logo
Despite ongoing federal probe into state schools, Central Valley School Board sends Title IX complaint to feds

Despite ongoing federal probe into state schools, Central Valley School Board sends Title IX complaint to feds

Yahoo06-05-2025
May 5—In a special meeting Monday, the Central Valley School Board finalized and filed a federal Title IX complaint against the state public schools authority, challenging guidance on transgender sports participation, which they say conflicts with federal directives .
The board was split in sending the complaint, with Directors Stephanie Jerdon, Pam Orebaugh and Anneice Barker voting in favor, while Cindy McMullen and Tere Landa were opposed.
The complaint against Washington's Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction, in the form of two letters, in part urges an investigation that is already underway. Federal officials on Wednesday began the probe into state policies allowing trans students to play on whichever sports team and use whichever restroom with which they identify . The Liberty Lake-based board began drafting the letter last week, similar to one sent by the Mead school board in March.
"Washington state and the State Superintendent, Chris Reykdal, have blatantly disregarded directives of the United States Department of Education, and the lawful Executive Orders issued by our current President, creating discriminatory and unsafe environments detrimental to our children and particularly damaging to our girls and young women," the letter reads.
It lists specific areas of conflict between the state requirements and federal executive orders, all surrounding transgender students, like sports participation, restroom use and pronoun use by staff. The letter supports the ongoing investigation into the state and implores clarification from the feds on which directive to follow: the state or federal government.
It also seeks assurance that the district will maintain its federal funding that makes up 5% of Central Valley's operating budget. Reykdal has repeatedly contended these orders don't hold the weight of law and to follow them would violate state law and risk schools' state funding, around 78% of Central Valley's revenue.
"We have got to get advice from the federal government on what they deem is compliant and what they don't, because what OSPI is telling us to do right now could very well be out of compliance," Barker said.
Discussion during the Zoom meeting was contentious at times as directors disagreed on the timeliness of the letter, the political nature and the message it sends to trans students in their district.
"The issue is moot," McMullen said, pointing to the existing investigation.
She reiterated her stance aligning with the state policies on transgender sports participation and her position against sending the letter, requesting her name be omitted as a signatory.
"I find it terribly sad that we cannot look at every one of our students and see them for the great people that they are and the potential that they have and that we cannot find ways for all of them to participate fully in all of the activities that we offer," McMullen said. "This is a very sad day for Central Valley School District."
Orebaugh said though the investigation was underway, the letter indicated to federal officials that this is an issue statewide, not just with school districts Mead and La Center referenced in the federal official's notice of investigation. She pointed to a trans student -athlete who runs track with Central Valley athletes.
"I've heard from these athletes how discouraged they are, how the coaches are having to pump them up, 'Do the best you can, I know that you're likely not going to get first,' " Orebaugh said.
While correcting language in the letter, Barker questioned the existence of trans people.
"There's no such thing as a trans person; there are males and there are females," Barker said. "Like I said in the last meeting: it does not matter how you dress. It does not matter how much medication you take or how many surgeries you have. You are born male or you are born female, and male and female bodies are different."
The meeting fell outside of the board's regular schedule and was hosted online only via Zoom. There were five who spoke in public comment, split on the matter much like the board. Three speakers, two who have past spoken in favor of barring trans girls from school sports, urged the board to send the complaint. Two speakers said they don't support the board sending the letter, and spoke vehemently in defense of trans students.
Nan Smith, who resides in Central Valley and sent her kids to the district's schools, said there was no need to send such a letter, given the existing investigation. Smith added that a policy centered on estimated five to 10 trans student -athletes out of the 250,000 in the state, according to WIAA, would lead to targeting.
"Targeting five to 10 youths in this way is about labeling them and labeling them as other," Smith said. "History has taught us over and over that when we label a group of people as other, whether it be because of race, religion, disability or gender identity, labeling someone as other is very dangerous for society."
Recurring speaker Brandon Arthur continued to share concerns about his daughter's safety should she play sports with or against a trans girl. He countered that though they may be a small demographic, "it only takes one event, and then we will be having a very much bigger discussion around this."
Many who don't want trans girls to play on girls sports teams reiterated that they're not intending to discriminate against trans kids, only protecting cisgender girls. But that's not the message sent to trans people, said speaker Lexi Shay, who is trans and a parent with three kids in Central Valley schools.
"The message that is received is that you are not welcome," Shay said.
Elena Perry's work is funded in part by members of the Spokane community via the Community Journalism and Civic Engagement Fund. This story can be republished by other organizations for free under a Creative Commons license. For more information on this, please contact our newspaper's managing editor.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How do Cambodia and Thailand's military capabilities compare?
How do Cambodia and Thailand's military capabilities compare?

