
Singapore renews agreement with UN nuclear watchdog to help developing nations build nuclear expertise
Minister for Sustainability and the Environment Grace Fu and IAEA director general Rafael Mariano Grossi signed the renewed deal, known as the Third Country Training Programme, at the National University of Singapore.
Under the agreement, Singapore will develop training programmes with IAEA to support developing member states in the Asia Pacific region and beyond through fellowships, scientific visits and training courses, said the Ministry of Sustainability and the Environment (MSE) in a separate press release on Friday.
'Topics covered will include human health, industrial radiography, environmental radiography monitoring and analysis, and accelerator science,' MSE said.
The agreement will not cover military or defence-related uses of nuclear technology, the ministry confirmed in response to queries from CNA.
When asked about how the collaboration has grown and what more Singapore can do to build a safe and peaceful nuclear technology environment in the region, Mr Grossi said the cooperation between Singapore and IAEA has taken on a "number of dimensions" that have to do with nuclear applications.
The agency has been working with different Singapore institutions "very successfully", he added.
"Now, of course, there is this new ingredient because there is an interest to move into nuclear energy, and this is going to be adding frequency, maybe, and intensity of contacts we are having."
The first agreement was inked in 2000 and then renewed in 2015. Singapore has worked with the IAEA to train other nations in building their nuclear expertise under these deals.
More than 140 participants from 27 countries were trained through 17 fellowships and seven capacity-building programmes, MSE noted.
'These included both workshops and longer-term fellowship programmes, covering topics such as nuclear medicine, nuclear law, food safety and pest control,' said MSE in the press release.
Singapore 'strongly supports' IAEA's focus on building the international community's capabilities for safe, secure and peaceful applications of nuclear technology, said Ms Fu.
"As a responsible member of the international community, Singapore actively participates in the IAEA's work to promote and uphold high standards of nuclear safety, security and safeguards, regionally and globally," she added.
As the host country for the activities that would take place under the agreement, participants from Singapore would have greater access to IAEA and the international experts conducting these activities, said MSE.
Addressing common challenges such as human health, climate change and food security is also in countries' collective interests, it added.
There are currently no operational nuclear reactors in Southeast Asia, though some countries, including Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) member states, have been exploring the use of nuclear power as a potential source of clean energy.
Singapore and a few other neighbouring nations have made it clear that no decision has been made on whether to adopt nuclear energy, but the idea is being studied alongside other possible sustainable energy options.
Apart from the latest agreement with IAEA, Singapore also has nuclear cooperation agreements with other countries and jurisdictions.
This includes the 123 Agreement signed with the United States in 2024, a 30-year deal that furthers civil nuclear cooperation on advanced nuclear energy technologies between both nations.
Mr Grossi is in Singapore as part of the S R Nathan fellowship, a high-level programme for foreign leaders and prominent individuals to visit the country.
On Friday morning, Mr Grossi also met President Tharman Shanmugaratnam and Prime Minister Lawrence Wong.
He later delivered a lecture hosted by the newly launched Singapore Nuclear Research and Safety Institute at NUS and visited the National Environment Agency and the institute's facilities.
Mr Wong noted on Friday evening that Singapore has been a member of the IAEA since 1967 and strongly supports its work.
