logo
Can you find the dream ticket? The pros and cons of the house raffle

Can you find the dream ticket? The pros and cons of the house raffle

The Guardian17-06-2025
When Natalie Rowcroft decided to raffle off her house in Salford, everybody – including her husband, Bradley Rowcroft – thought she 'had lost the plot'. It was July 2020; people were doing stranger things with their first pandemic summer. But given that she had read a newspaper article about a couple who'd raffled their house in the morning, and had put her own up for sale by the evening, the scepticism was well-founded. 'At first, I wanted nothing to do with it,' says Bradley, a 38-year-old carpenter. It didn't help that she had also chucked the family car in the draw for good measure.
Still, Natalie, 38, a teaching assistant, persevered. She printed out leaflets and put them up all over Salford and Manchester, set up social media accounts to promote the draw and bought a big poster to hang in the couple's driveway.
The Rowcrofts had long dreamed of moving to Australia – but as the pandemic took hold and the housing market stagnated, it began to look increasingly like a dream that might never get off the ground. It was a story that struck a chord with penned-in Facebook scrollers everywhere: soon, Natalie was staying up into the early hours to field entrants' questions from around the world. She even began to be recognised – through her face mask – in the local supermarket.
Rowcroft realised that the more details she shared of the couple's life on social media, the more tickets they sold on Raffall, the site they used to host the draw. 'People would drive past and say: 'Oh my God, there's the crazy Rowcrofts, raffling off their house,'' she says.
Raffall, a UK-based company founded a decade ago, allows sellers to set a minimum ticket threshold, which they must meet for their property to be won. If they don't sell enough tickets, they can either give 50% of the ticket revenue to the winner and keep 40% themselves, or give away the house anyway and keep more of the proceeds. Naturally, the company gets a cut of the profit in both scenarios – between 10 and 15%, depending on a seller's subscription plan.
The Rowcrofts, whose house was valued at £290,000, needed to sell 200,000 tickets at £2 each to pay off their mortgage, cover both sides' fees and have some cash left over to pay for their flights and visas. The car was just a bonus – it wasn't worth the money they would spend shipping it to Brisbane. They gave themselves 90 days but, in the end, managed to meet their ticket threshold in a month-and-a-half.
'I didn't sleep for those 45 days,' says Natalie. 'I lost so much weight. It was the hardest time of my life – we were living and breathing it.' Much of that effort was expended reassuring people that it wasn't a scam: 'People didn't believe it was actually real.' Neither did the winner when, just a few weeks and £400,000 worth of tickets later, the raffle company got in touch to tell her she'd won a five bedroom semi-detached house and a white BMW saloon. After the mortgage and both sides' fees were paid and Raffall had taken its cut, the Rowcrofts pocketed about £90,000.
Natalie, who has three children, says the high of getting the competition over the line was 'like giving birth'. In the world of online property raffles, if you're going to do things by halves, you may as well not even bother.
Property competitions are big business in the UK, but for individual sellers, who are attempting to jostle with professional competition companies such as Raffle House, Tramway Path, Elite Competitions, BOTB and yes, Omaze – the prize draw giant that has been keeping UK punters in multimillion-pound dream houses since 2020 – stories such as the Rowcrofts' are rare. It is not for a lack of trying on the part of plucky sellers, who – often unable to sell the old-fashioned way – take matters into their own hands. A far cry from the multimillion pound profits of professional competition companies, many lone rafflers just want to make enough money to pay off their mortgage and move on.
'I really wanted it to work,' says Karen Sugden, a 50-year-old HR professional who tried to sell her Dublin flat on Raffall in 2023. A house raffle enthusiast herself (just before we speak, she has entered Tramway Path's latest competition to win a two-bed flat in south-east London), Sugden, who grew up in Yorkshire, was selling up in order to move to Paris. 'Property in Dublin was and is horribly expensive, so I thought: 'This is a nice way for someone to get on the property ladder for a fiver,'' she says. Modest but cosy, the one-bed flat in Kilmainham, on the edge of Phoenix Park, would've been a dream for a first-time buyer. Worth about €250,000 (£213,000), Sugden had lived there happily for 17 years.
'I wanted someone to get that place,' she says. 'I didn't want it to go to an investor.' Despite her best efforts, the raffle ended when she was within spitting distance of her 120,000 ticket target, the winner got a cash payout – 'still a life changing amount of money' – and the flat was subsequently sold to an investor hoping to build on his existing Dublin property portfolio. It's a grim, if all too familiar, fable about the state of the modern housing market in the UK and Ireland. 'The flat wasn't huge, but the rental income for it would have been €1,800 a month,' says Sugden, 'which is an absolute joke.'
Raffall isn't the only site where individual rafflers can set up shop, but it is one of the most namechecked; last month, Imelda Collins used the platform to raffle her picturesque cottage in Leitrim, Ireland, for £5 a ticket. Thanks to international media coverage and the cottage's postcard-worthy charm, sales surpassed the minimum threshold of 150,000. Though it's unknown how many tickets were sold, with the house valued at £255,000, the prize draw netted a profit of at least £495,000 – not bad for a two-bedroom bungalow. 'I am not the first to do this and certainly won't be the last,' Collins told the New York Times a few days before the competition closed. When contacted by the Guardian, she responded that she and the winner, who is thought to be American, are 'keeping a low profile. Letting it all sink in.' 'Clearly I wasn't as savvy as Imelda was,' says Sugden.
