AML Incubator Congratulates Nominis on Winning 1st Prize at Mastercard's Europe-Wide Fintech Forum - and Redefining the Future of Crypto Compliance
Athens, Greece--(Newsfile Corp. - May 16, 2025) - AML Incubator, backs founders who rethink broken systems. AMLI congratulates their partner Nominis for winning 1st place at Mastercard's Europe-wide Fintech Forum 2025 - a powerful signal that the future of crypto compliance is being built now.
Snir Levi, founder and CEO of Nominis.io posing with the first prize trophy.
To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/11332/252369_5bbc5030e4285905_001full.jpg
Why this matters:
Most KYT tools are reactive - built for regulators, not startups.
Nominis flips the model: a proactive, API-first KYT & Blockchain Investigation platform built for crypto startups, yet trusted by law enforcement.
They help teams see what others miss - the full transaction story, not just source of funds. With Nominis, founders and compliance & risk teams get real-time context: on-chain signals, off-chain intelligence and behavior data - all working together to identify and stop what actually matters. Read more here.
What makes Nominis different:
Clarity over chaos - decision-ready alerts, not noise
Continuous wallet monitoring - not just onboarding scans
On-Chain, Off-chain, GeoInt & behavioral analysis - full-spectrum attribution
End-to-end case management - resolve faster, act sooner
API-first, automation-ready - made to scale with any stack
Nominis will now advance to the continental finals in Berlin - a spotlight on the most promising Fintech Companies on the continent.
AMLI has deployed Nominis internally and with its portfolio. It consistently uncovers threats legacy KYT tools miss - and gives crypto companies the speed and context they need to stay ahead of financial crime.
This is more than a win for Nominis. It's a signal that a smarter, startup-first era of crypto compliance is here.
About AML Incubator
AML Incubator backs bold startups solving the world's toughest financial crime challenges. From early traction to strategic scale, we help founders build, connect, and redefine the future of trust in finance.
Press Contact:
corp@nominis.iowww.nominis.iohttps://www.linkedin.com/company/nominisio
hello@amlincubator.comwww.amlincubator.com
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/252369
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
FirstGroup (LON:FGP) Could Be A Buy For Its Upcoming Dividend
Some investors rely on dividends for growing their wealth, and if you're one of those dividend sleuths, you might be intrigued to know that FirstGroup plc (LON:FGP) is about to go ex-dividend in just three days. The ex-dividend date is usually set to be two business days before the record date, which is the cut-off date on which you must be present on the company's books as a shareholder in order to receive the dividend. The ex-dividend date is an important date to be aware of as any purchase of the stock made on or after this date might mean a late settlement that doesn't show on the record date. This means that investors who purchase FirstGroup's shares on or after the 3rd of July will not receive the dividend, which will be paid on the 8th of August. The company's upcoming dividend is UK£0.048 a share, following on from the last 12 months, when the company distributed a total of UK£0.065 per share to shareholders. Looking at the last 12 months of distributions, FirstGroup has a trailing yield of approximately 2.8% on its current stock price of UK£2.312. Dividends are a major contributor to investment returns for long term holders, but only if the dividend continues to be paid. As a result, readers should always check whether FirstGroup has been able to grow its dividends, or if the dividend might be cut. AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. If a company pays out more in dividends than it earned, then the dividend might become unsustainable - hardly an ideal situation. FirstGroup paid out a comfortable 32% of its profit last year. Yet cash flows are even more important than profits for assessing a dividend, so we need to see if the company generated enough cash to pay its distribution. The good news is it paid out just 5.7% of its free cash flow in the last year. It's encouraging to see that the dividend is covered by both profit and cash flow. This generally suggests the dividend is sustainable, as long as earnings don't drop precipitously. See our latest analysis for FirstGroup Click here to see the company's payout ratio, plus analyst estimates of its future dividends. Stocks in companies that generate sustainable earnings growth often make the best dividend prospects, as it is easier to lift the dividend when earnings are rising. If business enters a downturn and the dividend is cut, the company could see its value fall precipitously. It's encouraging to see FirstGroup has grown its earnings rapidly, up 75% a year for the past five years. Earnings per share have been growing very quickly, and the company is paying out a relatively low percentage of its profit and cash flow. This is a very favourable combination that can often lead to the dividend multiplying over the long term, if earnings grow and the company pays out a higher percentage of its earnings. Many investors will assess a company's dividend performance by evaluating how much the dividend payments have changed over time. In the last three years, FirstGroup has lifted its dividend by approximately 81% a year on average. Both per-share earnings and dividends have both been growing rapidly in recent times, which is great to see. Is FirstGroup an attractive dividend stock, or better left on the shelf? We love that FirstGroup is growing earnings per share while simultaneously paying out a low percentage of both its earnings and cash flow. These characteristics suggest the company is reinvesting in growing its business, while the conservative payout ratio also implies a reduced risk of the dividend being cut in the future. FirstGroup looks solid on this analysis overall, and we'd definitely consider investigating it more closely. In light of that, while FirstGroup has an appealing dividend, it's worth knowing the risks involved with this stock. In terms of investment risks, we've identified 1 warning sign with FirstGroup and understanding them should be part of your investment process. A common investing mistake is buying the first interesting stock you see. Here you can find a full list of high-yield dividend stocks. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio
