Australia: PWDA Condemns Ableist Rhetoric And Calls For Respectful Leadership Ahead Of Election
PWDA is also concerned about the rise of ableist abuse and misinformation on social media during the election, with people with disability and other marginalised groups facing increased vilification online.
People with Disability Australia (PWDA), the national disability rights and advocacy peak body, is calling on all political parties, candidates and members of the public to reject ableist language and divisive narratives in the final days of the Federal Election campaign and to commit to respectful, inclusive discourse.
PWDA President Trinity Ford expressed concern harmful rhetoric had marred the election campaign.
'Throughout this campaign, PWDA has been alarmed by the use of language that harms and stigmatises people with disability. This includes disparaging references to mental illness, negative stereotyping of people with psychosocial disability, and reports of slurs such as the R-word being used at campaign events.
'Language matters. Words that belittle, dehumanise or stereotype people with disability fuel discrimination and exclusion. They cause real harm. There is no excuse for this kind of rhetoric in Australian public life, especially at a time when our community is seeking leadership that will take real action to end the violence and inequality we continue to endure,' she said.
PWDA is also concerned about the rise of ableist abuse and misinformation on social media during the election, with people with disability and other marginalised groups facing increased vilification online.
'Online spaces should be places where disabled people can raise our voices and participate fully in democracy. Instead, we are seeing worrying trends of abuse and misinformation targeting people with disability and other communities,' said PWDA CEO Sebastian Zagarella.
PWDA is urging all candidates, political parties, media outlets and members of the public to uphold respect and inclusion in their language and actions. PWDA's Language Guide provides free, best-practice advice on inclusive language, and we encourage everyone to use it.
'Disability is a normal part of human diversity. Mental illness is not a character flaw or a danger. People with disability are not burdens to be feared or problems to be solved. We are valued members of our community who have the right to participate, to belong and to be heard,' said Mr Zagarella.
'If political leaders are serious about addressing inequality, they must reject divisive and harmful narratives and focus on delivering real reforms. That means investment in accessible housing, increasing income support payments, providing disability services outside the NDIS and upholding the rights of people with disability,' Ms Ford said.
PWDA stands in solidarity with all communities who have been targeted by harmful rhetoric during this election campaign.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Spinoff
4 days ago
- The Spinoff
Walls go back up as open-plan classroom experiment falls flat
Once hailed as the future of education, the cavernous classrooms are finally being scrapped after years of complaints, writes Catherine McGregor in today's extract from The Bulletin. End of the open-plan era The Ministry of Education will no longer build open-plan classrooms, education minister Erica Stanford announced yesterday, calling time on a once-fashionable approach to teaching that critics say has failed to deliver. Open-plan classrooms, also known as modern or flexible learning environments, were rolled out from 2011 under then-education minister, National's Hekia Parata. Designed to foster collaboration and student-led learning, the model typically removed internal walls between classrooms and grouped students in large, open areas. But from the beginning, many teachers and principals raised concerns about noise, distraction and the classrooms' impact on behavioural issues. Now, after years of pushback, the government has confirmed all new classrooms will return to standard designs with the flexibility to open or close spaces as needed. The Christchurch experiment As Cate Macintosh reported last month in The Press (paywalled), Christchurch schools were at the vanguard – often unwillingly – of the open-plan movement, with many schools rebuilt post-earthquake according to the then-trendy principles of modern learning. Now they are among the most vocal in rejecting them. Rangiora High School spent $1.5 million retrofitting walls into its sprawling 3185m² open space. Shirley Boys' High spent $800,000; Avonside Girls' spent $60,000 on largely ineffectual acoustic dividers and screens. 'It was sort of the emperor's new clothes,' says Avonside Girls' principal Catherine Law of the open-plan trend. 'Everyone went '21st century learning', 'modern environments', 'no knowledge', and nobody was prepared to say, 'but that's not good teaching and learning'.' Now the tide has changed – but retrofits are expensive, and schools operating under public-private partnerships face additional barriers to making changes, Macintosh writes. In an era of fiscal restraint, many principals are asking how the government plans to help schools convert spaces they never wanted in the first place. The noise annoys There's no shortage of evidence showing what went wrong. Research has highlighted the negative impact of noise and distraction on learning, particularly for neurodiverse students. 'Nobody can learn, least of all these kids for whom education means everything to their future independence, when they're freaked out by their environment,' writes Australian former principal Adam Voigt, who once championed open-plan spaces but now calls them a failure. Studies cited in Ed Design Magazine show that noise in open classrooms can reduce speech perception by up to 75% for students sitting at the back of the room. Children with ADHD, autism or sensory sensitivities are disproportionately affected by this lack of structure and quiet. Teachers, too, have struggled with classroom management and identifying students who need extra help in cavernous, shared teaching spaces. Broader questions about modern education styles Open-plan classrooms are just one element of the 'modern learning environment' movement that took hold in the 2010s, alongside the introduction of student-led inquiry projects, cross-disciplinary teaching and the widespread use of digital devices. As the Herald's Simon Collins reported in a deep dive into the issue six years ago, teachers' roles have shifted from 'the sage on the stage' to 'the guide on the side', helping students take ownership of their learning. But as New Zealand's international rankings in literacy and numeracy declined, critics including the NZ Initiative began to question whether innovation had come at the cost of educational outcomes. Some parents and teachers remain enthusiastic about the flexibility and engagement that modern spaces can offer, especially when used selectively. Still, reviews have found little empirical evidence that open-plan designs improve learning. With this week's announcement, the tide has definitively turned – and the next challenge will be what to do with the thousands of students still learning in spaces built on a now-abandoned idea.