But to what extent does our desire for stories of triumph – the man who failed to sell his sprawling £545,000 farmhouse through an estate agent and instead raffled it off to a 23-year-old admin assistant; the newlywed who had multiple sales fall through before he decided to set up his own raffle company – belie these competitions' success?
Jason Dale, the managing director of raffle curation site Loquax, says that of the Raffall property competitions that his site has listed, just 13% have concluded with a house winner. 'I think it's much harder now for an individual to give away their house than it was back in 2020,' he says. 'For a while, people were coming along thinking, 'Here's my house in Grimsby or somewhere, I'm going to put it on at £50 a ticket, and I'm going to become a millionaire.' It just didn't work.'
For one, properties belonging to ordinary sellers – a (perfectly nice) Sheffield semi-detached; a one-bedroom flat in Aberdeen – appear almost risibly shabby compared with the palatial houses of Omaze, or the flashy McMansions of Elite Competitions. Then there's the legwork required to garner the publicity that professional raffle companies inherently attract. 'One thing that people don't realise when they go to Raffall is that they've still got to become influencers,' says Dale, who has listed more than 500 house competitions on Loquax since 2017. 'They've got to do all the social media and get the press involved and keep going and going. It's a really tough task. '
Loquax, which earns revenue from raffle companies when entrants click through from its site, has listed 63 house competitions so far this year – mostly from professional companies. Last year it was 118 – 90 of which resulted in a house win, 23 of which saw a cash payout, one of which was closed without details, two of which were closed with entrants being refunded and two of which are still open. 'Whether or not they're good quality is another question,' says Dale. His job is just to post them.
'The truth of it is that it's a very long process,' says Mark, who attempted to sell a property on Raffall last year when his marriage ended. 'Unless you've got a load of money to put into Google Ads.' For individual rafflers, the task is not just selling your house, but yourself. 'We had some pretty nasty comments in the papers,' says Mark. 'Opening yourself up to that, if you're just a normal person, isn't easy, and you don't get any sort of briefing on it.' Months after his raffle failed to sell enough tickets, 'all I want to do is sell it and get rid of it now'.
Dunstan Low, a 45-year-old artist, was lucky enough to catch the raffle wave at the right time. Actually, he adopted the Omaze model – introducing free postal entries, so the raffle can be classed as a free draw and escape regulation by the Gambling Commission; donating a cut of the revenue to charity – before Omaze even arrived in the UK in 2020.
Launched in 2017, the raffle to win Low's Grade II-listed Georgian manor in Lancashire netted £1m in ticket sales after he failed to sell it through an estate agent. A self-described 'mortgage prisoner' who was up to his eyeballs in debt, Low had little choice but to get rid of it. 'I would have been repossessed and probably divorced,' he says. 'As it is, it wasn't repossessed … though I am divorced.' Granted, his then-wife didn't know that their house was up for raffle until the local paper was already on its way.
The property raffle industry in the UK is largely unregulated: most raffles are classed as free draws or prize competitions, and do not come under the Gambling Act 2005. Free draws offer free postal entries alongside paid-for online tickets, while prize competitions involve entrants having to answer a question – one that's sufficiently difficult to discourage people from entering – in the vein of daytime TV competitions. Neither require a licence to run.
'Raffle sites are right on the border of gambling, really,' says Dale. Many would argue they're no different. 'It's very difficult – you hear stories of people spending a lot of money on pay-to-enter sites,' he says. One entrant to Low's competition bought £10,000 worth of tickets. 'Say I spent £500 on a bingo site – that might get flagged up,' says Dale. 'If I play on a competition site, it doesn't. There's a conflict there.'
Raffle companies themselves may have eyes on the prize, but the individuals who raffle their properties often do so with a desire to do good. Adam Thwaites, a 40-year-old accountant, raffled his three-bedroom family home in South Shields for £1-a-ticket on Raffall in the hope of raising £50,000 for children's charity Grace House. While they only managed to raise £3,000 for the charity after ticket sales fell wide of their – admittedly ambitious – 200,000 mark, they decided to give away their house anyway. 'Financially, it wasn't worth it, but in the end we just said, 'If we get enough to pay off what's left on the mortgage, we'll just let someone have it and it doesn't matter,'' he says. They handed over the keys to a 27-year-old from Carlisle who was struggling to get on the property ladder. 'We were going to move anyway,' he shrugs. At least when they work, property raffles can change lives.
As for Natalie and Bradley, they're settling nicely into life in Brisbane. 'We're just a normal family that followed their dream,' says Natalie. Would they do it again? 'Never. Never in a million years.' They've kept the sign they had on the house advertising the raffle, though, just in case they change their minds: 'It's in the garage. I'm like: 'Can we just burn it now?' It's embarrassing. But Brad won't let me get rid of it.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gold and its miners may enjoy a 'critical mineral' upgrade
Gold and its miners may enjoy a 'critical mineral' upgrade

