toffees lost 3-0 to Bournemouth in their opening Premier League Summer Series match, leaving David Moyes to rue a lack of signings this summer. He said: 'Yes, but let's be fair, it's not just players missing. We need to sign a lot of players and we're hugely aware that we need to bring a bunch of new players in. 'I wish we could have had them earlier because it would have helped us now and helped us prepare them for the team. 'We're fully aware that we've come here with a really limited squad and numbers and quite a few injuries as well.'
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
We bought the retirement caravan of our dreams but it turned into a financial nightmare... now we're £150k out of pocket and working three jobs just to stay afloat
A British grandmother and grandfather claim to have been left £150,000 out of pocket after buying a 'nightmare' caravan purchase they say has 'ruined' their lives. Lisa and Robert Colvin-Jones bought a caravan by the sea after downsizing their home, with the aim to make memories with their grandson and to rent it out when they are not there. However, the purchase has turned into a financial nightmare for the pair, aged 55 and 56 respectively, with alleged hidden costs and other fees. The couple say they have to work three jobs between them just to stay afloat. They have only stayed in the caravan for three days in 2024 and not at all in 2025 - earning just £500 in rent across 32 weeks. 'We could not have known this would be the start of a financial nightmare that is still ruining our lives today,' Lisa said. 'Robert and I are forced to work three jobs between us because of the financial hole [this] has left us in. 'It is not where we wanted to be at this stage in our lives. 'What should have been a simple, peaceful family investment has instead turned into a huge financial loss with misleading information, hidden fees and false promises at every turn. 'Our trust has been completely betrayed. We feel trapped and hope that sharing our story will prevent others from falling into the same trap.' The pair visited Sea Bay Resort park in West Sussex in September 2021. Lisa, a full-time carer, from Sussex, was going through serious medical issues at the time of the purchase and having a relaxing family retreat seemed 'just the ticket'. The salesperson showed them the 2019 ABI Ambleside caravan for £89,995. They claim to have been reassured that it was a 'platinum' standard home - the highest earning rental classification - and when not using it themselves, they could potentially earn a significant income from it. A £10,000 deposit was put down and the remainder was financed. However, soon after they got the keys, the pair realised a veranda would be needed for the safety of Lisa's father, who suffers from COPD. After finding a reputable contractor, who would do the job for £6,000, the couple claim to have been informed by Seal Bay that they were only allowed to use a 'park approved' contractor to the tune of £11,000. Lisa said: 'We were also contractually bound to buy our gas bottles directly from the park at £105 per bottle. Elsewhere, the same bottle costs around £80. 'Electricity similarly has to be purchased from the park in fixed blocks with no transparency or control. 'We were not allowed to install cheaper, green options like solar panels.' To help recover some costs, the pair tried to rent out the caravan but soon discovered that their supposed 'platinum' mobile home was actually 'gold plus' - meaning less rental rate and booking volume. And when they did get renters in, their energy bills surged. To add insult to injury, they were then hit with an increase in ground rent - despite allegedly being told that fees had remained consistent for years. In 2023, another salesperson suggested upgrading to a caravan they could rent out more easily - and for more money - costing a further £25,000. Lisa said: 'We were promised the new unit would generate £20,000 plus in annual rental income. '[Obviously, we were] hesitant after our previous experiences but we felt like we had no other options. 'We were desperate.' But, there was a hidden cost - it needed a larger pitch, increasing their ground rent from £6,500 to £7,500 per year. There was also no path across the wet grass and to have one fitted, it would cost £899 for nine flat stones using the park's approved contractor. Lisa and Robert, who works in IT and baggage handling at an airport, claim the slabs were already in place, but were removed for the caravan, meaning they had to pay to put them back. The final straw came when they tried to sell the caravan back to the park, who could only offer them £24,100 - an 80 per cent loss. Lisa added: 'Our grandson loved the caravan holidays we did have and we tried so hard to make it work. 'But the costs are just unworkable. 'When we did manage to rent out the caravan, the park held onto the money for months and there was little left over after the bills. 'We lose money every month. 'Other people who sold back to the park have told us that their caravans went straight back on the market for full value. 'We looked into selling privately but Seal Bay told us that if we didn't sell to them, then they would charge the new owners an extra £500 a year in ground rent - effectively making private sales impossible. 'Overall, we were given drastically unrealistic expectations around costs and rental income.' Greg Wilson, CEO of European Consumer Claims (ECC), said: 'Sadly, the Colvin-Jones' experience are by no means unique. 'Misleading sales presentations are totally unacceptable when life changing amounts of money are involved. 'Inflated, hidden and monopolistic costs are reported right across the industry, and we at ECC are leading a nationwide call for the government to introduce legislation to protect people like Lisa and Robert.' Jack Irvine, who represents Seal Bay Resort park, said: 'I would stress that Seal Bay as a matter of company policy tries to treat all clients in a fair and honest manner and the allegations are totally alien to everything we do.'
