logo
Sinking of MSC Elsa-3: Kerala files admiralty suit seeking ₹9,531-crore compensation for marine pollution, economic loss to fishers

Sinking of MSC Elsa-3: Kerala files admiralty suit seeking ₹9,531-crore compensation for marine pollution, economic loss to fishers

The Hindu07-07-2025
The Kerala government on Monday moved an admiralty suit in the High Court against the vessel MSC Akiteta-2, which is owned by MSC Shipping Company, as security for a ₹9,531-crore compensation claim for marine and coastal pollution , the subsequent loss of livelihood caused to fishers, and the 'remediation' measures following the sinking of the company's container vessel MSC Elsa-3 off the Alappuzha coast on May 25.
Following this, the court ordered interim arrest of MSC Akiteta-2, currently berthed at the Vizhinjam port, till July 10. The admiralty suit was filed before the Bench of Justice M.A. Abdul Hakim by Advocate General K. Gopalakrishna Kurup who was assisted by government pleader Parvathy Kottol, citing the grave environmental, ecological, and economic damage due to the sinking of the vessel. The maritime compensation has been sought under the Admiralty (Jurisdiction and Settlement of Maritime Claims) Act, 2017.
Harmful nurdles
Among others, the vessel was carrying over 643 containers, which included hazardous cargo and plastic pellets known as 'nurdles'. The subsequent oil slick and floating cargo is a serious threat to not only coastal fisheries but to public health. As on June 30, a total of 61 containers washed ashore and about 60 tonnes of plastic nurdles were collected as part of the clean-up operations by over 600 government personnel and 300 volunteers.
Fisheries sector hit
The fisheries market has suffered a severe crash due to the fear of contamination, while six carcasses, including of dolphins and a whale that are suspected to have died due to exposure to microplastics and toxic substances from the vessel, were found washed ashore. This has in turn affected the coastal economy and public confidence, says the admiralty suit, while claiming ₹8,626.12 crore for the damage due to pollution, ₹378.48 crore to restore the environment and ₹526.51 crore for economic loss to fishers.
The government further submitted that the sunken ship and MSC Akiteta-2 are sister ships under a common operator, despite their registration under different shell companies. This shows a pattern of deliberate corporate structuring to defeat potential claims and this structure is a fraudulent device to frustrate maritime claim enforcement.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Four accused in rape and abetment of suicide of schoolgirl sent to magisterial custody
Four accused in rape and abetment of suicide of schoolgirl sent to magisterial custody

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Four accused in rape and abetment of suicide of schoolgirl sent to magisterial custody

Kolhapur: A Sangli court sent four accused of allegedly raping and abetting the suicide of a 16-year-old girl to 14 days' magisterial custody after their five-day police custody ended on Monday. The girl committed suicide in the early hours of Monday last week. Her father lodged a complaint that evening, alleging that four from the village were harassing her while she was on her way to school. He said they raped her and recorded the incident. She was threatened with the video being made public if she refused further sexual relations. A senior police official in Sangli said, "We have gathered all technical evidence, including digital video recorder of CCTV cameras. The technical evidence will be sent to a Kolhapur-based forensic laboratory. We asked for magisterial custody, requesting the right to obtain police custody whenever required." Police said a preliminary examination of the victim's cell phone revealed that the suspects were repeatedly calling her until 11.30 pm on Sunday, prompting the girl to switch off her mobile phone. All the suspects are in the 20-24 years age group. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Cách giao dịch ETH/USD mà không cần nắm giữ Ether IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo One of them runs a bakery in the village, another works in the bakery, one is a farmer, and the fourth runs a garage, Kamble said. A case of offences punishable under sections 64 (2) (m) (raping the same woman repeatedly), 74 (outraging the modesty of a woman), and 78 (stalking and attempting to contact a woman despite rejection) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and sections 4 and 6 (both related to sexual assault) and 12 (sexual harassment) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POSCO) Act has been registered in this connection.

Centre questions maintainability of PFI's plea against ban in Delhi HC
Centre questions maintainability of PFI's plea against ban in Delhi HC

India Gazette

time2 hours ago

  • India Gazette

Centre questions maintainability of PFI's plea against ban in Delhi HC

New Delhi [India], July 14 (ANI): The Central government on Monday objected to the legal validity of a petition on maintainability ground filed by the Popular Front of India (PFI) in the Delhi High Court, challenging the confirmation of a five-year ban imposed on the organization under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). During the hearing, the Additional Solicitor General (ASG) S V Raju, representing the Centre, argued that the petition was not maintainable under Articles 226 or 227 of the Constitution. He submitted that the tribunal upholding the ban was led by a sitting High Court judge, and therefore, any challenge to its order should be made under Article 136 in the Supreme Court, not in the High Court. The ASG also stated that the authority of a High Court judge presiding over a tribunal does not fall under the purview of subordinate courts. PFI's counsel countered by referencing a previous ruling by a division bench of the High Court, which, according to them, allows the petition to be heard. However, the bench comprising Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela decided to re-list the matter for further arguments, listing the next hearing on August 7. The court has not yet issued a formal notice on the petition. PFI's petition contests the tribunal's order from March 2024, which affirmed the Centre's September 2022 decision to ban the organisation and its affiliates for allegedly engaging in terrorist activities and promoting communal hatred. The Ministry of Home Affairs declared PFI and its linked groups--including the Campus Front of India, Rehab India Foundation, and National Women's Front--as 'unlawful associations' under UAPA. The government cited extensive evidence, including video materials and testimony from over 100 witnesses, to justify the ban. It claimed connections between PFI and other proscribed groups such as ISIS, SIMI, and Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh (JMB), along with involvement in financing terrorism, executing targeted killings, and destabilising public order. Following the crackdown in September 2022, more than 150 individuals reportedly linked to PFI were detained across India. (ANI)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store