Nationwide Climate Protests Target ANZ, Shane Jones No-show
During his Budget 2025 speech, Minister Shane Jones condemned the protest, inadvertently spurring a significant boost to protest RSVPs. Despite his promises that "I will be there the day before. And I will be there with my megaphone, - the Minister failed to show up as promised.
350 Aotearoa spokesperson Adam Currie says Government Ministers breaking promises is not surprising, and is why the protest group is focused instead on targeting ANZ to achieve change. 'We're here because ANZ is providing banking services to coal giant Bathurst Resources, whose monstrous coal mine proposal threatens not only the Denniston Plateau, but the climate we all rely on. ANZ enabling the biggest coal proposal in NZ history isn't a mistake. It's a business model: profit now, climate collapse later.'
'Fossil fuel expansion is the worst of the worst - and there is no moral or economic basis for ANZ to enable climate crime. Without banking services, companies like Bathurst can't dig, drill, or destroy. Other banks, such as BNZ and Kiwibank, have committed to shutting down banking services to coal expansionists by 2030. Yet ANZ is banking with fossil fuel companies other banks have dropped. For the sake of the climate we love, it's time for ANZ to break free from fossil fuels.'
The ANZ protests kicked off in Pōneke/Wellington yesterday. Actions are scheduled today for Dunedin, Rotorua, Auckland and Wānaka, and protests in Nelson and Christchurch are scheduled for tomorrow. The week of protest will culminate in a protest outside ANZ's sole branch in the West Coast - where ANZ client Bathurst Resources hopes to open a 20 million tonne coal mine on the pristine Denniston Plateau. Protests range from theatre demonstrations, to rallies, to interactive games such as ' Pin the kiwi under the bulldozer'. Details, times and locations of protests can be found via this link: https://act.350.org/event/anz-action-25/
The week of action comes after protests erupted at Bathurst's proposed coal mine on the Denniston Plateau, with climbers shutting down Stockton Mine and over 70 protestors camping in the mine footprint.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
Less of the bombast, please
Comprehensive evaluation of how local government is organised and the role it plays may be necessary, but getting a rational debate on it will be difficult. Everyone has an opinion on the merits or otherwise of their local authority, particularly when the rates go up or money is spent on a controversial project. That concern does not often enough translate into bothering to vote in local elections, but that is another issue. The country's local government network is made up of 78 councils, the largest group being the 61 territorial local authorities with its mix of city and district councils, 11 regional councils and six unitary authorities (these combine the functions of regional and territorial councils). There has been some tinkering with local government since the major reform of local government in 1989 and some mergers of councils but no major national reorganisation since then. In several areas, ideas of amalgamating some councils arise from time to time, but getting support for such changes is never simple. Recently, we have had much noise and colourful language, as is his wont, from Regional Development Minister Shane Jones about what he sees as the need to get rid of regional councils. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon also says he wants to explore the possibility of scrapping New Zealand's regional councils as the government reforms the Resource Management Act. Mr Jones, in a Facebook post promoting his plan to take a remit to the New Zealand First conference later this year on "rationalisation of local government" with a view to next year's general election campaign, describes himself as a doubting Thomas about regional government. He goes on to say the reason for this is because Otago Regional Council is "opposed to my mining projects". He accuses the council of destroying jobs and "conveniently" discovering a moth nobody had heard of to scuttle the expansion of gold mining. Mr Jones says the country cannot have a system of regional government which refuses to rapidly allocate resource consents to drive growth and to effect better outcomes for employment. In the course of this he has also labelled the ORC the "Kremlin of the South Island" and accused it of being full of "KGB green zealots". His over-the-top rhetoric is in response to the council's assessment of environmental effects from an application to expand the Macraes' gold mine. While he portrays the council concerns as solely about a rare moth, the report recommending the application be declined in full also said the project would result in actual and potential effects on surface water quality, aquatic ecology, natural inland and ephemeral wetlands and lizard habitat. The report said these effects would be "significantly adverse" and could not be avoided, minimised, remedied, offset or compensated for. Mr Jones sounds more like a miffed pre-schooler