TRENDS symposium discusses 'Islamist Separatism in Europe', proposes solutions to dismantle extremist ideologies
Abu Dhabi (Aletihad)Participants in the seminar 'Islamist Separatism in Europe: Challenges and Solutions', organized by TRENDS Research & Advisory at the Salle d'Honneur at the Grand Palais in Paris, unanimously stressed the danger of separatist tendencies adopted by extremist groups and terrorist movements — foremost among them the Muslim Brotherhood. They warned that these tendencies lead to the spread of violence, division, extremism and hatred, contributing to the erosion of national and societal unity.During the symposium, which was moderated by Hamad Al-Hosani, Senior Researcher and Head of Political Islam Studies at TRENDS — held as part of the center's research tour in France and on the sidelines of its participation in the Paris International Book Fair — intellectuals, experts and specialists called for the dismantling of extremist groups' ideas and ideologies, supporting values of tolerance and coexistence, and strengthening international cooperation in this regard. They emphasized the importance of confronting these narratives intellectually, by expanding scientific and academic analysis to deconstruct their discourse and concepts.The symposium was attended by His Excellency Dr. Mohammed Hamad Al Kuwaiti, Head of the UAE Government Cyber Security Council; His Excellency Fahad Saeed Al Raqbani, UAE Ambassador to France; as well as a wide array of thinkers, experts, writers, journalists and scholars interested in the study of political Islamist groups, extremism and terrorism.
Extremist IdeologiesDr. Mohammed Abdullah Al-Ali, CEO of TRENDS Research & Advisory, opened the symposium discussions with a welcoming address, emphasizing that extremist groups — particularly Islamist groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood — threaten the cohesion and security of societies through the propagation of extremist ideas and ideologies.He noted that, since its inception, TRENDS has committed itself to combating extremism and deconstructing the rhetoric of terrorist groups, especially the Muslim Brotherhood, through scientific and intellectual analysis aimed at dismantling their concepts and ideologies, and offering effective recommendations and solutions for confronting them intellectually.
The Danger of Separatist TendenciesDr. Al-Ali pointed out that many nations, intellectuals and opinion leaders have begun to recognize the danger of Brotherhood ideology to their societies, particularly as the group seeks to monopolize religious discourse. France and the UAE are at the forefront of this effort, working to neutralize extremist elements and ensure religious narratives that promote tolerance, openness and coexistence. This reflects an awareness of the threat posed by the separatist tendencies promoted by the Muslim Brotherhood, which undermine national unity and social harmony and spread hatred.He stressed that intellectuals, opinion leaders and governments should be more engaged in countering the dangers of extremist rhetoric — particularly from the Muslim Brotherhood, which has sought to establish an alternative, ideologically-driven religious identity that fosters an 'emotional estrangement' from their communities and countries, fueling a desire to overturn societal values and destabilize social cohesion.
Politicizing ReligionFor his part, Imam Hassen Chalghoumi, President of the Conference of Imams of France and Imam of Drancy Mosque in Seine-Saint-Denis, spoke about 'The role of religious leaders in confronting Islamist separatism'. He explained that protecting societies from the politicization of religion and the danger of the Muslim Brotherhood is a collective responsibility that requires cooperation among researchers, policymakers and academic and intellectual institutions.He stressed the need for strengthening parental oversight and raising awareness among families about the methods used by the Muslim Brotherhood to recruit and brainwash youth.Chalghoumi noted that the religious discourse promoted by the Muslim Brotherhood is a politically motivated, aggressive rhetoric filled with hatred, incitement and rejection of coexistence. He called for reforming this discourse and turning religious platforms into channels for disseminating Islam's authentic values, mutual respect, peaceful integration and shared living. He pointed out that more than 1,700 websites in Europe connected to political Islam and the Muslim Brotherhood promote the group's ideology, targeting youth and posing a direct threat to intellectual and social security — a challenge requiring immediate and effective confrontation.