WIRED
an hour ago
- WIRED
I Let AI Agents Plan My Vacation—and It Wasn't Terrible
The latest wave of AI tools claim to take the pain out of booking your next trip. From transport and accommodation to restaurants and attractions, we let AI take the reins to put this to the test. Photo-Illustration: Wired Staff/Victoria Turk The worst part of travel is the planning: the faff of finding and booking transport, accommodation, restaurant reservations—the list can feel endless. To help, the latest wave of AI agents, such as OpenAI's Operator and Anthropic's Computer Use claim they can take these dreary, cumbersome tasks from befuddled travelers and do it all for you. But exactly how good are they are digging out the good stuff? What better way to find out than deciding on a last-minute weekend away. I tasked Operator, which is available to ChatGPT Pro subscribers, with booking me something budget-friendly, with good food and art, and told it that I'd prefer to travel by train. What's fascinating is that you can actually watch its process in real time—the tool opens a browser window and starts, much as I would, searching for destinations accessible by rail. It scrolls a couple of articles, then offers two suggestions: Paris or Bruges. 'I recently went to Paris,' I type in the chat. 'Let's do Bruges!' Armed with my decision, Operator goes on to look up train times on the Eurostar website and finds a return ticket that will take me to Brussels and includes onward travel within Belgium. I intervene, however, when I see the timings: It selected an early-morning train out on Saturday, and an equally early train back on Sunday—not exactly making the most of the weekend, I point out. It finds a later return option. So far impressed, I wait to double-check my calendar before committing. When I return, however, the session has timed out. Unlike ChatGPT, Operator closes conversations between tasks, and I have to start again from scratch. I feel irrationally slighted, as if my trusty travel assistant has palmed me off to a colleague. Alas, the fares have already changed, and I find myself haggling with the AI: can't it find something cheaper? Tickets eventually selected, I take over to enter my personal and payment details. (I may be trusting AI to blindly send me across country borders, but I'm not giving it my passport information.) Using ChatGPT's Operator to book a train ticket to Bruges. Courtesy of Victoria Turk Trains booked, Operator thinks its job is done. But I'll need somewhere to stay, I remind it—can it book a hotel? It asks for more details and I'm purposefully vague, specifying that it should be comfy and conveniently located. Comparing hotels is perhaps my least favorite aspect of travel planning, so I'm happy to leave it scrolling through I restrain myself from jumping in when I see it's set the wrong dates, but it corrects this itself. It spends a while surveying an Ibis listing, but ends up choosing a three-star hotel called Martin's Brugge, which I note users have rated as having an excellent location. Now all that's left is an itinerary. Here, Operator seems to lose steam. It offers a perfunctory one-day schedule that appears to have mainly been cribbed from a vegetarian travel blog. On day 2, it suggests I 'visit any remaining attractions or museums.' Wow, thanks for the tip. The day of the trip arrives, and, as I drag myself out of bed at 4:30AM, I remember why I usually avoid early departures. Still, I get to Brussels without issue. My ticket allows for onward travel, but I realize I don't know where I'm going. I fire up Operator on my phone and ask which platform the next Bruges-bound train departs from. It searches the Belgian railway timetables. Minutes later, it's still searching. I look up and see the details on a station display. I get to the platform before Operator has figured it out. Bruges is delightful. Given Operator's lackluster itinerary, I branch out. This kind of research task is perfect for a large language model, I realize—it doesn't require agentic capabilities. ChatGPT, Operator's OpenAI sibling, gives me a much more thorough plan, plotting activities by the hour with suggestions of not just where to eat, but what to order (Flemish stew at De Halve Mann brewery). I also try Google's Gemini and Anthropic's Claude, and their plans are similar: Walk to the market square; see the belfry tower; visit the Basilica of the Holy Blood. Bruges is a small city, and I can't help but wonder if this is simply the standard tourist route, or if the AI models are all getting their information from the same sources. Various travel-specific AI tools are trying to break through this genericness. I briefly try MindTrip, which provides a map alongside a written itinerary, offers to personalize recommendations based on a quiz, and includes collaborative features for shared trips. CEO Andy Moss says it expands on broad LLM capabilities by leveraging a travel-specific 'knowledge base' containing things like weather data and real-time availability. Courtesy of Victoria Turk After lunch, I admit defeat. According