SEC football schedule expansion debate looms at spring meetings
As it stands, the SEC has approved no schedule format beyond the upcoming 2025 season.
The SEC carried on this scheduling charade for years since the announcement of Texas and Oklahoma joining the league. Some conference members previously pretended like they wanted an additional conference game, only to turtle up come voting time and preserve the eight-game conference schedule that's supplemented with a feast of non-conference cupcake games.
HEATED MATCHUPS: Ranking the 10 best SEC football rivalries
BEHIND CENTER: Breaking down every SEC quarterback situation
Before this came up for vote the last time in 2023, SEC commissioner Greg Sankey implied that money wouldn't be a driver in the scheduling decision. Only an idiot would believe that, though. Money talks, and some conference members were reluctant two years ago to add another conference game unless ESPN, the league's media partner, put more cash on the table. ESPN didn't sweeten the pot.
Sankey proclaimed before the schedule vote in 2023 that the conference at the vanguard of college athletics "does not stand still." Days later, the SEC's membership unanimously voted to stand still with an eight-game conference schedule for the 2024 and 2025 seasons. Eighteen months later, the Big Ten, which plays nine conference games, led all conferences with four playoff qualifiers. The jokes write themselves.
Rivalries hang in balance of SEC football schedule debate
The SEC cared so much about secondary rivalries like Auburn-Georgia and Alabama-Tennessee in its divisional era that it built a schedule format around maintaining those games. This next vote on the schedule will test how much resolve still exists for protecting centuries-long rivalry games.
A nine-game conference schedule would allow for secondary rivalries like those two and others like Texas-Texas A&M to continue annually. Forging ahead with an eight-game format would put those secondary rivalries under threat of interruption unless the league abandons its stated goal of having all schools play each other twice during a four-year period.
Rivalry scenes like the "Prayer at Jordan-Hare" and cigar-puffing Tennessee fans tearing down the goal posts and baptizing them in the river after a long-awaited win on "The Third Saturday in October" help make the SEC brand what it is.
But, maybe SEC members will decide this week that it's more important to leave room on the schedule for Tennessee to play Furman and Kennesaw State - both will come to Neyland Stadium in 2026! - instead of Alabama, and for Auburn to tussle with Jacksonville State instead of Georgia.
And after the Mississippi beats Wofford 92-0 in 2026, coach Lane Kiffin can chant "S-E-C! S-E-C!" and declare the strength of the SEC (half of which the Rebels didn't play) so strong that the Rebels deserve a playoff bid with their 9-3 record.
Few SEC teams opt for 10 power conference games in current format
Credit Alabama, Florida and South Carolina for cueing up two Power Four non-conference opponents in 2025 to accompany the eight conference games. If Florida smashes Miami and Florida State en route to a 9-3 record against a rigorous schedule, well, we might see a 9-3 playoff team for the first time.
By comparison, the 13 other SEC teams will play only nine Power Four opponents. That's one fewer Power Four opponent than teams like Arizona and Central Florida will play.
If Missouri can manage to fend off Central Arkansas, Kansas, Louisiana-Lafayette, Massachusetts, Vanderbilt and one more SEC team, the Tigers would wrap up bowl eligibility.
That's the beauty of the eight-game conference schedule: Bowl bids await for average teams that can beat bad teams in their out-of-league slate.
The beauty of the SEC adding a ninth conference game would be the creation of more matchups fans want to watch and media partners want to televise.
One fewer cupcake game also would bolster the SEC's case when it comes time to stump for at-large bids for bubble teams.
Even better, ESPN might now be ready to fork over extra revenue in exchange for that ninth SEC game.
The SEC could even time its rollout of a ninth conference game with playoff expansion that's probably coming in 2026. A bigger playoff would reduce the risk of an additional conference game thwarting a team's opportunity for playoff access.
Alternatively, the SEC could stay at eight, turn up its nose at rivalries, rebuff the prospect of a bigger payday from ESPN, protect the cupcake games, and maintain the daintier conference schedule that offers minimal resistance to the league's weaker members securing a Liberty Bowl bid.
At this point, there's not much left to debate. So, go on ahead, sonny, and call it to a vote.
Blake Toppmeyer is the USA TODAY Network's national college football columnist. Email him at BToppmeyer@gannett.com. Follow him on X @btoppmeyer.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
20 minutes ago
- BBC News
Long-term Sesko or short-term Watkins?