Reuters

time10 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Gold and its miners may enjoy a 'critical mineral' upgrade

LAUNCESTON, Australia, July 3 (Reuters) - Is gold the next metal to be added to the list of "critical minerals"? Gold is not a vital component of advanced manufacturing like other critical minerals such as rare earths, lithium and copper. But the precious metal appears to be undergoing a subtle shift in how it is viewed by governments and investors. Since countries moved away from the gold standard by the early 1970s, gold has largely been viewed as a relatively niche part of investment portfolios and government reserves. Gold was something that was added to portfolios as an inflation hedge or during times of heightened geopolitical tensions. In some ways, the role of gold in both central bank and investment portfolios was overtaken by bonds, with U.S. Treasuries becoming the most important of these assets. But the return of Donald Trump to the U.S. presidency is leading to a global reassessment of the relative safety of U.S. assets, the independence of the Federal Reserve and the likely worsening of the U.S. fiscal position. Add in Trump's attacks on the rule of law in the United States and the likely hit to both the U.S. and global economies from his trade policies, and the stage is set for a reevaluation of the role of gold. The precious metal has gained 32.3% from a low of $2,536.71 an ounce hit on November 14 in the days after Trump's victory over his Democratic Party rival, former Vice President Kamala Harris. It reached a record high of $3,500.05 an ounce on April 22, and has since retreated slightly to close at $3,357.08 on Wednesday. While gold's day-to-day moves are still largely driven by the news cycle, the overall backdrop looks supportive. The World Gold Council released a report last month in which it surveyed 73 central banks, and 95% of them expected the official sector to increase holdings in the coming 12 months. "This is a record high since it was first tracked in the 2019 survey and represents a 17% increase from the 2024 findings," the council said. Central banks are also moving to repatriate more of their holdings back to their home countries and away from the United States, a further sign that there is a loss of confidence in U.S. assets and the policies of the Trump administration. Gold is also well-placed as one of the few viable alternatives if more governments, fund managers and private investors outside the United States form the view that the era of U.S. exceptionalism is over and that U.S. Treasuries are now a riskier asset as the country's fiscal position deteriorates. Another factor that is showing the positive story for gold is the performance of gold mining equities. Major gold producers have seen their share prices rise at a far faster pace than the actual metal. There are several reasons why this could be the case, including the expectation that shareholders will receive higher dividend payouts in the future and that companies are being rewarded for showing capital discipline in prior years. But it also may be that investors are starting to re-rate gold mining companies in the expectation that gold becomes a more vital and larger part of portfolios, both public and private. For example, shares in Newmont (NEM.N), opens new tab, the world's largest listed gold miner, have risen 63% from their most recent low on December 30 to close at $60.06 on Wednesday. Canada's Barrick Mining ( opens new tab has seen its shares gain 40.6% in U.S. dollar terms from its recent low on December 19 to the close on Wednesday. Anglogold Ashanti (AU.N), opens new tab shares in New York have surged 108% from the low on December 30 to the close of $46.66 on Wednesday, while Gold Fields (GFIJ.J), opens new tab has seen a gain of 88% in U.S. dollar terms from its November 14 low to the close on Wednesday. If gold does become a more central part of investment strategies, the listed miners are likely to become more attractive, given the difficulty of finding and developing new projects and the long time between exploration and production. Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X, opens new tab. The views expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.