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

How do Cambodia and Thailand's military capabilities compare?

Months of simmering tensions between Cambodia and Thailand have exploded into armed conflict, in the heaviest fighting between the Southeast Asian neighbours in over a decade. Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim of Malaysia, the current chair of Southeast Asian bloc ASEAN, in which Thailand and Cambodia are also members, urged calm and said he would speak to leaders of both countries to peacefully resolve their dispute. China also expressed concern at the fighting and said it was willing to play a role in promoting de-escalation. For more than a century, Thailand and Cambodia have contested sovereignty at various undemarcated points along their 817km (508-mile) land border, which has led to skirmishes over several years and at least a dozen deaths, including during a weeklong exchange of artillery in 2011. Tensions were reignited in May following the killing of a Cambodian soldier during a brief exchange of gunfire, which escalated into a full-blown diplomatic crisis and now has triggered armed clashes. Here is a look at the defence forces and arsenals of two countries, according to data from the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies: Budgets and ground personnel Cambodia had a defence budget of U$1.3 billion in 2024 and 124,300 active military personnel. The armed forces were established in 1993 from the merger of the country's former Communist military and two other resistance armies. Of this, the Cambodian army is the largest force, with some 75,000 soldiers, backed by more than 200 battle tanks and around 480 pieces of artillery. Thailand, which the U.S. classifies as a major non-NATO ally, has a large, well-funded military, with a defence budget of U$5.73 billion in 2024 and 360,000 active armed forces personnel. The Thai army has a total of 245,000 personnel, including an estimated 115,000 conscripts, around 400 battle tanks, over 1,200 armoured personnel carriers and some 2,600 artillery weapons. The army has its own fleet of aircraft, comprising passenger planes, helicopters such as dozens of U.S.-made Black Hawks, and unmanned aerial vehicles. Air Forces Cambodia's air force has 1,500 personnel, with a relatively small fleet of aircraft, including 10 transport planes and 10 transport helicopters. It doesn't possess any fighter aircraft but has 16 multi-role helicopters, including six Soviet-era Mi-17s and 10 Chinese Z-9s. Thailand has one of the best-equipped and trained air forces in Southeast Asia, with an estimated 46,000 personnel, 112 combat-capable aircraft, including 28 F-16s and 11 Swedish Gripen fighter jets, and dozens of helicopters. Navies The Cambodian navy has an estimated 2,800 personnel, including 1,500 naval infantry, with 13 patrol and coastal combat vessels and one amphibious landing craft. Thailand's navy is much larger, with nearly 70,000 personnel, comprising naval aviation, marines, coastal defence and conscripts. It has one aircraft carrier, seven frigates, and 68 patrol and coastal combat vessels. The Thai fleet also contains a handful of amphibious and landing ships capable of holding hundreds of troops each and 14 smaller landing craft. Thailand's naval aviation division has its own fleet of aircraft, including helicopters and UAVs, besides a marine corps that has 23,000 personnel, backed by dozens of armed fighting vehicles.