Scoop
5 days ago
- Scoop
NZ Jewish Council Clarifies Position: Advocating For Safety And Accountability, Not Censorship
The New Zealand Jewish Council (NZJC) categorically rejects the mischaracterisation made by the Free Speech Union that it is calling for censorship in response to the rise in antisemitism in New Zealand. Recent commentary has inaccurately portrayed the NZJC's joint statement with the Holocaust Centre of New Zealand, which called for the development of a national strategy to address antisemitism, as a call for 'tougher censorship laws.' This is not the case. Our call was, and remains, for a coordinated, principled, and effective government response to antisemitism, following recent actions taken by the Australian Government. To be clear: We have not called for restrictions on free speech. We have not asked for the silencing of criticism of Israel or advocacy for Palestinian rights. We are not seeking to criminalise opinions or suppress debate. We have been consistent in our position with regards to hate speech laws, even when that hate was directed at us. What we are calling for is accountability when rhetoric becomes harassment, exclusion and incitement, and when hostile environments silence and endanger others, particularly in universities, where young Jewish New Zealanders are reporting increased intimidation, marginalisation, and the inability to safely express their identity and opinions. Our position is grounded in democratic values. We believe in open discourse, but we also believe in ensuring that publicly funded institutions do not enable or ignore discrimination, whether against Jews or any other minority group. It is not 'censorship' to expect that our public institutions uphold basic standards of safety, respect, and inclusion. It is responsible governance. We welcome engagement on this issue. We believe that civil society, including groups like the Free Speech Union, can play a constructive role in helping New Zealand navigate the balance between freedom of expression and freedom from hate. But it is essential that public commentary accurately reflects the positions of those it critiques. We invite all New Zealanders, regardless of background or beliefs, to stand against antisemitism and support a national conversation that strengthens our democracy and upholds the dignity and physical safety of all.
NZ Herald
5 days ago
- NZ Herald
Australia's focus on deepening economic ties with China, amid security questions, carries its own risks
Xi said ties between China and Australia should continue to grow 'no matter how the international landscape may evolve'. 'I note your comments in your opening remarks about seeking common ground while sharing differences, that approach has indeed produced very positive benefits for both Australia and for China,' Albanese responded. Albanese has made stabilising relations with China a hallmark of his foreign policy. But he faces an increasingly delicate balancing act between maintaining ties with Australia's most important ally, the US, and its biggest economic patron, China. He is trying to bolster trade with China, even as Beijing asserts its military dominance closer and closer to Australia's shores. Xi acknowledged the turnaround in ties, saying relations 'have emerged from their low point'. Albanese also met Premier Li Qiang, China's second-highest-ranking official. But despite his efforts to keep the trip focused on trade, questions about security loomed over the six-day visit. Albanese's arrival in Shanghai coincided with a report in the Financial Times that the Pentagon was pressuring Australia and Japan to specify what they would do if China and the US went to war over Taiwan, the self-governed island claimed by Beijing. After their meeting, Albanese said Xi made no mention of US demands regarding Taiwan. The Prime Minister said he reaffirmed Australia's position of supporting the 'status quo' on Taiwan. Both Japan and Australia are US allies, but committing to a response in such a war would be crippling to their important trade relationships with China, and highly unusual on the world stage. Even the US itself will not say whether it would go to war for Taiwan, as part of a decades-old policy that aims to both deter China from attacking and dissuade Taiwan from seeking formal independence. But Washington could try to exert pressure on Australian officials. Last month, the Pentagon said it was reviewing whether a three-way security pact with Britain to equip Australia with nuclear-powered submarines aligns with the Trump Administration's 'America First criteria'. 'The tightrope along which it's been walking between the US and China just got pulled tighter at both ends,' said James Curran, a historian at the University of Sydney. Xi's team will likely privately underscore to Australian officials how US calls for greater commitments over Taiwan make Washington an increasingly unreliable partner. Beijing is trying to persuade countries such as Australia not to enter trade deals with the US that would restrict Chinese exports. China has been casting itself as a defender of the global trading system, criticising the Trump Administration for disrupting the international economy with tariffs. 'In the face of the chaotic international situation, all countries should work together to uphold international justice, safeguard multilateralism and free trade,' Xi said during the leaders' meeting. Asked later how Trump's trade policies have affected Sino-Australian ties, Albanese deflected, saying 'Our relationship with China is very separate from that'. Albanese's first visit to Beijing as prime minister in 2023 came after several years of barbed rhetoric and punishing trade restrictions on Australian exports under an earlier government. Since then, Australia has largely played up the importance of the economic relationship while remaining restrained in talking about China as a security threat. In a sign of both nations' desire for improved relations, some of the points of contention between the two appeared to have been glossed over or simply not broached yesterday. Albanese said Xi did not bring up the port of Darwin, whose lease is held, controversially, by a Chinese company. The Australian leader said he talked about Yang Hengjun, an Australian held on national security charges in China and facing a death sentence, but that no 'immediate outcome' should be expected. Still, Albanese's approach in doubling down on economic relations carries its own pitfalls, said Michael Shoebridge, an analyst at Strategic Analysis Australia and a former defence and intelligence official. 'The thing that he overlooks is the enormous vulnerability and risk in deepening Australia's already extraordinary level of trade dependence,' Shoebridge said. 'It turns out that greed beats fear every time.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: Victoria Kim and David Pierson ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