"Singapore government agencies contribute to several technical committees, and we have greatly benefited from IAEA's expertise in nuclear medicine, imaging, and oncology," the Prime Minister wrote in a Facebook post.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
5 days ago
- Straits Times
Malaysia moving closer to adopting nuclear energy, says minister
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Malaysia is working to amend its Atomic Energy Act to allow for the ratification of key international treaties and conventions under the IAEA. KUALA LUMPUR - Malaysia is moving a step closer towards adopting nuclear energy as part of its long-term energy transition strategy, with the government having completed a pre-feasibility study on nuclear power. Science, Technology and Innovation Minister Chang Lih Kang said the study's initial findings indicated that nuclear energy has strong potential to serve as a stable, clean and reliable power source for the country. 'In line with this, six technical task forces have been proposed to support nuclear energy readiness. 'Three of these are under the ministry, focusing on technology and industry development, the development of nuclear competencies and a legal and regulatory framework,' he said in Parliament on July 30. According to him, the remaining three teams fall under the purview of the Energy Transition and Water Transformation Ministry. The country currently has 323 nuclear researchers under the Malaysian Nuclear Agency and 36 science officers under the Atomic Energy Department, with 61 of them holding qualifications in nuclear science and engineering, according to Mr Chang. 'This reflects the country's continued commitment to building local expertise to support the safe and responsible advancement of nuclear technology,' he said. He added that Malaysia was working to amend its Atomic Energy Act to allow for the ratification of key international treaties and conventions under the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 'Once approved by Cabinet, we aim to table the amended Act in this Parliament session. 'This will demonstrate Malaysia's seriousness in exploring nuclear energy as one of our power generation options,' he said. Mr Chang also confirmed that Malaysia signed a strategic civil nuclear cooperation agreement with the United States on July 10, complementing its existing collaborations with China and Russia. 'The agreement will act as a catalyst for long-term cooperation in infrastructure development, joint research, technical training and local industry strengthening,' he added. He said Malaysia is also working closely with the IAEA through technical cooperation programmes, regional partnerships, the Asian Nuclear Cooperation Forum and coordinated research projects. Beyond power generation, nuclear technology was also being used in climate and environmental research, he said. 'This includes isotopic techniques for monitoring greenhouse gas emissions, landslide management, ocean acidification and groundwater lifespan,' said Mr Chang. The IAEA recognises nuclear science as contributing to the 13th United Nations Sustainable Development Goal on climate action, he added. In agriculture, Malaysia was also using nuclear-related techniques for plant mutation breeding to produce climate-resilient crops and to support disease control, he said. Responding to a question from Datuk Ahmad Amzad Hashim, Mr Chang acknowledged that Malaysia still needs to ratify several international treaties before advancing nuclear development. He said local lab-scale extraction projects have shown encouraging results on thorium research , though Malaysia has yet to begin research and development on thorium-based power generation. 'We are progressively upgrading our research capabilities and working with countries such as China, India, Russia and the United States that have advanced expertise in this area,' he said. THE STAR/ASIA NEWS NETWORK


New Paper
28-07-2025
- New Paper
Singapore must build nuclear energy capabilities: Tan See Leng
Singapore has to build its capabilities in nuclear energy even though it has not made a decision on its use, as countries in the region have publicly signalled their intent to build such facilities. Dr Tan See Leng, Singapore's Minister-in-charge of Energy and Science & Technology, said in an interview on July 21 that the country needs to acquire technical expertise in this area to ensure its safety. "Our neighbours, the Philippines, Indonesia, have publicly signalled that they intend to build nuclear plants. So, regardless of whether we have made the decision, our neighbours have made the decision," he said in his first interview in the new portfolio. Dr Tan was previously overseeing energy issues as Second Minister for Trade and Industry. Five Asean countries - Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines, Malaysia and Thailand - have said they are either studying the feasibility of advanced nuclear technology to meet their growing energy needs, or already have plans to build new reactors in the coming decades. As Singapore continues to evaluate the viability of nuclear energy for the country, local talents have to be trained so they can determine whether advanced nuclear technologies are safe and suitable for the Republic when these come onto the market, Dr Tan said. On July 11, the Singapore Nuclear Research and Safety Institute was launched with an aim to train 100 nuclear experts by 2030 - up from the 50 today. Singapore also renewed the Third Country Training Programme Memorandum of Understanding with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on July 25. Under the agreement, Singapore will develop training programmes with the UN nuclear watchdog to support developing IAEA member states with fellowships, scientific visits and training courses. Topics covered will include human health, industrial radiography, environmental radioactivity monitoring and analysis, and accelerator science. Singapore's approach to nuclear energy has changed over the years, as new technologies come online. In 2012, the Republic had initially considered atomic power nuclear technologies of that time unsuitable for deployment in the small city-state. Dr Tan noted that conventional nuclear plants are large, and require exclusive buffer zones. "Categorically, let me tell you that they will not be suitable for us," he said. But nuclear technologies have evolved since. Small modular reactors (SMRs) are thought to be more suitable for land-scarce, population-dense Singapore, as they have a lower power capacity, enhanced safety standards and require much smaller buffer zones, compared with conventional reactors. Dr Tan said: "We have not excluded that... because there is a lot of promise for some of the advanced modular reactors - the physics, the engineering, the technical feasibility, all point to the fact that they are possible, but it is just that commercially, they are still not viable yet." He also stressed that ensuring the safety of nuclear technologies is of "paramount importance" to the Government. While Dr Tan acknowledged that Singaporeans may still have certain perceptions about nuclear energy, he said the country still needs to press ahead in this area given the interest from some of its neighbours. Singapore has bilateral agreements with the United States and France to pursue cooperation on nuclear energy, which could better help in the country's evaluation of the viability. In July 2024, the Republic inked the 123 Agreement on Nuclear Cooperation with the US, which will allow Singapore to learn more about nuclear technologies and scientific research from American organisations. For example, local research institutes could work with US national laboratories and technology companies to perform safety simulations and modelling of SMRs. In May, Singapore and France signed agreements on nuclear energy to facilitate cooperation on safety, workforce development, research, environmental protection, the protection of public health, and emergency preparedness and response, among others. Dr Tan said that these partnerships will enable Singapore to learn more about the regulatory approvals, safety protocols, operations and engineering designs, among other things. The US tariffs are not likely to affect these agreements, he said. Dr Tan said that the learnings from the partnerships will help Singapore eventually make the assessment on whether to "jump in, or just stay at the capacity- and capability-building level". He added that Singapore is also open to exploring partnerships with other countries that have nuclear expertise, such as the United Arab Emirates, China and South Korea.


