Receive a random package you didn't order? You may be a victim of a ‘brushing' scheme — here's how it works
'I did think that maybe someone in my family was playing a joke on me, that they were telling me that I needed to eat healthier,' Simmons shared with WSB-TV Atlanta.
Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast)
Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10)
But the package wasn't a joke. Simmons, as he would come to learn, had unwillingly become the target of a scam known as 'brushing.' The scheme is reportedly designed to exploit consumer data and manipulate online product reviews, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service (USPIS) reports.
And while that may seem fairly harmless, USPIS has issued a warning to Americans across the country: if you receive a package that you didn't order, do not scan any QR codes that come with it.
The brushing scam involves third-party sellers on e-commerce platforms that send unsolicited, low-value items to random people whose names and addresses were found online.
Once the item is shipped, the scammers leave fake five-star reviews online using the recipient's name, or a fake profile made to resemble the recipient. The goal is to make the seller's products appear popular and highly rated in order to gain more visibility and sales.
'They didn't order anything, they received it, and it's generally a household item, a low-value item,' said U.S. Postal Inspector David Gealey. 'They have your personal information, which is easy to get because they can just Google a name and address. It's out there on the web, right?'
Although the brushing scam might not directly lead to a financial loss, it signals that your personal information — such as your name and address — is being used without your knowledge. And that personal information could be circulating on unsecured databases or among bad actors online.
All of this would be cause for concern, but the dangers of this scam can become a lot more severe if the target does not exercise caution.
Read more: You're probably already overpaying for this 1 'must-have' expense — and thanks to Trump's tariffs, your monthly bill could soar even higher. Here's how 2 minutes can protect your wallet right now
Postal inspectors say the real danger comes when these packages include a QR code, which urges recipients to scan for more information or to confirm the delivery. These codes can lead to malicious websites that steal personal data, install malware or phish for sensitive information.
'We do caution customers: do not scan any QR code on the package because sometimes that QR code can lead to a malicious site,' Gealey warned.
Fortunately, Simmons' package did not contain a QR code. However, he still took a few necessary steps to protect himself and ensure his Amazon and banking accounts hadn't been compromised.
Receiving an unexpected package could indicate that your personal information is being misused. Here's what USPIS recommends.
Do not scan QR codes: As we discussed above, scanning QR codes from unreliable sources can bring on a heap of trouble that could lead to stolen personal data or harmful malware installed on your device(s).
Do not return the item: You are not legally obligated to return unsolicited items. Simply keeping or discarding the package is safe, but don't follow any instructions that came with it.
Check your financial accounts: Review your online bank and credit card statements, as well as your online shopping profiles and Amazon account activity immediately to ensure that your accounts haven't been hacked.
Report the package: Notify your local police department, USPIS and/or the Federal Trade Commission about the unsolicited package. Reporting the package can help authorities with their investigation and can potentially prevent others from becoming a victim.
Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it
Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead
Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now
Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you?
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
10 hours ago
- USA Today
July 4th fireworks 2025: What's the minimum age to buy fireworks?
The July 4th holiday is typically a time for family gatherings, barbecues, and of course, fireworks. While many cities and towns, big and small, set off professional pyrotechnics to celebrate Independence Day, Americans have a long tradition of buying their own fireworks. Unlike the more powerful explosives, which are federally regulated, each state gets to decide if selling fireworks is legal. Age restrictions for purchasing fireworks vary widely across the U.S., ranging from no age limits to a maximum of 21 to know about buying fireworks, and at what age. More: Fireworks injuries were way up last year. How to protect yourself this year. How old do you have to be to buy fireworks? Only two states, Maine and New Hampshire, require buyers of fireworks to be 21 years of age or older, according to the American Pyrotechnics Association. But in most states, the age requirement to purchase fireworks is 18. This includes: Alaska, Arizona, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Minnesota, Montana, New York, Ohio, South Dakota, Virginia, West Virginia and states, however, do allow 16-year-olds to purchase fireworks: Alabama, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Louisiana, Michigan, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah and minimum age to buy fireworks in Missouri is 14, and in four states: Arkansas, Mississippi, North Dakota and Oklahoma, 12-year-olds are allowed to purchase Pennsylvania, Washington, DC, Wisconsin and Wyoming have no age restrictions, but local ordinances usually require that an adult (over the age of 18) be present. Which state has banned fireworks? Since 1943, Massachusetts has banned the possession, use, and sale of fireworks by individuals without a license. The state's regulations only allow fireworks at public, permitted events. Also, the law prohibits fireworks bought and transported from other states to Massachusetts. Any safety tips for handling fireworks? In 2024, there were 11 fireworks-related deaths, mainly due to misuse and malfunctions, according to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). Injuries rose sharply to an estimated 14,700, a 38% increase in deaths and 52% in injuries compared to 2023. About 1,700 of these injuries involved sparklers and required emergency room treatment. 'Behind these numbers are real people, real families — and often, preventable incidents,' said CPSC Acting Chairman Peter Feldman in a June 25 statement. 'Fireworks injuries don't just happen on the Fourth of July. We urge everyone to celebrate responsibly — because safety must always come first.'