Analyzing Ideological Phenomena Marek Halter, French writer, artist and human rights activist, spoke about the connections between separatism and terrorism. He emphasized the importance of the intellectual and awareness-raising role played by think tanks in dismantling extremist and terrorist rhetoric. He stressed that it is the responsibility of these institutions to analyze ideological phenomena and educate societies about the dangers of religious extremism.Halter asserted that Islam is a great religion, but extremism corrodes it from within. He added that moderate Islam must liberate itself from this malignant extremism, as extremist groups — especially the Muslim Brotherhood — use religion as a cover for their political ambitions, spreading division among nations and threatening the stability of societies and states by fomenting internal discord.
Complex Organizational NetworksDr. Florence Bergeaud-Blackler, President of the European Center for Research and Information on Freemasonry (CERIF), addressed the spread and dangers of Brotherhood-driven separatism in Europe. She explained that the emergence of the Muslim Brotherhood in Europe resulted from the gradual internationalization of Egypt's Brotherhood movement. Over time, it evolved through the development of highly organized and complex networks, establishing links with other extremist groups and movements seeking to undermine human rights values and 'Islamize' society.She highlighted that the Muslim Brotherhood's activities in Europe have raised significant concerns regarding social integration and radicalization, underscoring the importance of understanding the group's objectives and strategies. Such an understanding, she noted, can contribute to the development of effective policies and plans to confront the challenges posed by the Brotherhood and its offshoot organizations within European societies.
Undermining DemocracyShannon Seban, President of the Renaissance Party in the Seine-Saint-Denis region, argued that Islamist separatism is not a religious issue, but a political and ideological project — a deliberate attempt by a radical minority to reject the law, undermine democracy, and spread intimidation and fear. She stressed that this tiny minority does not represent the nearly two billion peaceful, law-abiding Muslims around the world.
Seban emphasized that the spread of Islamist separatist ideology weakens social cohesion, fosters extremism and violence, and fuels division and populism. She called for greater transparency in the funding of religious institutions, proper training for imams in Europe, and support for associations defending women's rights and civil liberties. Additionally, she advocated empowering teachers and social workers — the first line of defense against extremism — and investing in education to raise a generation capable of critical thinking and resilient against ideological manipulation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
2 days ago
- Middle East Eye
Why Sudanese people are losing faith in the 'government of hope'
When former UN official Kamil Idris was sworn in as Sudan's new prime minister this spring, he became the first person to hold the position in a permanent capacity since Abdalla Hamdok resigned in January 2022 amid ongoing political turmoil. His appointment by Sudanese army chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan elicited a polarised response. Proponents viewed it as a potential turning point in Sudan's democratic transition, citing Idris's political independence, technocratic expertise, and established ties with international organisations. They argued that his non-partisan background would help in navigating Sudan's complex transitional landscape. Sceptics, meanwhile, questioned the legitimacy of an unelected leader, arguing that his appointment - as opposed to a popular mandate - could constrain his autonomy. Critics have also pointed to the persistence of military influence, suggesting that Idris might function as a civilian proxy, with his authority circumscribed. This perspective underscores broader apprehensions about the deep involvement of the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) in politics - a role that contradicts the principle of a military remaining neutral in governance. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters While not all observers may recognise this dynamic, analysts, and those closely following Sudanese politics, note SAF's entrenched influence in political life. Furthermore, during the ongoing conflict in Sudan this politicisation of the army has led to suggestions about the close connections with the Islamist-led regime which had been overthrown by the revolution of 2018/2019. There is heightened skepticism about whether Sudan's current transition will produce a genuinely inclusive civilian government, or if military-backed structures will continue to shape power behind the scenes, and therefore the risks of a facade of civilian rule without substantive democratisation. Idris faces multiple challenges, chief among them the ongoing war between the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which has raged since April 2023, severely destabilising Sudan's economy and social cohesion. Forming a new