
Wimbledon's curfew rule explained: The tennis Grand Slam with an early bedtime
At 10:18 p.m. Monday night, the latter two came together, as they so often do. American No. 1 Taylor Fritz and France's Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard finished the fourth set of what had become a five-set match, Fritz leveling the contest at 2-2. But instead of continuing, they met at the net with tournament officials. Words were exchanged. Arms were flung up. Then the players picked up their bags and walked off the court.
Advertisement
Then at 9:30 p.m. Thursday night, Ben Shelton sat down to prepare to serve to win his match against Rinky Hijikata of Australia. Or so he thought. The chair umpire instead announced that the match had been suspended, leaving Shelton remonstrating with a tournament supervisor as darkness fell.
Shelton's match had a fairly pedestrian explanation: the darkness was about to prevent the electronic line calling (ELC) system, which this year replaced line judges after 147 years, from working properly. He came back the next day and took 70 seconds and four points to see off Hijikata.
Fritz and Mpetshi Perricard's match, by contrast, was at the mercy of the most sacred and strange tradition of them all: the 11 p.m. curfew imposed on a sporting event beamed across the globe. Wimbledon is the only Grand Slam with an early bedtime, and the lights go out on time, every time, with no exceptions — almost.
The curfew was introduced in 2009, when the All England Club installed a retractable roof on Centre Court. That meant that play could go on later at a tournament that previously ran to the sun's clock, but local residents — and their council — did not want fans streaming past their houses in the early hours.
'The 11pm curfew is a planning condition applied to balance the consideration of the local residents with the scale of an international tennis event that takes place in a residential area,' Merton Council said.
'The challenge of transport connectivity and getting visitors home safely is also a key consideration.'
Not annoying the residents is a particular concern this year. The All England Club will be in the High Court next week, for a judicial review of planning permission to build 39 new courts on the old golf course in Wimbledon Park. That would allow Wimbledon to bring qualifying on site, in line with the other four majors, but the curfew, which is also an outlier, is a frontier that it will not cross.
Advertisement
The French Open's night session regularly goes beyond midnight, with play not starting until 8:15 p.m. local time because, the tournament organizers say, people will not leave work in time to begin earlier. The U.S. Open and Australian Open wear their late-night tennis as a kind of badge of honor, with two matches scheduled.
The Billie Jean King Tennis Center and Melbourne Park are more removed from metropolitan life than the All England Club, but their status as late-night events goes beyond geography.
The ubiquity of late-night tennis at the U.S. Open means some American fans were left baffled by Fritz's match being stopped prematurely. 'I had no idea about the curfew,' said Theo Moll, a 20-year-old student from Cleveland, Ohio who visited Wimbledon Friday with his dad, Rob.
'I remember seeing that on the first night and saying, 'What's going on, why do they stop?' And then looking into it. Fritz was behind and then he got close to winning and I was like, 'What's the score, how did it end? It didn't?''
Late finishes are almost integral to the culture of the tournaments, even if the impact on players and fans has recently been acknowledged to be more severe than the benefits of increased attention and excitement. Small concessions have been introduced about when matches can start to try and mitigate the situation, though there is still always the chance of a very late finish in New York and Melbourne if matches run long.
At Wimbledon, there are no concessions. At 11 p.m., play stops. Just once in recent history has the tournament made an exception, when Andy Murray beat Marcos Baghdatis in four sets at 11:02 p.m in 2012. The clock had struck 11 with Murray up 5-1 in the fourth set and about to serve for the match. 'Common sense,' tournament organizers said at the time, was the driver behind a two-minute extension on one of the strictest rules in sports.
Fritz himself also couldn't understand. Fans on No. 1 Court were generally furious and let their feelings be known, while broadcasters — including ones in America where it was around 5 p.m. ET were similarly perplexed. Foreign broadcasters are often one of the key stakeholders in scheduling decisions. Not so at Wimbledon, where the Centre Court 1:30 p.m. start time, by far the latest of all the majors, is not because of any televisual considerations but so that the spectators in hospitality can get lunch in before play starts.
Advertisement
Going home at 11 p.m. is also ingrained in British culture. Pubs close at 11, and in general it's not a country where people eat late or stay out especially late. In the UK sitcom The Office, the character Tim articulates the difference between the UK and the U.S. by describing a nightclub called 'New York, New York.'
'They call it the nightclub that never sleeps. That closes at one.'
Wimbledon is the tennis manifestation of this attitude, the sensible friend who likes to call it a night early. Wimbledon has work to do in the morning. Wimbledon will absolutely not be doing shots at 2 a.m. As much as the Centre Court fans were upset by the Fritz vs. Mpetshi Perricard match finishing early, many are happy to leave when it gets dark.