Manchester United "can't keep taking punts" on young players with potential, says ESPN senior writer Mark Red Devils have invested in talented forward prospects like Rasmus Hojlund and Joshua Zirkzee in recent seasons, but these players are yet to show significant returns for the appear to be approaching this transfer window differently with the signings of Matheus Cunha and Bryan Mbeumo who both already have Premier League question is whether they will continue this through pursuing experience in Aston Villa's Ollie Watkins or if they will opt to move for 22-year-old Benjamin Sesko from RB Leipzig."United over recent years have taken too many gambles on young players," Ogden told BBC Radio 5 Live's Football Daily podcast. Rasmus Hojlund being one and Joshua Zirkzee being another. They had a very, very young strike force last year and it could barely score a goal."It is a dilemma, though. They go for a guy [Watkins] who is 29, you probably get a season or two out of him, but if he has a good season and gets them back in the Champions League then it is a return on the investment, however, I think United's view is they would rather play the long game."They have signed two players in their mid-20s in Cunha and Mbeumo and I think with Sesko, the worry is that he could be another Rasmus Hojlund. Although, I feel Sesko is more developed and he has had more time in a top league than Hojlund. He basically had one season at Atalanta, whereas Sesko has had a couple of years in the Bundesliga, plus Champions League experience when playing for Salzburg, so he is the better option."What I think United need is a proven, seasoned goalscorer, but their view is that the investment in Sesko is a better, more long-term option. However, you need to win today and tomorrow rather than just the long-term and United can't keep taking punts for four or five years down the line, they need to be winning now."Listen to the full discussion on BBC SoundsFind your club and sign up for news alerts
The Herald Scotland
6 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
College football season improvement plan has Alabama's help
My lasting thought: Byrne suggested a worthwhile idea for how to improve the college football season. This came after I asked Byrne, one of the nation's most prominent athletic directors, last spring how he'd address the playoff. He shared a few thoughts, but he emphasized he felt most passionately about the selection process needing to place additional merit on non-conference strength of schedule. "I am 100% convinced that (would be) good for the game and everybody around it," Byrne told me. He's right. Weighting non-conference strength of schedule would encourage Power Four teams to schedule more games fans want to see and media partners want to televise. That's good for the game. The playoff is not broken. Neither is the selection process, subjective and controversial though it is. But, playoff ideas that would boost the season interest me. This idea would do that, by incentivizing schools to schedule better non-conference games. I'd add an addendum to Byrne's suggestion. Don't just value non-conference schedule strength. Value teams that win key interleague games. The March Madness selection process has figured this out better than college football. Consider last basketball season, when the SEC dominated non-conference play, including a 14-2 record in the ACC-SEC challenge. The SEC's NET ranking topped all conferences, and it appropriately qualified 14 of its 16 teams for the tournament. Throughout the postseason, the SEC lived up to the reputation it built during the season. ON CAMPUS: What is the best college football stadium? Our top 25 ranking BAD IDEA: Big Ten's playoff plan a recipe to make season worse, not better Byrne, who serves on the NCAA men's tournament selection committee, says he pays particular attention to non-conference metrics as he partakes in the selection process. "One of the first things I look at is non-conference strength of schedule in men's basketball," Byrne said, "because I think that's good for men's basketball to have it not be just a January to March sport." Again, he's right. Likewise, wouldn't it be better if college football's September docket featured more non-conference blockbusters like Texas-Ohio State or LSU-Clemson, while reducing the number of games like Houstin Christian-Nebraska and Austin Peay-Georgia? The abundance of lopsided, lackluster non-conference games creates a drag on the regular season. Too many coaches and their bosses gravitate toward the path of least resistance, after seeing that strategy rewarded. The past two national champions, Ohio State and Michigan, finished on top after neither played a Power Four non-conference opponent. Penn State crafted a similar road map for this year. The Nittany Lions will begin the season by chowing down on Nevada, Florida International and Villanova. Indiana wriggled into the playoff last season after rolling through a non-conference feast of Florida International, Western Illinois and Charlotte. The Hoosiers recently doubled down on this strategy, adjusting