government was his first hurdle. Last month, Idris unveiled plans for a non-partisan, technocratic "government of hope" - a move that swiftly drew criticism from key political factions, who accused him of sidelining major civilian coalitions that had been instrumental in resisting military rule. Escalating tensions Although Idris has vowed to convene an inclusive dialogue with Sudan's political and social stakeholders, this initiative faces significant challenges, as some parties contest the legitimacy of his appointment and decry his government as unrepresentative of their interests. Notably, the Sudanese Congress Party, the Socialist Arab Ba'ath Party, and Somood, the Civil Democratic Alliance (CDA) led by the former Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok. The latter was a product of the fragmentation of Taqadum, a civilian coalition formed in early 2024 of specific political actors from the Forces of Freedom and Change (FFC). Eventually, Tadadum split with two movements emerging; some FFC members joined Somood under Hamdok's leadership while others joined the Sudan Founding Alliance (Ta'sis), championed by RSF leader Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo (Hemeti). By forming an alliance with the latter, these civilian political actors rejected the authority of the Idris-led government. For its part, Somood has opted instead to engage directly with warring factions, circumventing the government based in Port Sudan. Tensions had been escalating since Idris dissolved the previous caretaker government in early June. Signatories of the Juba Peace Agreement protested the move, viewing it as an erosion of their negotiated gains. The dispute revolves around an article in the Juba agreement that had guaranteed signatories a 25-percent share of executive authority throughout the transitional period established by the Constitutional agreement of August 2019. Critics argue that the Juba deal has failed to address broader societal demands or to resolve persistent on-the-ground grievances, intensifying calls for its revision or scrapping. But ignoring its safeguards would erode trust in political settlements, destabilise the transition, and undermine national unity. Idris's technocratic experiment thus raises existential questions: is this a genuine democratic step, or another military facade? Mohamed Sid Ahmed al-Jakumi, head of the Northern Track, a signatory to the Juba deal, has demanded adherence to the 'quarter of power' principle, under threat of legal action. He has called for key ministries to be led by independent experts, rejecting the 'monopolisation' of power by any party. Amid this dispute, Idris advanced his cabinet formation late last month, issuing decisions to appoint Lieutenant General Hassan Daoud Kabron Kayan as defence minister and Lieutenant General Babiker Samra Mustafa Ali as interior minister. In early July, three technocratic appointments followed, with several Sudanese professors placed in charge of the agriculture, higher education and health ministries. Among the figures were Muiz Omer Bakhit, minister of health, Ismat Gurashi Abdullah Mohamed, minister of Agriculture and Irrigation, Ahmed Mudawi Musa Mohamed, minister of Higher Education and Scientific Research. These three ministries were said to be pro-revolution. Idris emphasised merit-based selection, but the nominations have ignited a backlash, with critics scrutinising the appointees' allegiances and warning of militarised governance. Significant setback Since then, Idris has appointed another 10 ministers to his 'government of hope', filling the rural development, justice, finance, trade, and religious affairs ministries on 7 July; and the fisheries, culture, minerals, social welfare, and transport portfolios a week later. Idris described the appointments as the result of a thorough review of national competencies and expertise. The remaining seven ministerial appointments remain pending. But already, the ministerial appointments represent a significant setback for the transitional process. Many of the appointees were involved in the previous government. For example, just to cite a few names, Mahassen Ali Yacoub who was the acting minister of trade and industry in the previous government that took over after the coup of 2021, is holding the same post in Idris-led government. Also, Abdall Mohamed Daraf, who is appointed as minister of Justice, is publicly known for his political support for the previous government, raising questions about the extent of his neutrality in this sensitive position. Sudan crisis: How a parallel RSF government could destroy the nation Read More » This could undermine trust in the state's commitment to meaningful reforms, while sending a deeply concerning signal to both the international community and the US-hosted process aimed at resolving the Sudanese crisis. Rather than advancing progress, these appointments reflect is only a repetition of past mistakes and failed modalities of governance despite different forms of organisation. Finally, Tasis finalised its charter and managed to establish a parallel 'peace and unity government' on 26 July with Hemeti as the leader of the presidential council. It has espoused a compromise pertaining to the commitment of its ally