As for the players, barely any want to be playing after midnight given how late that means they actually get to bed, and how that then affects them for a day or so after. When Djokovic beat Lorenzo Musetti at 3:07 a.m. at last year's French Open, sports medicine experts told The Athletic that doing so would increase his risk of injury going forward. In Djokovic's next match the following day, he tore his meniscus in his right knee.
The Wimbledon attitude to night-time tennis is not without issues. After beating Mpetshi Perricard the next day, Fritz said that he would prefer to have a late finish to coming back the next day.
Dusk stopping play has also been a feature of this year's tournament, with matches held over on all of the first four days, including on both main courts on Monday — despite no rain on three of the days. If matches are becoming so drawn out that it's a struggle to fit in a full day's play at Wimbledon before night falls with the current start times, then the structure of the tournament will start to creak.
Shelton and Hijikata's match Thursday did not start until around 7:15 p.m., giving them just two hours and 15 minutes to rattle through it. Matches in the men's singles draw last year averaged two hours and 43 minutes last year, according to data from Opta.
Advertisement
They very nearly managed it, but were stopped with Shelton a game away and about to serve for the match. He and Hijikata had already discussed stopping at the end of the second set and then again a few games into the third, and so finishing with the end potentially 70 seconds away was deeply unsatisfying.
Unlike the curfew, there isn't a designated stop time for bad light. It's down to the discretion of tournament staff, who decided that it was too dark even though Shelton was told that there was five minutes before the ELC system would no longer be able to function. 'I was telling him, I only need 60 seconds,' a smiling Shelton said in a news conference Friday.
Adding floodlights on the outside courts would not solve the issue of grass courts becoming slippy once night falls and the temperature drops. The daylight rule, like the curfew, is more sensible than it perhaps first appears.
Shelton, who was sanguine about having to come back to beat Hijikata on Friday, said that adjusting to different conditions and regulations was all part of being a tennis player.
Nowhere is this truer than Wimbledon, which has always been a law unto itself.
— Caoimhe O'Neill contributed reporting.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Wimbledon hit with electronic line call controversy as Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova says game was ‘stolen' from her
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova (right) speaks to umpire Nico Helwerth during her match against Sonay Kartal. - Visionhaus/Getty Images Wimbledon organizers have apologized and explained that 'human error' was the reason behind the electronic line-calling system being turned off during a match on Sunday – and the tournament subsequently has removed the ability for operators to manually halt the tracking of the ball. The move comes after controversy stemming from a missed out call during Sunday's fourth-round clash between Russian Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova and Britain's Sonay Kartal on Centre Court. Advertisement 'Following our review, we have removed the ability for Hawk-Eye operators to manually deactivate the ball tracking,' the All England Lawn Tennis & Croquet Club (AELTC) said in a statement Monday to CNN Sports. 'While the source of the issue was human error, this error cannot now be repeated due to the system changes we have made.' During the first set of the match between Pavlyuchenkova and Kartal, a backhand from Kartal went long but there was no 'out' call from the electronic system, which has replaced human line umpires at Wimbledon this year. Pavlyuchenkova, who was one point away from winning that game, stopped playing with the ball landing outside the court. Umpire Nico Helwerth called for the match to be paused, while the automated system said, 'stop, stop,' leading to confusion from both players and the fans in attendance. Helwerth informed the crowd that he was going to check if the system was 'up and running' before spending time on the phone. Advertisement After a short delay, he said that the electronic system 'was unfortunately unable to track the last point,' which was subsequently replayed. Kartal went on to win the point and break Pavlyuchenkova to take a 5-4 lead. In the change of ends, the Russian could be heard saying to Helwerth: 'You took the game away from me. … They stole the game from me. They stole it.' The automated system did not pick up on balls landing out on three occasions in the game, with Helwerth calling the other two. The AELTC stated that Helwerth did not know the system had not been running. After the match had finished – with Pavlyuchenkova eventually winning 7-6(3), 6-4 to reach the quarterfinals – a spokesperson for the AELTC said that the system had been deactivated in error by 'those operating the system' and that a full investigation had taken place. Advertisement 'We have apologized to the players involved,' the spokesperson said in a statement to CNN. 'We continue to have full confidence in the accuracy of the ball tracking technology. 'The live ELC (electronic line-calling) system relies on the Hawk-Eye operators, the Review Official and the technology to work in harmony. This did not happen. In this instance there was a human error and as a consequence we have fully reviewed our processes and made the appropriate changes.' It added that Helwerth had 'followed the established process' of replaying the point if the system goes down and it's unclear whether the ball was in or out. After booking her spot in the next round, Pavlyuchenkova called the whole situation 'confusing,' in particular when the umpire ordered the point to be replayed instead of awarding it to her. Advertisement 'I think it's good to raise this subject for the future,' Pavlyuchenkova told reporters. 