New York Post
10 hours ago
- New York Post
Revealed: Chilling step-by-step account of Bryan Kohberger's blood-lust murders of 4 Idaho students
Bryan Kohberger's first two victims were sleeping when he stole into the off-campus house in Moscow, Idaho around 4 a.m. Nov. 13, 2022. Best friends Maddy Mogen and Kaylee Goncalves were in bed together as he butchered them with a Ka-Bar knife he had bought months earlier on Amazon, prosecutors revealed Wednesday. Prosecuting Attorney Bill Thompson choked up as he summarized the details that a weeks-long trial would have revealed about the cold-blooded and ruthless blood-lust murders that Kohberger admitted to on Wednesday. Advertisement His guilty plea — which has divided the victims' families, including the Mogens and the Goncalveses — means Thompson's run-down of the evidence may be the best picture the world ever gets of what happened inside that home near the University of Idaho campus. Thompson suggested that Kohberger may have been plotting the senseless quadruple homicide for nearly six months. 'He killed — intentionally, willfully, deliberately, with premeditation, and with malice and forethought — Maddy Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Ethan Chapin, and Xana Kernodle,' prosecutor Thompson told a Boise courtroom Wednesday before Kohberger, 30, formally submitted his guilty plea. 6 Bryan Kohberger, 30, pleaded guilty for four counts of first degree homicide in a Boise courtroom Wednesday. AP Advertisement Kohberger's deal means he'll be safe from execution by firing squad — on the table if he were found guilty at a trial which was scheduled for August — but he will spend his life in prison serving four consecutive life terms without the possibility of parole. The shocking confession comes as the prosecution amassed piles of damning evidence that pointed directly at Kohberger, which Thompson laid out in bare detail ahead of the plea Wednesday. It all started in March 2022, when Kohberger was living at his parents' Pennsylvania home and logged onto to buy a military-grade Ka Bar knife and sheath — the same blade he would go on to hack his victims to death with eight months later. Advertisement He then moved to Pullman, Washington — located minutes from the Moscow, Idaho, murder site — in June to pursue a PhD in criminology at Washington State University. By early July, six months before the murders, Kohberger's phone began pinging off the cell tower that served the house — but only during odd hours of the night. 6 The University of Idaho victims (clockwise from bottom left): Kaylee Goncalves, 21, Madison Mogen, 21, Ethan Chapin, 20, and Xana Kernodle, 20. Between July and the night of the November murders, Kohberger's phone pinged off that tower 23 times between the hours of 10 p.m. and 4 a.m., prosecutors said, adding that there was no evidence he ever had any direct contact with his victims during that time. Advertisement But on the day of the killing Kohberger's phone was powered off in Pullman around 2 a.m. before being turned back in the Moscow area just before 5 a.m. — disappearing from the cellular grid at the exact time he was hacking his victims to death. During that blackout window he drove his White Hyundai from his Pullman apartment and parked it behind the victims' Moscow house, prosecutors said. Evidence like security footage clearly showed the vehicle. Wearing a dark face mask he slipped into the home using the kitchen's sliding door around 4 a.m. He then climbed to the home's third floor where he used his seven-inch Ka Bar blade to butcher Mogen and Goncalves — both 21-year-old college seniors — as they slept alongside each other. There he left the knife's sheath. It had his DNA on it, which would later ensure his downfall. 6 Prosecutor Bill Thompson nearly broke down in tears as he read the names of Kohberger's victims in court. August Frank/Tribune Kohberger then stole out of the room when he encountered 20-year-old Kernodle on the stairs. She had been awake after picking up a food delivery, and he cut her down and left her dying where she stood. 'Her room was not on the third floor, it was on the second floor,' Thompson said, his voice shaking. 'He encountered Xana, and he ended up killing her, also with a large knife.' Kohberger then moved into her bedroom where her boyfriend — 20-year-old Chapin — was sleeping, and butchered him. Advertisement 'We will not represent that he intended to commit all of the murders that he did that night, but we know that that is what resulted,' Thompson said. 6 Kohberger dodged the death penalty with his guilty plea, but will spend his life in prison no possibility of parole. AP As Kohberger was leaving the house one of the two housemates who were left alive and untouched peered into a hallway and saw a man with 'bushy eyebrows' exiting the home. From there a neighbor's security footage showed Kohberger's car peeling out of the neighborhood, and cell records indicate he was back home in Pullman around 5:30 a.m. He then drove back to his victims' home around 9 a.m., cell records show, but by 9:30 a.m. he was back home and taking a bizarre photo of himself flashing a thumbs up in his apartment bathroom. Advertisement From there, he began desperately trying to cover his tracks. Over the next days he took a trip to Lewiston, Idaho — a town prosecutors noted was filled with rivers and fast-moving water. They believe that's where he dumped the murder weapon, which was never found. He also began searching online for another knife and sheath, and tried in vain to delete his purchase history on Amazon. He also changed his car's registration from Pennsylvania to Idaho in an apparent attempt to throw investigators off his trail, Thompson said. Advertisement Then he carried on with his life. 