CNA
25-07-2025
- CNA
Singapore could be ‘most perfect example' of a country that needs nuclear energy: IAEA chief
SINGAPORE: Singapore could be the 'most perfect example' of a country that needs nuclear energy given its territorial limitations, energy requirements, technological base and institutional maturity, said the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Rafael Mariano Grossi on Friday (Jul 25). The chief of the United Nations' nuclear watchdog was in Singapore as part of the SR Nathan Fellowship, a high-level programme for foreign leaders and prominent individuals to visit the country. The country on Friday also renewed its agreement with the IAEA to help train experts from developing countries in nuclear research. Speaking during a lecture and question-and-answer session hosted by the newly launched Singapore Nuclear Research and Safety Institute at the National University of Singapore, Mr Grossi said that Singapore is prepared to host nuclear power 'relatively soon'. The Singapore government is looking at alternatives to gas, and nuclear energy stands out as one, he added, noting that Singapore has limitations when it comes to producing renewable energy. The country cannot produce hydropower and lacks the territory to produce enough wind or solar energy to meet its energy needs, he said. 'In my opinion, and in the opinion of many experts, in terms of the options, perhaps Singapore could rightly figure as the most perfect example of a country that needs nuclear energy, because with a very small nuclear power plant, you can have a level of energy density and production that you cannot match with anything else,' he said. Mr Grossi's impression is that Singapore will see its first nuclear power plant 'within a few years'. This may be a cooperative effort with the rest of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), he said. All the ASEAN countries are also looking into nuclear energy, though they are all looking into it in different ways since they have different systems and economies, he noted. 'All of them are saying, we want nuclear energy. How can we get it?' he said. 'And of course, Singapore with its technological base, with its institutional maturity, is ideally, I would say, prepared to host nuclear power relatively soon.' Mr Grossi highlighted one scenario where Singapore could collaborate with a neighbouring country on a nuclear power project. 'We have traditional, big nuclear power plants. Is this a good fit for Singapore? Perhaps Singapore in combination or in cooperation with another country in ASEAN, it's not impossible,' said Mr Grossi. Raising the example of the Krsko power plant in Slovenia that supplies energy to both Slovenia and Croatia, Mr Grossi noted that citizens from both countries work at the plant. 'It's a beautiful example of confidence building, good neighbourhood and intelligence applied to energy,' he said. Singapore and a few other neighbouring nations have made it clear that no decision has been made on whether to adopt nuclear energy, but the idea is being studied alongside other possible sustainable energy options. There are no nuclear-powered nations in ASEAN yet. GLOBAL NUCLEAR ENERGY TRENDS A new trend in nuclear energy is small modular reactors. While most are not in operation yet, these reactors are being licensed in many countries, including the United States, France, the United Kingdom and Argentina, said the IAEA's chief. 'They seem to be a very interesting option here,' he noted, adding that Africa also has 'enormous interest' in such reactors, since its grids are smaller or weaker and do not need big nuclear power plants. Climate scientists and experts have recognised that, in terms of climate change, decarbonisation without nuclear energy is 'practically utopian'. Subtracting the nuclear energy factor for big industrial economies that are heavily reliant on coal or fossil fuels will create a situation that is 'almost impossible to manage' if the world wants to achieve the emissions levels agreed upon in the Paris agreement, said Mr Grossi. He urged the audience to recognise nuclear energy's contribution to gradual decarbonisation, which the world is embarking on. 'Because we all know that this is a process that will take time. A quick phase-out of fossil fuel is impossible, as we know,' he added. Responding to a question about the cost of nuclear energy, Mr Grossi noted that nuclear energy is very capital-intensive at the beginning. This is why analysts say it is too expensive compared to solar or wind energy generators, he added. 'But when it comes to energy, cost is one factor. It is not the defining factor overall,' said Mr Grossi. For example, a country like Singapore has less space for solar energy farms, and big economies like the US will not be able to sustain themselves on only renewable energy, he noted. There are also political factors when it comes to cost, said the IAEA's chief, highlighting that it is important to subsidise clean energy. 