'Because if anything like that happens in a very important moment of the match, I think we should have a wire system like in football. Then it's clear for everybody and we can move on right away instead of just guessing.' Pavlyuchenkova will play Amanda Anisimova in the quarterfinals of Wimbledon. - Visionhaus/Getty Images The automated line-calling system has been a big talking point at this year's Wimbledon. Great Britain's top-ranked players – Jack Draper and Emma Raducanu – have both expressed their doubts about the system, with Raducanu calling it 'dodgy.' Switzerland's Belinda Bencic said that the new automated system has been a topic of discussion among players in the locker room. Advertisement The introduction of technology to replace line judges at Wimbledon follows many other tournaments around the world, including the Australian Open and the US Open. Following her win on Sunday, Pavlyuchenkova said that Helwerth 'probably was scared to take such a big decision' with the technology not working and called for more human intervention. 'That's why we have a chair umpire,' she said. 'Otherwise, I think soon let's just play without them and then we're going to have everything automatic. I think we are losing a little bit of the charm of actually having human beings, ballboys. 'Like during Covid, we didn't have ballboys. It just becomes a little bit weird and robot sort of orientated.' CNN's Ben Church contributed to this report. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account at
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Eddie Hall shares throwback photo as fans refuse to believe he's 11
Former world's strongest man Eddie Hall has left fans floored after sharing a throwback photo of himself as a young boy. The Beast posted the surprising picture he had dug up on his social media. Eddie, from Clayton, weighed a staggering 195kg (31 stone) during his Strongman days. And the 6ft 2in has seemingly always been a man mountain. In an old snap posted on Facebook, he is stood topless, flexing his arm muscles, while sporting a pair of round sunglasses. He captioned the photo: "11 years old looking like Bronson." READ MORE: Driver dies in Royal Stoke after hitting tree READ MORE: Live updates as air ambulance lands at Stoke-on-Trent beauty spot The picture was shared just days after he uploaded another topless picture with a chain around his neck, a pierced nipple and cream trousers on. He captioned the image: "13-years-old and on the doors." The throwback photos have wowed fans and many refuse to believe his age. One said: "Damn, I was like 3 foot nothing and built like a noodle at the same age." Another joked: "Seriously 11 years old. Are you joking? Someone must have eaten all their green giant beans." A third commented: "Insane body at 11." Eddie was previously a competitive swimmer who competed in the UK Nationals when he was a youngster - even setting a British record for his age group in the pool. At his peak he won the prestigious World's Strongest Man competition in 2017 in Botswana and set a world record by completing a 500kg deadlift. The legend has gone into fighting in recent years and scored a knockout victory in 30 seconds over Mariusz Puzianowski in his first MMA bout earlier this year. Get daily headlines and breaking news emailed to you - it's FREE
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Wimbledon 2025: Amanda Anisimova reaches semifinals for first time with win over Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
Prior to Tuesday, Amanda Anisimova had never advanced past the quarterfinals at Wimbledon. That's no longer the case. Anisimova is moving on to the semifinals after a 6-1, 7-6 win over Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova on Tuesday. It was a dominant performance by Anisimova early, who allowed Pavlyuchenkova to take just one game in the first set. Advertisement Things weren't as easy in the second set. Despite getting out to a strong lead, Anisimova struggled to put Pavlyuchenkova away. A late rally by Pavlyuchenkova made it 5-5 in the second set. After the two traded games, the second set went to a tiebreak. In a tiebreak that lasted 20 points, it was Anisimova who eventually came out on top thanks to a final winner. Anisimova's serve was a major weapon throughout the match, picking up 6 aces and 26 winners. The win marks the farthest Anisimova has advanced at Wimbledon during her career. She previously reached the quarterfinals back in 2022, where she lost to Simona Halep. The win also matches Anisimova's best performance at a Grand Slam. The only other time she reached the semifinals came in the 2019 French Open, where she lost to Ashleigh Barty. Advertisement If Anisimova wants to reach a new career-high at a Grand Slam, she'll have to go through the No. 1 ranked women's player, Aryna Sabalenka, who came back to defeat Laura Siegemund on Tuesday. While Sabalenka will prove to be a step up for Anisimova, the American actually holds the advantage in head-to-head record. Anisimova has gone 5-3 against Sabalenka in their eight matches. One of those wins came during Anisimova's run to the 2019 French Open semifinals. Anisomova dominated those matchups earlier in her career, starting 4-0 against Sabalenka. But the women's No. 1 has flipped the script recently, going 3-1 in their four most-recent matches. The last time to two squared off was at the 2025 French Open, where Sabalenka took Anisimova down in straight sets. Advertisement If Anisomova can keep up her momentum, she could become the first American woman to win the event since Serena Williams in 2016.