'Mr. Kohberger proceeded to finish his semester of studies at Washington State University and return to Pennsylvanian for the holidays,' Thompson said. 6 Kohberger parked his car outside of the Moscow, Idaho, home during the murders, and was seen peeling out after. Kevin C. Downs for NY Post But in the weeks following, investigators began to identify him as a suspect. Advertisement After searching his parents' trash, were able to pull DNA off a Q-Tip that tests proved was was related to the DNA was found on the sheath left by Mogen's bloodied body. Kohberger was arrested soon after, and the full scope of his attempts to hide his crimes became apparent as they began to search his home and belongings. 'Spartan would be a kind characterization, there was virtually nothing there,' Thompson said of Kohberger's Pullman apartment. And his car had been 'pretty much disassembled internally,' Thompson added, characterizing it as being scrubbed absurdly clean. 6 AP 'I think we can all look to our own cars. Those compartments in the doors where you try to keep them clean where you put stuff? There's always some degree of crud in there – they were spotless,' Thompson said. 'Defendant's car had been meticulously cleaned inside.' Prosecutors said evidence indicated Kohberger had even called on his criminology studies to cover up the crime, explaining he had recently written a paper on crime scene analysis. 'That was part of the defendant's plan in covering up this. The defendant has studied crime. In fact, he did a detailed paper on crime scene processing when he was working on his pre-doctorate degree,' Thompson said. 'He had that knowledge and skill,' he added. Despite the laundry list of evidence, it still remains unclear why Kohberger carried out the killings — and his guilty plea means the world may never know as has no legal obligation to provide a motive. His sentencing is set for July 23. Kohberger will have an opportunity to speak after listening to victim impact statements, though it is unclear if he will say anything.
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump Declares War on Los Angeles Following ICE Protests
The Trump administration has sued the City of Los Angeles for discriminating against federal immigration officers. President Donald Trump's Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a lawsuit Monday against Los Angeles, its mayor Karen Bass, and the Los Angeles City Council for 'illegal' sanctuary city policies that it says 'deliberately impede federal immigration officers' ability to carry out their responsibilities.' This move comes weeks after the city erupted in protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids. These protests quickly turned violent following Trump's decision to deploy thousands of California National Guard troops to Los Angeles without notifying California Gov. Gavin Newsom or Bass. The lawsuit claimed that Los Angeles' refusal to cooperate with federal immigration authorities resulted in 'lawlessness, rioting, looting, and vandalism,' causing the situation to become 'so dire' that the California National Guard and U.S. Marines had to be deployed to the city. 'A direct confrontation with federal immigration authorities was the inevitable outcome of the Sanctuary City law,' the suit stated. Yet a lawsuit filed over a week ago accusing Kristi Noem's Department of Homeland Security (DHS) of being violent towards peaceful protestors claimed that the administration 'used the violent spectacle created by DHS as a reason to commandeer the National Guard and send the United States Marines into California, which in turn has generated more widespread protests.' This did not stop Attorney General Pam Bondi from blaming sanctuary city policies for the violence. 'Sanctuary policies were the driving cause of the violence, chaos, and attacks on law enforcement that Americans recently witnessed in Los Angeles,' Bondi said in a DOJ press release Monday. 'Jurisdictions like Los Angeles that flout federal law by prioritizing illegal aliens over American citizens are undermining law enforcement at every level—it ends under President Trump,' she added. In its suit, the DOJ said the City of Los Angeles was violating the supremacy clause, which says that state judges are bound to the federal law of the land. It noted that the supremacy clause 'prohibits the City of Los Angeles and its officials from singling out the Federal Government for adverse treatment—as the challenged law and policies do—thereby discriminating against the Federal Government.' Some examples listed of how these policies 'intentionally' discriminate against federal immigration agents were: restricting access to property and individual detainees, forbidding contractors and sub-contractors from providing information to agents, and 'disfavoring federal criminal laws that the City of Los Angeles has decided not to comply with.' The suit said that the Los Angeles Ordinance and other policies 'intentionally obstruct the sharing of information envisioned by Congress, thereby impairing federal apprehension and detention of removable aliens, including dangerous criminals, as required by federal law.' It also said that these 'obstructionist Sanctuary City laws' prevent Los Angeles law enforcement from helping federal immigration to take 'removable aliens' into custody. 'The preferences of the City of Los Angeles notwithstanding, Congress made an explicit policy choice that such removals can be effectuated by civil arrest warrants for immigration enforcement,' it said. U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli for the Central District of California said that 'the United States Constitution's Supremacy Clause prohibits the City from picking and choosing which federal laws will be enforced and which will not.' 'By assisting removable aliens in evading federal law enforcement, the City's unlawful and discriminatory ordinance has contributed to a lawless and unsafe environment that this lawsuit will help end,' he said.