Business live: UK borrowing costs in focus as Currys resumes dividend
Business live: UK borrowing costs in focus as Currys resumes dividend

Times

time11 minutes ago

  • Times

Business live: UK borrowing costs in focus as Currys resumes dividend

The electrical retailer has resumed dividend payments as it posted upbeat full-year results this morning. Headline profit at Currys rose 37 per cent to £162 million in the 12 months to the end of April, from £117 million. Revenue over the period rose 3 per cent to £8.7 billion, from £8.47 billion the previous year. Like-for-like sales were up 2 per cent across the group, driven by a 4 per cent increase in the UK. The retailer announced a full-year dividend of 1.5p a share. Currys suspended dividends in 2023 as it grappled with its then-troubled Nordic business, which is now back on track. Government borrowing costs will be in focus this morning after Sir Keir Starmer rushed to back the chancellor Rachel Reeves after doubts were raised about her future following about-turns on welfare reforms that blew a hole in her budget plans. Bond yields rose sharply across the board and the pound dropped yesterday after the chancellor appeared tearful during prime minister's question time after Starmer had refused to confirm that she would stay as chancellor until the next election when questioned by Kemi Badenoch. While the rise in bond yields and the fall in the pound eased after Starmer's support for Reeves, the graphs show markets remain nervous. Economists say the chancellor will struggle to meet her fiscal rules after the £5 billion in savings from proposed welfare reforms are wiped out by this week's amendments. It raises the prospect of higher taxes and a freeze on tax thresholds.

Pound calm after Starmer backs Reeves, following bond sell-off
Pound calm after Starmer backs Reeves, following bond sell-off

The Guardian

time13 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Pound calm after Starmer backs Reeves, following bond sell-off

Update: Date: 2025-07-03T06:24:50.000Z Title: Introduction: Bonds and sterling in spotlight after Wednesday wobble Content: Good morning, and welcome to our rolling coverage of business, the financial markets and the world economy. All eyes are on UK bonds, and the pound, after both fell sharply yesterday amid speculation over the future of chancellor Rachel Reeves. Wednesday was a turbulent day for the UK bond market; prices of British government debt fell heavily as investors were gripped by concerns of change at the top of the Treasury. The selloff highlights anxiety that the government's u-turn on welfare reform has blown a multi-billion pound black hole in the chancellor's budget plans. Bonds slumped, driving up borrowing costs, after Keir Starmer failed initially to give his full backing to Reeves at prime minister's questions, with a tearful chancellor alongside him. The pound also suffered, falling by a cent against the US dollar as it slid from $1.3745 to $1.3636, making it the worst-performing major currency in the world. Starmer has now defended Reeves, saying her tears were due to a 'personal matter' and insisted she will remain chancellor 'for a very long time to come'. The bond selloff may actually have reinforced Reeves's position as chancellor, highlighting that the markets would not welcome a replacement who might be less devoted to fiscal discipline. Andrew Wishart, economist at Berenberg Bank argues that 'Investors probably saved the Chancellor', saying: By selling sterling assets investors have probably kept UK chancellor Rachel Reeves in her post. Financial markets initially reacted little to the government failing to get approval for savings in the disability benefit budget from its own parliamentary faction. But when the Prime Minister failed to say that a visibly upset Reeves would remain in her job during Prime Ministers Questions, UK assets sold off. The Chancellor has become synonymous with a fiscal rule of covering day-to-day spending with tax revenue. UK selloff signals that fiscal rules are not just for show #reeves #fiscal #gilts #macro #ukeconomy #ukmacro That fiscal rule may dictate tax rises in the autumn budget, as spending cuts could be too much of a political headache, judging by the massive rebellion against the welfare bill that has created a £5bn hole in the chancellor's plans. America's economy may take the market spotlight off Reeves this afternoon, when the latest US jobs report is released. It will show whether trade war tensions have hit hiring at US businesses. 9.30am BST: UK service sector PMI for June 10am BST: OECD Economic Survey of the European Union and Euro Area 1.30pm BST: US non farm payrolls employment report for June

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store