TikTok Will ‘Go Dark' Soon if China Does Not Strike Deal, Commerce Secretary Says
TikTok Will ‘Go Dark' Soon if China Does Not Strike Deal, Commerce Secretary Says

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

TikTok Will ‘Go Dark' Soon if China Does Not Strike Deal, Commerce Secretary Says

Howard Lutnick says TikTok's algorithm must be sold for the popular app to remain active past Sept. 17 No more extensions. TikTok will 'go dark' if China does not cut a deal with the Trump administration that transfers control of the app's technology and algorithm, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Thursday. More from TheWrap TikTok Will 'Go Dark' Soon if China Does Not Strike Deal, Commerce Secretary Says Trump Says It Is 'Not Do-able' for AI Companies to Pay for All Copyrighted Content Used in Training Models YouTube Ad Revenue Up 13% Year-Over-Year in 2nd Quarter of 2025, Hitting $9.8 Billion Oracle in Talks With Paramount-Skydance for $100 Million Cloud Deal | Report Lutnick was discussing the ongoing TikTok negotiation during an appearance on CNBC's 'Squawk on the Street.' TikTok's parent company, Beijing-based ByteDance, is currently facing a Sept. 17 deadline to offload the app's American operation or face being banned in the States. 'We've made the decision: you can't have Chinese control and have something on 100 million American phones. That's just not okay,' Lutnick said. He continued: 'So if it's in American control, and, you know, China can have a little piece, or ByteDance, the current owner, can keep a little piece. But basically, Americans will have control. Americans will own the technology, and Americans will control the algorithm.' His comments come after TikTok has received multiple extensions from the president to reach a deal on selling its U.S. app. TikTok was initially set to be banned on Jan. 19, after President Joe Biden signed a law last year requiring ByteDance to sell TikTok's American operation. The chief concern lawmakers had was that TikTok could act as a stealth spyware app for China's communist government, as ByteDance is required by Chinese law to hand over any user data the government asks for. President Trump, on his first day back in office on Jan. 20, gave TikTok a 75-day extension to make a deal, and the app's future in the U.S. has remained in limbo ever since. The president gave TikTok a second extension in April, and then another one last month, making Sept. 17 the latest deadline. In late June, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said President Trump's 'main goal' is making sure TikTok remains available in the U.S. — 'while protecting [Americans'] privacy and security.' TikTok has said it has 170 million American users. On Thursday, Lutnick said TikTok is 'not really' part of a larger trade deal being discussed with China. But he also said it is hard for the topic to not come up 'unofficially' during discussions with Chinese diplomats. You can watch part of Lutnick's CNBC appearance by clicking here. The post TikTok Will 'Go Dark' Soon if China Does Not Strike Deal, Commerce Secretary Says appeared first on TheWrap.

Faraday Future Hosts Successful Capitol Hill Club Reception Showcasing Commitment to American Manufacturing and Innovation
Faraday Future Hosts Successful Capitol Hill Club Reception Showcasing Commitment to American Manufacturing and Innovation

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Faraday Future Hosts Successful Capitol Hill Club Reception Showcasing Commitment to American Manufacturing and Innovation