'But nuclear energy has never benefited from any subsidy. So you need levelised cost of energy before you start making calculations,' he said. SAFETY CONCERNS AND GEOPOLITICS Mr Grossi also addressed the safety concerns that came with nuclear technology and nuclear energy. Responding to a question about Russia targeting nuclear power plants in Ukraine and whether the IAEA is concerned about similar scenarios in the future, Mr Grossi said: 'Of course, the fact that a nuclear power plant is caught in the middle of a war or a conflict is something that greatly concerns us.' This is why the UN Security Council established principles about how nuclear power plants should not be attacked or become military bases, indicating clearly that both sides should exercise 'maximum restraint', he added. 'Whether this is a trend or not, I suppose not. I think the problem here is the war, it's not the technology,' said Mr Grossi. Inviting the audience to think about this 'in military terms', he stressed that a power plant – a big piece of infrastructure – has an impact on the economy of the countries involved. 'It's like in law, you establish jurisprudence, precedent … Thanks to the example we have in the Zaporizhzhia crisis, if in the future we have a similar situation, we will have the authority and the capacity to intervene, because we did it once and because it worked,' he said. The Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant in southeastern Ukraine, which is Europe's largest nuclear power plant, was captured by Russian forces in March 2022. Mr Grossi also addressed a question from Israel's Ambassador to Singapore Eli Vered Hazan about how a nuclear Iran can be prevented. This boils down to the inspection regime that should be put in place for parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), said the IAEA's chief. Iran is a party to the treaty, though it has threatened to pull out before. Noting that Israel is not a party to the treaty, Mr Grossi said that all the countries that signed the agreement subject their facilities to a 'very stringent regime of inspections'. In Iran's case, the IAEA has been doing this with 'some successes and some failures', Mr Grossi said, adding that there were areas that were 'not entirely clear' for 'quite some time'. Reiterating what he said in June, Mr Grossi stressed that Iran does not have nuclear weapons and does not have a programme aimed at having nuclear weapons. 'But at the same time, they need to be accountable for everything they do because their programme is extremely big and very ambitious,' he added, noting that this increases the level of Iran's responsibilities. Iran has been found in breach of their obligations before, Mr Grossi added, noting that the IAEA is insisting that its inspectors return to Iran as soon as possible. 'This is what created a situation of concern, sometimes doubts about what was really going on in Iran. And most importantly, because we cannot undo the past, what happened happened, what we need now is to prevent further attacks or violence or situations like this,' he said. Noting that Iran has indicated that they will be ready to restart some conversations 'at a technical level', Mr Grossi added: 'I think we need to reengage in a normal relationship. It's not a matter of confidence or anything else. This is an obligation for as long as you are a party to the NPT.' DEALING WITH NUCLEAR WASTE Mr Grossi also responded to a question from the High Commissioner of South Africa to Singapore Charlotte Lobe about the disposal of radioactive waste and how to deal with the environmental impact of using nuclear energy. Highlighting that countries have been using nuclear power for more than 50 years, the IAEA's chief said: 'There has never been an accident or a problem with the nuclear waste.' This means that the world has technologically apt solutions for dealing with nuclear waste, he added. 'Important to be considered is that no country can have a nuclear power programme without a very clearly defined and agreed plan for the waste. You cannot simply start a nuclear power plant and then I will see what I do when the fuel has been burned and I have to put it somewhere,' said Mr Grossi. There are very clear methodologies to deal with nuclear waste that are used to 'great success'. Debates have been more centred around the long-term disposal of nuclear waste, which will hold a certain degree of radiation for hundreds or thousands of years, the IAEA chief noted. The amount of nuclear waste is 'extremely low', he stressed. 'We are not creating a mountain of nuclear waste that cannot be handled.' What countries normally do is they look for a place with a 'very stable geological situation' and then the waste is put in a container until it is no longer dangerous, said Mr Grossi. 'More important, we even check and inspect. We are the only industry that checks the rubbish,' he added, to laughter from the audience. Nuclear waste is inspected to ensure that it is not a radiation hazard and that it complies with nuclear non-proliferation measures, said Mr Grossi, who added that it is important to explain decisions to the public and to be accountable for them.