their future non-conference schedules to make them as easy as possible. Washington coach Jedd Fisch called Indiana's strategy of playing three non-conference nobodies "dead-on right." It's doggone pathetic, too, and it doesn't stop with Indiana. Big Ten, SEC teams among those seeking out cupcakes Big Ten teams will play four times as many MAC foes as they will SEC opponents. SEC teams will square off against the Ohio Valley as often as they'll face the Big 12. Six Big Ten teams won't play a single non-conference game against either a Power Four opponent or Notre Dame. Alabama, Florida and South Carolina are the only SEC teams that will play two Power Four non-conference games, for a total of 10 games against Power Four competition. The rest of the conference opted for additional patsies. Teams might lose their appetite for cupcakes if the playoff committee more heavily weighted non-conference metrics. And, if teams stiffened their non-league schedules, that would assist the committee's task of evaluating at-large playoff contenders. How might this idea affect playoff selection? If non-conference metrics had been more heavily weighted last season, that might have exposed Indiana, one of the last at-large teams admitted into the field. The Hoosiers didn't bother to play a Power Four non-conference opponent. The committee admitted Indiana thanks to its 11-1 record and its avoidance of a bad loss. If non-conference results had been more greatly valued, a 10-2 BYU team that beat SMU, a playoff qualifier, might have appealed more to the committee. Two-loss Miami, which beat Florida at The Swamp, also would have merited a stronger look. Three-loss South Carolina could have gained more of a boost from winning at Clemson, the ACC's champion. Now, let's revisit my original thought: Would adding weight to non-conference schedule strength be self-serving for Alabama? Perhaps. Starting this year, through 2034, Alabama has two games scheduled per season against either Power Four non-conference opponents or Notre Dame. Adding playoff selection value specific to non-conference metrics might therefore accelerate Alabama in bubble situations. But, shouldn't we want teams to follow Alabama's lead of seeking out challenging non-conference opponents, rather than ducking Power Four opponents in favor of Austin Peay? To Byrne, the answer seems obvious. "Good non-conference games are really good for college football," Byrne said. Rewarding teams that play good non-conference games would help ensure those games remain part of college football's future. Blake Toppmeyer is the USA TODAY Network's national college football columnist. Email him at BToppmeyer@ and follow him on X @btoppmeyer.
The Herald Scotland
6 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Shannon Sharpe 'at peace' with ESPN firing, but wanted network to wait
Sharpe said his only request was that the network wait until Monday, Aug. 4, to release the news. His older brother, longtime Green Bay Packers wide receiver Sterling Sharpe, is being enshrined in Canton, Ohio as part of the Pro Football Hall of Fame class of 2025 on Saturday. Shannon and Sterling Sharpe are set to become the first pair of brothers in the Pro Football Hall of Fame. Shannon Sharpe was inducted in the class of 2011. ESPN "did what they feel they needed to do and I'm at peace with that," Shannon Sharpe said. "But I just wish guys, I just wish this thing could have waited until Monday because I hate the fact that I've overshadowed my brother. The first two brothers in the Pro Football Hall of Fame and this is what the headline is going to be for the next couple of days." ESPN has yet to publicly comment on Sharpe's status since The Athletic first reported the network's decision to cut ties with him on Wednesday, July 30. The split between ESPN and Sharpe occurred less than two weeks after Sharpe settled a $50 million lawsuit related to sexual assault and battery accusations by an ex-girlfriend. Sharpe last appeared on ESPN in April, stepping away after the lawsuit was initially filed. But he publicly denied the allegations, calling it a "shakedown," and maintained his relationship with the accuser was "100% consensual." Sharpe said at the time he planned to return to ESPN's airwaves when NFL training camps began ahead of the 2025 season. The settlement in Sharpe's case came to light on July 18 when Tony Buzbee, the attorney for the woman identified as "Jane Doe" in the court filing, announced the sides had reached a resolution and the lawsuit would be dismissed. No details of the agreement were released. The woman accused Sharpe of sexually assaulting her twice, in October 2024 and January 2025, after previously engaging in the intentional infliction of emotional distress. She said Sharpe became violent over the course of their relationship and recorded their sexual encounters without her consent. Sharpe never faced criminal charges in the matter. Sharpe, 57, retired from the NFL in May 2004 after a 14-year career in which he won three Super Bowls and became the first tight end with more than 10,000 career receiving yards.
