
Despite ongoing federal probe into state schools, Central Valley School Board sends Title IX complaint to feds
The board was split in sending the complaint, with Directors Stephanie Jerdon, Pam Orebaugh and Anneice Barker voting in favor, while Cindy McMullen and Tere Landa were opposed.
The complaint against Washington's Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction, in the form of two letters, in part urges an investigation that is already underway. Federal officials on Wednesday began the probe into state policies allowing trans students to play on whichever sports team and use whichever restroom with which they identify . The Liberty Lake-based board began drafting the letter last week, similar to one sent by the Mead school board in March.
"Washington state and the State Superintendent, Chris Reykdal, have blatantly disregarded directives of the United States Department of Education, and the lawful Executive Orders issued by our current President, creating discriminatory and unsafe environments detrimental to our children and particularly damaging to our girls and young women," the letter reads.
It lists specific areas of conflict between the state requirements and federal executive orders, all surrounding transgender students, like sports participation, restroom use and pronoun use by staff. The letter supports the ongoing investigation into the state and implores clarification from the feds on which directive to follow: the state or federal government.
It also seeks assurance that the district will maintain its federal funding that makes up 5% of Central Valley's operating budget. Reykdal has repeatedly contended these orders don't hold the weight of law and to follow them would violate state law and risk schools' state funding, around 78% of Central Valley's revenue.
"We have got to get advice from the federal government on what they deem is compliant and what they don't, because what OSPI is telling us to do right now could very well be out of compliance," Barker said.
Discussion during the Zoom meeting was contentious at times as directors disagreed on the timeliness of the letter, the political nature and the message it sends to trans students in their district.
"The issue is moot," McMullen said, pointing to the existing investigation.
She reiterated her stance aligning with the state policies on transgender sports participation and her position against sending the letter, requesting her name be omitted as a signatory.
"I find it terribly sad that we cannot look at every one of our students and see them for the great people that they are and the potential that they have and that we cannot find ways for all of them to participate fully in all of the activities that we offer," McMullen said. "This is a very sad day for Central Valley School District."
Orebaugh said though the investigation was underway, the letter indicated to federal officials that this is an issue statewide, not just with school districts Mead and La Center referenced in the federal official's notice of investigation. She pointed to a trans student -athlete who runs track with Central Valley athletes.
"I've heard from these athletes how discouraged they are, how the coaches are having to pump them up, 'Do the best you can, I know that you're likely not going to get first,' " Orebaugh said.
While correcting language in the letter, Barker questioned the existence of trans people.
"There's no such thing as a trans person; there are males and there are females," Barker said. "Like I said in the last meeting: it does not matter how you dress. It does not matter how much medication you take or how many surgeries you have. You are born male or you are born female, and male and female bodies are different."
The meeting fell outside of the board's regular schedule and was hosted online only via Zoom. There were five who spoke in public comment, split on the matter much like the board. Three speakers, two who have past spoken in favor of barring trans girls from school sports, urged the board to send the complaint. Two speakers said they don't support the board sending the letter, and spoke vehemently in defense of trans students.
Nan Smith, who resides in Central Valley and sent her kids to the district's schools, said there was no need to send such a letter, given the existing investigation. Smith added that a policy centered on estimated five to 10 trans student -athletes out of the 250,000 in the state, according to WIAA, would lead to targeting.
"Targeting five to 10 youths in this way is about labeling them and labeling them as other," Smith said. "History has taught us over and over that when we label a group of people as other, whether it be because of race, religion, disability or gender identity, labeling someone as other is very dangerous for society."
Recurring speaker Brandon Arthur continued to share concerns about his daughter's safety should she play sports with or against a trans girl. He countered that though they may be a small demographic, "it only takes one event, and then we will be having a very much bigger discussion around this."
Many who don't want trans girls to play on girls sports teams reiterated that they're not intending to discriminate against trans kids, only protecting cisgender girls. But that's not the message sent to trans people, said speaker Lexi Shay, who is trans and a parent with three kids in Central Valley schools.