WASHINGTON, July 24, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. (NASDAQ: FFAI) ("Faraday Future", "FF" or the "Company"), a California-based global shared intelligent electric mobility ecosystem company, held a well-attended and impactful reception at the Capitol Hill Club this week, drawing over a dozen members of Congress and key stakeholders from across the policy and business landscape. The event served as a platform to highlight Faraday Future's ongoing efforts to bring advanced electric vehicle innovation and manufacturing jobs back to American soil. "We at Faraday Future have expressed our desire to play a role in the great American comeback we are seeing under this Administration, particularly as it relates to the automotive industry, which has been the bedrock of American industry for ages," said John Schilling, Global Director of Communications and Public Relations at Faraday Future. The event featured both FF's cutting-edge FF 91 2.0 electric supercar as well as its recently unveiled FX Super One MPV model. Attendees got a firsthand look at both products and experienced the technology, craftsmanship, and vision driving FF's expansion strategy. FF leadership, including FX CEO Max Ma, also met with staff at the White House earlier this week, which included an open dialogue on a number of policy topics such as tariffs, U.S. manufacturing and innovation. FF looks forward to continuing to work closely with the White House in the near future to promote the long-term prosperity of America's high-end manufacturing sector, centered around the automotive industry and its broader ecosystem. "We were extremely honored by the attendance of numerous members of Congress who were interested in both our vehicles, because who wouldn't be, but more importantly, our story about building and employing American," continued Schilling. "We're committed to expanding production here at home and look forward to working with Congress and the Trump Administration to help make that vision a reality." Faraday Future's leadership emphasized that the company is aligning with the current Administration's vision to reindustrialize America and revitalize core manufacturing sectors. With plans to increase domestic production and invest in U.S. jobs, Faraday is proud to be a part of a new chapter in American innovation. ABOUT FARADAY FUTURE Faraday Future is a California-based global shared intelligent electric mobility ecosystem company. Founded in 2014, the Company's mission is to disrupt the automotive industry by creating a user-centric, technology-first, and smart driving experience. Faraday Future's flagship model, the FF 91, exemplifies its vision for luxury, innovation, and performance. The FX strategy aims to introduce mass production models equipped with state-of-the-art luxury technology similar to the FF 91, targeting a broader market with middle-to-low price range offerings. FF is committed to redefining mobility through AI innovation. Join us in shaping the future of intelligent transportation. For more information, please visit FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS This press release includes "forward looking statements" within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When used in this press release, the words "plan to," "can," "will," "should," "future," "potential," and variations of these words or similar expressions (or the negative versions of such words or expressions) are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, conditions or results, and involve a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other important factors, many of which are outside the Company's control, that could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Important factors, among others, that may affect actual results or outcomes include, among others: the Company's ability to secure necessary agreements to license or produce FX vehicles in the U.S., the Middle East, or elsewhere, none of which have been secured; the Company's ability to homologate FX vehicles for sale in the U.S., the Middle East, or elsewhere; the Company's ability to secure the necessary funding to execute on its AI, EREV and Faraday X (FX) strategies, each of which will be substantial; the Company's ability to secure necessary permits at its Hanford, CA production facility; the Company's ability to secure regulatory approvals for the proposed Super One front grill; the potential impact of tariff policy; the Company's ability to continue as a going concern and improve its liquidity and financial position; the Company's ability to pay its outstanding obligations; the Company's ability to remediate its material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting and the risks related to the restatement of previously issued consolidated financial statements; the Company's limited operating history and the significant barriers to growth it faces; the Company's history of losses and expectation of continued losses; the success of the Company's payroll expense reduction plan; the Company's ability to execute on its plans to develop and market its vehicles and the timing of these development programs; the Company's estimates of the size of the markets for its vehicles and cost to bring those vehicles to market; the rate and degree of market acceptance of the Company's vehicles; the Company's ability to cover future warranty claims; the success of other competing manufacturers; the performance and security of the Company's vehicles; current and potential litigation involving the Company; the Company's ability to receive funds from, satisfy the conditions precedent of and close on the various financings described elsewhere by the Company; the result of future financing efforts, the failure of any of which could result in the Company seeking protection under the Bankruptcy Code; the Company's indebtedness; the Company's ability to cover future warranty claims; the Company's ability to use its "at-the-market" program; insurance coverage; general economic and market conditions impacting demand for the Company's products; potential negative impacts of a reverse stock split; potential cost, headcount and salary reduction actions may not be sufficient or may not achieve their expected results; circumstances outside of the Company's control, such as natural disasters, climate change, health epidemics and pandemics, terrorist attacks, and civil unrest; risks related to the Company's operations in China; the success of the Company's remedial measures taken in response to the Special Committee findings; the Company's dependence on its suppliers and contract manufacturer; the Company's ability to develop and protect its technologies; the Company's ability to protect against cybersecurity risks; and the ability of the Company to attract and retain employees, any adverse developments in existing legal proceedings or the initiation of new legal proceedings, and volatility of the Company's stock price. You should carefully consider the foregoing factors and the other risks and uncertainties described in the "Risk Factors" section of the Company's Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 31, 2025, and other documents filed by the Company from time to time with the SEC. View source version on Contacts Investors (English): ir@ Investors (Chinese): cn-ir@ Media:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store