
Iran-Israel conflict may spill into Pakistan: Masood Khan
In a series of interviews, He said that a prolonged war could prompt an influx of Iranian refugees into Pakistan, comparable to the fallout of the Afghan conflict.
He cautioned that Pakistan's already stretched resources would come under further strain if hostilities in the Middle East persist.
If the war drags on, there is a strong possibility of a mass exodus of Iranian refugees towards Pakistan,' Khan said. 'Such a scenario would create economic, political, and social pressure.'
Khan also warned that instability on the western border could provide a gateway for infiltration by anti-state groups allegedly backed by hostile foreign powers, especially India.
He named outfits like the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) and the Balochistan Liberation Front (BLF) as potential threats.
'A weakened border with Iran could be exploited by proxies seeking to destabilise Pakistan,' Khan stated.
Discussing Israel's strategic aims, Khan noted that Tel Aviv had already targeted Iranian nuclear infrastructure at Fordow, Natanz, Isfahan, and other critical sites. According to Khan, Israel claims to have neutralised nearly 40% of Iran's air defence network.
He further alleged that Israel is pushing the United States either to intervene militarily or to grant approval for the limited use of tactical nuclear weapons.
'They're proposing subterranean nuclear strikes, which they argue would limit fallout,' Khan explained. 'But experts believe such thinking is dangerously naïve.'
On international reactions, Khan said that while Russia and China have voiced support for Iran, Tehran has not formally sought military assistance.
He added that Russian President Vladimir Putin offered to mediate, a gesture welcomed by Iran but dismissed by Israel.
Khan also highlighted ongoing diplomatic efforts, noting that the United States has allowed a 15-day window to decide its course.
'This has opened room for backchannel diplomacy,' he said. 'The British Foreign Secretary has been active in Washington, and even some of President Trump's advisors are calling for restraint.'
Despite diplomatic movements, Khan warned that US military deployments in Europe, the Middle East, and at Diego Garcia signal preparation for escalation.
'The world stands at a perilous crossroads,' he concluded. 'We must prepare for all outcomes, even as we hope diplomacy prevails.'
Meanwhile, Iran has condemned US airstrikes on its nuclear facilities as a grave breach of international law, warning of dangerous consequences and vowing to defend its sovereignty by all means.
Read more: Tehran vows self-defence with 'all force' after US strikes three nuclear installations
The strikes, carried out on June 21 and announced by US President Donald Trump, targeted Iran's main nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan.
Trump declared the mission a success and warned Tehran of further attacks if it retaliates or refuses peace.
The attack, launched in coordination with Israel amid its ongoing military attacks against Iran, marked a major escalation in regional tensions.
Trump, flanked by senior US officials, said the strikes aimed to destroy Iran's nuclear capability and prevent it from acquiring a nuclear weapon. He later claimed all US aircraft had exited Iranian airspace safely.
Iran denounced the strikes as criminal aggression and called on the United Nations and the IAEA to hold Washington accountable.
Iranian officials accused both the US and Israel of undermining diplomacy, and criticised Western nations for demanding Iran return to talks it says it never left.
Global reaction was mixed. Israel praised Trump's decision as historic, while UN Secretary-General António Guterres called it a dangerous escalation that threatens global security.
The EU, UK, and several other nations urged de-escalation and a return to diplomacy. Countries including Venezuela, Cuba, and Qatar condemned the US action, warning of regional instability.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Express Tribune
26 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
India's proxy web: Afghan general's revelation validates Pakistan's stance
Listen to article The recent confession by former Afghan General Sami Sadat regarding Indian money being channeled through the Taliban to arm anti-Pakistan militant groups once again validates Pakistan's long-held concerns about India using Afghan soil for terrorism. He further disclosed that terrorist leaders have been openly operating from Afghan territory, enjoying safe havens and logistical support provided by elements within the Taliban. Over the past few years, three key factors have emerged as a persistent threat to Pakistan's stability: ungoverned spaces in Afghanistan, the advanced weaponry left behind following the 2021 withdrawal of US troops, and the growing cooperation between the banned Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA). As the rise in terrorist attacks originating from Afghanistan demonstrates, the Afghan government has failed to manage its security situation. The Taliban's tacit approval — also acknowledged by the United Nations in 2024 — has enabled terrorists to use Afghan territory for training, weapons storage, and cross-border operations. A 2024 West Point analysis revealed that terrorist digital command structures rely on encrypted servers traced back to Indian intelligence. Airfields in Kandahar and Herat, now controlled by proxy groups, have reportedly become key transit points for arms, with NATO documents confirming their use in transporting drones and weapons to the Fitna-al-Khawarij (FAK). Hawala networks are also being exploited to conceal foreign state support for terrorism, with RAW and GDI operating behind tribal fronts. In addition, Afghanistan's weak oversight has