"The message that is received is that you are not welcome," Shay said.
Elena Perry's work is funded in part by members of the Spokane community via the Community Journalism and Civic Engagement Fund. This story can be republished by other organizations for free under a Creative Commons license. For more information on this, please contact our newspaper's managing editor.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
10 hours ago
- New York Post
Shuttered Albany restaurant popular with NY elite, politicians to reopen as members-only social club
An Albany restaurant that used to feature a clientele list teeming with some of the most powerful politicians in New York is set to reopen as a private members' dining club in late 2025. The La Serre restaurant closed in 2020 after it was unable to bounce back from the COVID-19 lockdown, with much of its business at the time relying on large gatherings like banquets and receptions, founder Anne Trimble told the Times Union. The French-based restaurant originally opened in 1977 and quickly became a favorite among New York's political elite on both sides of the aisle during its run, including former Govs. Hugh Carey, Mario Cuomo, George Pataki and Andrew Cuomo. Advertisement Albany's La Serre restaurant will be taken over by an exclusive politician nightclub. Albany Times Union via Getty Ima Now, Mayor Eric Adams' spokesman Todd Shapiro is looking to revamp the historic mainstay alongside Greg Caggiano and Todd Miller of the law firm Miller & Caggiano. 'This is going to be the most important political and social venue north of Manhattan. We're bringing back the old-school power — but with a modern twist: young, trendsetting, high-end, and unapologetically political,' Shapiro said. Advertisement Their vision centers around elevating the old restaurant's history by making it a hotspot for 'high-level networking, private events, and political strategy' while filling the space of a much-needed 'contemporary social anchor,' according to a press release. They plan to make it highly selective, primarily limiting membership to public leaders, media influencers, creatives and civic entrepreneurs, according to the release. La Serre closed in 2020 after it was unable to recover from the COVID-19 lockdown. Albany Times Union via Getty Ima The restaurant will also include a secluded 'War Room' — which shares its name with another restaurant owned by Shapiro — that will be reserved for politicians' off-the-record meetings. Advertisement The new and improved La Serre will include a rooftop terrace and renovated interior, likely shifting away from the upscale, green leather-laden atmosphere of the old restaurant and gravitating towards something more 'clubby,' per the release. Trimble founded the restaurant alongside her late husband, Geoffrey, who passed away in 2005. She managed the restaurant with her son, John, up through its closure, the Times Union reported.


CNBC
12 hours ago
- CNBC
U.S. and China to resume tariff talks on Monday in effort to extend truce
Senior U.S. and Chinese negotiators meet in Stockholm on Monday to tackle longstanding economic disputes at the center of the countries' trade war, aiming to extend a truce keeping sharply higher tariffs at bay. China is facing an Aug. 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement with President Donald Trump's administration, after Beijing and Washington reached a preliminary deal in June to end weeks of escalating tit-for-tat tariffs. Without an agreement, global supply chains could face renewed turmoil from duties exceeding 100%. The Stockholm talks, led by U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng, take place a day after European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen met Trump at his golf course in Scotland to clinch a deal that would see a 15% baseline tariff on most EU goods. Trade analysts on both sides of the Pacific say the discussions in the Swedish capital are unlikely to produce any breakthroughs but could prevent further escalation and help create conditions for Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping to meet later this year. Previous U.S.-China trade talks in Geneva and London in May and June focused on bringing U.S. and Chinese retaliatory tariffs down from triple-digit levels and restoring the flow of rare earth minerals halted by China and Nvidia H20 AI chips and other goods halted by the United States. So far, the talks have not delved into broader economic issues. They include U.S. complaints that China's state-led, export-driven model is flooding world markets with cheap goods, and Beijing's complaints that U.S. national security export controls on tech goods seek to stunt Chinese growth. "Stockholm will be the first meaningful round of U.S.-China trade talks," said Bo Zhengyuan, Shanghai-based partner at China consultancy firm Plenum. Trump has been successful in pressuring some other trading partners, including Japan, Vietnam and the Philippines, into preliminary deals accepting higher U.S. tariffs of 15% to 20%. Analysts say the U.S.