after losing a tussle over a toy digger in a sandpit, than a government minister promoting a serious discussion about long-term change. As ORC chairwoman Gretchen Robertson diplomatically put it, "name-calling" was unhelpful. The Otago council remained focused on its responsibility to protect the environment while supporting sustainable economic development. "That balance is not ideological — it reflects the law, and we believe it reflects the values of our region: caring for both our environment and our livelihoods." She said the country's regional councils welcomed "meaningful dialogue" on how to best deliver the services they were intended to — flood protection, biosecurity, civil defence, environmental management and public transport. As we saw with the Three Waters reform proposals before the last election, it is easy for fervour to be whipped up over issues involving local control, debates to become narrowly focused, and often not based in fact. Those on either side of the argument quickly moved to talking, or shouting, past each other rather than working sensibly through the issues. Mr Jones' bombastic outbursts are setting the scene for more of that. If there is to be reform, it should not be achieved without proper meaningful input from those it will affect. The government saying "jump", and expecting those in the regions to respond "how high?" will not work.
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
MP Maureen Pugh pitches one-stop-shop for mining consents
MP Maureen Pugh wants a local fast-track system to speed up consent processing times. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone West Coast Tasman MP Maureen Pugh has weighed into the campaign to improve waiting times for miners needing resource consents and other permits. Pugh has suggested a local "mini-version" of the government's fast-track system to speed up consent processing times. Resources Minister Shane Jones gave the West Coast Regional Council a strong serve last week, after it closed down a gold mine site that had waited 17-months for a consent. The council also faced criticised from Cr Brett Cummings, a gold miner himself, whose company had been left waiting six months for consent. Pugh says the Minister is justifiably frustrated at the holdups. "This has been going on for far too long. There are guys that have their mining permits and they're paying up to $20,000 a year to NZ Petroleum and Minerals for the right to mine but they can't even get onto the land because the council hasn't sorted their resource consent or DOC hasn't processed their concession." By comparison, a large-scale miner she knew was able to gain approval to mine in New South Wales in Australia within six weeks, she said. "He's got another one in New Guinea - that took twelve weeks," she said. "[He has] one application active in New Zealand and he's been waiting for two years and he still doesn't know how it's going to go. "The delays are not new but they've just got worse and worse, at a time when we desperately need to grow the economy. It's not how to do business well." In her former career as Westland mayor, Mrs Pugh said she had tried to speed up the bureaucracy by delegating district council land-use consents to the Regional Council to process. "I believe that what we need now is a local fast-track system. A mini-version of the government's one-stop-shop, with one office in the region where every agency involved in a mining application is co-located, and has a staffer. All of these permits should be happening concurrently." Pugh said she had proposed her idea to the Minister (Shane Jones) and he was interested in progressing it. "We've simply got to find a new way of doing this and we can't go on having consultants in the North Island dealing with alluvial goldmining consents down here. "They know nothing about the West Coast so of course they're risk averse about everything and their reports reflect that, and there's the constant for further information and they keep sending applications back and asking for more information, and every time their meters are ticking." The miners' continual outgoings were simply paying the wages of bureaucrats and not generating revenue, Pugh said. "It should all be happening concurrently - as it is you're paying to hold your mining license just in case you can overcome all the other. It's enough to make you tear your hair out." The Regional Council is looking at taking on more consents staff and this week began work on new resource consent templates which it says will simplify and speed up the process for alluvial gold miners. LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
Special tax change for fossil fuel companies was proposed ahead of Budget 2025, ministers went for $200m co-investment option
A tax deduction change specifically for some expenditure by fossil fuel companies was initially proposed as a potential Budget 2025 option to increase gas production in New Zealand. Officials from the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) advised ministers the option would 'provide a greater benefit' than the Investment