Al Hilu, the leader of one of the fragments of the Sudan People's Liberation Movement/Army (SPLM/A-North) and a stanuch advocate of a secular Sudanese state. Overall, Idris's efforts have unveiled deepening fractures between civilian and military actors, among Juba signatories, and within the realm of public opinion. Sudan's political landscape remains paralysed by entrenched polarisation, with the war economy and societal fragmentation aggravating divisions. This deadlock, compounded by grievances and institutional distrust, risks precipitating state fragmentation unless a consensus-driven dialogue emerges among military, political and civilian forces. The enduring contest for dominance has left Sudan trapped in a cycle of instability for nearly seven decades, as political and military elites have consistently failed to resolve their protracted power struggles. Idris's technocratic experiment thus raises existential questions: is this a genuine democratic step, or another military facade? As fragmentation looms, Sudanese people demand action, not just hope. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Al Etihad
5 days ago
- Al Etihad
Outstanding humanitarian role in aid for Gaza and its people
31 July 2025 00:46 MOHAMMED ABDULLA AL-ALIThe columnist is the Chief Executive Officer of the think-tank firm TRENDS Research & AdvisoryIn light of the ongoing conflict in the Gaza Strip and the absence of any political breakthrough due to the deepening deadlock surrounding this devastating crisis, for which about two million Palestinians are paying the price, the Strip has reached a critical state and unprecedented levels of widespread continued conflict since October 2023, coupled with the collapse of the food supply system and the closure of humanitarian crossings, now threatens the survival of over two million people. Many have already died of starvation, while entire families go days without food, as international bodies warn of an imminent and large-scale humanitarian these dire humanitarian conditions, the UAE, as usual, wasted no time in taking the initiative, resuming airdrops of aid and rapidly intensifying relief efforts by land, air, and goal is to avert an imminent humanitarian catastrophe by every possible means, while mobilising international efforts to pressure all parties into allowing the delivery of life-saving show that the UAE has topped the list of countries providing humanitarian support to the Gaza Strip since the beginning of the conflict, contributing over 42% of the total aid delivered to the Strip. Once aid channels reopened, the UAE dispatched the ship 'Khalifa', its eighth and largest humanitarian vessel, carrying approximately 7,166 tonnes of food and medical supplies, while Emirati airdrops of relief continue across the the ground, humanitarian aid trucks from the UAE, Egypt, and Jordan have resumed entry into the Gaza Strip through key border five Emirati automatic bakeries are operating in Egypt's Al Arish city, supplying daily bread to nearly half a million people in Gaza and helping to alleviate the severe bread shortage inside the Strip. In addition, six water desalination plants are providing approximately 1.2 million gallons of clean water to over 600,000 residents across the aid reflects the UAE's unwavering commitment to supporting its Palestinian brothers and sisters during the devastating humanitarian crisis in Gaza. It is part of the humanitarian operation 'Chivalrous Knight 3' and a series of initiatives launched by the UAE under the directives of President His Highness Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al efforts include medical care for the wounded and sick through a field hospital in Gaza, the treatment of hundreds of injured and ill individuals from Gaza in Emirati hospitals, support for community kitchens across the Strip, and the provision of tents to shelter displaced humanitarian support is making every effort to prevent the collapse of Gaza's health system and the loss of basic necessities of life. The airdropping of aid has helped ease the impact of the devastating humanitarian crisis. Today, the skies over Gaza witness the largest airdrop of Emirati assistance, as the 'Birds of Goodness' continue their missions of delivering food and essential supplies to isolated areas that are inaccessible by land due to the ongoing conflict. Since the launch of the initiative, total aid has reached approximately 3,763 tonnes of food and relief supplies, delivered as part of a deeply rooted humanitarian and moral commitment to support the Palestinian people in particular and humanity at UAE extends its helping hand to Gaza along two parallel paths: one humanitarian and the other political. Since the outbreak of the war, it has tirelessly worked to bring the conflict to an end and explore avenues for a lasting solution, while simultaneously providing humanitarian aid, relief, and medical care for the wounded and sick. These efforts are guided by humanitarian priorities and the realities on the ground, with a clear vision for a sustainable political settlement as the only viable path to breaking the cycle of war, violence, and instability in the region. Source: Aletihad - Abu Dhabi
Middle East Eye
6 days ago
- Middle East Eye