-China negotiations are far more complex and will require more time. China's grip on the global market for rare earth minerals and magnets, used in everything from military hardware to car windshield wiper motors, has proved to be an effective leverage point on U.S. industries. In the background of the talks is speculation about a possible meeting between Trump and Xi in late October. Trump has said he will decide soon whether to visit China in a landmark trip to address trade and security tensions. A new flare-up of tariffs and export controls would likely derail any plans for a meeting with Xi. "The Stockholm meeting is an opportunity to start laying the groundwork for a Trump visit to China," said Wendy Cutler, vice president at the Asia Society Policy Institute. Bessent has already said he wants to work out an extension of the Aug. 12 deadline to prevent tariffs snapping back to 145% on the U.S. side and 125% on the Chinese side. Still, China is likely to request a reduction of the multi-layered U.S. tariffs, which total 55% on most goods, and further easing of U.S. high-tech export controls, analysts said. Beijing has argued that such purchases would help reduce the U.S. trade deficit with China, which reached $295.5 billion in 2024. China is currently facing a 20% tariff related to the U.S. fentanyl crisis, a 10% reciprocal tariff, and 25% duties on most industrial goods imposed during Trump's first term. Bessent has also said he would discuss the need for China to rebalance its economy away from exports toward domestic consumer demand. The shift would require China to put an end to a protracted property crisis and boost social safety nets to encourage household spending. Michael Froman, a former U.S. trade representative during former President Barack Obama's administration, said such a shift has been a goal of U.S. policymakers for two decades. "Can we effectively use tariffs to get China to fundamentally change their economic strategy? That remains to be seen," said Froman, now president of the Council on Foreign Relations think-tank.


New York Post
14 hours ago
- New York Post
Trump ‘really likes' TikTok— but admin warns Chinese ownership not acceptable as dead deadline looms
President Trump likes TikTok but the Chinese-owned short video app, used by some 170 million Americans, has to move to US ownership, Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick said on Sunday. 'The President really likes TikTok, and he said it over and over again, because, you know, it was a good way to communicate with young people,' Lutnick said in an interview on Fox News Sunday with Shannon Bream. 'But let's face it, you can't have the Chinese have an app on 100 million American phones, that is just not okay. So, it's got to move to American ownership, it's got to move to American technology, American algorithms,' he said. 'I know the President is positive towards TikTok, if it can move into American hands.' Advertisement 3 Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said Sunday that President Trump likes TikTok because 'it was a good way to communicate with young people.: FOX NEWS Lutnick's comments follow his warning last week that TikTok will have to stop operating in the U.S. if China does not approve a deal for the app. He told CNBC on Thursday that US must control the algorithm that makes the social media platform work. Advertisement TikTok parent ByteDance has a Sept. 17 deadline to divest the platform's US assets. Last month, President Trump extended by 90 days to Sept. 17, a deadline for China-based ByteDance to divest the US assets of TikTok. Trump's action took place despite a 2024 law that mandated a sale or shutdown by Jan. 19 of this year if there had not been significant progress. 3 President Trump has set a Sept. 17 deadline for Chinese firm ByteDance to divest TikTok's US assets. Getty Images 'China can have a little piece or ByteDance, the current owner, can keep a little piece. But basically, Americans will have control. Americans will own the technology, and Americans will control the algorithm,' Lutnick said. Advertisement 'If that deal gets approved, by the Chinese, then that deal will happen,' he added. 'If they don't approve it, then TikTok is going to go dark, and those decisions are coming very soon.' 3 A deal that was in the works this spring that would spin off TikTok's US operations into a new US-based firm stalled. Chidori_B – A deal had been in the works this spring that would spin off TikTok's US operations into a new US-based firm, majority-owned and operated by US investors. This stalled after China indicated it would not approve it following Trump's announcements of steep tariffs on Chinese goods. Trump has three times granted reprieves from federal enforcement of the law that mandated the sale or shutdown of TikTok that was supposed to take effect in January.