to ChatGPT's itinerary I should spend the afternoon on a boat tour, taking photos in another square, and visiting a museum. It has vastly overestimated the stamina of a human who's been up since 4:30AM. I go to rest at my hotel, which is basic, but indeed ideally located. I'm coming around to Operator's lazier plans: I'll do the remaining attractions tomorrow. As a final task, I ask the agent to make a dinner reservation—somewhere authentic but not too expensive. It gets bamboozled by a dropdown menu during the booking process but manages a workaround after a little encouragement. I'm impressed as I walk past the obvious tourist traps to a more out-of-the-way dining room that serves classic local cuisine and is themed around pigeons. It's a good find—and one that doesn't seem to appear on the top 10 lists of obvious guides like TripAdvisor or The Fork. On the train home, I muse on my experience. The AI agent certainly required supervision. It struggled to string tasks together and lacked an element of common sense, such as when it tried to book the earliest train home. But it was refreshing to outsource decision-making to an assistant that could present a few select options, rather than having to scroll through endless listings. For now, people mainly use AI for inspiration, says Emma Brennan at travel agent trade association ABTA; it doesn't beat the human touch. 'An increasing number of people are booking with the travel agents for the reason that they want someone there if something goes wrong,' she says. It's easy to imagine AI tools taking over the information gateway role from search and socials, with businesses clamoring to appear in AI-generated suggestions. 'Google isn't going to be the front door for everything in the future,' says Moss. Are we ready to give this power to a machine? But then, perhaps that ship has sailed. When planning travel myself, I'll reflexively check a restaurant's Google rating, look up a hotel on Instagram, or read TripAdvisor reviews of an attraction, despite desires to stay away from the default tourist beat. Embarking on my AI trip, I worried I'd spend more time staring at my screen. By the end, I realize I've probably spent less.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Is Now The Time To Put Cranswick (LON:CWK) On Your Watchlist?
For beginners, it can seem like a good idea (and an exciting prospect) to buy a company that tells a good story to investors, even if it currently lacks a track record of revenue and profit. But as Peter Lynch said in One Up On Wall Street, 'Long shots almost never pay off.' While a well funded company may sustain losses for years, it will need to generate a profit eventually, or else investors will move on and the company will wither away. If this kind of company isn't your style, you like companies that generate revenue, and even earn profits, then you may well be interested in Cranswick (LON:CWK). Even if this company is fairly valued by the market, investors would agree that generating consistent profits will continue to provide Cranswick with the means to add long-term value to shareholders. We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. Generally, companies experiencing growth in earnings per share (EPS) should see similar trends in share price. So it makes sense that experienced investors pay close attention to company EPS when undertaking investment research. Cranswick managed to grow EPS by 8.5% per year, over three years. That's a good rate of growth, if it can be sustained. Top-line growth is a great indicator that growth is sustainable, and combined with a high earnings before interest and taxation (EBIT) margin, it's a great way for a company to maintain a competitive advantage in the market. Cranswick maintained stable EBIT margins over the last year, all while growing revenue 4.8% to UK£2.7b. That's a real positive. In the chart below, you can see how the company has grown earnings and revenue, over time. For finer detail, click on the image. View our latest analysis for Cranswick Of course the knack is to find stocks that have their best days in the future, not in the past. You could base your opinion on past performance, of course, but you may also want to check this interactive graph of professional analyst EPS forecasts for Cranswick. It's pleasing to see company leaders with putting their money on the line, so to speak, because it increases alignment of incentives between the people running the business, and its true owners. Shareholders will be pleased by the fact that insiders own Cranswick shares worth a considerable sum. To be specific, they have UK£35m worth of shares. That's a lot of money, and no small incentive to work hard. Even though that's only about 1.2% of the company, it's enough money to indicate alignment between the leaders of the business and ordinary shareholders. As previously touched on, Cranswick is a growing business, which is encouraging. For those who are looking for a little more than this, the high level of insider ownership enhances our enthusiasm for this growth. The combination definitely favoured by investors so consider keeping the company on a watchlist. If you think Cranswick might suit your style as an investor, you could go straight to its annual report, or you could first check our discounted cash flow (DCF) valuation for the company. Although Cranswick certainly looks good, it may appeal to more investors if insiders were buying up shares. If you like to see companies with more skin in the game, then check out this handpicked selection of British companies that not only boast of strong growth but have strong insider backing. Please note the insider transactions discussed in this article refer to reportable transactions in the relevant jurisdiction. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio
