logo
Fresh twist in plans for Glasgow congestion charge and Clyde Tunnel toll revealed

Fresh twist in plans for Glasgow congestion charge and Clyde Tunnel toll revealed

Scottish Sun13 hours ago
People who don't live in Glasgow would be hit with the fees
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
DRIVERS could be hit with Clyde Tunnel toll and congestion charges under bombshell new plans being eyed by Glasgow City Council.
People who don't live in the city would be slapped with the fees – while locals could be spared – in a controversial bid to slash car use and boost greener travel.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
1
Drivers could be hit with Clyde Tunnel toll and congestion charges
Credit: John Gunion - The Sun Glasgow
The idea, backed by Transport Scotland, would see Glasgow take the wheel as a 'leading city' in a nationwide push to get drivers out of their motors.
The legal wheels on the plans won't start turning until after next May's Holyrood elections due to regulatory checks having to be made.
Councillor Angus Millar insisted there are 'no specific proposals' on the table for now – but admitted the city is 'interested' in tolls for non-residents using the Clyde Tunnel or entering the city.
He said: 'The council has no specific proposals to introduce any road user charging in Glasgow.
"However members will be aware that the council has repeatedly stated its interest in further exploring possibilities around a boundary congestion charge and potential tolling at the Clyde Tunnel – both with exemptions for Glasgow residents.'
The SNP councillor, who's in charge of transport and climate, added that Glasgow is in talks with Transport Scotland and COSLA about how to legally bring in such charges.
'Council officers continue to engage with Transport Scotland and Cosla particularly in relation to national commitments to reduce car vehicle mileage and the potential roll out of road user charging as a travel demand management tool.
'Transport Scotland has expressed interest in Glasgow and Edinburgh taking a lead role in exploring road user charging and we anticipate further discussions with City of Edinburgh Council in establishing their interest.'
Cllr Millar said the Scottish Government is now launching a legal and regulatory review to clear the way for councils to roll out the controversial charges.
He added: 'We welcome the recent commitment from Transport Scotland and the Scottish Government to undertake legislative and regulatory review to establish how the process can be clarified for local authorities to take forward and this is a matter I have engaged with officials and other councils on via COSLA.'
Scotland's Vehicle Ban in LEZs: Controversy Piles Up
He added: 'We will engage in the coming legislative review to ensure Glasgow is well positioned to consider any developments.'
The plans were welcomed by Scottish Green councillor Blair Anderson, who claimed the scheme would help fund a 'publicly owned, reliable and free' bus system.
He said: "The only way we can meet our climate targets is moving people from cars to public transport.'
He added: 'A road user charging scheme would give us the money to make Glasgow's buses publicly owned, reliable, fast and free.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Decision to revoke planning permission for battery storage plant to be investigated
Decision to revoke planning permission for battery storage plant to be investigated

STV News

time3 hours ago

  • STV News

Decision to revoke planning permission for battery storage plant to be investigated

The potential revocation of planning permission for a controversial battery energy storage plant in Eaglesham will be investigated. The required legal steps and the cost of the process if a decision to U-turn on the construction of a 40MW facility on greenbelt land are to be explored by East Renfrewshire Council. Conservatives on the council previously had a motion which pushed for revocation ruled incompetent. They returned with a call for officials to set out the necessary process in a report. However, they have claimed debate on the issue is being 'suppressed' as councillors voted against a wider discussion on the topic at a meeting last week. Over 3,500 people have signed a petition against the plan from GPC 1337 Ltd, a subsidiary of Apatura, to store energy in batteries on agricultural land at the east side of Glasgow Road. The firm wants to store surplus energy from the national grid in the batteries, which would then be returned when required. It has said the development will 'support the decarbonisation of the energy industry in the UK'. Cllr Paul Edlin said there are 'widespread' concerns locally, including over safety, as there is 'evidence that such batteries have a risk of catching fire'. His motion aimed to determine 'the likely cost and process' of revocation if it 'were to be proposed at a later date'. 'I would stress this is not a party political matter but rather a quasi-judicial issue,' he said. Permission for the development was initially refused by East Renfrewshire's planning committee, but a second application was later approved. After that decision, a reporter appointed by the Scottish Government rejected an appeal over the first plan. Keith Bray, the reporter, found the proposal would lead to 'adverse visual effects in a greenbelt location'. Cllr Edlin's motion stated 'a previous application for an almost identical development was rejected' and asked councillors to note the 'significant similarities between the two applications and the clear precedent set by the reporter's ruling… regarding development in the greenbelt'. However, these sections were removed by an amendment from council leader Owen O'Donnell, Labour, who described them as 'assertions and matters of judgement which we can't agree to as a council body'. Councillors voted 11-5 in favour of his amendment, which was backed by both Labour and the SNP. Before considering the motion, councillors were asked to decide whether they wanted to have a debate or move straight to a vote. They voted 11-5 in favour of continuing without a debate, with only the Tories and Cllr David Macdonald, an independent, in support of further talks. Cllr Edlin said he had 'no idea why this motion should be challenged' other than 'certain members of the council are not prepared to accept a motion' from the Conservatives. 'I find that very sad because we are here to serve the residents of the whole of East Renfrewshire,' he said, adding 'democracy has been suppressed because we can't discuss it'. 'The amendment… will have the same effect, the same things will be done, but the statement has been changed because it suppresses aspects of the discussion which is not in the spirit of openness which I would like to think this council has. 'This is a purely political decision as far as I'm concerned, and the motion is apolitical.' Officials will now prepare a report on the 'legal and procedural steps required to issue a revocation order' as well as 'potential compensation liabilities'. Cllr O'Donnell said the report would hopefully provide 'sunlight on issues which have led to much public and sometimes misleading debate'. The council has also received notice of a judicial review, as campaigners look to get the planning ruling overturned. The decision to rule the initial motion not competent was taken by independent Cllr Annette Ireland, who was chairing the planning meeting, following external legal advice, which had indicated the motion identified 'no basis for revocation'. The developers have said the application was 'accompanied by a suite of technical documents which demonstrate the proposal will not lead to significant adverse harm'. Council officials previously reported the second application differed from the original as more information has been submitted on fire safety and a water tank is now proposed to be underground. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

Interim finance chief at cash-strapped university quits after days in post
Interim finance chief at cash-strapped university quits after days in post

Rhyl Journal

time3 hours ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Interim finance chief at cash-strapped university quits after days in post

Chris Reilly, who took on the role on an interim basis days at the start of last week, has left the university by 'mutual agreement'. Dundee University is grappling with a financial crisis which has resulted in the Scottish Government using special powers to award a further £40 million to the institution. Faced with a £35 million deficit, the university is looking to cut hundreds of jobs. Professor Nigel Seaton, Dundee's interim principal and vice chancellor, confirmed Mr Reilly's departure in a message to staff – saying the institution is 'moving quickly' to replace him. Prof Seaton, who himself only took on the role after the previous interim principal quit last month, said Mr Reilly's replacement would help take the university through the 'next steps' of its recovery plan. Previous interim principal Professor Shane O'Neill quit the post in June after a report by former Glasgow Caledonian University principal Professor Pamela Gillies was critical of him and other former senior Dundee University figures for their actions before the scale of the crisis became public. That report found members of the university executive group, which included the 'triumvirate' of Prof O'Neill, former principal Professor Iain Gillespie and ex-chief operating officer Jim McGeorge, had 'failed' to 'properly respond to the worsening situation' with the institution's finances in 2024.

Interim finance chief at cash-strapped university quits after days in post
Interim finance chief at cash-strapped university quits after days in post

Glasgow Times

time4 hours ago

  • Glasgow Times

Interim finance chief at cash-strapped university quits after days in post

Chris Reilly, who took on the role on an interim basis days at the start of last week, has left the university by 'mutual agreement'. Dundee University is grappling with a financial crisis which has resulted in the Scottish Government using special powers to award a further £40 million to the institution. Faced with a £35 million deficit, the university is looking to cut hundreds of jobs. Professor Nigel Seaton, Dundee's interim principal and vice chancellor, confirmed Mr Reilly's departure in a message to staff – saying the institution is 'moving quickly' to replace him. Prof Seaton, who himself only took on the role after the previous interim principal quit last month, said Mr Reilly's replacement would help take the university through the 'next steps' of its recovery plan. Previous interim principal Professor Shane O'Neill quit the post in June after a report by former Glasgow Caledonian University principal Professor Pamela Gillies was critical of him and other former senior Dundee University figures for their actions before the scale of the crisis became public. That report found members of the university executive group, which included the 'triumvirate' of Prof O'Neill, former principal Professor Iain Gillespie and ex-chief operating officer Jim McGeorge, had 'failed' to 'properly respond to the worsening situation' with the institution's finances in 2024.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store