allowed it to become a thriving narco-terror hub — a crucial supply line for FAK, supporting terrorist operations in K-P and Punjab. According to the Danish Institute (2024), the manipulation of transit routes — underwritten by foreign actors — is not about trade but about fuelling instability in Balochistan. Pakistan has repeatedly pointed to the Afghan government's full patronage and India's involvement in state-sponsored terrorism, particularly along the border. Indian state-sponsored terrorism is not covert — it is being implemented as official policy. Since January 2024, 5,436 Indian-sponsored terrorist incidents have been recorded, with 1,987 terrorists killed by Pakistani security forces. Pakistan is not alone in facing this threat. Other regional neighbours have also suffered due to India's use of state-sponsored terrorism to advance its Hindutva-driven agenda. For the first time in South Asia's history, India's infamous intelligence agency, RAW, executed suicide bombings in Sri Lanka via its proxy, the Tamil Tigers. Today, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and NSA Ajit Doval continue to spread terror in Pakistan through proxies like the TTP and BLA. India has historically been, and remains, a hub of terrorism in South Asia and beyond. It funded 70 militants through Sarfraz Bangalzai, who exploited Baloch women for subversive purposes. BLA spokesperson Bahot Baloch, speaking on an Indian news channel, openly claimed responsibility for attacks in Khuzdar, on the Jaffar Express, and in other areas. The rise of terrorism in Pakistan is not the product of internal insurgency alone. It is a carefully orchestrated proxy war — funded, directed, and supported by hostile intelligence agencies across the border. Pakistan must take decisive and comprehensive action against Indian-sponsored proxies, as pledged by its military leadership. Terrorist groups operating from Afghan territory pose a serious threat not only to Pakistan, but to regional and global stability. The continued inaction of the international community risks emboldening countries engaged in state-sponsored terrorism — and may set a dangerous precedent for others to follow. The writer is a freelance columnist and contributes regularly on issues concerning national security.
1724919650-0%2FUntitled-design-(5)1724919650-0-640x480.webp&w=3840&q=100)

Express Tribune
6 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Imran's release unlikely, sons won't come to Pakistan: K-P Governor
Listen to article Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (K-P) Governor Faisal Karim Kundi has said that the release of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan from prison appears unlikely, adding that his sons are also not expected to return to Pakistan. Addressing senior journalists in Peshawar on Saturday, Kundi dismissed speculation about the involvement of Khan's sons, Sulaiman and Kasim, in PTI's upcoming protest campaign. 'It is highly unlikely they will come back,' he said, reiterating that prospects of Imran Khan's release remain slim. Earlier this month, Khan's sister Aleema Khan claimed that both sons would join the party's anti-government protest movement, expected to begin in August. She had also stated that the former prime minister would lead the campaign 'from inside the jail'. Reports suggest that Khan's sons have held meetings with key figures in the United States ahead of their possible visit to Pakistan. However, Governor Kundi appeared dismissive of these developments, describing them as political optics rather than reality. On the broader political and administrative front, the governor stressed the need for a tribal jirga to address unresolved issues in the former Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA). He proposed that the jirga include tribal elders, ex-parliamentarians, and political stakeholders from the region. 'The merger of FATA with K-P cannot be undone without a constitutional amendment,' he said, urging the federal government to release the development funds that were promised at the time of the merger. Turning to the security situation in the province, Kundi painted a grim picture. 'The law and order situation is dire. Extortion is being collected openly — even in broad daylight — from traders, local leaders, and ordinary citizens,' he said. 'In Dera Ismail Khan, people avoid stepping out of their homes after Asr prayers due to fear.' He also criticised what he termed the federal government's Punjab-centric approach to national initiatives. 'Schemes like the laptop programme, youth development projects, and Daanish Schools have excluded the youth of K-P,' he said. Commenting on the state of sports infrastructure, Kundi described the renovation of Peshawar's Arbab Niaz Stadium as substandard and said the lack of quality sports facilities was one reason why Pakistan Super League (PSL) matches have not been held in the province. On PTI's internal politics, the governor claimed the party was facing deep factionalism in K-P. 'They cannot even bring out 20 vehicles for their planned protest on August 5,' he concluded.


Business Recorder
10 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Russia's Zakharova says peace settlement in Ukraine has never been on ‘real agenda' of the West
MOSCOW: Peace talks and a settlement in Ukraine have never been on the real agenda of the West, Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said on Saturday, in her first comments on negotiations since Russian and Ukrainian officials held talks on Wednesday. Russia says it has captured two villages in Ukraine If the West wanted 'real peace' in Ukraine, it would stop supplying Kyiv with weapons, Zakharova said in comments reported by TASS news agency. Earlier, in her weekly briefing on Thursday, she had declined to comment on the talks.