Two men forcibly disappeared in Egypt after storming police station over Gaza blockade
Two men have been forcibly disappeared in Egypt following their alleged participation in the storming of the State Security headquarters at the Ma'asara police station in Helwan in southern Cairo in protest of Egypt's alleged complicity in the Gaza siege, Middle East Eye has learned. Twenty-seven-year-old Mohsen Mustafa and his 23-year-old cousin Ahmed Sherif Ahmed Abdel Wahab have not been heard from since Mustafa posted on Facebook claiming responsibility for the raid, shortly before his profile was removed. The men were reportedly involved in the storming of the police station on 25 July, where a group who identified themselves as 'Iron 17' raided the facility and detained several security personnel for hours. Footage of the raid showing the young men holding the officers captive went viral. The videos, which were published on a Telegram channel and viewed millions of times, showed the men condemning the closure of Egypt's Rafah border crossing with Gaza and the arrests of activists collecting aid for Palestinians in the territory. In one clip, a detained officer said that the opening of the crossing was 'impossible'. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Egypt's interior ministry promptly issued two statements claiming the footage was fabricated as part of a Muslim Brotherhood-led plot, and that those involved in circulating it had been arrested. The ministry accused the Muslim Brotherhood of attempting to undermine Egypt's support for Palestine. The Telegram channel disappeared shortly after. Police station stormed in Egypt as outrage over Gaza blockade reaches boiling point Read More » The Egyptian Network for Human Rights (ENHR) said the videos had been verified by former detainees who were held at the facility, while Egyptian news outlet Mada Masr cited lawyers who said documents visible in the footage belong to detainees who are currently under surveillance. Hours before the channel disappeared, the group released an audio statement, attributed to Mustafa and Wahab, claiming responsibility for the operation. In the statement, they rejected any political affiliations and described themselves as 'heirs of Omar ibn al-Khattab and Amr ibn al-As', in reference to early Islamic military and political leaders. A friend of the men's families told Middle East Eye that the pair were last heard from on the morning of the raid, when they said Mustafa was due to report to the station as part of his probation - Wahab accompanied him. The family then saw a post by Mustafa on his Facebook page, claiming that he had seized the police station. Shortly after, his Facebook profile was taken down, and he and Wahab disappeared. 'Full of Anger' Mustafa and Wahab's involvement in the raid came as a shock to the family - particularly Wahab, who they said had no history of political activity and had never even entered a police station. Mustafa, however, was previously detained and forcibly disappeared for months in 2020, during which time he was subjected to torture. According to the family friend, he was detained while security forces raided his home searching for one of his relatives. As he was the only male at home, they detained him to force his relative to hand himself in. The authorities denied his detention, and banned him from travel following his release. In the five years since his release, he was required to report to the police station on a monthly basis. The family friend said Mustafa was 'full of anger' over his treatment by the authorities - his detention had interrupted his last year of university, forcing him to repeat the academic year. Second detainee death in Egypt police custody recorded within 24 hours Read More » Since the storming of the police station, all male members of the family have been arrested, and the whole family is now under informal house arrest and subject to 24/7 surveillance. With no news of Mustafa and Wahab's whereabouts, and the total refusal by the authorities to acknowledge that the raid ever happened, the families are fearing for the young men's lives. 'There is no chance of accountability for something that never happened,' the family friend told MEE. Meanwhile, Mada Masr reported a surge in arrests in the aftermath of the raid, with security forces setting up a security cordon around the area. Rights lawyer Nabih al-Genady reported an uptick in arrests in Helwan even before the footage was circulated. He noted that the arrests did not appear to be targeting a specific group, and that some of them were in connection with content posted on personal Facebook pages. The storming of the police headquarters comes amid mounting public anger against the Egyptian authorities for failing to do more to open the Rafah crossing and ensure the entry of aid into the besieged Gaza strip, where dozens are dying of Israeli-imposed starvation. The action follows a wave of protests the previous week outside Egyptian embassies in European capitals, sparked by activist Anas Habib in the Netherlands, who symbolically locked embassy gates to protest the Rafah closure. The men's disappearances also come after rights groups reported that two detainees had died in Egyptian police custody within 24 hours.
